新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer]
石三生
·从周小平主席到蜀国皇帝刘备
·周小平比鲁迅更伟大
·没有选择的蔡英文
·猜猜周小平主席有没有睡艺人?
·周小平主席应该是“周家人”
·两会为何不互联网+?
·孙立平先生的“公约数论”太梦幻
·蔡英文借他山之玉 周小平祸国殃民
·周小平若不反击就太无耻了
·周小平骂两会代表陈光标是小人
·报告孟建柱:草民的“获得感”这个样
·指导一下中国长安网遣词造句
·指导一下中国长安网遣词造句
·周小平啥样,央视就啥样
·“二妻”谣言不可笑 政协委员荒唐多
·周小平造谣是文明 网民造谣被刑拘
·周小平很生气 蔡英文要受苦
·周小平主席恨台湾而爱日本
·习总为何在政法会上讲“忧患”?
·晴天霹雳---周小平首倡“中国梦”
·罗援若武统 民主做先锋
·石三生与小粉红
·周小平主席力助周涛重掌春晚?
·石三生将编、导史诗巨制《三周魂销》
·小粉红坚壁清野 顾晓军枉费心机
·小粉红与赵忠祥也有一腿?
·小粉红己身不修,何以平天下?
·小粉红越界刷屏 蔡英文应对失措
·周涛若复出,春晚必成史上最艳夜
·扬言武统的罗援少将是逃兵?
·周涛复出主春晚 韩国议长悔不迭
·国台办耍金箍棒 蔡英文偷着乐
· 小粉红旁敲侧击 问世间何为正道
·鲁迅不倒 天理难容
·绝对奇迹--比平邑矿难更奇的山东奇迹
·可怜的鲁迅,可悲的语文
·一百年间两二货:周小平与周树人
·问孟建柱:政法委也不能干预司法吗?
·辛亥革命百年后,人民开始怀念慈禧
·央视春晚弃有污点演员,却用艳荡的主持
·李克强舍近求远为哪般
·国务院管不好住,能管好农民的嘴吗?
·抗议谷歌、抗议网络流氓
·给国务院并织金县纪委献一策
·温家宝是一个好总理吗?
·报告习总:这里有一个被丢下的贫困群众
·博客中国意欲何为?
·金正恩到底打了谁一耳光?
·冤狱23年的陈满之高尚羞煞窦娥
·云南、海南与福建三起冤案统一口径为哪般?
·陈满的境界与邓小平一般高
·如此司法进步
·有意思:周小平说方兴东是个大忽悠
·台湾地震了,春晚还演吗?
·欲加“武威三记者”之罪,何患无辞
·台湾地震与安倍及春晚
·周小平是谁的国师?
·春晚与正能量
·团中央“娱乐化”一瞥
·若老能养老,干部能养干部吗?
·龙应台与周小平的暧昧令人作呕
·龙应台的轻佻与虚伪
·谁“伪造”了龙应台的两份声明?
·谁是龙应台的后台?
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(序)
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(一)
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(二)
·龙应台为周小平已神魂颠倒
·卖艺也卖身
·蔡英文与龙应台及小粉红
·肖仲华与周小平
·中纪委也学会了吹牛?
·中纪委何时扫荡“地主帮”?
·“负能量”缺席是“五个一百”的耻辱
·蔡英文回应石三生
·复旦博士于迎丽装傻为哪般?
·阎肃“假去世”与山东老汉“活人出殡”
·被总书记忽悠了一把
·被总书记忽悠了一把
·习总回应石三生?
·两会代表到底怕什么?
·留美女生主犯忏悔:自由是恶魔
·华东师大学者自杀,证明上帝如白痴
·李克强的创新与唐僧的紧箍咒
·党媒姓党,却炒作一个神经病
·揭开任志强“反党”的画皮
·国务院意见扰民 党媒辩解更添堵
·拆了败家的鸟巢如何?
·鸟巢是恐怖分子的老巢?
·仰慕白痴的姚晨为何有八千万粉丝?
·鸟巢怎可能不腐败?
·鸟巢为何成禁区?
·百家讲坛与史学奇才抑郁自杀
·史学奇才自杀是因为作假吗?
·史学天才林嘉文或装死
·党媒姓党,只是不懂常识与常理
·于丹与北大终于要合伙坐实“天才少年”
·王毅响应顾晓军 “九二共识”已过时
·鸟巢的回应---边自夸;边删贴
·推荐顾晓军、潘基文、蔡英文联袂角逐诺奖
·北京法官被杀,与司法不公有关系吗?
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer

   
   To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers
   heated debate "universal values"
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials 

   hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments · 127 
   
   Translator:God has eyes
   
   The Centuries ago, the great thinker Rousseau and
   Voltaire, Diderot of heated debate and generated
   ill feelings. And help us to understand the
   truth: there is no perfect idea, great thinkers
   can not get rid of the limitations of the times.
   Based on this, Mr. Gu Xiaojun "just values" has
   deeply affected the care Disciples, Gu Powder
   group members, as well as subtle many people
   dare not anger nor outspoken. But they still lack
   the voice of opposition. Shi Sansheng I feel
   sorry, not against people, but seen in the
   network "dissidents" and more general terms,
   dare to refute Mr. Gu Xiaojun thinking of
   glorious, just blindly attack Xia Sanlu. Such
   "dissent", a slight understanding of the little
   people of the mainland strict management
   ideology can tell, which was fifty cents were the
   usual "thinking of you speak to him, he speaks to
   you and sophistry" approach.
   So, in addition to fifty cents trouble. Have not
   really thought people dare to stand up and
   loudly refuted Mr. Gu Xiaojun "fair view"? Of
   course not, there are at least the selection of
   "foreign policy" previous "one hundred global
   thinkers" who was never shot. Even foreign
   thinkers read understand Mr. Gu Xiaojun "fair
   view", as well as the local Chinese thinkers. Even
   the local Chinese thinkers refused to hand, not
   there "Foreign Policy" can "emancipate the mind
   the great debate" in the name, a survival of the
   fittest to do!
   Way back Shi Sansheng year has also been
   located the Recruitment Challenge Cup world
   Confucius Hole Sun and hole Confucian
   descenShit on Confucius's "destiny" concept is
   the grotesque not by the divination doctrine
   "debate. Unfortunately, until it is blocked, not
   even one person can refute Shi Sansheng
   global. Detract from one of the world's leading
   media --- "foreign policy, are not as good as Shi
   Sansheng my tolerance? Moreover, the Chinese
   culture is about "was not exposed deed goes
   unpunished". If foreign policy seriously affect
   China willing to liberal ideas of the Western
   world, why not schooling is a Shi Sansheng, to a
   real confrontation of ideas?
   Seriously China, the courage to stand up and
   self-proclaimed "big thinkers", the only one of
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun ear. The world to see: Mr. Gu
   was blocked under every possible way, his mind
   is still "wild fire, Springtime Renaissance. The
   estimated global thinkers, especially local
   Chinese thinkers early on Mr. Gu Xiaojun unique
   heart Health unforgiveness. "Foreign Policy" Why
   not nationality Mr. Gu Xiaojun introduce
   ourselves to another disciple recommend, Gu
   dough recommended when the title "public impartiality is
   the first values, Chinese thinkers shot together
   to field the Rush it? Sure enough, the natural
   rights of freedom "beat" public impartiality is the first
   values. That does not prove that the westerly
   overwhelm the Dongfeng? Foreign policy from the
   sidelines, fame and fortune, why not?
   To be honest, not even good at Habitat the Gu
   disciples first "Big Brother", "public impartiality is the first
   values," Mr. Gu Xiaojun still feel a puzzle. How
   eager global foreign policy thinkers wing,
   pointing my maze!
   How? Foreign policy decision-makers, you have
   no courage and magnanimity, dare to come to
   the farm, the Western ideological polemics?
   People cooking, CCTV, huh "Sino-French Culinary
   Competition. Is the so-called thinkers, not
   people cooking brave?
   The mule is a horse, he will have to pull out yo
   not.
   [Shi Sansheng Friday, October 26, 2012 5:43 China]
(2012/10/26 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场