新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Foreign Policy already know shame TIME still obsessed]
石三生
·左右都是一家人颜昌海窝斗孔孙
·Open letter to jury Nobel Prize
·致诺贝尔奖评委会的第二封信
·致诺贝尔奖评委会的第三封信
·Caused the third letter of the Nobel Peace Prize Jury
·可怜颜粉百多万更无一个是男儿
·保钓与爱国及转基因与女特工
·韩寒与狗及艾未未与李承鹏
·韩寒与狗及艾未未与李承鹏
·顾晓军归隐 焦国标登场
·致山东高级人民法院的公开信
·诺贝尔奖及其它
·致诺贝尔奖评委会的第四封信
·致山东高级人民法院院长的公开信
·诺贝尔与文学及其他
·让我们一起对着世界喊:噢...公正!
·感谢韩寒;一个不够!
·从李庄漏罪案到诺贝尔奖得主
·为什么公正是第一价值观
·中国人猜中了莫言获诺贝尔奖
·致瑞典国王的公开信
·致瑞典国王的第二封信
·Open letter to the King of Sweden
·致瑞典国王的第三封信
·莫言与顾晓军的差距
·瑞典国王的特使回访石三生
·致瑞典国王的第四封信
·论《打倒诺贝尔奖》
·诺贝尔文学奖的堕落与和平奖的无奈
·陈瞎子明修栈道 莫言偷袭诺贝尔
·诺奖丑闻缠身 莫言臭名远扬
·致瑞典国王的第五封信
·感谢顾晓军先生及热爱公正的人们
·公正始来 漫天雪飞
·马悦然为何爆料山东文化干部行贿
·致《外交政策》:顾晓军才是当之无愧的思想家
·马悦然与瑞典文学院很可能涉嫌诈骗
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”领先全球
·致外交政策:思想家需要前瞻更须影响力
·莫言获奖橙子虚 顾晓军拒不领情
·To “Foreign Policy”: Gu Xiaojun is worthy and Fully deserve thinkers
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”是普世价值
·To Foreign Policy: “the public impartiality is the first values” is
·马悦然唯利是图 文学奖难免龌龊
·致外交政策:请全球思想家激辩"普世价值"
·为何马悦然与诺评委主席嘴中尽是谎言
·To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer
·石三生与潍坊市政府争讼案之终结篇--国家赔偿
·致外交政策:草泥马是国骂是垃圾不是思想
·权外交政策莫学纽约时报继续出洋相
·马悦然何不劝莫言扮山东文化干部?
·问外交政策:思想是什么?
·马悦然曲线求饶 张一一甘做伪使
·Asked "foreign policy": What is the Thought?
·问外交政策:你们真关心中国人的命运吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy: Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们懂得忏悔吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy:谁敢指导十八大?
·Who dares to guide 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of Ch
·Asked Foreign Policy: You know Gu dough?
·Foreign Policy's Choice - pretended blind or pretended the fool
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们知道顾粉团吗?
·Foreign Policy的抉择—装瞎或装傻
·to TIME :数中国风云人物,勿忘顾晓军
·Foreign Policy 是否正当?
·to TIME A number of influential man in China, do not forget Gu Xiaojun
·问时代周刊:为何没有中国的思想家?
·Asked TIME: Why no Chinese thinker?
·时代周刊与阴部整容
·TIME magazine and the genital organs to face-lift
·罗姆尼是落水狗 时代周刊很像猪
·瑞典国也学会了反炒
·时代周刊与罗姆尼气疯了
·The TIME magazine and Romney angry Go berserk
·问时代周刊骗子的肉香吗?
·AskedTIME liar meaty fragrant?
·TIME 的三大骗
·特务与时局
·TIME's three big cheat
·装瞎的奥巴马与TIME
·问TIME你混得怎么样?
·Spies and the current political situation
·Disguised as blind Obama and TIME
·Asked TIME: How well do you unspoken rules?
·TIME为Obama挖了一个坑
·TIME dug a pit for Obama
·TIME正全力狙击顾晓军
·TIME is full to snipe Gu Xiaojun
·TIME是在贩卖艺术还是在贩毒?
·TIME的良知与下场
·TIME conscience and the final outcome
·Asked TIME:尔等意欲何为?
·Asked TIME: What are those of you who want to
·外交政策已知羞时代周刊仍痴迷
·温家宝总理引用屈原诗赏析
·Foreign Policy already know shame TIME still obsessed
·外交政策为何要抛弃陈光诚?
·感谢美国外交政策向公正靠拢
·To thank U.S. Foreign Policy closer to impartiality
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Foreign Policy already know shame TIME still obsessed

   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials 18 hundred people group "Shi Sansheng Kyushu comment · one hundred Fifty-eight
    
   Translator: God has eyes
    

   Foreign Policy see Multidimensional a "foreign
   policy: how to bring democracy to China",
   understand that this is in the slope, prepare the
   ass.
   The article says: "The United States should
   adopt a new way to influence China's future
   political: to explain democracy will bring
   concrete benefits, such as more balanced growth,
   stability and personal security - even for senior
   Communist party officials. Based arguments of
   the results will be the recognition of the many
   economic and intellectual elite, may have the
   opportunity to influence the ideas of President Xi
   Jinping and his staff. "
   The article also said: "The Chinese people very
   utilitarian concept of" rights "- they seek to
   maximize the interests of the majority - Western
   point of view of the rights of the latter think that
   this is to protect the minority who lost
   citizenship erosion even the most critical of
   Beijing intellectuals also admit that the idea of
   Chen​​ and other dissidents in China's 1.3 billion
   can only get minimal response. "
   The Times also learned in the previous point,
   but unfortunately foreign policy, with help
   Obama to identify a group of mounted blind fool
   dead liar do voice. If I had to introduce
   ourselves to listen to Mr. Gu Xiaojun Gu Xiaojun
   doctrine is selected to do the think tank (see
   "Chinese Obama"). Ho As for today understand
   that the so-called universal values with​​ no
   hanging hair? Now want to explain what
   "democracy" in Communist China, late Sanqiu!
   Chinese Communists really good deeds, like
   political reform, Mr. Gu Xiaojun own local big
   thinkers "populist democracy", "justice is the
   first values" out of the box. Why should we take
   your pants fart ---- abandoned German horse to
   ride it to find an American donkey.
   After that foreign policy is not so much what 1.3
   billion Chinese people do not trust the dissident
   Chen Guangcheng and his ilk do not respond.
   Why not dare to openly admit that they know are
   wrong, know no shame, know Chan blind ilk
   really is no one with like garbage? Why not dare
   admit Chen blind man and his ilk, was originally
   a spokesperson of the Western world, the elites
   of the Western countries for a bargaining chip
   with the Chinese elite, is a democratic process to
   establish the partnership repressor stumbling
   block?
   But lately, Chen blind fled to the United States
   foreignEmbassy, ​​ policy also does not leave the
   mouth of U.S. Congressman Frank Wolf, yelling
   "went to the United States to stand up for its
   ideals moment" it? Shit ideals of the United
   States? Not that the "interests"! The foreign
   policy dare Furthermore, laid bare the true face
   of Chen Guangcheng fake blind?
   Where is Chen Guangcheng minimal impact on
   you! Mr. Gu Xiaojun first questioned, tell the
   world the Chinese people already know that
   Chen Guangcheng is a "fake", followed Piandao
   Shou / dog / day / then the Nobel Peace Prize.
   I'm afraid that influence is not negligible, right?
   Of course, foreign policy shy, in the end is to say
   the fact that Chen blind has become a rags. Stay
   in the United States, and sooner or later a
   bomb. Want to return to China, I'm afraid to be
   prohibitively difficult! Shi Sansheng Masters
   want me pointing you look at it?
   Chinese people like Yang tattered. With a
   German horse, is already within the shame of
   not. A few years ago, Wu Bangguo adults on
   straight said "not to engage in five", which
   means that Western-style democracy, the CCP
   has cover from the ears, and no longer listen to.
   I do not want to hear, people have stuffed her
   ears with donkey hair, you still think that the
   interpretation of "democracy" with others, have
   Alex use? This is clearly not want to fall on deaf
   ears!
   Now is that the United States if you want to also
   hold "democratic" Fudge Chinese people, only to
   start all over again. The fake not useful, why not
   try to go fight it? Gu Xiaojun doctrine advocated
   "justice is the first values" populist democracy,
   has been the world's default. Even Communist
   China are as if pierced brains have to Gu Xiaojun
   'pain killer. So, foreign policy, why not
   abandoned its own Western-style "democracy"
   that change sub-Spear, attack sub Shield: with
   TIME, Mr. Gu Xiaojun included into the TOP 100
   TIME 100?
   As Mr. Gu Gu Xiaojun political Minutes (b)
   "said:" the most fundamental interests of the
   American people, is the maintenance of
   democratic institutions, and the promotion of
   democratic institutions and the purpose of
   promoting or maintaining this world as long as
   there are shaped the same fascist militarism
   system, at any time may appear war engulfed
   the fruits of democracy. "so straightforward truth
   presumably foreign policy with the Times is not
   difficult to understand it? However, if the
   "tantamount to fascist militarism system" nipped
   in the bud, in addition to the promotion of
   democracy, there are more effective means of?
   Both Shashi Hou, and also thinking about talking
   endlessly to "explain"! Fooled dozens of overload,
   this made little actual action?
    
   [Shi Sansheng Friday, November 23, 2012 5:37 China]
(2012/11/23 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场