新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[The current situation Achievement Gu Xiaojun Times in vain to comfort ]
石三生
·致瑞典国王的公开信
·致瑞典国王的第二封信
·Open letter to the King of Sweden
·致瑞典国王的第三封信
·莫言与顾晓军的差距
·瑞典国王的特使回访石三生
·致瑞典国王的第四封信
·论《打倒诺贝尔奖》
·诺贝尔文学奖的堕落与和平奖的无奈
·陈瞎子明修栈道 莫言偷袭诺贝尔
·诺奖丑闻缠身 莫言臭名远扬
·致瑞典国王的第五封信
·感谢顾晓军先生及热爱公正的人们
·公正始来 漫天雪飞
·马悦然为何爆料山东文化干部行贿
·致《外交政策》:顾晓军才是当之无愧的思想家
·马悦然与瑞典文学院很可能涉嫌诈骗
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”领先全球
·致外交政策:思想家需要前瞻更须影响力
·莫言获奖橙子虚 顾晓军拒不领情
·To “Foreign Policy”: Gu Xiaojun is worthy and Fully deserve thinkers
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”是普世价值
·To Foreign Policy: “the public impartiality is the first values” is
·马悦然唯利是图 文学奖难免龌龊
·致外交政策:请全球思想家激辩"普世价值"
·为何马悦然与诺评委主席嘴中尽是谎言
·To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer
·石三生与潍坊市政府争讼案之终结篇--国家赔偿
·致外交政策:草泥马是国骂是垃圾不是思想
·权外交政策莫学纽约时报继续出洋相
·马悦然何不劝莫言扮山东文化干部?
·问外交政策:思想是什么?
·马悦然曲线求饶 张一一甘做伪使
·Asked "foreign policy": What is the Thought?
·问外交政策:你们真关心中国人的命运吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy: Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们懂得忏悔吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy:谁敢指导十八大?
·Who dares to guide 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of Ch
·Asked Foreign Policy: You know Gu dough?
·Foreign Policy's Choice - pretended blind or pretended the fool
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们知道顾粉团吗?
·Foreign Policy的抉择—装瞎或装傻
·to TIME :数中国风云人物,勿忘顾晓军
·Foreign Policy 是否正当?
·to TIME A number of influential man in China, do not forget Gu Xiaojun
·问时代周刊:为何没有中国的思想家?
·Asked TIME: Why no Chinese thinker?
·时代周刊与阴部整容
·TIME magazine and the genital organs to face-lift
·罗姆尼是落水狗 时代周刊很像猪
·瑞典国也学会了反炒
·时代周刊与罗姆尼气疯了
·The TIME magazine and Romney angry Go berserk
·问时代周刊骗子的肉香吗?
·AskedTIME liar meaty fragrant?
·TIME 的三大骗
·特务与时局
·TIME's three big cheat
·装瞎的奥巴马与TIME
·问TIME你混得怎么样?
·Spies and the current political situation
·Disguised as blind Obama and TIME
·Asked TIME: How well do you unspoken rules?
·TIME为Obama挖了一个坑
·TIME dug a pit for Obama
·TIME正全力狙击顾晓军
·TIME is full to snipe Gu Xiaojun
·TIME是在贩卖艺术还是在贩毒?
·TIME的良知与下场
·TIME conscience and the final outcome
·Asked TIME:尔等意欲何为?
·Asked TIME: What are those of you who want to
·外交政策已知羞时代周刊仍痴迷
·温家宝总理引用屈原诗赏析
·Foreign Policy already know shame TIME still obsessed
·外交政策为何要抛弃陈光诚?
·感谢美国外交政策向公正靠拢
·To thank U.S. Foreign Policy closer to impartiality
·与好争辩的美国外交政策专家谈谈
·With the like argue's U.S.Foreign Policy experts to talk
·热烈祝贺外交政策继续装傻
·顾晓军大败美国外交政策
·Warmly congratulate the foreign policy continues to play the fool
·Time 龌龊之极obama 牙白心黑
·Gu Xiaojun defeated American foreign policy
·时代风云人物—全球顶级思想家顾晓军
·Time the dirty extremely obama the teeth white heart black
·Times influential man - the world's top thinkers Gu Xiaojun
·风云人物顾晓军反智先锋数时代
·外交政策真白痴 时代风云已式微
·Influential man Gu Xiaojun Anti intellectualism pioneer is TIME
·"Foreign Policy" true idiot, "TIME" already fading
·奥巴马豪赌时代周刊 顾晓军智胜外交政策
·Obama gamble times weekly Gu Xiaojun outwit foreign policy
·时代周刊诡计多端 顾晓军思想真精彩
·时代周刊不堪凌辱 借韩媒反驳石三生
·回味顾晓军思想 看时代周刊作弊
·The U.S. TIME crafty Gu Xiaojun ism brilliant
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
The current situation Achievement Gu Xiaojun Times in vain to comfort

   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • The one hundred seventy-five
    
   Translator:God has eyes
    

   An old saying: A hero. Americans own creation
   "2012 doomsday" nonsense did not come to
   pass. Touches on the achievements of a big
   thinker, writer, the economic political scientist
   turned advent.
   Do not look at Jasmine revolution after another,
   the impact is fairly Wei. Who can see those
   countries what is thought to contribute to
   human? That are trying to support the U.S.
   ambassador Jon Huntsman "walking" revolution,
   had become the laughing stock of China. Egypt
   has riots continued it not because it had four
   great civilizations toward democracy, leading
   civilization forward thinking has not yet born
   because of it? Is not the rulers and opponents
   are in a democracy that will be before the arrival
   of the blind spot - as the Chinese eighty-nine
   when unrest, the Chinese Communist Party and
   a party both to engage do not know what you
   want is what?
   Take a look at the foreign policy of inclusion, the
   candidate of the Time magazine list of thinkers
   known novelist, became the world's big thinkers.
   Oops! / Dog / day / Western civilization, the
   birth date, are thought to the civilization of
   human society is fictional, is dreaming this?
   Time magazine included an activist girls, are we
   supposed to call for little children all over the
   world have to stand out of the revolution? The
   Time magazine deluded blind, big result stayed
   rights? China's human rights not only did not
   see the progress, but rather to worse. Rights
   scam, mud horse, the U.S. government, you will
   not have to be in China do not go on the
   transfer to go to Pakistan?
   Concept of ancient and modern, real social
   change, could there by thinkers preamble.
   Progressive ideas must guide the society towards
   prosperity and civilization; Conversely, backward
   thinking, it is inevitable or cause social
   stagnation or turbulence and no security. The
   German horse backward thinking, resulting in a
   worldwide tragedy is obvious to all.
   Contemporary China, the Chinese Communist
   thinking seriously lagging behind, causing social
   polarization, moral turpitude, demolitions, self-
   immolation, petitioners, petitioners, black
   prisons, mental illness, etc., is not the best
   empirical it?
   Even Communist China, recognize China to face
   the greatest changes in three thousand ". Such
   a large change in the situation, if there is no
   advanced thinking to do guide, I'm afraid you
   Changba debut of Chinese civilization will
   degenerate into usual, right? The bastard
   "Times" to Emperor Wen Lift the day. The
   residual brain do not think about it: Sui Laoer if
   it is really so good, democratic ideas, and where
   his empire As for Chuan II will perish? His head
   what competent political overlord. The Sui Laoer
   throne is "the transferee" from, he will Jiangshan
   ceded people do? Also without firing a shot and
   took Jiangshan, if Brought in like, considered the
   emperor of feudal society! Sui Emperor, it is not
   worth mentioning!
   Without thinking of leading social change. It will
   inevitably lead to the stagnant human
   civilization, even unrest difficult security. To be
   a real achievement, "three thousand years have
   seen many changes" great civilizations, the CPC
   is bound to lift its own curse of brainstorming, a
   hundred schools of thought contend. If the
   Three Represents, harmonious society like even
   itself is difficult to justify the idea, in addition
   to the confusion caused by social ideology in
   civilization no benefit.
   The big change will inevitably produce a great
   hero, a great thinker! Otherwise, the change in
   the situation, such as large Sui Dynasty only
   short-lived. This great thinker, look at China,
   only Mr. Gu Xiaojun and indeed the match.
   To know how advanced is the idea Mrof ​​. Gu
   Xiaojun? Xi Jinping, general secretary of an
   accession to the throne, advocated to make a
   long story short, "talk about the country". You
   Zaiqiao Mr. Gu Xiaojun, from political
   commentary articles to novels, to the
   interpretation of the populist democratic ideas
   are, from time to excellence, and no longer
   simple to Jane you? CCP itself know the the
   Bagu article kill people! President Hu Jintao is
   not troublesome, refused to recite the eighteen
   full report it? Authored by Mr. Gu Xiaojun, I'm
   afraid without five thousand words, put the
   party's achievements, the Programme clearly said
   it! Ruling of thinking of the Chinese Communist
   Party has been in power more than 60 Years,
   seized political power, when the founding
   leaders also continue to be used mostly
   illiterate, had asked the secretary to write, not
   absurd? Since today's leaders are among the
   fine, why should the possessor of a lot of
   secretary for themselves "speech? Is this is the
   inverse of the legendary eliminated?
   Of course, Mr. Gu Xiaojun ideological essence is
   not just a mere formality, "just", "populist
   democracy", "questioned the school economics
   era index Ling Lang everywhere spectacular! To
   know how much impact to Gu Xiaojun 'backward
   thinking? Look at the the CPC Excluding Costly
   crazy blocked know!
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun thought, not only leading in the
   morphology of the human society. Of the times
   from the Office of the Silent Thunder: value king
   thin event, only two or three months, the in Bo
   Associated Press on a record of more than 10
   million page views. Han three cheat, rely on
   Sina's large network, even recommended with
   forged CTR much better than this, right!
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun in China today, and sure enough
   times produce their heroes. He thought, concise,
   logical, necessary for what were trying to create
   "no major changes" in the millennium
   civilization. Not only that, the "fair values",
   "populist democracy", or Western civilization to
   re-enter the evolutionary track of catalyst. The
   United Nations in the future to lead the world
   toward a common civilization Fuji Bao Jian. Not
   just the country, discontent; not just the world,
   must be in turmoil. If the fair, many problems
   solved; World if the justice, Ban Ki-moon also do
   not have East channeling West ran everywhere
   extinguishing but to no avail.
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun thinking is profound. Non Ai
   large stay the blame on the thought of
   Confucius, Mencius, virtue and intellect letter
   comparable, more is definitely not semiliterate
   Chen blind "Imagine a rule of law" can hold a
   candle to. Foreign policy is really residual brain
   to the extreme, a society based on the rule of
   law "is the ancient Chinese five thousand years
   ago to understand the truth. This could be
   considered the ideological? Really shit eating too
   much!
   Gu Xiaojun emerged, only fortune, good luck can
   not be demanded. Even God can not
   manufacture thinkers, The Times insists on trying
   to fish, obscenity several clown posing as a
   thinker, the man of the practice, destined to be
   the wise spurned become a stumbling block to
   the dustbin of history of civilization.
    
   [Shi Sansheng Thursday, December 6, 2012 06:43 China]
(2012/12/06 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场