新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer]
石三生
·被莫言、李敖们玩残了的文学
·国务院管鸟事比管人事更靠谱
·贪官与鸟齐赞河南法治好
·邓亚萍试水政法 公平正义似乒乓
·邓亚萍试水政法 公平正义似乒乓
·柴静是编剧雾霾是天气;“公正第一”才是思想
·河南法治动物为救少林寺?
·政法大学出尔反尔 邓亚萍进退两难
·邓亚萍兼职政法大学教授是腐败
·李冰冰卖萌 孔子学院无人睬
·政法大学越描越黑 邓亚萍免费获诽谤
·猜猜邓亚萍的金牌与博士那个真?
·邓亚萍的清华学士文凭或造假
·一生两死---从邓亚萍说到方静与徐明
·邓亚萍的剑桥博士真不了
·笑看吴法天李吉明双挺邓亚萍
·金将军太会玩:美女、核弹两不误
·茅于轼又荒唐 茅粉们再呓语
·石三生大师又多了一提鞋的
·为什么茅于轼能发出独立的声音?
·猜猜是谁阻止了朝鲜美女的演出?
·茅于轼的人文经济学都扯些什么?
·杨恒均呼吁特赦腐败 中纪委机关报自讨没趣
·向中纪委机关报推荐一下顾晓军
·也谈中纪委机关报斥责的“比烂”心态
·龙应台挺浦志强,与天何干?
·给美国史密斯议员讲讲浦志强
·解放快七十年,党还是喜欢夜里忙
·解放快七十年,党还是喜欢夜里忙
·为广东党报与法院对决喝倒彩
·广东党报认怂 东莞法院别得意
·唱红打黑歇菜后,重庆开始强拆?
·雾霾是实现民主的急先锋
·聂树斌案,最高法勿拿“程序正义”说事儿
· 党纪再严,奈何得邓亚萍吗?
·神探李昌钰也破不了聂树斌案
·鲁迅真的会讲道理吗?
·法院战胜历史 炎黄春秋败诉
·巧家奇冤,岂是无罪释放这么简单?
·奥巴马再次崩溃 龙应台继续摸黑
·住建部要为深圳渣土滑坡辟谣吗?
·三向中纪委机关报推荐顾晓军
·商务部不必酸 马大爷说的对
·王石对宝能扯文化有点不靠谱
·骗子为何不服判?
·向统战部推荐顾晓军
·云南坐13年冤狱的女孩不值得同情
·奥运冠军与东亚病夫
·鲁迅真是间谍吗?
·周小平的智力是否正常?
·不服就试试:一个你绝对会答错的社会问题
·周小平认为:大飞机前景堪忧
·除了天才周小平,没有人可以答对
·通过周小平现象管窥《白毛女》
·推荐顾晓军兼批判重庆缺“公正”论
·习、马倡导和平,不如习、顾共逐诺奖
·推荐蔡英文、顾晓军联袂共逐诺奖
·习、马视为鸡肋;顾、蔡如获至宝
·“依法治国”有时比流感阴毒
·国务院一边减政一边集权
·代习先生辩:“有付出,就会有收获”
·石三生新年献词:梦里寻梦又一年
·石三生新年献词:梦里寻梦又一年
·无锡强拆继续 永康狱中难安
·向习近平主席推荐顾晓军
·南大校长周文斌被判无期冤不冤?
·驳莫言的“两个基本判断”
·公开推荐顾晓军角逐2016年诺贝尔和平奖
·两个台湾女人搅了国共两党的好梦
·三个台湾女人唱大戏
·毛泽东为何没得诺贝尔和平奖?
·推荐顾晓军、蔡英文获诺奖是民意
·用周小平思想统一中国
·可能是史上最乌龙的香港罪犯
·为民告官胜诉率为零的上海欢呼
·周小平主席要开杀戒?
·习总为何不注重民意?
·周小平主席期冀“台独”
·向蔡英文主席推荐“公正第一”
·从周小平主席到蜀国皇帝刘备
·周小平比鲁迅更伟大
·没有选择的蔡英文
·猜猜周小平主席有没有睡艺人?
·周小平主席应该是“周家人”
·两会为何不互联网+?
·孙立平先生的“公约数论”太梦幻
·蔡英文借他山之玉 周小平祸国殃民
·周小平若不反击就太无耻了
·周小平骂两会代表陈光标是小人
·报告孟建柱:草民的“获得感”这个样
·指导一下中国长安网遣词造句
·指导一下中国长安网遣词造句
·周小平啥样,央视就啥样
·“二妻”谣言不可笑 政协委员荒唐多
·周小平造谣是文明 网民造谣被刑拘
·周小平很生气 蔡英文要受苦
·周小平主席恨台湾而爱日本
·习总为何在政法会上讲“忧患”?
·晴天霹雳---周小平首倡“中国梦”
·罗援若武统 民主做先锋
·石三生与小粉红
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer

   
   To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers
   heated debate "universal values"
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials 

   hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments · 127 
   
   Translator:God has eyes
   
   The Centuries ago, the great thinker Rousseau and
   Voltaire, Diderot of heated debate and generated
   ill feelings. And help us to understand the
   truth: there is no perfect idea, great thinkers
   can not get rid of the limitations of the times.
   Based on this, Mr. Gu Xiaojun "just values" has
   deeply affected the care Disciples, Gu Powder
   group members, as well as subtle many people
   dare not anger nor outspoken. But they still lack
   the voice of opposition. Shi Sansheng I feel
   sorry, not against people, but seen in the
   network "dissidents" and more general terms,
   dare to refute Mr. Gu Xiaojun thinking of
   glorious, just blindly attack Xia Sanlu. Such
   "dissent", a slight understanding of the little
   people of the mainland strict management
   ideology can tell, which was fifty cents were the
   usual "thinking of you speak to him, he speaks to
   you and sophistry" approach.
   So, in addition to fifty cents trouble. Have not
   really thought people dare to stand up and
   loudly refuted Mr. Gu Xiaojun "fair view"? Of
   course not, there are at least the selection of
   "foreign policy" previous "one hundred global
   thinkers" who was never shot. Even foreign
   thinkers read understand Mr. Gu Xiaojun "fair
   view", as well as the local Chinese thinkers. Even
   the local Chinese thinkers refused to hand, not
   there "Foreign Policy" can "emancipate the mind
   the great debate" in the name, a survival of the
   fittest to do!
   Way back Shi Sansheng year has also been
   located the Recruitment Challenge Cup world
   Confucius Hole Sun and hole Confucian
   descenShit on Confucius's "destiny" concept is
   the grotesque not by the divination doctrine
   "debate. Unfortunately, until it is blocked, not
   even one person can refute Shi Sansheng
   global. Detract from one of the world's leading
   media --- "foreign policy, are not as good as Shi
   Sansheng my tolerance? Moreover, the Chinese
   culture is about "was not exposed deed goes
   unpunished". If foreign policy seriously affect
   China willing to liberal ideas of the Western
   world, why not schooling is a Shi Sansheng, to a
   real confrontation of ideas?
   Seriously China, the courage to stand up and
   self-proclaimed "big thinkers", the only one of
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun ear. The world to see: Mr. Gu
   was blocked under every possible way, his mind
   is still "wild fire, Springtime Renaissance. The
   estimated global thinkers, especially local
   Chinese thinkers early on Mr. Gu Xiaojun unique
   heart Health unforgiveness. "Foreign Policy" Why
   not nationality Mr. Gu Xiaojun introduce
   ourselves to another disciple recommend, Gu
   dough recommended when the title "public impartiality is
   the first values, Chinese thinkers shot together
   to field the Rush it? Sure enough, the natural
   rights of freedom "beat" public impartiality is the first
   values. That does not prove that the westerly
   overwhelm the Dongfeng? Foreign policy from the
   sidelines, fame and fortune, why not?
   To be honest, not even good at Habitat the Gu
   disciples first "Big Brother", "public impartiality is the first
   values," Mr. Gu Xiaojun still feel a puzzle. How
   eager global foreign policy thinkers wing,
   pointing my maze!
   How? Foreign policy decision-makers, you have
   no courage and magnanimity, dare to come to
   the farm, the Western ideological polemics?
   People cooking, CCTV, huh "Sino-French Culinary
   Competition. Is the so-called thinkers, not
   people cooking brave?
   The mule is a horse, he will have to pull out yo
   not.
   [Shi Sansheng Friday, October 26, 2012 5:43 China]
(2012/10/26 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场