新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Asked TIME: Why no Chinese thinker?]
石三生
·云南坐13年冤狱的女孩不值得同情
·奥运冠军与东亚病夫
·鲁迅真是间谍吗?
·周小平的智力是否正常?
·不服就试试:一个你绝对会答错的社会问题
·周小平认为:大飞机前景堪忧
·除了天才周小平,没有人可以答对
·通过周小平现象管窥《白毛女》
·推荐顾晓军兼批判重庆缺“公正”论
·习、马倡导和平,不如习、顾共逐诺奖
·推荐蔡英文、顾晓军联袂共逐诺奖
·习、马视为鸡肋;顾、蔡如获至宝
·“依法治国”有时比流感阴毒
·国务院一边减政一边集权
·代习先生辩:“有付出,就会有收获”
·石三生新年献词:梦里寻梦又一年
·石三生新年献词:梦里寻梦又一年
·无锡强拆继续 永康狱中难安
·向习近平主席推荐顾晓军
·南大校长周文斌被判无期冤不冤?
·驳莫言的“两个基本判断”
·公开推荐顾晓军角逐2016年诺贝尔和平奖
·两个台湾女人搅了国共两党的好梦
·三个台湾女人唱大戏
·毛泽东为何没得诺贝尔和平奖?
·推荐顾晓军、蔡英文获诺奖是民意
·用周小平思想统一中国
·可能是史上最乌龙的香港罪犯
·为民告官胜诉率为零的上海欢呼
·周小平主席要开杀戒?
·习总为何不注重民意?
·周小平主席期冀“台独”
·向蔡英文主席推荐“公正第一”
·从周小平主席到蜀国皇帝刘备
·周小平比鲁迅更伟大
·没有选择的蔡英文
·猜猜周小平主席有没有睡艺人?
·周小平主席应该是“周家人”
·两会为何不互联网+?
·孙立平先生的“公约数论”太梦幻
·蔡英文借他山之玉 周小平祸国殃民
·周小平若不反击就太无耻了
·周小平骂两会代表陈光标是小人
·报告孟建柱:草民的“获得感”这个样
·指导一下中国长安网遣词造句
·指导一下中国长安网遣词造句
·周小平啥样,央视就啥样
·“二妻”谣言不可笑 政协委员荒唐多
·周小平造谣是文明 网民造谣被刑拘
·周小平很生气 蔡英文要受苦
·周小平主席恨台湾而爱日本
·习总为何在政法会上讲“忧患”?
·晴天霹雳---周小平首倡“中国梦”
·罗援若武统 民主做先锋
·石三生与小粉红
·周小平主席力助周涛重掌春晚?
·石三生将编、导史诗巨制《三周魂销》
·小粉红坚壁清野 顾晓军枉费心机
·小粉红与赵忠祥也有一腿?
·小粉红己身不修,何以平天下?
·小粉红越界刷屏 蔡英文应对失措
·周涛若复出,春晚必成史上最艳夜
·扬言武统的罗援少将是逃兵?
·周涛复出主春晚 韩国议长悔不迭
·国台办耍金箍棒 蔡英文偷着乐
· 小粉红旁敲侧击 问世间何为正道
·鲁迅不倒 天理难容
·绝对奇迹--比平邑矿难更奇的山东奇迹
·可怜的鲁迅,可悲的语文
·一百年间两二货:周小平与周树人
·问孟建柱:政法委也不能干预司法吗?
·辛亥革命百年后,人民开始怀念慈禧
·央视春晚弃有污点演员,却用艳荡的主持
·李克强舍近求远为哪般
·国务院管不好住,能管好农民的嘴吗?
·抗议谷歌、抗议网络流氓
·给国务院并织金县纪委献一策
·温家宝是一个好总理吗?
·报告习总:这里有一个被丢下的贫困群众
·博客中国意欲何为?
·金正恩到底打了谁一耳光?
·冤狱23年的陈满之高尚羞煞窦娥
·云南、海南与福建三起冤案统一口径为哪般?
·陈满的境界与邓小平一般高
·如此司法进步
·有意思:周小平说方兴东是个大忽悠
·台湾地震了,春晚还演吗?
·欲加“武威三记者”之罪,何患无辞
·台湾地震与安倍及春晚
·周小平是谁的国师?
·春晚与正能量
·团中央“娱乐化”一瞥
·若老能养老,干部能养干部吗?
·龙应台与周小平的暧昧令人作呕
·龙应台的轻佻与虚伪
·谁“伪造”了龙应台的两份声明?
·谁是龙应台的后台?
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(序)
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(一)
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(二)
·龙应台为周小平已神魂颠倒
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Asked TIME: Why no Chinese thinker?

   
   
   Asked TIME: Why no Chinese thinker?
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng the Kyushu Comments • The one hundred forty-three

   
   
   
   Translator:God has eyes
   
   
   
   See the TIME100, surprising divided into five
   categories, one of which is the "Scientists &
   Thinkers", it was an accident. More unexpected
   ranked "Foreign Policy" "TOP 100 Global
   Thinkers" thinkers, without exception, are
   excluded from the TIME100 the Thinkers.
   Talk about the importance, TIME and Foreign
   Policy are famous publications in the United
   States, what President Obama said, "universal
   values" really exists. These two publications at
   least should have about the same values?
   Especially are the eyes of the Americans, how
   would generate so much different?
   Clearly, Americans TIME vision, Han is just a
   person "Artists & Entertainers"; look at the
   American Foreign Policy vision, Han Han
   entertainment industry is actually the world's
   top thinkers. As you said, it's not nonsense, get
   Chinese people to make fun of you! More
   absurd, both the "Times" or "foreign policy", the
   reasons for their inclusion are relevant to what
   Han Han's blog click-through rate. If this theory,
   TIME and Foreign Policy editors are blind? Sina
   blog CTR highest nor Han Han, but some shares
   childcare ah! Not brokerage childcare should be
   selected for the TIME 100 TOP100?
   In on Shi Sansheng I also thought: the reason
   why Time magazine selected Chinese thinkers,
   most likely because of their own limitations, no
   real match "thinkers" in China. That being the
   case, why do not I TIME again to recommend
   even owned all the eighty million Chinese
   Communists are afraid to sleepless nights of big
   thinkers --- Mr. Gu Xiaojun.
   First, I have to admit, TIME choice, should not
   the Chinese system thinkers. Fool knows: the
   Chinese Communist Party in Marx's Marxism
   German guy started thinking, then how the
   founding characteristics, have failed to get rid of
   the magic spell of Mazhu Yi. So how could there
   own thoughts. Foreign Policy Han, Ai Weiwei and
   his ilk selection thinkers practice, in addition to
   the ridiculous to the extreme, there is no other
   word can describe. Either no thinkers; have only
   outside the system, outside the mainstream of
   society, or the Chinese Communist Party to
   abandon Marxism.
   Outside the system, the only way to have their
   own system of thought (covered by the new
   philosophy, political science, economics,
   literature), not only in theory, far-sighted, reality
   can withstand the bumps the only "Gu Xiaojun
   doctrine.
   Gu Xiaojun how profound doctrine, its highly
   Interrogation even death threats "who start
   political reform who supported, Baidu headlines
   Communist China 48 major topics in political
   reform has now become afraid of risk fear.
   Despite the Chinese Communists Zhefan still
   inevitable Fudge of ingredients, but after all, is
   aware of the risk of no longer hesitated just
   steadily. Since Mao Zedong's founding of the
   Chinese people on Wishing democracy best
   suited. Also continue to stay at the helm, set
   the expense of the interests of the people, it is
   justified.
   CCP's political reform will be afraid of the fear of
   risk "also confirms Mr. Gu speculate eighteen
   big" said: "there is a resolution, that is political
   reform (single row, eighteen major report in of a
   portion may be larger) "?
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun thinking profound obsession and
   concern for the people. Overseas democracy
   movement Yi Diesheng of clamoring for the Mid-
   Autumn Uprising "standing on the sidelines,
   rose rebuked / dog / day / we do not want to
   hurt their own hairs, but delusions to confuse
   the people of the continent to act as their
   cannon fodder. Gu Xiaojun 'people-oriented, "not
   opposed to the revolution, do not advocate the
   sacrifice". China is not not revolution. Chinese
   revolution, not leather head, but leather ideas
   of predestination. "Chinese revolution, is the
   territory of the netizens can without hesitation,
   everyone can participate in the revolution" (see
   Gu Xiaojun doctrine: changing one thousand
   eight hundred twenty-one China • Chinese
   revolution ").
   Gu Xiaojun 'sail from the end of 2008, the
   situation will be in 2012 and reveal its
   unparalleled wisdom, and the end of May, the
   article predicted the Chinese Communists
   eighteen large list of seven of the Standing
   Committee ", raised the media involved in the
   world an uproar, not only a direct result of easy
   to master Beijing Ferrari car accident in March,
   former state leaders alerted false appearance of
   news from time to time to eliminate the
   "negative" impact.
   Gu Xiaojun Marxism and non only its one an
   article holding the nose of the media around the
   world to go. The face of such influence is not
   enough to enter the original not divided into
   good and evil TIME100, even TIME100 in the
   "thinkers" 20 it?
   Such a face of China's "three years have seen
   the greatest changes, estimate: Foreign Policy is
   a bimonthly original tail disaster to make a U-
   turn, Lost harder to return, it is difficult to catch
   this wave of far-reaching ideological revolution in
   the TOP100.
   TIME is weekly, another TIME Asia Edition,
   publication and distribution of land in Hong
   Kong, China. Siwei Ken refused civilized climate,
   geography is ready, he sent the decision makers
   are stubborn, willing to adults up to himself
   borrowed "three years have seen a big change,"
   China Dongfeng icing on the cake for the human
   civilization, into a big step.
   
   
   
   [Shi Sansheng Thursday, November 8, 2012 6:42 China](2012/11/07)
(2012/11/08 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场