新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer]
石三生
·强烈推荐韩寒角逐诺贝尔奥斯卡奖
·撑起稻草人韩寒的骆驼们之鄢烈山篇
·对骗子情有独钟的新中国
·韩寒与余杰,是坏与更坏的区别
·韩寒与余杰,是坏与更坏的区别
·韩寒与余杰,是坏与更坏的区别
·韩寒与余杰,是坏与更坏的区别
·美国《time》糗大了:韩寒是专制的帮凶
·破译韩寒与顾晓军的政治隐喻
·互联网也唱红打黑 顾晓军欲决战韩寒
·牛津大学与薄熙来有一腿
·李承鹏忙演戏 资中筠是看客
·艾未未急如律 刘晓原试反水
·华西都市报造谣与政法委的活埋名单
·特赦天下
·中国正在进步
·只谈韩寒
·“三个代表”与《三重门》
·别倒驴的韩粉与毛左思维
·别倒驴的韩粉与毛左思维
·于建嵘暗讥GFW 韩寒咬出XXX
·江泽民现身星巴克与新浪给鸡拜年
·赵普抢了薄熙来的风头?
·孔庆东迷途知返 “三个代表”是扯淡
·赵普效应与薄谷开来事件
·韩寒的靠山是他?
·江泽民救过胡耀邦吗?
·薄瓜瓜的声明是文革作风
·小消失的城市与断代的《江泽民传》
·陈光诚已死?
·美国政府已成骗子的托儿
·陈光诚提三条要挟温家宝
·陈光诚大逃亡证实瞎子也会飞
·陈光诚进美使馆 奥巴马仍被驴牵
·陈光诚瞎子妙算想救谁?
·美国政府为何炒作陈光诚
·陈光诚做过人体器官移植?
·中国三大假货:薄瓜瓜、韩寒、陈光诚
·一时疏忽,黑了一个网站
·陈光诚为何想亲吻克林顿?
·美国政府抛弃陈光诚的原因
·陈光诚为何又想逃离中国?
·一个牧师与一个瞎子合谋的骗局
·一个牧师
·揭开陈光诚临沂计生事件维权的骗局
·指导奥巴马正确解读评估报告
·言语轻薄的陈瞎子对美女啥感觉?
·美国国会中,有些议员是婊子养的
·维权律师陈瞎子是“三个代表”的典范
·陈瞎子一个事故的N个版本
·多线索求证陈瞎子维权的骗局
·全球扫盲之看图说话
·“瞎子摸象”是个很大的局
·陈瞎子已经走火入魔
·纽约大学的孔杰荣教授很阴谋
·陈瞎子的二难问题
·依法治国必须公审陈光诚法办陈光诚
·依法治国必须公审陈光诚法办陈光诚
·李开复为何给马英九与韩寒拉皮条
·捧韩寒的台湾立法院顾问是个骗子
·某法大师诗《选择》解读
·巧家爆炸案为什么“巧”
·胡锦涛主席引用韩愈诗赏析
·不得了,被环球网潜规则了
·世纪大案--维稳与政教纷争之谜
·第一回外交部私通邪教凯风网鸡刀杀牛
·世纪大案--维稳与政教纷争之谜(第二回)
·世纪大案--维稳与政教纷争之谜(第二回)
·世纪大案--维稳与政教纷争之谜(第二回)
·从新华社记者“自宫”说开去
·从新华社记者“自宫”说开去
·骗子律师高智晟 白痴作家刘三妹
·高智晟满门皆骗士反邪教中共布疑阵
·全世界都在看美国与诺贝尔奖有多蠢
·诺奖尚未揭晓 瞎粉们已内讧
·外交部颠倒时空造假为哪般?
·世纪大案--维稳与政教纷争之谜(第五回)
·奥巴马在等什么?
·顾晓军主义催生绝世神功
·你想要一个怎样的政改?
·世纪大案--维稳与政教纷争之谜(第六回)
·陈瞎子能否“开天目"?
·美国智囊被噤声陈瞎子利空思变
·打通“任督二脉”符合脑子进水的症状
·顾晓军“入常”致“法拉利车祸”易主
·芜湖副市长詹云超送女上学很无聊
·在绝望中制造希望“法拉利车祸演绎的危机”
·芜湖副市长詹云超骑车送女是作秀无疑
·芜湖副市长詹云超真是富庙穷和尚?
·陈瞎子再被狙击 奥巴马装聋作哑
·询六四惊现共济会 翻薄案搜出一何新
·詹云超副市长给我出了个难题
·世纪阳谋转基因与薄熙来的末日之谜(引子)
·顾晓军与七个局中人
·骆家辉大使真的很猥琐
·又一个瞎子轰动海外
·李旺阳生的矛盾死的蹊跷
·李旺阳之死的N个可能
·美国、香港Google李旺阳
·全球扫盲之上吊常识
·李旺阳是装死!
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer

   
   To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers
   heated debate "universal values"
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials 

   hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments · 127 
   
   Translator:God has eyes
   
   The Centuries ago, the great thinker Rousseau and
   Voltaire, Diderot of heated debate and generated
   ill feelings. And help us to understand the
   truth: there is no perfect idea, great thinkers
   can not get rid of the limitations of the times.
   Based on this, Mr. Gu Xiaojun "just values" has
   deeply affected the care Disciples, Gu Powder
   group members, as well as subtle many people
   dare not anger nor outspoken. But they still lack
   the voice of opposition. Shi Sansheng I feel
   sorry, not against people, but seen in the
   network "dissidents" and more general terms,
   dare to refute Mr. Gu Xiaojun thinking of
   glorious, just blindly attack Xia Sanlu. Such
   "dissent", a slight understanding of the little
   people of the mainland strict management
   ideology can tell, which was fifty cents were the
   usual "thinking of you speak to him, he speaks to
   you and sophistry" approach.
   So, in addition to fifty cents trouble. Have not
   really thought people dare to stand up and
   loudly refuted Mr. Gu Xiaojun "fair view"? Of
   course not, there are at least the selection of
   "foreign policy" previous "one hundred global
   thinkers" who was never shot. Even foreign
   thinkers read understand Mr. Gu Xiaojun "fair
   view", as well as the local Chinese thinkers. Even
   the local Chinese thinkers refused to hand, not
   there "Foreign Policy" can "emancipate the mind
   the great debate" in the name, a survival of the
   fittest to do!
   Way back Shi Sansheng year has also been
   located the Recruitment Challenge Cup world
   Confucius Hole Sun and hole Confucian
   descenShit on Confucius's "destiny" concept is
   the grotesque not by the divination doctrine
   "debate. Unfortunately, until it is blocked, not
   even one person can refute Shi Sansheng
   global. Detract from one of the world's leading
   media --- "foreign policy, are not as good as Shi
   Sansheng my tolerance? Moreover, the Chinese
   culture is about "was not exposed deed goes
   unpunished". If foreign policy seriously affect
   China willing to liberal ideas of the Western
   world, why not schooling is a Shi Sansheng, to a
   real confrontation of ideas?
   Seriously China, the courage to stand up and
   self-proclaimed "big thinkers", the only one of
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun ear. The world to see: Mr. Gu
   was blocked under every possible way, his mind
   is still "wild fire, Springtime Renaissance. The
   estimated global thinkers, especially local
   Chinese thinkers early on Mr. Gu Xiaojun unique
   heart Health unforgiveness. "Foreign Policy" Why
   not nationality Mr. Gu Xiaojun introduce
   ourselves to another disciple recommend, Gu
   dough recommended when the title "public impartiality is
   the first values, Chinese thinkers shot together
   to field the Rush it? Sure enough, the natural
   rights of freedom "beat" public impartiality is the first
   values. That does not prove that the westerly
   overwhelm the Dongfeng? Foreign policy from the
   sidelines, fame and fortune, why not?
   To be honest, not even good at Habitat the Gu
   disciples first "Big Brother", "public impartiality is the first
   values," Mr. Gu Xiaojun still feel a puzzle. How
   eager global foreign policy thinkers wing,
   pointing my maze!
   How? Foreign policy decision-makers, you have
   no courage and magnanimity, dare to come to
   the farm, the Western ideological polemics?
   People cooking, CCTV, huh "Sino-French Culinary
   Competition. Is the so-called thinkers, not
   people cooking brave?
   The mule is a horse, he will have to pull out yo
   not.
   [Shi Sansheng Friday, October 26, 2012 5:43 China]
(2012/10/26 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场