新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Nobel Prize without the open conspiracy Times and more underhand]
石三生
·写在潍坊副市长陈白峰自缢之后
·写在潍坊副市长陈白峰自缢之后(二)
·写在潍坊副市长陈白峰自缢之后(三)
·三个精神病副市长:杨宽生、王立军、陈白峰
·“相关人物”突然成空白的高官
·半月内两山东官员自杀
·半月内两山东官员自杀
·“反腐”只能各自为战
·也谈宁财神吸毒
·许立全组团 美女市长现身
·贼与官(三)
·杨恒均的心事
·杨恒均的使命
·走下坡路的杨恒均与李承鹏
·且看中央巡视组山东打老虎
·贼与官(四)
·山东“老虎”喜迎李总理
·与老老常委齐名
·为虎作伥者之韩寒篇
·为虎作伥者之高智晟篇
·诺贝尔和平奖或沦陷
·山东终于表态拥护打大老虎
·习王无恩,何来感谢?
·本轮反腐中的山东之最
·贼与官(五)
·无法可依
·想到的与未想到的
·反腐或成鸡肋
·“泰坦尼克”与“东方之星”
·“泰坦尼克”与“东方之星”
·中纪委的回应很莫名
·中纪委的回应很莫名
·搅局与设局
·政府作孽 百姓遭殃
·请教牛泪:人类社会如何进步?
·明的癣疥脓疮呢?
·洋人与二奶
·乱lun
·爱迪生的心思 杨振宁与莫言不懂
·顾晓军与杨恒均的“社会观”
·李开复画蛇添足
·搅局与设局(二)
·杨恒均或保王林脱难
·释永信跳进黄河 王林案悄然降温
·“打虎”与我何关?
·王胜俊与“女业主被当众扒裤”
·毕福剑与杨恒均
·莫言有罪
·莫言的难言之隐
·匪夷所思
·信力健或成人权新样本
·莫须有的罪名 莫须有的人权
·请奥巴马入瓮
·“窝里斗”及其他
·再谈“窝里斗”及其他
·三谈“窝里斗”及其他
·四谈“窝里斗”及其他
·五谈“窝里斗”及其他---兼答卢德素
·七谈“窝里斗”及其他---兼答卢德素
·十谈“窝里斗”及其他之“李嘉诚跑了”
·李嘉诚的“愚昧”论不知所云
·共产无望 共妻有戏
· “共妻”论反进化
·“共妻”论缺德
·“共妻”论反文明
·也谈“一场豪赌”
·他们在为谁做嫁衣?
·莫言为何不愿见“佛”?
·中纪委为何不管管莫言?
·习总的讲话为何不提莫言?
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?(二)
·也谈“习总的书单”
·百度机器人或建议腐败们早跳楼
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?(三)
·乱伦----是一种文明
·也谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·习办或闭目塞听
·再谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·三谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·我为什么咬定莫言?
·“三个代表”高风险
·“精准扶贫”或是梦
·无梦---兼答卢德素
·“特赦贪官”不如放弃“三个代表”
·“马会韩”后“习马会”
·“放开二胎”要感谢莫言?
·最不可琢磨的汉语言
·财新网为何不敌巩义法院枉判
·财新网为何不敌巩义法院枉判(二)
·财新网为何不敌巩义法院枉判(三)
·日本人更懂中国
·日本人最懂中国
·“双十一”、打假与打虎
·我的洋鬼子朋友杨恒均
·我的洋鬼子朋友杨恒均(二)
·“白毛女”或与“依法治国”相左
·莫曹杨与《打倒鲁迅》
·鲁迅与洋人杨恒均
·中央网信办为何不自信?
·杨恒均与“王的女人”将如何逆转?
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Nobel Prize without the open conspiracy Times and more underhand

   
   “China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group” Shi Sansheng Kyushu
   Comments • The one hundred seventy-eight
    
   Translator: God has eyes

    
   Fight lasting two hours this morning, with
   Google chrome, only made an overseas blog
   article in English, fan turn mad, and the hard
   disk light Changming. Worried about my old
   notebook to an attack and had to turn off the
   computer. Re-open, also like at the child, so still
   it seems that you can hear your own heartbeat.
   Only stare at my stalker, this is clearly not the
   Central Propaganda Department of the style. But
   only wholeheartedly recommended to Time
   magazine, Mr. Gu Xiaojun, because no clear
   answer to the Person of the Year candidate list
   (open all the time), and you can not give up.
   Hard on my browser, in addition to the Times,
   but also who is it?
   Needless to say, with learning general secretary
   to “emancipate the mind”, to complete the
   national revival Albert, to uphold the
   constitution dignity, to ensure the
   implementation of the constitution of the duties
   of any organization or individual are not above
   the Constitution and the law of privilege.
   Everything violation of the Constitution and the
   law must be investigated. “old school rogue only
   riotings, the occluder people the freedom of
   speech of the Central Propaganda Department,
   has been impossible to follow his steps. Then
   again, the the subjective ideology Li Changchun
   adults, also Resurrection turn to the life, “is no
   longer the party and state leaders not. In its
   place, the interest of his. Is an opposition
   elderly continue guiding ideology of the Central
   Propaganda Department?
   Apart from the Central Propaganda Department,
   not only the “Times” the American devils are
   also anti-intellectual, anti-civilization, anti-
   justice Shisan Sheng Gu dough hated you?
   Time magazine once again advise a: multi-line
   unjust is doomed to destruction. Repentance
   now, not yet too late. I did not refuse to see
   foreign policy included the fate of Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun? Not to mention a mere “foreign policy”,
   that the Nobel Peace Prize, the Literature Prize
   and how?
   After in the Mo Yan swoop Sweden country, many
   in and outside the media seem to have hit a
   strong shot in the arm, re-flooding many days
   from the dare “Mo Yan winning the topic of
   speculation. Poor that dippy King of Sweden, also
   had to play dumb, ignoring the strong doubts
   School “questioned, given to honor this
   untrustworthy, insincere vice chairman of the
   Chinese Writers Association.
   Including the Nobel literature jury before, the
   incumbent Chairman and Mayueran installed
   grandson, both dare respond Mo Yan why
   winning? They dare not refute Shandong cultural
   cadres bribery rumor. Sufficient to prove that the
   Swedish Academy was justice defeated the first
   values “​​challenged school! Not only the Swedish
   Academy was beaten gray head gray face. Even
   Mo Yan had to pretend to “oranges” will
   recommend Mr. Gu Xiaojun to winning as a
   bargaining chip to question the school “sign of
   weakness, to curry favor with the.
   The “in Mo Yan winning” reflections, called:
   “storyteller”, and “storytelling won the Nobel
   Prize for Literature proud. He added: “I’m after
   winning a lot of wonderful stories, these stories,
   I firmly believe that truth and justice, there is.”
   “Storytelling” to replace the “novel” is clearly
   absurd. Mr. Gu Xiaojun “Goran Malmqvist is a
   novel idiot”, has said quite understand. Only
   from the literal meaning of the novel
   “storytelling”; but the story never can say
   “fiction”. For example, Mr. Gu Xiaojun novel
   “fate” by an old man “story” about the fate of
   the Chinese people of an era. Lack of acting that
   does not mean the end, “said Gary’s” an old
   man “story” about a novel era of Chinese people.
   Can we do that? Everyone has a story, can;
   everyone has the novel can also be? Goran
   Malmqvist really is a novel of idiot, the Swedish
   Academy really is a bunch of novels idiot.
   Mo Yan is not only equivalent to the “story” in
   the novel as crazy, even at the cost of borrowing
   the Nobel literature platform idiot fallacy, spread
   to the world, it is the people of insight Xiaodiao
   Daya!
   Mo Yan insights idiot, doomed his “storytelling”
   is a liar, no philosophy at all. For example, in his
   speech, one side says “My mother is not literate,
   but very respected illiterate people.” Side but
   for unknown reasons, said their own primary
   schools are not graduating “dropout sucker
   interpreted as the Cultural Revolution caused
   but unexpectedly Mo Yan also said “When I
   reach for cattle and sheep passing from the front
   of the school, see old classmates fooling around
   campus, my heart is full of sadness, deeply
   appreciate a person, even a child, leave groups
   after painful. ‘
   In order to render the greatness of his mother,
   Mo Yan even describe her, said: “My child, do
   not worry, even though I live a little fun, but
   Yan Wangye not call me, I will not go.” With
   parents born world mother, especially the
   mother of the Chinese people, even depending
   on their minor son are suffering, not entirely
   “fun”? Mo Yan with his mother, contrary to
   repeat itself and humanity also!
   Mo Yan’s hypocrisy, and far more than that.
   News and other brain-dead media shoved
   holding smelly feet “to Mo Yan Nobel speech:
   memory mother Mo Yan psychological dark youth,
   it has been quite superior a more visible for the
   beginning of the three the philosophical story
   ending”.
   Mo Yan’s first story, only those sucker talents
   can read philosophy to never really crying. Sure
   enough, he was moved to tears, and certainly in
   no mood to observe whether others even cry fake
   tears. To see the exhibition, see only the
   exhibits or someone else’s back, sneaky
   (childhood, perhaps with naughty), who has a
   the spies general psychological only nationals
   own fake cry when peeping performance .
   The second story, but is a reflection of the
   people and dogs in general conditions. How can
   there be any philosophy at all?
   The third story, but would like to ridicule people
   who questioned him after his award-winning.
   Sure enough, he is also one to believe that
   “truth and justice exist” would not be afraid of
   questioning, not posing as “oranges” to Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun lightly re-promise.
   See the outside of the Internet, someone said,
   “the Nobel Prize is open conspiracy”, which is
   really too much residual brain. Concept of the
   Nobel, exactly which one civilization and
   progress of human society, triggered because of
   the Nobel Prize. Is there? Is not there?
   I’m afraid the progress is difficult to seek a
   trace. Credit for anti-civilization, touches as the
   Nobel Peace Prize in 2012, the Literature Prize,
   the foreign policy of the top100 thinkers Times
   annual candidate objects together forever in
   history. Was later cast aside, criticized!
    
   [Shi Sansheng Sunday, December 9, 2012 09:49 China]
(2012/12/09 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场