新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Nobel Prize without the open conspiracy Times and more underhand]
石三生
·《求是》副总编为何求死?
·人民日报对“反腐败”自信的离谱
·《中国共产党问责条例》可信吗?
·造谣,是一种教科书式的美德
·三谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·四谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·五谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·六谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·“三类人”与“国家保护动物”
·七谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·中国的法治:一边鞠躬;一边作孽
·南海仲裁案,德国鬼子出了个馊主意
·刘刚与高智晟及其他
·第二巡回法庭为何不扫门前雪
·刘刚与高智晟及其他(二)
·连上帝都感到意外的巧合
·刘刚与高智晟及其他(三)
·刘刚与高智晟及其他(四)
·刘刚与高智晟及其他(五)
·城头变幻难解百姓之苦
·令人窒息的理想
·也谈“刘刚改了密电码”
·“四亿九”祭
·“四亿九”之后
·推荐顾晓军、刘刚、郭文贵联袂角逐诺贝尔奖
·请王岐山书记主持公正
·后周永康时代
·等于零的人生
·再谈“刘志军倒下无所谓”
·这些年,那些事
·借海航十个亿,与郭文贵对赌
·小鸟与郭文贵
·西诺与文贵
·郭文贵与“发不会”
·特朗普、郭文贵及最赚钱的生意
·郭文贵事件之假想
·美国的月亮是真的圆
·刘大湿与十三省
·紫禁城月下放人 郭文贵初战告捷
·马云避实就虚 刘刚连遭辟谣
·郭文贵口若悬河 刘大湿如梦初醒
·郭文贵口若悬河 刘大湿如梦初醒
·郭文贵与达赖喇嘛
·郭文贵与达赖喇嘛(二)
·刘刚与郭文贵
·郭文贵真情流露 夏业良随狼起舞
·老领导欲盖弥彰 郭文贵敛财有道
·此郭文贵不是彼郭文贵
·刘刚与郭文贵貌离神合
·刘刚妙计安天下
·顾晓军与刘刚及郭文贵与王恩哥
·郭文贵首战五连胜 螳螂党隔海羞死牛
·和尚被抓,郭文贵再胜一回
·郭文贵是那个“老领导”的小三?
·郭文贵与黄艳
·渲染后事 郭氏骗局进入第二季
·“郭共”之争唯有顾晓军能厘清
·郭文贵爆料台湾 统一大业指日可待
·郭文贵老谋深算 刘大湿再被拉黑
·刘大湿明珠投暗 郭文贵一统海外
·达赖喇嘛或被郭文贵愚弄
·刘大湿惊天逆转 郭文贵无愧小三
·顾晓军与刘刚及郭文贵
·呼吁刘刚接受顾晓军的挑战
·向709们求财
·向刘刚大师求败 向郭文贵求荣
·刘刚护嫂荒唐 郭文贵统战有方
·刘刚孤注一计 顾晓军点睛“老领导”
·郭文贵开启核爆 刘刚单骑飞帝都
·刘刚故伎重施 顾晓军再被威胁
·向刘刚大师并高智晟认错
·江桥美女色艺双绝
·时势造英雄 刘刚造时势
·刘刚的傲慢与郭文贵的梦呓
·郭文贵的骗局与刘刚的偏见
·从“新领导”法治郭文贵说开去
·刘刚痴心难改 郭文贵反炒自己
·金无怠与郭文贵
·请达赖喇嘛、刘晓波联袂推荐顾晓军
·请154位诺贝尔奖得主组团推荐顾晓军
·请154位诺贝尔奖得主关注顾晓军
·再请154位诺贝尔奖得主推荐顾晓军
·请海外民运推荐顾晓军角逐诺贝尔和平奖
·请王丹、吾尔开希推荐顾晓军角逐诺贝尔和平奖
·再请达赖喇嘛、刘晓波联袂推荐顾晓军
·请《纽约时报》推荐顾晓军角逐诺贝尔和平奖
·刘晓波与顾晓军,谁能做“这个世界的老师”?
·三请达赖喇嘛、刘晓波联袂推荐顾晓军
·刘晓波已走,谁来做“我们的思想领袖”?
·徐文立,让诺贝尔和平奖蒙羞
·致挪威诺贝尔委员会主席安德森的公开信
·建言王丹:让刘晓波走,请顾晓军上
·高智晟的上帝或是白痴
·顾晓军的前瞻与高智晟的反智
·高智晟正在拉底西方人的智商
·美国需要“新思维”
·2018年,上帝将因高智晟沦为笑柄
·基督教或涉嫌诈骗
·平民需要顾晓军
·被忽悠的诺贝尔委员会
·平民需要顾晓军(二)
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Nobel Prize without the open conspiracy Times and more underhand

   
   “China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group” Shi Sansheng Kyushu
   Comments • The one hundred seventy-eight
    
   Translator: God has eyes

    
   Fight lasting two hours this morning, with
   Google chrome, only made an overseas blog
   article in English, fan turn mad, and the hard
   disk light Changming. Worried about my old
   notebook to an attack and had to turn off the
   computer. Re-open, also like at the child, so still
   it seems that you can hear your own heartbeat.
   Only stare at my stalker, this is clearly not the
   Central Propaganda Department of the style. But
   only wholeheartedly recommended to Time
   magazine, Mr. Gu Xiaojun, because no clear
   answer to the Person of the Year candidate list
   (open all the time), and you can not give up.
   Hard on my browser, in addition to the Times,
   but also who is it?
   Needless to say, with learning general secretary
   to “emancipate the mind”, to complete the
   national revival Albert, to uphold the
   constitution dignity, to ensure the
   implementation of the constitution of the duties
   of any organization or individual are not above
   the Constitution and the law of privilege.
   Everything violation of the Constitution and the
   law must be investigated. “old school rogue only
   riotings, the occluder people the freedom of
   speech of the Central Propaganda Department,
   has been impossible to follow his steps. Then
   again, the the subjective ideology Li Changchun
   adults, also Resurrection turn to the life, “is no
   longer the party and state leaders not. In its
   place, the interest of his. Is an opposition
   elderly continue guiding ideology of the Central
   Propaganda Department?
   Apart from the Central Propaganda Department,
   not only the “Times” the American devils are
   also anti-intellectual, anti-civilization, anti-
   justice Shisan Sheng Gu dough hated you?
   Time magazine once again advise a: multi-line
   unjust is doomed to destruction. Repentance
   now, not yet too late. I did not refuse to see
   foreign policy included the fate of Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun? Not to mention a mere “foreign policy”,
   that the Nobel Peace Prize, the Literature Prize
   and how?
   After in the Mo Yan swoop Sweden country, many
   in and outside the media seem to have hit a
   strong shot in the arm, re-flooding many days
   from the dare “Mo Yan winning the topic of
   speculation. Poor that dippy King of Sweden, also
   had to play dumb, ignoring the strong doubts
   School “questioned, given to honor this
   untrustworthy, insincere vice chairman of the
   Chinese Writers Association.
   Including the Nobel literature jury before, the
   incumbent Chairman and Mayueran installed
   grandson, both dare respond Mo Yan why
   winning? They dare not refute Shandong cultural
   cadres bribery rumor. Sufficient to prove that the
   Swedish Academy was justice defeated the first
   values “​​challenged school! Not only the Swedish
   Academy was beaten gray head gray face. Even
   Mo Yan had to pretend to “oranges” will
   recommend Mr. Gu Xiaojun to winning as a
   bargaining chip to question the school “sign of
   weakness, to curry favor with the.
   The “in Mo Yan winning” reflections, called:
   “storyteller”, and “storytelling won the Nobel
   Prize for Literature proud. He added: “I’m after
   winning a lot of wonderful stories, these stories,
   I firmly believe that truth and justice, there is.”
   “Storytelling” to replace the “novel” is clearly
   absurd. Mr. Gu Xiaojun “Goran Malmqvist is a
   novel idiot”, has said quite understand. Only
   from the literal meaning of the novel
   “storytelling”; but the story never can say
   “fiction”. For example, Mr. Gu Xiaojun novel
   “fate” by an old man “story” about the fate of
   the Chinese people of an era. Lack of acting that
   does not mean the end, “said Gary’s” an old
   man “story” about a novel era of Chinese people.
   Can we do that? Everyone has a story, can;
   everyone has the novel can also be? Goran
   Malmqvist really is a novel of idiot, the Swedish
   Academy really is a bunch of novels idiot.
   Mo Yan is not only equivalent to the “story” in
   the novel as crazy, even at the cost of borrowing
   the Nobel literature platform idiot fallacy, spread
   to the world, it is the people of insight Xiaodiao
   Daya!
   Mo Yan insights idiot, doomed his “storytelling”
   is a liar, no philosophy at all. For example, in his
   speech, one side says “My mother is not literate,
   but very respected illiterate people.” Side but
   for unknown reasons, said their own primary
   schools are not graduating “dropout sucker
   interpreted as the Cultural Revolution caused
   but unexpectedly Mo Yan also said “When I
   reach for cattle and sheep passing from the front
   of the school, see old classmates fooling around
   campus, my heart is full of sadness, deeply
   appreciate a person, even a child, leave groups
   after painful. ‘
   In order to render the greatness of his mother,
   Mo Yan even describe her, said: “My child, do
   not worry, even though I live a little fun, but
   Yan Wangye not call me, I will not go.” With
   parents born world mother, especially the
   mother of the Chinese people, even depending
   on their minor son are suffering, not entirely
   “fun”? Mo Yan with his mother, contrary to
   repeat itself and humanity also!
   Mo Yan’s hypocrisy, and far more than that.
   News and other brain-dead media shoved
   holding smelly feet “to Mo Yan Nobel speech:
   memory mother Mo Yan psychological dark youth,
   it has been quite superior a more visible for the
   beginning of the three the philosophical story
   ending”.
   Mo Yan’s first story, only those sucker talents
   can read philosophy to never really crying. Sure
   enough, he was moved to tears, and certainly in
   no mood to observe whether others even cry fake
   tears. To see the exhibition, see only the
   exhibits or someone else’s back, sneaky
   (childhood, perhaps with naughty), who has a
   the spies general psychological only nationals
   own fake cry when peeping performance .
   The second story, but is a reflection of the
   people and dogs in general conditions. How can
   there be any philosophy at all?
   The third story, but would like to ridicule people
   who questioned him after his award-winning.
   Sure enough, he is also one to believe that
   “truth and justice exist” would not be afraid of
   questioning, not posing as “oranges” to Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun lightly re-promise.
   See the outside of the Internet, someone said,
   “the Nobel Prize is open conspiracy”, which is
   really too much residual brain. Concept of the
   Nobel, exactly which one civilization and
   progress of human society, triggered because of
   the Nobel Prize. Is there? Is not there?
   I’m afraid the progress is difficult to seek a
   trace. Credit for anti-civilization, touches as the
   Nobel Peace Prize in 2012, the Literature Prize,
   the foreign policy of the top100 thinkers Times
   annual candidate objects together forever in
   history. Was later cast aside, criticized!
    
   [Shi Sansheng Sunday, December 9, 2012 09:49 China]
(2012/12/09 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场