新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[To thank U.S. Foreign Policy closer to impartiality]
石三生
·向统战部推荐顾晓军
·云南坐13年冤狱的女孩不值得同情
·奥运冠军与东亚病夫
·鲁迅真是间谍吗?
·周小平的智力是否正常?
·不服就试试:一个你绝对会答错的社会问题
·周小平认为:大飞机前景堪忧
·除了天才周小平,没有人可以答对
·通过周小平现象管窥《白毛女》
·推荐顾晓军兼批判重庆缺“公正”论
·习、马倡导和平,不如习、顾共逐诺奖
·推荐蔡英文、顾晓军联袂共逐诺奖
·习、马视为鸡肋;顾、蔡如获至宝
·“依法治国”有时比流感阴毒
·国务院一边减政一边集权
·代习先生辩:“有付出,就会有收获”
·石三生新年献词:梦里寻梦又一年
·石三生新年献词:梦里寻梦又一年
·无锡强拆继续 永康狱中难安
·向习近平主席推荐顾晓军
·南大校长周文斌被判无期冤不冤?
·驳莫言的“两个基本判断”
·公开推荐顾晓军角逐2016年诺贝尔和平奖
·两个台湾女人搅了国共两党的好梦
·三个台湾女人唱大戏
·毛泽东为何没得诺贝尔和平奖?
·推荐顾晓军、蔡英文获诺奖是民意
·用周小平思想统一中国
·可能是史上最乌龙的香港罪犯
·为民告官胜诉率为零的上海欢呼
·周小平主席要开杀戒?
·习总为何不注重民意?
·周小平主席期冀“台独”
·向蔡英文主席推荐“公正第一”
·从周小平主席到蜀国皇帝刘备
·周小平比鲁迅更伟大
·没有选择的蔡英文
·猜猜周小平主席有没有睡艺人?
·周小平主席应该是“周家人”
·两会为何不互联网+?
·孙立平先生的“公约数论”太梦幻
·蔡英文借他山之玉 周小平祸国殃民
·周小平若不反击就太无耻了
·周小平骂两会代表陈光标是小人
·报告孟建柱:草民的“获得感”这个样
·指导一下中国长安网遣词造句
·指导一下中国长安网遣词造句
·周小平啥样,央视就啥样
·“二妻”谣言不可笑 政协委员荒唐多
·周小平造谣是文明 网民造谣被刑拘
·周小平很生气 蔡英文要受苦
·周小平主席恨台湾而爱日本
·习总为何在政法会上讲“忧患”?
·晴天霹雳---周小平首倡“中国梦”
·罗援若武统 民主做先锋
·石三生与小粉红
·周小平主席力助周涛重掌春晚?
·石三生将编、导史诗巨制《三周魂销》
·小粉红坚壁清野 顾晓军枉费心机
·小粉红与赵忠祥也有一腿?
·小粉红己身不修,何以平天下?
·小粉红越界刷屏 蔡英文应对失措
·周涛若复出,春晚必成史上最艳夜
·扬言武统的罗援少将是逃兵?
·周涛复出主春晚 韩国议长悔不迭
·国台办耍金箍棒 蔡英文偷着乐
· 小粉红旁敲侧击 问世间何为正道
·鲁迅不倒 天理难容
·绝对奇迹--比平邑矿难更奇的山东奇迹
·可怜的鲁迅,可悲的语文
·一百年间两二货:周小平与周树人
·问孟建柱:政法委也不能干预司法吗?
·辛亥革命百年后,人民开始怀念慈禧
·央视春晚弃有污点演员,却用艳荡的主持
·李克强舍近求远为哪般
·国务院管不好住,能管好农民的嘴吗?
·抗议谷歌、抗议网络流氓
·给国务院并织金县纪委献一策
·温家宝是一个好总理吗?
·报告习总:这里有一个被丢下的贫困群众
·博客中国意欲何为?
·金正恩到底打了谁一耳光?
·冤狱23年的陈满之高尚羞煞窦娥
·云南、海南与福建三起冤案统一口径为哪般?
·陈满的境界与邓小平一般高
·如此司法进步
·有意思:周小平说方兴东是个大忽悠
·台湾地震了,春晚还演吗?
·欲加“武威三记者”之罪,何患无辞
·台湾地震与安倍及春晚
·周小平是谁的国师?
·春晚与正能量
·团中央“娱乐化”一瞥
·若老能养老,干部能养干部吗?
·龙应台与周小平的暧昧令人作呕
·龙应台的轻佻与虚伪
·谁“伪造”了龙应台的两份声明?
·谁是龙应台的后台?
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(序)
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(一)
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(二)
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
To thank U.S. Foreign Policy closer to impartiality

   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group "Shi Sansheng Kyushu comment · one hundred sixty-one
    
   Translator: God has eyes
    

   See the multi-dimensional foreign policy: how to
   bring democratic China "did not pay particular
   attention to of Yasheng its people. Even in
   subsequent foreign policy why should abandon
   Chen Guangcheng, "paranoid conspiracy of
   Americans may exist.
   After some understanding of the author,
   although not clear all their doubts. But on
   foreign policy at this time the intention of this
   article, a positive view of a sharp increase in
   many. Of course, Mr. Huang Yasheng further: or
   directly expose the true face of Chen
   Guangcheng; found that the most important
   force in China's democratic factions ---- Gu
   Xiaojun doctrine or the same as Mr. Lei Da. The
   foreign policy of "fair view" abunShitly clear
   also!
   Originally, this author really is not mortal, but
   authentic Maoist descenShit --- had been Mao
   Zedong "Hunan Hesen Hubei Huang negative
   raw" yellow Negative Health grandson, "airwaves"
   never disappear of Huang Gang's son, and Ai
   Weiwei with Yasheng Huang went to the
   American Empire in 1981 studies. , Baidu
   Encyclopedia, 2010 edition of the South
   "hundred the Archduke known" biography, very
   authentic. The obviously red three generations of
   Liuyang learning, it seems as though the whole
   people has always been a "Chinese" in general.
   Look at the Old Man, Mr. Wong's knowing
   economic theory, or useful set is also very biased
   people. My teacher Mr. Gu Xiaojun unfortunately
   not been coaching, a cavity blood, it turned into
   a Ukrainian --- spade are white torn. Such as
   Long as the dispute, such as to a people money
   initiatives, such as the U.S. policy toward China
   the Chinese people disgusted.
   Contrast Mr. Huang's Old Man, "how to bring
   democratic China" argument is not unexpected,
   in its conversations with the Chinese people ",
   has been created. Mr. Wong rehash error, blame
   his "nerd" gas, if he really did not mean to play
   the fool, then. Chinese people talk or
   recommendations to the U.S. government to
   adjust its China policy or Mr. Huang's error,
   failed to recognize the nature of things ----
   Washington's China policy is a conspiracy.
   Mr. Wong is a special foreign policy writer's
   identity, and very conceited ---- think they are
   well aware of China's Harvard professor. Indulge
   in empty talk economic theory, and not a
   speculation the blind, Ai large stay noted that
   the foreign policy of the Times, the Han three
   cheat absurd, it is somewhat surprising. Do not
   know it when Mr. Gu Xiaojun Han questioned for
   more than three years, did not know Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun more than a year of Ai Weiwei
   questioned. How you can not know Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun Chen Guangcheng "fake" expose it? This
   is alarmed Chinese Vice Foreign Minister
   personally visit Gary's blog and message of the
   big event! Even foreign policy should, by the
   mouth of the congressmen, said Chen blind
   "made history" big event ah! Do not know how
   the nerve to say that they are understanding of
   China's human children?
   Foreign policy and its false Yasheng mouth of the
   review of Washington's China strategy. Why not
   just review a long fatuous Yasheng pass headed
   diplomacy experts? Mr. Wong well done article,
   the why so has only GeshanShiiu to the people
   no benefit? Why foreign policy to make its own
   experts to look in the sitting real no a scholar
   with it? The "failure" of Washington's China
   strategy (the failure of the Chinese people, but
   it can not be denied that the success of the
   American people), to what extent is dependent
   on international affairs publication "is
   recognized as the world's most influential
   "influence?
   Can it be said: the failure of Washington and
   the strategy of China, that is judged that the
   failure of the foreign policy of China issues? This
   failure, In addition to was blinded (Yasheng this
   expert, will be blinded by it?), The missing
   elements of the foreign policy of their own
   conscience? Foreign policy will be a tax evasion
   7,000,000 Ai stay sought after as a thinker. Is
   not advocate crime?
   Of course, regardless of how democracy to China,
   "the starting point is what? In this case, the
   value published on the occasion of the Chinese
   Communist Party 18 big, I believe the real China
   or benefit. Although not laid bare the fake blind
   the true face of Chen blind, but able to
   recognize the the fakes role has been "minimal",
   can be considered slightly better than no
   progress! But have to point out is that the
   foreign policy of this article, in the progress of a
   little while. And the birth of a greater fallacy ----
   Chinese political elite certainly understand that
   democracy provides property and personal
   safety. Both of the foreign policy of the quasi-
   criminals Ai stayed hailed as thinkers, western
   democratic countries is still dominated by the
   United States Government to open the door, and
   wantonly accepted China's corrupt, the bare
   Officer relatives. All these are to instill the
   concept of China's political elite.
   But China's political elites are not fools, they
   understand that the United States and other
   Western world can help harboring stolen goods
   ill-gotten gains, and also natural understanding
   of these ill-gotten gains if they are in a
   democratic country, barely. Democratic countries,
   and tolerance for their crime, than Autocratic
   countries and more harsh. Whether Yasheng
   example, the number of Chinese Communist
   Party leaders, Crown Dali XingJu death penalty,
   can not stop the autocratic love of Chinese
   political elites. This point, the views of ordinary
   people than the Chinese foreign policy wise a
   million times: the net of impartiality, sparse and will
   drain. Eighty million troops, bad luck always just
   a handful. The key is to stand a good team, with
   the right people.
   Therefore, the foreign policy of trying to explain
   the benefits of democracy, still howling at the
   moon with the CCP's political elites. Democracy
   bad North Korea as standard authoritarian
   country would not advertised himself as a
   democratic country. Let alone see the Chinese
   political elite knowledge and more widely.
   Nevertheless, Shi Sansheng still very grateful to
   the reflection of the foreign policy. Also grateful
   to the foreign policy insincerely bravely ants
   step forward to "impartiality". If Yasheng Huang, the
   so-called China hand is not blinders seen this
   monster Gu Xiaojun doctrine. Shi Sansheng my
   thanks and gratitude, and I'm afraid it will as
   the surging Yangtze River water, rushing is not
   no way out.
   On a small step forward, Mr. Gu Xiaojun
   included into the TOP100 it! If foreign policy
   really want to promote democracy would come
   soon to the magical land.
    
   [Shi Sansheng Sunday, November 25, 2012 03:09 China]
(2012/11/24 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场