新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Asked TIME: Why no Chinese thinker?]
石三生
·诺贝尔与文学及其他
·让我们一起对着世界喊:噢...公正!
·感谢韩寒;一个不够!
·从李庄漏罪案到诺贝尔奖得主
·为什么公正是第一价值观
·中国人猜中了莫言获诺贝尔奖
·致瑞典国王的公开信
·致瑞典国王的第二封信
·Open letter to the King of Sweden
·致瑞典国王的第三封信
·莫言与顾晓军的差距
·瑞典国王的特使回访石三生
·致瑞典国王的第四封信
·论《打倒诺贝尔奖》
·诺贝尔文学奖的堕落与和平奖的无奈
·陈瞎子明修栈道 莫言偷袭诺贝尔
·诺奖丑闻缠身 莫言臭名远扬
·致瑞典国王的第五封信
·感谢顾晓军先生及热爱公正的人们
·公正始来 漫天雪飞
·马悦然为何爆料山东文化干部行贿
·致《外交政策》:顾晓军才是当之无愧的思想家
·马悦然与瑞典文学院很可能涉嫌诈骗
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”领先全球
·致外交政策:思想家需要前瞻更须影响力
·莫言获奖橙子虚 顾晓军拒不领情
·To “Foreign Policy”: Gu Xiaojun is worthy and Fully deserve thinkers
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”是普世价值
·To Foreign Policy: “the public impartiality is the first values” is
·马悦然唯利是图 文学奖难免龌龊
·致外交政策:请全球思想家激辩"普世价值"
·为何马悦然与诺评委主席嘴中尽是谎言
·To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer
·石三生与潍坊市政府争讼案之终结篇--国家赔偿
·致外交政策:草泥马是国骂是垃圾不是思想
·权外交政策莫学纽约时报继续出洋相
·马悦然何不劝莫言扮山东文化干部?
·问外交政策:思想是什么?
·马悦然曲线求饶 张一一甘做伪使
·Asked "foreign policy": What is the Thought?
·问外交政策:你们真关心中国人的命运吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy: Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们懂得忏悔吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy:谁敢指导十八大?
·Who dares to guide 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of Ch
·Asked Foreign Policy: You know Gu dough?
·Foreign Policy's Choice - pretended blind or pretended the fool
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们知道顾粉团吗?
·Foreign Policy的抉择—装瞎或装傻
·to TIME :数中国风云人物,勿忘顾晓军
·Foreign Policy 是否正当?
·to TIME A number of influential man in China, do not forget Gu Xiaojun
·问时代周刊:为何没有中国的思想家?
·Asked TIME: Why no Chinese thinker?
·时代周刊与阴部整容
·TIME magazine and the genital organs to face-lift
·罗姆尼是落水狗 时代周刊很像猪
·瑞典国也学会了反炒
·时代周刊与罗姆尼气疯了
·The TIME magazine and Romney angry Go berserk
·问时代周刊骗子的肉香吗?
·AskedTIME liar meaty fragrant?
·TIME 的三大骗
·特务与时局
·TIME's three big cheat
·装瞎的奥巴马与TIME
·问TIME你混得怎么样?
·Spies and the current political situation
·Disguised as blind Obama and TIME
·Asked TIME: How well do you unspoken rules?
·TIME为Obama挖了一个坑
·TIME dug a pit for Obama
·TIME正全力狙击顾晓军
·TIME is full to snipe Gu Xiaojun
·TIME是在贩卖艺术还是在贩毒?
·TIME的良知与下场
·TIME conscience and the final outcome
·Asked TIME:尔等意欲何为?
·Asked TIME: What are those of you who want to
·外交政策已知羞时代周刊仍痴迷
·温家宝总理引用屈原诗赏析
·Foreign Policy already know shame TIME still obsessed
·外交政策为何要抛弃陈光诚?
·感谢美国外交政策向公正靠拢
·To thank U.S. Foreign Policy closer to impartiality
·与好争辩的美国外交政策专家谈谈
·With the like argue's U.S.Foreign Policy experts to talk
·热烈祝贺外交政策继续装傻
·顾晓军大败美国外交政策
·Warmly congratulate the foreign policy continues to play the fool
·Time 龌龊之极obama 牙白心黑
·Gu Xiaojun defeated American foreign policy
·时代风云人物—全球顶级思想家顾晓军
·Time the dirty extremely obama the teeth white heart black
·Times influential man - the world's top thinkers Gu Xiaojun
·风云人物顾晓军反智先锋数时代
·外交政策真白痴 时代风云已式微
·Influential man Gu Xiaojun Anti intellectualism pioneer is TIME
·"Foreign Policy" true idiot, "TIME" already fading
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Asked TIME: Why no Chinese thinker?

   
   
   Asked TIME: Why no Chinese thinker?
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng the Kyushu Comments • The one hundred forty-three

   
   
   
   Translator:God has eyes
   
   
   
   See the TIME100, surprising divided into five
   categories, one of which is the "Scientists &
   Thinkers", it was an accident. More unexpected
   ranked "Foreign Policy" "TOP 100 Global
   Thinkers" thinkers, without exception, are
   excluded from the TIME100 the Thinkers.
   Talk about the importance, TIME and Foreign
   Policy are famous publications in the United
   States, what President Obama said, "universal
   values" really exists. These two publications at
   least should have about the same values?
   Especially are the eyes of the Americans, how
   would generate so much different?
   Clearly, Americans TIME vision, Han is just a
   person "Artists & Entertainers"; look at the
   American Foreign Policy vision, Han Han
   entertainment industry is actually the world's
   top thinkers. As you said, it's not nonsense, get
   Chinese people to make fun of you! More
   absurd, both the "Times" or "foreign policy", the
   reasons for their inclusion are relevant to what
   Han Han's blog click-through rate. If this theory,
   TIME and Foreign Policy editors are blind? Sina
   blog CTR highest nor Han Han, but some shares
   childcare ah! Not brokerage childcare should be
   selected for the TIME 100 TOP100?
   In on Shi Sansheng I also thought: the reason
   why Time magazine selected Chinese thinkers,
   most likely because of their own limitations, no
   real match "thinkers" in China. That being the
   case, why do not I TIME again to recommend
   even owned all the eighty million Chinese
   Communists are afraid to sleepless nights of big
   thinkers --- Mr. Gu Xiaojun.
   First, I have to admit, TIME choice, should not
   the Chinese system thinkers. Fool knows: the
   Chinese Communist Party in Marx's Marxism
   German guy started thinking, then how the
   founding characteristics, have failed to get rid of
   the magic spell of Mazhu Yi. So how could there
   own thoughts. Foreign Policy Han, Ai Weiwei and
   his ilk selection thinkers practice, in addition to
   the ridiculous to the extreme, there is no other
   word can describe. Either no thinkers; have only
   outside the system, outside the mainstream of
   society, or the Chinese Communist Party to
   abandon Marxism.
   Outside the system, the only way to have their
   own system of thought (covered by the new
   philosophy, political science, economics,
   literature), not only in theory, far-sighted, reality
   can withstand the bumps the only "Gu Xiaojun
   doctrine.
   Gu Xiaojun how profound doctrine, its highly
   Interrogation even death threats "who start
   political reform who supported, Baidu headlines
   Communist China 48 major topics in political
   reform has now become afraid of risk fear.
   Despite the Chinese Communists Zhefan still
   inevitable Fudge of ingredients, but after all, is
   aware of the risk of no longer hesitated just
   steadily. Since Mao Zedong's founding of the
   Chinese people on Wishing democracy best
   suited. Also continue to stay at the helm, set
   the expense of the interests of the people, it is
   justified.
   CCP's political reform will be afraid of the fear of
   risk "also confirms Mr. Gu speculate eighteen
   big" said: "there is a resolution, that is political
   reform (single row, eighteen major report in of a
   portion may be larger) "?
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun thinking profound obsession and
   concern for the people. Overseas democracy
   movement Yi Diesheng of clamoring for the Mid-
   Autumn Uprising "standing on the sidelines,
   rose rebuked / dog / day / we do not want to
   hurt their own hairs, but delusions to confuse
   the people of the continent to act as their
   cannon fodder. Gu Xiaojun 'people-oriented, "not
   opposed to the revolution, do not advocate the
   sacrifice". China is not not revolution. Chinese
   revolution, not leather head, but leather ideas
   of predestination. "Chinese revolution, is the
   territory of the netizens can without hesitation,
   everyone can participate in the revolution" (see
   Gu Xiaojun doctrine: changing one thousand
   eight hundred twenty-one China • Chinese
   revolution ").
   Gu Xiaojun 'sail from the end of 2008, the
   situation will be in 2012 and reveal its
   unparalleled wisdom, and the end of May, the
   article predicted the Chinese Communists
   eighteen large list of seven of the Standing
   Committee ", raised the media involved in the
   world an uproar, not only a direct result of easy
   to master Beijing Ferrari car accident in March,
   former state leaders alerted false appearance of
   news from time to time to eliminate the
   "negative" impact.
   Gu Xiaojun Marxism and non only its one an
   article holding the nose of the media around the
   world to go. The face of such influence is not
   enough to enter the original not divided into
   good and evil TIME100, even TIME100 in the
   "thinkers" 20 it?
   Such a face of China's "three years have seen
   the greatest changes, estimate: Foreign Policy is
   a bimonthly original tail disaster to make a U-
   turn, Lost harder to return, it is difficult to catch
   this wave of far-reaching ideological revolution in
   the TOP100.
   TIME is weekly, another TIME Asia Edition,
   publication and distribution of land in Hong
   Kong, China. Siwei Ken refused civilized climate,
   geography is ready, he sent the decision makers
   are stubborn, willing to adults up to himself
   borrowed "three years have seen a big change,"
   China Dongfeng icing on the cake for the human
   civilization, into a big step.
   
   
   
   [Shi Sansheng Thursday, November 8, 2012 6:42 China](2012/11/07)
(2012/11/08 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场