新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer]
石三生
·扫地僧闻鸡起舞 韩军团虽死犹生
·扫地僧断网出沪 百度少年今二十
·易中天品三国将就挺韩寒词不达意
·方舟子祸起萧墙 倒韩战落下帷幕
·天下第一时评人的庄严声明
·博客教父方兴东与史记作者司马迁
·致山东高级人民检察院、法院的公开信
·时代周刊为什么会选择韩寒?
·跋扈的方舟子与妾一般的深广电
·赵长天语焉不详 方韩战各怀鬼胎
·方方思维很方 洪晃挺韩荒唐
·雷锋同志心猿意马 日记喻军队国家化
·麦田恼羞成怒 韩寒杀气腾腾
·奥巴马挺南周 南周挺韩寒与转基因
·奥巴马挺南周 南周挺韩寒与转基因
·比大熊猫更珍贵的。。。
·当代五君子
·他搅乱了时局又隐没入尘埃
·我比你还要脏
·美国人为何也瞎掺乎刑诉法修正案?
·我们都被门夹了一下
·纽约时报佯攻恶法 秘密拘捕悄然通过
·缝肛与江姐及其他
·洋垃圾与洋文化
·特务手段管控社会 薄熙来害人终害己
·薄熙来唱红遭免 中国作协应检讨
·初笑薄瓜瓜 二叹薄熙来
·二笑薄瓜瓜 三叹薄熙来
·三笑薄瓜瓜 四叹薄熙来
·给艾未未的债主普及一点常识与法律
·四笑薄瓜瓜 五叹薄熙来
·新华网重大改版 高层动态失踪中
·解读时事之看天下谁主苍生
·司法部愚蠢 亵渎了法律侮辱了党
·左右皆混蛋 薄熙来末路的始作俑者
·捅破杨澜国籍的窗户纸
·写在余杰去国后的多余话
·方滨兴与秦始皇 防民防贼两长城
·孔庆东巧言献媚 韩三骗因祸得福
·孔庆东到底被包养了没?
·给流年不利的公知刘晓原律师指一招
·孔庆东与韩寒是两条不太一样的狗
·毛左派正向右看 伪公知何时蜕皮
·中国民主没有左右只有欺骗
·驳雷达先生对民主思潮的误判谬读
·艾未未不想出国背后的隐情
·再谈艾未未不想出国背后的隐情
·艾未未或偷漏税行政复议被驳回
·艾未未借钱缴税根本就是骗局
·中国第一真骂与世界第一奸骂
·韩寒与薄熙来有个约会
·韩寒与铁凝及莫言:谁懂政治?
·韩寒与铁凝及莫言:谁懂政治?
·一批美国:自由奖无自由 茅于轼应知羞
·二批美国:愚蠢的时代 荒唐的外交
·二批美国:愚蠢的时代 荒唐的外交
·我检讨:批茅于轼错了!
·韩寒是条狗与茅于轼老东西
·四月的乌有正知羞韩寒茅于轼当有耻
·毛左派偃旗息鼓 顾晓军趁火打劫
·两个中国天才韩寒与薄瓜瓜
·强烈推荐韩寒角逐诺贝尔奥斯卡奖
·撑起稻草人韩寒的骆驼们之鄢烈山篇
·对骗子情有独钟的新中国
·韩寒与余杰,是坏与更坏的区别
·韩寒与余杰,是坏与更坏的区别
·韩寒与余杰,是坏与更坏的区别
·韩寒与余杰,是坏与更坏的区别
·美国《time》糗大了:韩寒是专制的帮凶
·破译韩寒与顾晓军的政治隐喻
·互联网也唱红打黑 顾晓军欲决战韩寒
·牛津大学与薄熙来有一腿
·李承鹏忙演戏 资中筠是看客
·艾未未急如律 刘晓原试反水
·华西都市报造谣与政法委的活埋名单
·特赦天下
·中国正在进步
·只谈韩寒
·“三个代表”与《三重门》
·别倒驴的韩粉与毛左思维
·别倒驴的韩粉与毛左思维
·于建嵘暗讥GFW 韩寒咬出XXX
·江泽民现身星巴克与新浪给鸡拜年
·赵普抢了薄熙来的风头?
·孔庆东迷途知返 “三个代表”是扯淡
·赵普效应与薄谷开来事件
·韩寒的靠山是他?
·江泽民救过胡耀邦吗?
·薄瓜瓜的声明是文革作风
·小消失的城市与断代的《江泽民传》
·陈光诚已死?
·美国政府已成骗子的托儿
·陈光诚提三条要挟温家宝
·陈光诚大逃亡证实瞎子也会飞
·陈光诚进美使馆 奥巴马仍被驴牵
·陈光诚瞎子妙算想救谁?
·美国政府为何炒作陈光诚
·陈光诚做过人体器官移植?
·中国三大假货:薄瓜瓜、韩寒、陈光诚
·一时疏忽,黑了一个网站
·陈光诚为何想亲吻克林顿?
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer

   
   To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers
   heated debate "universal values"
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials 

   hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments · 127 
   
   Translator:God has eyes
   
   The Centuries ago, the great thinker Rousseau and
   Voltaire, Diderot of heated debate and generated
   ill feelings. And help us to understand the
   truth: there is no perfect idea, great thinkers
   can not get rid of the limitations of the times.
   Based on this, Mr. Gu Xiaojun "just values" has
   deeply affected the care Disciples, Gu Powder
   group members, as well as subtle many people
   dare not anger nor outspoken. But they still lack
   the voice of opposition. Shi Sansheng I feel
   sorry, not against people, but seen in the
   network "dissidents" and more general terms,
   dare to refute Mr. Gu Xiaojun thinking of
   glorious, just blindly attack Xia Sanlu. Such
   "dissent", a slight understanding of the little
   people of the mainland strict management
   ideology can tell, which was fifty cents were the
   usual "thinking of you speak to him, he speaks to
   you and sophistry" approach.
   So, in addition to fifty cents trouble. Have not
   really thought people dare to stand up and
   loudly refuted Mr. Gu Xiaojun "fair view"? Of
   course not, there are at least the selection of
   "foreign policy" previous "one hundred global
   thinkers" who was never shot. Even foreign
   thinkers read understand Mr. Gu Xiaojun "fair
   view", as well as the local Chinese thinkers. Even
   the local Chinese thinkers refused to hand, not
   there "Foreign Policy" can "emancipate the mind
   the great debate" in the name, a survival of the
   fittest to do!
   Way back Shi Sansheng year has also been
   located the Recruitment Challenge Cup world
   Confucius Hole Sun and hole Confucian
   descenShit on Confucius's "destiny" concept is
   the grotesque not by the divination doctrine
   "debate. Unfortunately, until it is blocked, not
   even one person can refute Shi Sansheng
   global. Detract from one of the world's leading
   media --- "foreign policy, are not as good as Shi
   Sansheng my tolerance? Moreover, the Chinese
   culture is about "was not exposed deed goes
   unpunished". If foreign policy seriously affect
   China willing to liberal ideas of the Western
   world, why not schooling is a Shi Sansheng, to a
   real confrontation of ideas?
   Seriously China, the courage to stand up and
   self-proclaimed "big thinkers", the only one of
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun ear. The world to see: Mr. Gu
   was blocked under every possible way, his mind
   is still "wild fire, Springtime Renaissance. The
   estimated global thinkers, especially local
   Chinese thinkers early on Mr. Gu Xiaojun unique
   heart Health unforgiveness. "Foreign Policy" Why
   not nationality Mr. Gu Xiaojun introduce
   ourselves to another disciple recommend, Gu
   dough recommended when the title "public impartiality is
   the first values, Chinese thinkers shot together
   to field the Rush it? Sure enough, the natural
   rights of freedom "beat" public impartiality is the first
   values. That does not prove that the westerly
   overwhelm the Dongfeng? Foreign policy from the
   sidelines, fame and fortune, why not?
   To be honest, not even good at Habitat the Gu
   disciples first "Big Brother", "public impartiality is the first
   values," Mr. Gu Xiaojun still feel a puzzle. How
   eager global foreign policy thinkers wing,
   pointing my maze!
   How? Foreign policy decision-makers, you have
   no courage and magnanimity, dare to come to
   the farm, the Western ideological polemics?
   People cooking, CCTV, huh "Sino-French Culinary
   Competition. Is the so-called thinkers, not
   people cooking brave?
   The mule is a horse, he will have to pull out yo
   not.
   [Shi Sansheng Friday, October 26, 2012 5:43 China]
(2012/10/26 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场