新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[To thank U.S. Foreign Policy closer to impartiality]
石三生
·左右都是一家人颜昌海窝斗孔孙
·Open letter to jury Nobel Prize
·致诺贝尔奖评委会的第二封信
·致诺贝尔奖评委会的第三封信
·Caused the third letter of the Nobel Peace Prize Jury
·可怜颜粉百多万更无一个是男儿
·保钓与爱国及转基因与女特工
·韩寒与狗及艾未未与李承鹏
·韩寒与狗及艾未未与李承鹏
·顾晓军归隐 焦国标登场
·致山东高级人民法院的公开信
·诺贝尔奖及其它
·致诺贝尔奖评委会的第四封信
·致山东高级人民法院院长的公开信
·诺贝尔与文学及其他
·让我们一起对着世界喊:噢...公正!
·感谢韩寒;一个不够!
·从李庄漏罪案到诺贝尔奖得主
·为什么公正是第一价值观
·中国人猜中了莫言获诺贝尔奖
·致瑞典国王的公开信
·致瑞典国王的第二封信
·Open letter to the King of Sweden
·致瑞典国王的第三封信
·莫言与顾晓军的差距
·瑞典国王的特使回访石三生
·致瑞典国王的第四封信
·论《打倒诺贝尔奖》
·诺贝尔文学奖的堕落与和平奖的无奈
·陈瞎子明修栈道 莫言偷袭诺贝尔
·诺奖丑闻缠身 莫言臭名远扬
·致瑞典国王的第五封信
·感谢顾晓军先生及热爱公正的人们
·公正始来 漫天雪飞
·马悦然为何爆料山东文化干部行贿
·致《外交政策》:顾晓军才是当之无愧的思想家
·马悦然与瑞典文学院很可能涉嫌诈骗
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”领先全球
·致外交政策:思想家需要前瞻更须影响力
·莫言获奖橙子虚 顾晓军拒不领情
·To “Foreign Policy”: Gu Xiaojun is worthy and Fully deserve thinkers
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”是普世价值
·To Foreign Policy: “the public impartiality is the first values” is
·马悦然唯利是图 文学奖难免龌龊
·致外交政策:请全球思想家激辩"普世价值"
·为何马悦然与诺评委主席嘴中尽是谎言
·To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer
·石三生与潍坊市政府争讼案之终结篇--国家赔偿
·致外交政策:草泥马是国骂是垃圾不是思想
·权外交政策莫学纽约时报继续出洋相
·马悦然何不劝莫言扮山东文化干部?
·问外交政策:思想是什么?
·马悦然曲线求饶 张一一甘做伪使
·Asked "foreign policy": What is the Thought?
·问外交政策:你们真关心中国人的命运吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy: Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们懂得忏悔吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy:谁敢指导十八大?
·Who dares to guide 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of Ch
·Asked Foreign Policy: You know Gu dough?
·Foreign Policy's Choice - pretended blind or pretended the fool
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们知道顾粉团吗?
·Foreign Policy的抉择—装瞎或装傻
·to TIME :数中国风云人物,勿忘顾晓军
·Foreign Policy 是否正当?
·to TIME A number of influential man in China, do not forget Gu Xiaojun
·问时代周刊:为何没有中国的思想家?
·Asked TIME: Why no Chinese thinker?
·时代周刊与阴部整容
·TIME magazine and the genital organs to face-lift
·罗姆尼是落水狗 时代周刊很像猪
·瑞典国也学会了反炒
·时代周刊与罗姆尼气疯了
·The TIME magazine and Romney angry Go berserk
·问时代周刊骗子的肉香吗?
·AskedTIME liar meaty fragrant?
·TIME 的三大骗
·特务与时局
·TIME's three big cheat
·装瞎的奥巴马与TIME
·问TIME你混得怎么样?
·Spies and the current political situation
·Disguised as blind Obama and TIME
·Asked TIME: How well do you unspoken rules?
·TIME为Obama挖了一个坑
·TIME dug a pit for Obama
·TIME正全力狙击顾晓军
·TIME is full to snipe Gu Xiaojun
·TIME是在贩卖艺术还是在贩毒?
·TIME的良知与下场
·TIME conscience and the final outcome
·Asked TIME:尔等意欲何为?
·Asked TIME: What are those of you who want to
·外交政策已知羞时代周刊仍痴迷
·温家宝总理引用屈原诗赏析
·Foreign Policy already know shame TIME still obsessed
·外交政策为何要抛弃陈光诚?
·感谢美国外交政策向公正靠拢
·To thank U.S. Foreign Policy closer to impartiality
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
To thank U.S. Foreign Policy closer to impartiality

   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group "Shi Sansheng Kyushu comment · one hundred sixty-one
    
   Translator: God has eyes
    

   See the multi-dimensional foreign policy: how to
   bring democratic China "did not pay particular
   attention to of Yasheng its people. Even in
   subsequent foreign policy why should abandon
   Chen Guangcheng, "paranoid conspiracy of
   Americans may exist.
   After some understanding of the author,
   although not clear all their doubts. But on
   foreign policy at this time the intention of this
   article, a positive view of a sharp increase in
   many. Of course, Mr. Huang Yasheng further: or
   directly expose the true face of Chen
   Guangcheng; found that the most important
   force in China's democratic factions ---- Gu
   Xiaojun doctrine or the same as Mr. Lei Da. The
   foreign policy of "fair view" abunShitly clear
   also!
   Originally, this author really is not mortal, but
   authentic Maoist descenShit --- had been Mao
   Zedong "Hunan Hesen Hubei Huang negative
   raw" yellow Negative Health grandson, "airwaves"
   never disappear of Huang Gang's son, and Ai
   Weiwei with Yasheng Huang went to the
   American Empire in 1981 studies. , Baidu
   Encyclopedia, 2010 edition of the South
   "hundred the Archduke known" biography, very
   authentic. The obviously red three generations of
   Liuyang learning, it seems as though the whole
   people has always been a "Chinese" in general.
   Look at the Old Man, Mr. Wong's knowing
   economic theory, or useful set is also very biased
   people. My teacher Mr. Gu Xiaojun unfortunately
   not been coaching, a cavity blood, it turned into
   a Ukrainian --- spade are white torn. Such as
   Long as the dispute, such as to a people money
   initiatives, such as the U.S. policy toward China
   the Chinese people disgusted.
   Contrast Mr. Huang's Old Man, "how to bring
   democratic China" argument is not unexpected,
   in its conversations with the Chinese people ",
   has been created. Mr. Wong rehash error, blame
   his "nerd" gas, if he really did not mean to play
   the fool, then. Chinese people talk or
   recommendations to the U.S. government to
   adjust its China policy or Mr. Huang's error,
   failed to recognize the nature of things ----
   Washington's China policy is a conspiracy.
   Mr. Wong is a special foreign policy writer's
   identity, and very conceited ---- think they are
   well aware of China's Harvard professor. Indulge
   in empty talk economic theory, and not a
   speculation the blind, Ai large stay noted that
   the foreign policy of the Times, the Han three
   cheat absurd, it is somewhat surprising. Do not
   know it when Mr. Gu Xiaojun Han questioned for
   more than three years, did not know Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun more than a year of Ai Weiwei
   questioned. How you can not know Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun Chen Guangcheng "fake" expose it? This
   is alarmed Chinese Vice Foreign Minister
   personally visit Gary's blog and message of the
   big event! Even foreign policy should, by the
   mouth of the congressmen, said Chen blind
   "made history" big event ah! Do not know how
   the nerve to say that they are understanding of
   China's human children?
   Foreign policy and its false Yasheng mouth of the
   review of Washington's China strategy. Why not
   just review a long fatuous Yasheng pass headed
   diplomacy experts? Mr. Wong well done article,
   the why so has only GeshanShiiu to the people
   no benefit? Why foreign policy to make its own
   experts to look in the sitting real no a scholar
   with it? The "failure" of Washington's China
   strategy (the failure of the Chinese people, but
   it can not be denied that the success of the
   American people), to what extent is dependent
   on international affairs publication "is
   recognized as the world's most influential
   "influence?
   Can it be said: the failure of Washington and
   the strategy of China, that is judged that the
   failure of the foreign policy of China issues? This
   failure, In addition to was blinded (Yasheng this
   expert, will be blinded by it?), The missing
   elements of the foreign policy of their own
   conscience? Foreign policy will be a tax evasion
   7,000,000 Ai stay sought after as a thinker. Is
   not advocate crime?
   Of course, regardless of how democracy to China,
   "the starting point is what? In this case, the
   value published on the occasion of the Chinese
   Communist Party 18 big, I believe the real China
   or benefit. Although not laid bare the fake blind
   the true face of Chen blind, but able to
   recognize the the fakes role has been "minimal",
   can be considered slightly better than no
   progress! But have to point out is that the
   foreign policy of this article, in the progress of a
   little while. And the birth of a greater fallacy ----
   Chinese political elite certainly understand that
   democracy provides property and personal
   safety. Both of the foreign policy of the quasi-
   criminals Ai stayed hailed as thinkers, western
   democratic countries is still dominated by the
   United States Government to open the door, and
   wantonly accepted China's corrupt, the bare
   Officer relatives. All these are to instill the
   concept of China's political elite.
   But China's political elites are not fools, they
   understand that the United States and other
   Western world can help harboring stolen goods
   ill-gotten gains, and also natural understanding
   of these ill-gotten gains if they are in a
   democratic country, barely. Democratic countries,
   and tolerance for their crime, than Autocratic
   countries and more harsh. Whether Yasheng
   example, the number of Chinese Communist
   Party leaders, Crown Dali XingJu death penalty,
   can not stop the autocratic love of Chinese
   political elites. This point, the views of ordinary
   people than the Chinese foreign policy wise a
   million times: the net of impartiality, sparse and will
   drain. Eighty million troops, bad luck always just
   a handful. The key is to stand a good team, with
   the right people.
   Therefore, the foreign policy of trying to explain
   the benefits of democracy, still howling at the
   moon with the CCP's political elites. Democracy
   bad North Korea as standard authoritarian
   country would not advertised himself as a
   democratic country. Let alone see the Chinese
   political elite knowledge and more widely.
   Nevertheless, Shi Sansheng still very grateful to
   the reflection of the foreign policy. Also grateful
   to the foreign policy insincerely bravely ants
   step forward to "impartiality". If Yasheng Huang, the
   so-called China hand is not blinders seen this
   monster Gu Xiaojun doctrine. Shi Sansheng my
   thanks and gratitude, and I'm afraid it will as
   the surging Yangtze River water, rushing is not
   no way out.
   On a small step forward, Mr. Gu Xiaojun
   included into the TOP100 it! If foreign policy
   really want to promote democracy would come
   soon to the magical land.
    
   [Shi Sansheng Sunday, November 25, 2012 03:09 China]
(2012/11/24 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场