新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Who dares to guide 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of Ch]
石三生
·为虎作伥者之韩寒篇
·为虎作伥者之高智晟篇
·诺贝尔和平奖或沦陷
·山东终于表态拥护打大老虎
·习王无恩,何来感谢?
·本轮反腐中的山东之最
·贼与官(五)
·无法可依
·想到的与未想到的
·反腐或成鸡肋
·“泰坦尼克”与“东方之星”
·“泰坦尼克”与“东方之星”
·中纪委的回应很莫名
·中纪委的回应很莫名
·搅局与设局
·政府作孽 百姓遭殃
·请教牛泪:人类社会如何进步?
·明的癣疥脓疮呢?
·洋人与二奶
·乱lun
·爱迪生的心思 杨振宁与莫言不懂
·顾晓军与杨恒均的“社会观”
·李开复画蛇添足
·搅局与设局(二)
·杨恒均或保王林脱难
·释永信跳进黄河 王林案悄然降温
·“打虎”与我何关?
·王胜俊与“女业主被当众扒裤”
·毕福剑与杨恒均
·莫言有罪
·莫言的难言之隐
·匪夷所思
·信力健或成人权新样本
·莫须有的罪名 莫须有的人权
·请奥巴马入瓮
·“窝里斗”及其他
·再谈“窝里斗”及其他
·三谈“窝里斗”及其他
·四谈“窝里斗”及其他
·五谈“窝里斗”及其他---兼答卢德素
·七谈“窝里斗”及其他---兼答卢德素
·十谈“窝里斗”及其他之“李嘉诚跑了”
·李嘉诚的“愚昧”论不知所云
·共产无望 共妻有戏
· “共妻”论反进化
·“共妻”论缺德
·“共妻”论反文明
·也谈“一场豪赌”
·他们在为谁做嫁衣?
·莫言为何不愿见“佛”?
·中纪委为何不管管莫言?
·习总的讲话为何不提莫言?
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?(二)
·也谈“习总的书单”
·百度机器人或建议腐败们早跳楼
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?(三)
·乱伦----是一种文明
·也谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·习办或闭目塞听
·再谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·三谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·我为什么咬定莫言?
·“三个代表”高风险
·“精准扶贫”或是梦
·无梦---兼答卢德素
·“特赦贪官”不如放弃“三个代表”
·“马会韩”后“习马会”
·“放开二胎”要感谢莫言?
·最不可琢磨的汉语言
·财新网为何不敌巩义法院枉判
·财新网为何不敌巩义法院枉判(二)
·财新网为何不敌巩义法院枉判(三)
·日本人更懂中国
·日本人最懂中国
·“双十一”、打假与打虎
·我的洋鬼子朋友杨恒均
·我的洋鬼子朋友杨恒均(二)
·“白毛女”或与“依法治国”相左
·莫曹杨与《打倒鲁迅》
·鲁迅与洋人杨恒均
·中央网信办为何不自信?
·杨恒均与“王的女人”将如何逆转?
·“三个自信”滋养腐败
·IS的乌托邦与周主席的“中国梦”
·张艺谋与韩寒心有灵犀
·王健林禁妄议 王思聪很惜玉
·公正如画、强拆似虎、腐败在继续
·请孙政才书记宣讲公正
·请允许我跟着李敖喊“万岁”
·请允许我跟着李敖挺圣战
·李敖老矣 唯言不休(复旦版)
·李敖还敢掀起一场中西文化论战吗?
·顾腚难顾头的文明---李敖清华演讲赏析
·左撇子的李敖不懂普世价值
·胡耀邦是怎样离开的人间?
·李敖宣布起义,北大怎么办?
·莫言的末日论与李敖的千年愿
·从中国第二大重要新闻说起
·从纽约时报整版赞习说起
·法官指天发誓启示录(二)
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Who dares to guide 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of Ch

   Asked Foreign Policy:
   
   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments · one hundred thirty-eight

   
   
   
   Translator:God has eyes
   
   
   
    [before:( all ladders
   complete collapse. This seems to have confirmed
   the speculation century of major --- maintenance
   of stability and political and religious disputes
   mystery: drywall, and take the ladder, in fact, is
   a group of people. 】 Foreign Policy can not seize
   the last opportunity, "Gu Xiaojun," and included
   into the "TOP 100 Global Thinkers", the Chinese
   Communists eighteen, estimated the world's
   mainstream media is necessary annihilated.
   Because the face of three years have seen such a
   change in the situation, not even a thinker to
   the pulse of the quasi-Communist China. Really
   the case, TOP100 I am afraid it had become a
   staple of jokes the world. Is not it? Tonight, the
   year two thousand and one on November 3, 2003,
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun Sina retransmission in May this
   year after about eighteen Old Man (survival less
   than one hour). Old Man new hair, the original
   is not surprising. Odd, in this series of articles,
   proprietary article entitled "to the eighteen
   provides several guiding ideology". Foreign Policy
   of insight, presumably would not understand the
   great significance of the "guiding ideology"
   implies, right? Not to mention that TOP100
   which thinkers dare to be so confident. Only fear
   with confidence and may not dare presumptuous
   it? Even if you dare confident, dare to be
   presumptuous, and I'm afraid that idiot stomach
   did not have even a drop of sesame oil. On the
   other let alone this one Mr. "to eighteen
   provides several guiding ideology, enough to be
   ranked TOP100, but also is Number one, only Gu
   Xiaojun. Is not so? Following Together we
   appreciate Mr. Gu Xiaojun "guiding ideology":
   "guiding ideology, First," learning theory "that
   Communist China should" learn impartiality. Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun, learning democracy --- the interests of
   impartiality to talk; political , to talk about
   democracy. "Needless to say, the proliferation of
   these years of Chinese society groups event,
   black fight blood levy, demolitions, self-
   immolation, the miscarriage of impartiality and
   repeatedly made major life and limb, the root
   cause is the government missing in the interests
   of impartiality led to the CPC leaders really speak
   impartiality, democracy, and will be a blessing for the
   Chinese people. Conversely, Mo Yan and his ilk
   have followed suit, learning what "speech" in the
   Yan'an Forum on Literature, repeat the speech,
   all the mistakes, who can guarantee that Premier
   Wen Jiabao worried Cultural Revolution dying
   embers resurgence it? guiding ideology of the
   "theory of the cake". Mr. Gu Xiaojun think it
   should be "learning by doing, Oiwake - both to
   do a big cake, more divided cake. Points good
   cake, about impartiality; big cake. About
   development. The "defection in Wang Lijun, thin
   valley open to Bo Xilai and other have been
   brought to impartiality after the reform open first
   Minjin the country retreat, and now into the
   people back into the country, wealthy and poor,"
   has become a well-known fact. Thin Hee the
   guiding ideology of the "first division good cake,
   do a big cake" with the ocean's "first big cake,
   and then divided into good cake" dispute, in
   addition to prove the correctness of the theory of
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun has no other significance.
   response mechanism. Mr. Gu Xiaojun "take the
   initiative to respond to, is the best means to
   eliminate the" rumors ". "The prevalence of
   these years rumors of Chinese society, natural
   design has a great relationship with the CCP's"
   response mechanisms "and the response
   mechanism of natural defects, naturally do not
   speak just the inevitable result. Lady this when
   the head of the to prospective First Lady of the
   statue, since nothing to fear from public
   activities under the eye, why not go further,
   openly respond questioned it? "active response"
   of course is the best means of destroying the
   rumors are not subject to attention Do not
   "respond" inflicted "active sophistry" initiative,
   such as the Swedish Academy's Nobel Prize for
   Literature before the jury, the incumbent
   President, and Goran Malmqvist side
   disinformation side rumor "active response" will
   be the opposite , the more the provision of more
   rumors. guiding ideology Fourth, the
   "maintenance of stability theory. Mr. Gu Xiaojun"
   If people with the police immediately to deal
   with local leading cadres hold - you do not have
   the ability to resolve contradictions, but aroused
   public resentment, I To what are you doing?
   Deal with you, is to let people vent, look to other
   officials. Vacated position, to train a new
   generation. "This one, Mr. Gu has
   interpretations too careful, why should Shi
   Sansheng blab it again. Communist China as
   true to say impartiality, estimated that China's social
   group events plummeted more than 90% The
   guiding ideology five is the role of the party
   members. Mr. Gu Xiaojun that suffer first, enjoy
   later; into conflict with the masses, disputes of
   interest, you should be courteous. Can not, you
   quit the party. "Mr. Gu This theory is" the root
   of all evil, "the moral standards of the feudal
   society officials to ask vowed to" serve the
   people "communists even this can not, depends
   on how the nerve in the party? How kind?
   Foreign Policy, you do not also organize your
   TOP100 to Communist China to offer advice?'m
   afraid Han Ai Weiwei addition to flatter, it will
   only show oneself, right?
   
   [Shi Sansheng
   Saturday, November 3, 2012, 23: 07 Chinese]
(2012/11/04 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场