新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Nobel Prize without the open conspiracy Times and more underhand]
石三生
·Gu Xiaojun defeated American foreign policy
·时代风云人物—全球顶级思想家顾晓军
·Time the dirty extremely obama the teeth white heart black
·Times influential man - the world's top thinkers Gu Xiaojun
·风云人物顾晓军反智先锋数时代
·外交政策真白痴 时代风云已式微
·Influential man Gu Xiaojun Anti intellectualism pioneer is TIME
·"Foreign Policy" true idiot, "TIME" already fading
·奥巴马豪赌时代周刊 顾晓军智胜外交政策
·Obama gamble times weekly Gu Xiaojun outwit foreign policy
·时代周刊诡计多端 顾晓军思想真精彩
·时代周刊不堪凌辱 借韩媒反驳石三生
·回味顾晓军思想 看时代周刊作弊
·The U.S. TIME crafty Gu Xiaojun ism brilliant
·打倒奥巴马 解放中国人
·Time magazine unbearable humiliation borrow Korean media refute Shi Sa
·To aftertaste Gu Xiaojun Thought Time magazine cheating
·Down with Obama liberation of the Chinese people
·Down with Obama liberation of the Chinese people
·时代周刊放软话 风云人物成悬念
·Time to put the soft words, Influential man into apprehensively
·时势成就顾晓军 时代周刊枉意淫
·The current situation Achievement Gu Xiaojun Times in vain to comfort
·奥巴马愚民有方 美国人无知超常
·外交政策已销魂 时代周刊必黯然
·Obama is good at fooling the people-Americans ignorant extraordinary
·诺贝尔奖无阳谋 时代周刊多阴招
·Foreign policy overwhelmed with sorrow or joy ,Time Intense darkness w
·Foreign policy overwhelmed with sorrow or joy ,Time Intense darkness w
·奥巴马为囚徒发飙 美议员替罪犯维权
·Nobel Prize without the open conspiracy Times and more underhand
·问中宣部:习总不封路,你们还封网?
·时代周刊黔驴技穷 诺贝尔奖追腥逐臭
·时代周刊黔驴技穷诺贝尔奖追腥逐臭
·时代与外交政策为何敢愚弄中国
·莫言获奖----中共喜成人类最阴暗面
·习近平呼应顾晓军 刘云山趣谈李瑞环
·时代风云人物没有顾晓军的后果
·时代周刊正难产 诺贝尔奖已沉寂
·时代周刊不分善恶 顾晓军思想有公正
·奥巴马松口人权 顾晓军再胜美国
·奥巴马幡然悔悟 时代周刊难回首
·Obama relax mouth human rights Gu Xiaojun again wins the America
·Obama wake up to reality Times could not look back
·顾晓军忍辱负重奥巴马思过向善
·中宣部禁言误国 时代周刊坑华夏
·Gu Xiaojun swallow humiliation and bear a heavy load Obama Forsake her
·The Central Propaganda Department Ban on speech, mislead the country.T
·中美杀童案的表象与深层次
·中美杀童案的表象与深层次之中国篇
·America China Kill children case Superficial and deep
·时代周刊树歪风 美国社会缺公正
·就风云人物评选致时代周刊的公开信
·就时代周刊风云人物致奥巴马的公开信
·就时代周刊风云人物致奥巴马的公开信
·就时代周刊风云人物致中共的公开信
·就推荐时代周刊风云人物致习近平的公开信
·就时代周刊风云人物致骆家辉的公开信
·Because TIME weekly influential man and give Obama's open letter
·Cause TIME weekly influential man and give the Chinese Communist open
·Cause recommended TIME weekly influential man and give Xi Jinping's op
·时代周刊举止失措顾晓军主义公正无敌
·About TIME weekly influential man and give Luo Jiahui's open letter
· Time magazine behavior mismanage,Gu Xiaojun ism the public impartiali
·陈水扁告洋状与马英九告瞎状
·輔導馬英九告瞎狀
·為工商聯副主席李彥宏的無知叫聲好
·網路民評官版中國十大新聞
·2012年中国十大新闻之十
·向习办推荐一下顾学
·向中纪委书记王岐山推荐一下顾学
·向中共各民主党派及工商联推荐一下顾学
·2012网络民评版中国十大公知
·2012 Network Public Evaluation version of China's ten largest public i
·红黑法拉利
·向刘云山推荐一下顾学
·向国家主席胡锦涛推荐一下顾学
·中共执政的败笔---先德体,反智思
·致挪威诺贝尔和平奖评委会的推荐信(一)
·To the Norwegian Nobel Peace Prize Committee recommendation letters (a
·致挪威诺贝尔和平奖评委会的推荐信(二)
·习近平的复兴梦与顾晓军的第一猜想
·致挪威诺贝尔和平奖评委会的推荐信(三)
·To the Norwegian Nobel Peace Prize Committee recommendation letters (b
·致诺贝尔和平奖得主昂山素季的公开信
·To the Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi's open letter
·致诺贝尔和平奖得主达赖喇嘛的公开信
·To Nobel Peace Prize laureate, the Dalai Lama an open letter
·致诺贝尔和平奖得主达赖喇嘛的第二封信
·致诺贝尔和平奖得主达赖喇嘛的第三封信
·To Nobel Peace Prize laureate, the Dalai Lama's second letter
·与达赖喇嘛漫谈一下顾学与时局
·To Nobel Peace Prize laureate, the Dalai Lama's third letter
·向达赖喇嘛请教一下民主与佛宗
·与达赖喇嘛聊聊诺贝尔与转世说
·原告给被告潍坊市委书记许立全的公开信
·请达赖喇嘛看看顾学及南周事件
·And the Darai Lama talk Nobel and reincarnation
·Talk GU theory and the current political situation with the Dalai Lama
·The plaintiff to the defendant by Weifang municipal Party committee se
·To consult the Dalai Lama about democracy and Buddhism purpose
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Nobel Prize without the open conspiracy Times and more underhand

   
   “China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group” Shi Sansheng Kyushu
   Comments • The one hundred seventy-eight
    
   Translator: God has eyes

    
   Fight lasting two hours this morning, with
   Google chrome, only made an overseas blog
   article in English, fan turn mad, and the hard
   disk light Changming. Worried about my old
   notebook to an attack and had to turn off the
   computer. Re-open, also like at the child, so still
   it seems that you can hear your own heartbeat.
   Only stare at my stalker, this is clearly not the
   Central Propaganda Department of the style. But
   only wholeheartedly recommended to Time
   magazine, Mr. Gu Xiaojun, because no clear
   answer to the Person of the Year candidate list
   (open all the time), and you can not give up.
   Hard on my browser, in addition to the Times,
   but also who is it?
   Needless to say, with learning general secretary
   to “emancipate the mind”, to complete the
   national revival Albert, to uphold the
   constitution dignity, to ensure the
   implementation of the constitution of the duties
   of any organization or individual are not above
   the Constitution and the law of privilege.
   Everything violation of the Constitution and the
   law must be investigated. “old school rogue only
   riotings, the occluder people the freedom of
   speech of the Central Propaganda Department,
   has been impossible to follow his steps. Then
   again, the the subjective ideology Li Changchun
   adults, also Resurrection turn to the life, “is no
   longer the party and state leaders not. In its
   place, the interest of his. Is an opposition
   elderly continue guiding ideology of the Central
   Propaganda Department?
   Apart from the Central Propaganda Department,
   not only the “Times” the American devils are
   also anti-intellectual, anti-civilization, anti-
   justice Shisan Sheng Gu dough hated you?
   Time magazine once again advise a: multi-line
   unjust is doomed to destruction. Repentance
   now, not yet too late. I did not refuse to see
   foreign policy included the fate of Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun? Not to mention a mere “foreign policy”,
   that the Nobel Peace Prize, the Literature Prize
   and how?
   After in the Mo Yan swoop Sweden country, many
   in and outside the media seem to have hit a
   strong shot in the arm, re-flooding many days
   from the dare “Mo Yan winning the topic of
   speculation. Poor that dippy King of Sweden, also
   had to play dumb, ignoring the strong doubts
   School “questioned, given to honor this
   untrustworthy, insincere vice chairman of the
   Chinese Writers Association.
   Including the Nobel literature jury before, the
   incumbent Chairman and Mayueran installed
   grandson, both dare respond Mo Yan why
   winning? They dare not refute Shandong cultural
   cadres bribery rumor. Sufficient to prove that the
   Swedish Academy was justice defeated the first
   values “​​challenged school! Not only the Swedish
   Academy was beaten gray head gray face. Even
   Mo Yan had to pretend to “oranges” will
   recommend Mr. Gu Xiaojun to winning as a
   bargaining chip to question the school “sign of
   weakness, to curry favor with the.
   The “in Mo Yan winning” reflections, called:
   “storyteller”, and “storytelling won the Nobel
   Prize for Literature proud. He added: “I’m after
   winning a lot of wonderful stories, these stories,
   I firmly believe that truth and justice, there is.”
   “Storytelling” to replace the “novel” is clearly
   absurd. Mr. Gu Xiaojun “Goran Malmqvist is a
   novel idiot”, has said quite understand. Only
   from the literal meaning of the novel
   “storytelling”; but the story never can say
   “fiction”. For example, Mr. Gu Xiaojun novel
   “fate” by an old man “story” about the fate of
   the Chinese people of an era. Lack of acting that
   does not mean the end, “said Gary’s” an old
   man “story” about a novel era of Chinese people.
   Can we do that? Everyone has a story, can;
   everyone has the novel can also be? Goran
   Malmqvist really is a novel of idiot, the Swedish
   Academy really is a bunch of novels idiot.
   Mo Yan is not only equivalent to the “story” in
   the novel as crazy, even at the cost of borrowing
   the Nobel literature platform idiot fallacy, spread
   to the world, it is the people of insight Xiaodiao
   Daya!
   Mo Yan insights idiot, doomed his “storytelling”
   is a liar, no philosophy at all. For example, in his
   speech, one side says “My mother is not literate,
   but very respected illiterate people.” Side but
   for unknown reasons, said their own primary
   schools are not graduating “dropout sucker
   interpreted as the Cultural Revolution caused
   but unexpectedly Mo Yan also said “When I
   reach for cattle and sheep passing from the front
   of the school, see old classmates fooling around
   campus, my heart is full of sadness, deeply
   appreciate a person, even a child, leave groups
   after painful. ‘
   In order to render the greatness of his mother,
   Mo Yan even describe her, said: “My child, do
   not worry, even though I live a little fun, but
   Yan Wangye not call me, I will not go.” With
   parents born world mother, especially the
   mother of the Chinese people, even depending
   on their minor son are suffering, not entirely
   “fun”? Mo Yan with his mother, contrary to
   repeat itself and humanity also!
   Mo Yan’s hypocrisy, and far more than that.
   News and other brain-dead media shoved
   holding smelly feet “to Mo Yan Nobel speech:
   memory mother Mo Yan psychological dark youth,
   it has been quite superior a more visible for the
   beginning of the three the philosophical story
   ending”.
   Mo Yan’s first story, only those sucker talents
   can read philosophy to never really crying. Sure
   enough, he was moved to tears, and certainly in
   no mood to observe whether others even cry fake
   tears. To see the exhibition, see only the
   exhibits or someone else’s back, sneaky
   (childhood, perhaps with naughty), who has a
   the spies general psychological only nationals
   own fake cry when peeping performance .
   The second story, but is a reflection of the
   people and dogs in general conditions. How can
   there be any philosophy at all?
   The third story, but would like to ridicule people
   who questioned him after his award-winning.
   Sure enough, he is also one to believe that
   “truth and justice exist” would not be afraid of
   questioning, not posing as “oranges” to Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun lightly re-promise.
   See the outside of the Internet, someone said,
   “the Nobel Prize is open conspiracy”, which is
   really too much residual brain. Concept of the
   Nobel, exactly which one civilization and
   progress of human society, triggered because of
   the Nobel Prize. Is there? Is not there?
   I’m afraid the progress is difficult to seek a
   trace. Credit for anti-civilization, touches as the
   Nobel Peace Prize in 2012, the Literature Prize,
   the foreign policy of the top100 thinkers Times
   annual candidate objects together forever in
   history. Was later cast aside, criticized!
    
   [Shi Sansheng Sunday, December 9, 2012 09:49 China]
(2012/12/09 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场