新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Nobel Prize without the open conspiracy Times and more underhand]
石三生
·Open letter to jury Nobel Prize
·致诺贝尔奖评委会的第二封信
·致诺贝尔奖评委会的第三封信
·Caused the third letter of the Nobel Peace Prize Jury
·可怜颜粉百多万更无一个是男儿
·保钓与爱国及转基因与女特工
·韩寒与狗及艾未未与李承鹏
·韩寒与狗及艾未未与李承鹏
·顾晓军归隐 焦国标登场
·致山东高级人民法院的公开信
·诺贝尔奖及其它
·致诺贝尔奖评委会的第四封信
·致山东高级人民法院院长的公开信
·诺贝尔与文学及其他
·让我们一起对着世界喊:噢...公正!
·感谢韩寒;一个不够!
·从李庄漏罪案到诺贝尔奖得主
·为什么公正是第一价值观
·中国人猜中了莫言获诺贝尔奖
·致瑞典国王的公开信
·致瑞典国王的第二封信
·Open letter to the King of Sweden
·致瑞典国王的第三封信
·莫言与顾晓军的差距
·瑞典国王的特使回访石三生
·致瑞典国王的第四封信
·论《打倒诺贝尔奖》
·诺贝尔文学奖的堕落与和平奖的无奈
·陈瞎子明修栈道 莫言偷袭诺贝尔
·诺奖丑闻缠身 莫言臭名远扬
·致瑞典国王的第五封信
·感谢顾晓军先生及热爱公正的人们
·公正始来 漫天雪飞
·马悦然为何爆料山东文化干部行贿
·致《外交政策》:顾晓军才是当之无愧的思想家
·马悦然与瑞典文学院很可能涉嫌诈骗
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”领先全球
·致外交政策:思想家需要前瞻更须影响力
·莫言获奖橙子虚 顾晓军拒不领情
·To “Foreign Policy”: Gu Xiaojun is worthy and Fully deserve thinkers
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”是普世价值
·To Foreign Policy: “the public impartiality is the first values” is
·马悦然唯利是图 文学奖难免龌龊
·致外交政策:请全球思想家激辩"普世价值"
·为何马悦然与诺评委主席嘴中尽是谎言
·To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer
·石三生与潍坊市政府争讼案之终结篇--国家赔偿
·致外交政策:草泥马是国骂是垃圾不是思想
·权外交政策莫学纽约时报继续出洋相
·马悦然何不劝莫言扮山东文化干部?
·问外交政策:思想是什么?
·马悦然曲线求饶 张一一甘做伪使
·Asked "foreign policy": What is the Thought?
·问外交政策:你们真关心中国人的命运吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy: Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们懂得忏悔吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy:谁敢指导十八大?
·Who dares to guide 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of Ch
·Asked Foreign Policy: You know Gu dough?
·Foreign Policy's Choice - pretended blind or pretended the fool
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们知道顾粉团吗?
·Foreign Policy的抉择—装瞎或装傻
·to TIME :数中国风云人物,勿忘顾晓军
·Foreign Policy 是否正当?
·to TIME A number of influential man in China, do not forget Gu Xiaojun
·问时代周刊:为何没有中国的思想家?
·Asked TIME: Why no Chinese thinker?
·时代周刊与阴部整容
·TIME magazine and the genital organs to face-lift
·罗姆尼是落水狗 时代周刊很像猪
·瑞典国也学会了反炒
·时代周刊与罗姆尼气疯了
·The TIME magazine and Romney angry Go berserk
·问时代周刊骗子的肉香吗?
·AskedTIME liar meaty fragrant?
·TIME 的三大骗
·特务与时局
·TIME's three big cheat
·装瞎的奥巴马与TIME
·问TIME你混得怎么样?
·Spies and the current political situation
·Disguised as blind Obama and TIME
·Asked TIME: How well do you unspoken rules?
·TIME为Obama挖了一个坑
·TIME dug a pit for Obama
·TIME正全力狙击顾晓军
·TIME is full to snipe Gu Xiaojun
·TIME是在贩卖艺术还是在贩毒?
·TIME的良知与下场
·TIME conscience and the final outcome
·Asked TIME:尔等意欲何为?
·Asked TIME: What are those of you who want to
·外交政策已知羞时代周刊仍痴迷
·温家宝总理引用屈原诗赏析
·Foreign Policy already know shame TIME still obsessed
·外交政策为何要抛弃陈光诚?
·感谢美国外交政策向公正靠拢
·To thank U.S. Foreign Policy closer to impartiality
·与好争辩的美国外交政策专家谈谈
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Nobel Prize without the open conspiracy Times and more underhand

   
   “China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group” Shi Sansheng Kyushu
   Comments • The one hundred seventy-eight
    
   Translator: God has eyes

    
   Fight lasting two hours this morning, with
   Google chrome, only made an overseas blog
   article in English, fan turn mad, and the hard
   disk light Changming. Worried about my old
   notebook to an attack and had to turn off the
   computer. Re-open, also like at the child, so still
   it seems that you can hear your own heartbeat.
   Only stare at my stalker, this is clearly not the
   Central Propaganda Department of the style. But
   only wholeheartedly recommended to Time
   magazine, Mr. Gu Xiaojun, because no clear
   answer to the Person of the Year candidate list
   (open all the time), and you can not give up.
   Hard on my browser, in addition to the Times,
   but also who is it?
   Needless to say, with learning general secretary
   to “emancipate the mind”, to complete the
   national revival Albert, to uphold the
   constitution dignity, to ensure the
   implementation of the constitution of the duties
   of any organization or individual are not above
   the Constitution and the law of privilege.
   Everything violation of the Constitution and the
   law must be investigated. “old school rogue only
   riotings, the occluder people the freedom of
   speech of the Central Propaganda Department,
   has been impossible to follow his steps. Then
   again, the the subjective ideology Li Changchun
   adults, also Resurrection turn to the life, “is no
   longer the party and state leaders not. In its
   place, the interest of his. Is an opposition
   elderly continue guiding ideology of the Central
   Propaganda Department?
   Apart from the Central Propaganda Department,
   not only the “Times” the American devils are
   also anti-intellectual, anti-civilization, anti-
   justice Shisan Sheng Gu dough hated you?
   Time magazine once again advise a: multi-line
   unjust is doomed to destruction. Repentance
   now, not yet too late. I did not refuse to see
   foreign policy included the fate of Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun? Not to mention a mere “foreign policy”,
   that the Nobel Peace Prize, the Literature Prize
   and how?
   After in the Mo Yan swoop Sweden country, many
   in and outside the media seem to have hit a
   strong shot in the arm, re-flooding many days
   from the dare “Mo Yan winning the topic of
   speculation. Poor that dippy King of Sweden, also
   had to play dumb, ignoring the strong doubts
   School “questioned, given to honor this
   untrustworthy, insincere vice chairman of the
   Chinese Writers Association.
   Including the Nobel literature jury before, the
   incumbent Chairman and Mayueran installed
   grandson, both dare respond Mo Yan why
   winning? They dare not refute Shandong cultural
   cadres bribery rumor. Sufficient to prove that the
   Swedish Academy was justice defeated the first
   values “​​challenged school! Not only the Swedish
   Academy was beaten gray head gray face. Even
   Mo Yan had to pretend to “oranges” will
   recommend Mr. Gu Xiaojun to winning as a
   bargaining chip to question the school “sign of
   weakness, to curry favor with the.
   The “in Mo Yan winning” reflections, called:
   “storyteller”, and “storytelling won the Nobel
   Prize for Literature proud. He added: “I’m after
   winning a lot of wonderful stories, these stories,
   I firmly believe that truth and justice, there is.”
   “Storytelling” to replace the “novel” is clearly
   absurd. Mr. Gu Xiaojun “Goran Malmqvist is a
   novel idiot”, has said quite understand. Only
   from the literal meaning of the novel
   “storytelling”; but the story never can say
   “fiction”. For example, Mr. Gu Xiaojun novel
   “fate” by an old man “story” about the fate of
   the Chinese people of an era. Lack of acting that
   does not mean the end, “said Gary’s” an old
   man “story” about a novel era of Chinese people.
   Can we do that? Everyone has a story, can;
   everyone has the novel can also be? Goran
   Malmqvist really is a novel of idiot, the Swedish
   Academy really is a bunch of novels idiot.
   Mo Yan is not only equivalent to the “story” in
   the novel as crazy, even at the cost of borrowing
   the Nobel literature platform idiot fallacy, spread
   to the world, it is the people of insight Xiaodiao
   Daya!
   Mo Yan insights idiot, doomed his “storytelling”
   is a liar, no philosophy at all. For example, in his
   speech, one side says “My mother is not literate,
   but very respected illiterate people.” Side but
   for unknown reasons, said their own primary
   schools are not graduating “dropout sucker
   interpreted as the Cultural Revolution caused
   but unexpectedly Mo Yan also said “When I
   reach for cattle and sheep passing from the front
   of the school, see old classmates fooling around
   campus, my heart is full of sadness, deeply
   appreciate a person, even a child, leave groups
   after painful. ‘
   In order to render the greatness of his mother,
   Mo Yan even describe her, said: “My child, do
   not worry, even though I live a little fun, but
   Yan Wangye not call me, I will not go.” With
   parents born world mother, especially the
   mother of the Chinese people, even depending
   on their minor son are suffering, not entirely
   “fun”? Mo Yan with his mother, contrary to
   repeat itself and humanity also!
   Mo Yan’s hypocrisy, and far more than that.
   News and other brain-dead media shoved
   holding smelly feet “to Mo Yan Nobel speech:
   memory mother Mo Yan psychological dark youth,
   it has been quite superior a more visible for the
   beginning of the three the philosophical story
   ending”.
   Mo Yan’s first story, only those sucker talents
   can read philosophy to never really crying. Sure
   enough, he was moved to tears, and certainly in
   no mood to observe whether others even cry fake
   tears. To see the exhibition, see only the
   exhibits or someone else’s back, sneaky
   (childhood, perhaps with naughty), who has a
   the spies general psychological only nationals
   own fake cry when peeping performance .
   The second story, but is a reflection of the
   people and dogs in general conditions. How can
   there be any philosophy at all?
   The third story, but would like to ridicule people
   who questioned him after his award-winning.
   Sure enough, he is also one to believe that
   “truth and justice exist” would not be afraid of
   questioning, not posing as “oranges” to Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun lightly re-promise.
   See the outside of the Internet, someone said,
   “the Nobel Prize is open conspiracy”, which is
   really too much residual brain. Concept of the
   Nobel, exactly which one civilization and
   progress of human society, triggered because of
   the Nobel Prize. Is there? Is not there?
   I’m afraid the progress is difficult to seek a
   trace. Credit for anti-civilization, touches as the
   Nobel Peace Prize in 2012, the Literature Prize,
   the foreign policy of the top100 thinkers Times
   annual candidate objects together forever in
   history. Was later cast aside, criticized!
    
   [Shi Sansheng Sunday, December 9, 2012 09:49 China]
(2012/12/09 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场