新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Asked Foreign Policy: Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese]
石三生
·Wu Dengsheng and Gu Xiaojun PK Nobel Peace Prize
·To the mayor of Weifang City Deputies to the National People's Congres
·Taiwan's Ang Lee not understand mainland's Gu Xiaojun
·To NPC deputy and mayor of Weifang Liu Shuguang second letter
·The idea of "​​civil rights" to recommend to the Nobel Pea
·Establish "Gu dough culture media company " Announcement
·中国文学的堕落与黄浦江死猪之殇
·“相對論”般的思想 《紅樓夢》般的文字
·請潘基文關注中國作家顧曉軍的困境
·典當行或成矛盾爆發地
·潍坊国土局为何要自证脑残?
·第一夫人成為時代人物的尷尬
·“习总打的”的伟大意义
·以防不測
·陈光诚是假瞎 全世界却装瞎
·陈光诚或成菲佣
·李克强与陈光诚接踵访欧有感
·顾晓军与陈光诚PK诺贝尔和平奖
·老子是个伪君子
·俞可平终于找到了替罪羊
·东北六月三把火
·顾晓军或成诺贝尔和平奖大赢家
·南非的良心与中国的骗子
·谁伪造了陈水总的微博?
·当局或借厦门纵火案诱导新型犯罪
·厦门日报越俎代庖向死人宣战
·从延安城管到革命圣地
·奥巴马或特赦棱镜泄密者
·愚蠢的美国泄密者斯诺登
·前谷歌副总裁李开复为何乱弹琴?
·中美英接踵上演间谍闹剧
·斯诺登与陈光诚
·再谈斯诺登与陈光诚
·四谈斯诺登与陈光诚
·五谈斯诺登与陈光诚
·六谈斯诺登与陈光诚
·聂树斌与王书金谁是真凶?
·时评家石三生的遭遇
·聂树斌与王书金谁是真凶?(五)
·曾成杰死刑之谜(二)
·他们和他们及谁与谁
·曾成杰死刑之谜(三)
·红歌将军与气功大师
·陈副省长的戾气与奸诈
·愚蠢的问题 难产的答案
·你的祖先是猴子吗?
·中美人权对话的骗局
·中美人权对话的骗局(二)
·中美人权对话的骗局(三)
·中美人权对话的骗局(四)
·中美人权对话的骗局(五)
·中美人权对话的骗局(六)
·中美人权对话的骗局(七)
·中美人权对话的骗局(八)
·孟建柱主管政法委 依法治国仍空谈
·作孽与漂白
·作孽与漂白(一)
·作孽与漂白(二)
·作孽与漂白(三)
·作孽与漂白(四)
·作孽与漂白(五)
·作孽与漂白(六)
·新快报丢骨头又丢人
·新快报丢了骨头救了市
·爆炸与维稳
·变态
·时与局
·时与局(二)
·漫谈“布道者”贺卫方
·别了,骆家辉
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴
·看任志强与央视互咬有感
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(二)
·国家安监局拿习总开涮
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(三)
·李嘉诚属“既得利益”怎成“笑谈”
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(四)
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(五)
·李嘉诚真的高尚吗?
·被李嘉诚炒红的张子强
·农业大丰收的神话将破灭
·偃旗息鼓的"十连增"
·李嘉诚与张子强
·李嘉诚与张子强(二)
·李嘉诚与张子强(三)
·李嘉诚与张子强(四)
·为愚蠢的湖南益阳当局支招
·李嘉诚与张子强(五)
·李嘉诚与张子强(六)
·李嘉诚与张子强(七)
·“转基因”转的到底是什么?
·陈光标和他的钱干净吗?
·央行为何纵容陈光标不法
·陈光标敢再说一次“绝不食言”吗?
·习总吃包子不是作秀胜似作秀
·看不懂的河南连霍高速大桥垮塌事故
·国税局为何纵容陈光标?
·“中国首善”渐露马脚
·陈光标的“中国首善”罩着多少阴霾?
·陈光标何不兑现承诺、破财消灾?
·缺德的“全国道德模范”
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Asked Foreign Policy: Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese

   
   
   Asked Foreign Policy: Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese people?
    
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu comment · 135

    
   Translator:God has eyes
    
   Despite the announcement from the "Foreign
   Policy" year 2012 "one hundred global thinkers"
   list for some time. But I Shisan Sheng has can
   be concluded that: "Foreign Policy" in this year's
   top 100 "Gu Xiaojun three words. People in the
   People's Liberation Army "who also hopes
   downright become some two hundred and fifty.
   Which, of course, including the Korean powder,
   blind powder, guarana powder, and Liu
   invincible followers. Read Mr. Gu Xiaojun "human meat
   pie" thinking: Or, the American people are kind,
   but also really willing to help the Chinese
   people, as when silly childhood determined to
   "save the American people living in dire straits
   "General. Otherwise, how would there be so
   many of the Flying Tigers, 14th Air team
   members sacrificed their precious lives? However,
   if the causes of World War II, really, as Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun said: "World War II" does these silly Pitt
   forced out "of the results, the goodness of the
   American people, is it also became a victim of
   the U.S. elite who? The elites of the democratic
   world, even this bring disaster to the tragedy of
   mankind as a whole can be manufactured. Said
   they worried about the fate of the Chinese
   people alone would not become a joke? Free
   world the essence of interests "(see Gu Xiaojun
   doctrine), Americans over the past century side
   are concerned about China, but he has also
   seemingly misread, misjudge China behind,
   whether just for their own interests? Otherwise,
   why in the strong intervention of the American
   Empire nearly a century, democracy, freedom, not
   only must not also a trial of strength to
   complicate the matter, it did not do? Sun Yat-
   sen support it? Stilwell sympathy for the Chinese
   Communists do? U.S. support of Liu invincible?
   A master of myth manufactured by the U.S.
   government? The blind Chen in the end is not a
   U.S. informant? Why the U.S. government is so
   good to him? Chen, the blind are not blind, Do
   Americans are blind? If Han, Ai Weiwei and his
   ilk, this is what / dog / fart / thinker? The world
   famous "foreign policy" keen on such a miserable
   fools who caused God. Purpose with the Chinese
   Communists, in order to fool the Chinese
   people? Idiot is Chinese thinkers. The people
   there are what count on? Why the wise men of
   the free world will only see the Chinese
   civilization refuse? American people really will
   "Grass Mud Horse" talks about even included
   into the textbooks to support Ai Weiwei great
   idea? The United States love swearing, indecent
   If that is the case, why not direct "Grass Mud
   Horse" instead of "hello"? Americans lack of
   acting, nor will the chief culprit of the subprime
   mortgage crisis, and condemned to the
   colonialists head of the British Empire? What
   you can not. Why will agree with Ai Weiwei
   blame social problems in China thousands of
   years ago, Confucius and Mencius head so
   preposterous "thinking" it?
   Why? In the end is why? The wise men of the
   free world do not want to see the real problem
   of the Chinese civilization --- "Gu Xiaojun 'such a
   brilliant idea? In the economy: the Spring
   Festival in 2008 predicted that the Chinese stock
   market without disaster fell continue ", hundreds
   of foreign policy thinkers have thought? Politics:
   China Council eventually, as he predicted (latest
   forecast is Mr. Gu own ban) is not bad. Only 9
   change 7 thesis of the world few can? Its
   ideological: the macro as "fair values" proposed
   to explain why the Western capitalist elite
   democratic society stagnating, stop the root
   causes of the evolution. Microscopic put forward,
   such as "a mortal scam" profoundly revealed the
   the current FY upheaval of Chinese society
   intrinsic motivation. Does foreign policy: either
   macro or micro, your global TOP 100 thinkers may
   have such a character? Perhaps Shi Sansheng
   my ignorance, rummaged through the Chinese
   media at home and abroad, we have not got
   more than Mr. Gu Xiaojun thinkers. If foreign
   policy to its referral to China; If not, ask you to
   Gu Xiaojun doctrine introduced to the world.
   Okay? Only in this way. In order to prove that
   the foreign policy is really concerned about
   China, concerned about the fate of the Chinese
   people. Otherwise, it can only be reduced to
   some garbage elite liar childcare.
    
   [Shi Sansheng Friday, November 2, 2012 7:01 China]
(2012/11/02 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场