新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?]
石三生
·“泰坦尼克”与“东方之星”
·中纪委的回应很莫名
·中纪委的回应很莫名
·搅局与设局
·政府作孽 百姓遭殃
·请教牛泪:人类社会如何进步?
·明的癣疥脓疮呢?
·洋人与二奶
·乱lun
·爱迪生的心思 杨振宁与莫言不懂
·顾晓军与杨恒均的“社会观”
·李开复画蛇添足
·搅局与设局(二)
·杨恒均或保王林脱难
·释永信跳进黄河 王林案悄然降温
·“打虎”与我何关?
·王胜俊与“女业主被当众扒裤”
·毕福剑与杨恒均
·莫言有罪
·莫言的难言之隐
·匪夷所思
·信力健或成人权新样本
·莫须有的罪名 莫须有的人权
·请奥巴马入瓮
·“窝里斗”及其他
·再谈“窝里斗”及其他
·三谈“窝里斗”及其他
·四谈“窝里斗”及其他
·五谈“窝里斗”及其他---兼答卢德素
·七谈“窝里斗”及其他---兼答卢德素
·十谈“窝里斗”及其他之“李嘉诚跑了”
·李嘉诚的“愚昧”论不知所云
·共产无望 共妻有戏
· “共妻”论反进化
·“共妻”论缺德
·“共妻”论反文明
·也谈“一场豪赌”
·他们在为谁做嫁衣?
·莫言为何不愿见“佛”?
·中纪委为何不管管莫言?
·习总的讲话为何不提莫言?
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?(二)
·也谈“习总的书单”
·百度机器人或建议腐败们早跳楼
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?(三)
·乱伦----是一种文明
·也谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·习办或闭目塞听
·再谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·三谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·我为什么咬定莫言?
·“三个代表”高风险
·“精准扶贫”或是梦
·无梦---兼答卢德素
·“特赦贪官”不如放弃“三个代表”
·“马会韩”后“习马会”
·“放开二胎”要感谢莫言?
·最不可琢磨的汉语言
·财新网为何不敌巩义法院枉判
·财新网为何不敌巩义法院枉判(二)
·财新网为何不敌巩义法院枉判(三)
·日本人更懂中国
·日本人最懂中国
·“双十一”、打假与打虎
·我的洋鬼子朋友杨恒均
·我的洋鬼子朋友杨恒均(二)
·“白毛女”或与“依法治国”相左
·莫曹杨与《打倒鲁迅》
·鲁迅与洋人杨恒均
·中央网信办为何不自信?
·杨恒均与“王的女人”将如何逆转?
·“三个自信”滋养腐败
·IS的乌托邦与周主席的“中国梦”
·张艺谋与韩寒心有灵犀
·王健林禁妄议 王思聪很惜玉
·公正如画、强拆似虎、腐败在继续
·请孙政才书记宣讲公正
·请允许我跟着李敖喊“万岁”
·请允许我跟着李敖挺圣战
·李敖老矣 唯言不休(复旦版)
·李敖还敢掀起一场中西文化论战吗?
·顾腚难顾头的文明---李敖清华演讲赏析
·左撇子的李敖不懂普世价值
·胡耀邦是怎样离开的人间?
·李敖宣布起义,北大怎么办?
·莫言的末日论与李敖的千年愿
·从中国第二大重要新闻说起
·从纽约时报整版赞习说起
·法官指天发誓启示录(二)
·法官指天发誓启示录
·高瑜认罪—一场游戏又一场梦
·杨恒均的好日子或快到头
·2016起,中国将成地球第一谎言强国
·杨恒均与石三生,谁是白痴?
·释永信无私生女 调查组或有私情
·顾晓军民主奖---一个让精英羞愧的奖
·释延洁呓语西天 中国梦泛滥成灾
·中共到底迷信不迷信?
·建言中共修改宪法序言
·建言人大修改宪法宣誓词
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?

   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments · one hundred forty-one
   
   

   
   Translator:God has eyes
   
   
   
   Unexpectedly, the Foreign Policy recommended
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun "tough fight" so soon MingJin to.
   With the advent of Gary's wrong "League"
   Foreign Policy and the political elite, said Gu Gu
   door rookie "won the Shi Sansheng Grilled
   material effort" non-democratic "theory Policy> publishers" series has been Mr.
   conclusive.
   Gary's "conclusive" one, it means that the past
   few years to engage in "TOP 100 Global Thinkers"
   made fast, and the legitimacy of the Foreign
   Policy of the world situation, has been seriously
   questioned. Foreign Policy innocence are not
   dictated TOP 100 will what goods? The world
   with the toes can guess what happens.
   So, regardless of the Foreign Policy of the club is
   the Carnegie Foundation, the Washington Post,
   in cooperation with the Communist party, in the
   end there is no order to the Chinese mainland
   thinkers candidates shall countertops
   transactions done anything on it? Says not even
   order blocking the mouth of Gu dough, the
   Foreign Policy also stand out, to explain their
   own TOP 100 in the end is how the vote out.
   For example:
   TOP100 documented selection of the Articles of
   Association?
   What is the definition of the TOP 100 Global
   Thinkers?
   TOP100 selection process like? Recommended or
   alone Huiyanshizhu Foreign Policy?
   TOP100 thinkers in the end what is thought?
   Their "great ideas" in the end of human
   civilization and progress over what kind of
   impact?
   Foreign Policy If the above can not answer basic
   questions, I am afraid to conceal his own
   trickster's work, right? Presumably Foreign Policy
   is still not low-level crooks with the Chinese
   mainland, as just a few people, rent an office,
   and then casually make a stamp dare to engage
   in what century Who's Who "or" project financing
   "acts like it?
   I remember, I have been fortunate enough to
   come into contact with Shi Sansheng behemoth
   such as the World Trade Fund Beijing
   Representative Office. In fact, riding a dead
   horse lame, led to several Chinese and foreign
   small Minions, rent on office in the capital city
   of Chang'an Avenue, under the banner of the
   name of foreign adults, specifically to deceive the
   Chinese people. Dead crooks really pay attention
   to both the desk, or reception room, everywhere
   not placed, is stuck in colorful national flag.
   Not to mention also, is so that some of the fraud
   gang under the banner hanging from the ocean
   adults, have been the Chinese government party
   nuclear trial, is the the barely veiled legitimate
   swindler.
   Of course, Foreign Policy Unlike the WTO Fund of
   the continent, the people, after all, living in a
   talk about "procedural justice" democratic
   society based on the rule of law. Even so, Foreign
   Policy will order "interests", like many involved
   in the foreign media as a golden egg from the
   Chinese party?
   
   
   
   [Shi Sansheng Monday, November 5, 2012 13:46 China]
(2012/11/05 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场