新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Foreign Policy already know shame TIME still obsessed]
石三生
·匪夷所思
·信力健或成人权新样本
·莫须有的罪名 莫须有的人权
·请奥巴马入瓮
·“窝里斗”及其他
·再谈“窝里斗”及其他
·三谈“窝里斗”及其他
·四谈“窝里斗”及其他
·五谈“窝里斗”及其他---兼答卢德素
·七谈“窝里斗”及其他---兼答卢德素
·十谈“窝里斗”及其他之“李嘉诚跑了”
·李嘉诚的“愚昧”论不知所云
·共产无望 共妻有戏
· “共妻”论反进化
·“共妻”论缺德
·“共妻”论反文明
·也谈“一场豪赌”
·他们在为谁做嫁衣?
·莫言为何不愿见“佛”?
·中纪委为何不管管莫言?
·习总的讲话为何不提莫言?
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?(二)
·也谈“习总的书单”
·百度机器人或建议腐败们早跳楼
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?(三)
·乱伦----是一种文明
·也谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·习办或闭目塞听
·再谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·三谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·我为什么咬定莫言?
·“三个代表”高风险
·“精准扶贫”或是梦
·无梦---兼答卢德素
·“特赦贪官”不如放弃“三个代表”
·“马会韩”后“习马会”
·“放开二胎”要感谢莫言?
·最不可琢磨的汉语言
·财新网为何不敌巩义法院枉判
·财新网为何不敌巩义法院枉判(二)
·财新网为何不敌巩义法院枉判(三)
·日本人更懂中国
·日本人最懂中国
·“双十一”、打假与打虎
·我的洋鬼子朋友杨恒均
·我的洋鬼子朋友杨恒均(二)
·“白毛女”或与“依法治国”相左
·莫曹杨与《打倒鲁迅》
·鲁迅与洋人杨恒均
·中央网信办为何不自信?
·杨恒均与“王的女人”将如何逆转?
·“三个自信”滋养腐败
·IS的乌托邦与周主席的“中国梦”
·张艺谋与韩寒心有灵犀
·王健林禁妄议 王思聪很惜玉
·公正如画、强拆似虎、腐败在继续
·请孙政才书记宣讲公正
·请允许我跟着李敖喊“万岁”
·请允许我跟着李敖挺圣战
·李敖老矣 唯言不休(复旦版)
·李敖还敢掀起一场中西文化论战吗?
·顾腚难顾头的文明---李敖清华演讲赏析
·左撇子的李敖不懂普世价值
·胡耀邦是怎样离开的人间?
·李敖宣布起义,北大怎么办?
·莫言的末日论与李敖的千年愿
·从中国第二大重要新闻说起
·从纽约时报整版赞习说起
·法官指天发誓启示录(二)
·法官指天发誓启示录
·高瑜认罪—一场游戏又一场梦
·杨恒均的好日子或快到头
·2016起,中国将成地球第一谎言强国
·杨恒均与石三生,谁是白痴?
·释永信无私生女 调查组或有私情
·顾晓军民主奖---一个让精英羞愧的奖
·释延洁呓语西天 中国梦泛滥成灾
·中共到底迷信不迷信?
·建言中共修改宪法序言
·建言人大修改宪法宣誓词
·刘晓庆逃税还是“逃睡”?
·新政为何笑冤不笑贫?
·笑谈李庄诉中青报案
·笑谈李庄诉中青报案
·笑谈贺卫方代理李庄诉中青报案
·思鸡肋弃阿斗 哈罗李敖或归隐
·被贺卫方、李庄们玩残了的法律
·被莫言、李敖们玩残了的文学
·国务院管鸟事比管人事更靠谱
·贪官与鸟齐赞河南法治好
·邓亚萍试水政法 公平正义似乒乓
·邓亚萍试水政法 公平正义似乒乓
·柴静是编剧雾霾是天气;“公正第一”才是思想
·河南法治动物为救少林寺?
·政法大学出尔反尔 邓亚萍进退两难
·邓亚萍兼职政法大学教授是腐败
·李冰冰卖萌 孔子学院无人睬
·政法大学越描越黑 邓亚萍免费获诽谤
·猜猜邓亚萍的金牌与博士那个真?
·邓亚萍的清华学士文凭或造假
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Foreign Policy already know shame TIME still obsessed

   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials 18 hundred people group "Shi Sansheng Kyushu comment · one hundred Fifty-eight
    
   Translator: God has eyes
    

   Foreign Policy see Multidimensional a "foreign
   policy: how to bring democracy to China",
   understand that this is in the slope, prepare the
   ass.
   The article says: "The United States should
   adopt a new way to influence China's future
   political: to explain democracy will bring
   concrete benefits, such as more balanced growth,
   stability and personal security - even for senior
   Communist party officials. Based arguments of
   the results will be the recognition of the many
   economic and intellectual elite, may have the
   opportunity to influence the ideas of President Xi
   Jinping and his staff. "
   The article also said: "The Chinese people very
   utilitarian concept of" rights "- they seek to
   maximize the interests of the majority - Western
   point of view of the rights of the latter think that
   this is to protect the minority who lost
   citizenship erosion even the most critical of
   Beijing intellectuals also admit that the idea of
   Chen​​ and other dissidents in China's 1.3 billion
   can only get minimal response. "
   The Times also learned in the previous point,
   but unfortunately foreign policy, with help
   Obama to identify a group of mounted blind fool
   dead liar do voice. If I had to introduce
   ourselves to listen to Mr. Gu Xiaojun Gu Xiaojun
   doctrine is selected to do the think tank (see
   "Chinese Obama"). Ho As for today understand
   that the so-called universal values with​​ no
   hanging hair? Now want to explain what
   "democracy" in Communist China, late Sanqiu!
   Chinese Communists really good deeds, like
   political reform, Mr. Gu Xiaojun own local big
   thinkers "populist democracy", "justice is the
   first values" out of the box. Why should we take
   your pants fart ---- abandoned German horse to
   ride it to find an American donkey.
   After that foreign policy is not so much what 1.3
   billion Chinese people do not trust the dissident
   Chen Guangcheng and his ilk do not respond.
   Why not dare to openly admit that they know are
   wrong, know no shame, know Chan blind ilk
   really is no one with like garbage? Why not dare
   admit Chen blind man and his ilk, was originally
   a spokesperson of the Western world, the elites
   of the Western countries for a bargaining chip
   with the Chinese elite, is a democratic process to
   establish the partnership repressor stumbling
   block?
   But lately, Chen blind fled to the United States
   foreignEmbassy, ​​ policy also does not leave the
   mouth of U.S. Congressman Frank Wolf, yelling
   "went to the United States to stand up for its
   ideals moment" it? Shit ideals of the United
   States? Not that the "interests"! The foreign
   policy dare Furthermore, laid bare the true face
   of Chen Guangcheng fake blind?
   Where is Chen Guangcheng minimal impact on
   you! Mr. Gu Xiaojun first questioned, tell the
   world the Chinese people already know that
   Chen Guangcheng is a "fake", followed Piandao
   Shou / dog / day / then the Nobel Peace Prize.
   I'm afraid that influence is not negligible, right?
   Of course, foreign policy shy, in the end is to say
   the fact that Chen blind has become a rags. Stay
   in the United States, and sooner or later a
   bomb. Want to return to China, I'm afraid to be
   prohibitively difficult! Shi Sansheng Masters
   want me pointing you look at it?
   Chinese people like Yang tattered. With a
   German horse, is already within the shame of
   not. A few years ago, Wu Bangguo adults on
   straight said "not to engage in five", which
   means that Western-style democracy, the CCP
   has cover from the ears, and no longer listen to.
   I do not want to hear, people have stuffed her
   ears with donkey hair, you still think that the
   interpretation of "democracy" with others, have
   Alex use? This is clearly not want to fall on deaf
   ears!
   Now is that the United States if you want to also
   hold "democratic" Fudge Chinese people, only to
   start all over again. The fake not useful, why not
   try to go fight it? Gu Xiaojun doctrine advocated
   "justice is the first values" populist democracy,
   has been the world's default. Even Communist
   China are as if pierced brains have to Gu Xiaojun
   'pain killer. So, foreign policy, why not
   abandoned its own Western-style "democracy"
   that change sub-Spear, attack sub Shield: with
   TIME, Mr. Gu Xiaojun included into the TOP 100
   TIME 100?
   As Mr. Gu Gu Xiaojun political Minutes (b)
   "said:" the most fundamental interests of the
   American people, is the maintenance of
   democratic institutions, and the promotion of
   democratic institutions and the purpose of
   promoting or maintaining this world as long as
   there are shaped the same fascist militarism
   system, at any time may appear war engulfed
   the fruits of democracy. "so straightforward truth
   presumably foreign policy with the Times is not
   difficult to understand it? However, if the
   "tantamount to fascist militarism system" nipped
   in the bud, in addition to the promotion of
   democracy, there are more effective means of?
   Both Shashi Hou, and also thinking about talking
   endlessly to "explain"! Fooled dozens of overload,
   this made little actual action?
    
   [Shi Sansheng Friday, November 23, 2012 5:37 China]
(2012/11/23 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场