新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Asked Foreign Policy: Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese]
石三生
·党没有思想不是人民的错
·人们为何都热爱骗子
·颜昌海骑驴找驴不知自己是汉奸
·陈平福罪有应得 颜昌海徒有虚名
·顾晓军主义哲学中的“封建”思想
·左右都是一家人颜昌海窝斗孔孙
·Open letter to jury Nobel Prize
·致诺贝尔奖评委会的第二封信
·致诺贝尔奖评委会的第三封信
·Caused the third letter of the Nobel Peace Prize Jury
·可怜颜粉百多万更无一个是男儿
·保钓与爱国及转基因与女特工
·韩寒与狗及艾未未与李承鹏
·韩寒与狗及艾未未与李承鹏
·顾晓军归隐 焦国标登场
·致山东高级人民法院的公开信
·诺贝尔奖及其它
·致诺贝尔奖评委会的第四封信
·致山东高级人民法院院长的公开信
·诺贝尔与文学及其他
·让我们一起对着世界喊:噢...公正!
·感谢韩寒;一个不够!
·从李庄漏罪案到诺贝尔奖得主
·为什么公正是第一价值观
·中国人猜中了莫言获诺贝尔奖
·致瑞典国王的公开信
·致瑞典国王的第二封信
·Open letter to the King of Sweden
·致瑞典国王的第三封信
·莫言与顾晓军的差距
·瑞典国王的特使回访石三生
·致瑞典国王的第四封信
·论《打倒诺贝尔奖》
·诺贝尔文学奖的堕落与和平奖的无奈
·陈瞎子明修栈道 莫言偷袭诺贝尔
·诺奖丑闻缠身 莫言臭名远扬
·致瑞典国王的第五封信
·感谢顾晓军先生及热爱公正的人们
·公正始来 漫天雪飞
·马悦然为何爆料山东文化干部行贿
·致《外交政策》:顾晓军才是当之无愧的思想家
·马悦然与瑞典文学院很可能涉嫌诈骗
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”领先全球
·致外交政策:思想家需要前瞻更须影响力
·莫言获奖橙子虚 顾晓军拒不领情
·To “Foreign Policy”: Gu Xiaojun is worthy and Fully deserve thinkers
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”是普世价值
·To Foreign Policy: “the public impartiality is the first values” is
·马悦然唯利是图 文学奖难免龌龊
·致外交政策:请全球思想家激辩"普世价值"
·为何马悦然与诺评委主席嘴中尽是谎言
·To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer
·石三生与潍坊市政府争讼案之终结篇--国家赔偿
·致外交政策:草泥马是国骂是垃圾不是思想
·权外交政策莫学纽约时报继续出洋相
·马悦然何不劝莫言扮山东文化干部?
·问外交政策:思想是什么?
·马悦然曲线求饶 张一一甘做伪使
·Asked "foreign policy": What is the Thought?
·问外交政策:你们真关心中国人的命运吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy: Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们懂得忏悔吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy:谁敢指导十八大?
·Who dares to guide 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of Ch
·Asked Foreign Policy: You know Gu dough?
·Foreign Policy's Choice - pretended blind or pretended the fool
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们知道顾粉团吗?
·Foreign Policy的抉择—装瞎或装傻
·to TIME :数中国风云人物,勿忘顾晓军
·Foreign Policy 是否正当?
·to TIME A number of influential man in China, do not forget Gu Xiaojun
·问时代周刊:为何没有中国的思想家?
·Asked TIME: Why no Chinese thinker?
·时代周刊与阴部整容
·TIME magazine and the genital organs to face-lift
·罗姆尼是落水狗 时代周刊很像猪
·瑞典国也学会了反炒
·时代周刊与罗姆尼气疯了
·The TIME magazine and Romney angry Go berserk
·问时代周刊骗子的肉香吗?
·AskedTIME liar meaty fragrant?
·TIME 的三大骗
·特务与时局
·TIME's three big cheat
·装瞎的奥巴马与TIME
·问TIME你混得怎么样?
·Spies and the current political situation
·Disguised as blind Obama and TIME
·Asked TIME: How well do you unspoken rules?
·TIME为Obama挖了一个坑
·TIME dug a pit for Obama
·TIME正全力狙击顾晓军
·TIME is full to snipe Gu Xiaojun
·TIME是在贩卖艺术还是在贩毒?
·TIME的良知与下场
·TIME conscience and the final outcome
·Asked TIME:尔等意欲何为?
·Asked TIME: What are those of you who want to
·外交政策已知羞时代周刊仍痴迷
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Asked Foreign Policy: Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese

   
   
   Asked Foreign Policy: Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese people?
    
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu comment · 135

    
   Translator:God has eyes
    
   Despite the announcement from the "Foreign
   Policy" year 2012 "one hundred global thinkers"
   list for some time. But I Shisan Sheng has can
   be concluded that: "Foreign Policy" in this year's
   top 100 "Gu Xiaojun three words. People in the
   People's Liberation Army "who also hopes
   downright become some two hundred and fifty.
   Which, of course, including the Korean powder,
   blind powder, guarana powder, and Liu
   invincible followers. Read Mr. Gu Xiaojun "human meat
   pie" thinking: Or, the American people are kind,
   but also really willing to help the Chinese
   people, as when silly childhood determined to
   "save the American people living in dire straits
   "General. Otherwise, how would there be so
   many of the Flying Tigers, 14th Air team
   members sacrificed their precious lives? However,
   if the causes of World War II, really, as Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun said: "World War II" does these silly Pitt
   forced out "of the results, the goodness of the
   American people, is it also became a victim of
   the U.S. elite who? The elites of the democratic
   world, even this bring disaster to the tragedy of
   mankind as a whole can be manufactured. Said
   they worried about the fate of the Chinese
   people alone would not become a joke? Free
   world the essence of interests "(see Gu Xiaojun
   doctrine), Americans over the past century side
   are concerned about China, but he has also
   seemingly misread, misjudge China behind,
   whether just for their own interests? Otherwise,
   why in the strong intervention of the American
   Empire nearly a century, democracy, freedom, not
   only must not also a trial of strength to
   complicate the matter, it did not do? Sun Yat-
   sen support it? Stilwell sympathy for the Chinese
   Communists do? U.S. support of Liu invincible?
   A master of myth manufactured by the U.S.
   government? The blind Chen in the end is not a
   U.S. informant? Why the U.S. government is so
   good to him? Chen, the blind are not blind, Do
   Americans are blind? If Han, Ai Weiwei and his
   ilk, this is what / dog / fart / thinker? The world
   famous "foreign policy" keen on such a miserable
   fools who caused God. Purpose with the Chinese
   Communists, in order to fool the Chinese
   people? Idiot is Chinese thinkers. The people
   there are what count on? Why the wise men of
   the free world will only see the Chinese
   civilization refuse? American people really will
   "Grass Mud Horse" talks about even included
   into the textbooks to support Ai Weiwei great
   idea? The United States love swearing, indecent
   If that is the case, why not direct "Grass Mud
   Horse" instead of "hello"? Americans lack of
   acting, nor will the chief culprit of the subprime
   mortgage crisis, and condemned to the
   colonialists head of the British Empire? What
   you can not. Why will agree with Ai Weiwei
   blame social problems in China thousands of
   years ago, Confucius and Mencius head so
   preposterous "thinking" it?
   Why? In the end is why? The wise men of the
   free world do not want to see the real problem
   of the Chinese civilization --- "Gu Xiaojun 'such a
   brilliant idea? In the economy: the Spring
   Festival in 2008 predicted that the Chinese stock
   market without disaster fell continue ", hundreds
   of foreign policy thinkers have thought? Politics:
   China Council eventually, as he predicted (latest
   forecast is Mr. Gu own ban) is not bad. Only 9
   change 7 thesis of the world few can? Its
   ideological: the macro as "fair values" proposed
   to explain why the Western capitalist elite
   democratic society stagnating, stop the root
   causes of the evolution. Microscopic put forward,
   such as "a mortal scam" profoundly revealed the
   the current FY upheaval of Chinese society
   intrinsic motivation. Does foreign policy: either
   macro or micro, your global TOP 100 thinkers may
   have such a character? Perhaps Shi Sansheng
   my ignorance, rummaged through the Chinese
   media at home and abroad, we have not got
   more than Mr. Gu Xiaojun thinkers. If foreign
   policy to its referral to China; If not, ask you to
   Gu Xiaojun doctrine introduced to the world.
   Okay? Only in this way. In order to prove that
   the foreign policy is really concerned about
   China, concerned about the fate of the Chinese
   people. Otherwise, it can only be reduced to
   some garbage elite liar childcare.
    
   [Shi Sansheng Friday, November 2, 2012 7:01 China]
(2012/11/02 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场