新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer]
石三生
·“英雄所恨略同”与朝阳群众爱的癫狂
·刘刚给世界出了个大难题
·跟着李悔之、贺卫方学扯淡
·刘刚义比关公 北风不知好歹
·“造谣”是种特权----兼感谢海外精英
·顾晓军不计前嫌 温云超忘恩负义
·跟着贺卫方教授学扯淡
·教教青年们跟贺卫方教授掐架
·政治家的肾与聂树斌案及其他(一)
·调侃贺卫方,温云超受不了
·聂树斌案凶多吉少
·政治家的肾与聂树斌案及其他(二)
·向诺贝尔和平奖推荐顾晓军、刘刚、蔡英文
·从高瑜、马永田抗强拆看伪维权的本质
·青年网的愚蠢等于凤凰姐的无知
·政治与生存---兼答刘刚先生
·政治与生存---兼答东野长峥先生
·政治与生存---再答东野长峥先生
·桃园三结义与煮酒论英雄
·桃园三结义与煮酒论英雄(二)
·当局为何鼓励网络恐怖?
·桃园论剑与煮酒论英雄(三)
·桃园论剑与煮酒论英雄(四)
·桃园论剑与煮酒论英雄(五)
·从巴拿马运河到北京如家女子遇袭
·北京两个“弱女子”的维权
·阴谋总会得逞,邪恶常占据上风
·治本无期,何不先解决下民众疾苦?
·顾晓军与东野长峥
·发改委野心勃勃 教育部乱弹琵琶
·郎咸平终于成了郭美美
·最无辜的昏官
·朴槿惠的虚伪与芮成钢的傲慢
·在中国,网络作家还不如个乞丐
·台湾的电信诈骗犯为何钟情大陆?
·朴槿惠的虚伪与芮成钢的傲慢(二)
·龙应台的落后与愚昧举世罕见
·中央“下大气力”抓信访,能否“零容忍”?
·火星都能去,为何“依法治国”这么难?
·龙应台的愚昧与龙粉的愚蠢很匹配
·龙应台的“自卑”与陈小鲁的“感觉良好”
·杨恒均的裙子与龙应台的胡子
·习总的讲话给谁听?
·阎连科是一条别有用心的“丧家犬”
·鸟治时代
·鸟治时代
·劳动也创造噩梦
·习总的讲话为何不提宪法?
·霍金是扯淡、还是故弄玄虚?
·霍金走红与魏则西之死
·从总理引喻失当说开去
·霍金或欺世盗名
·霍金或欺世盗名(二)
·从马彩云到雷洋,昌平之事动静大
·人大硕士雷洋真的嫖娼了吗?
·财新网与媒体掐架,郑州血案有真相吗?
·雷洋案只能糊涂了事
·政治、维权、欺骗(一)
·向天下人求助
·从习总玉言到现实的距离
·蔡英文固执己见 “九二共识”尴尬谢幕
·习总的“六个必须”缺了什么?
·哈佛教授与“五毛党”
·法治的昏聩登峰造极
·雷洋案----一次伪民意的自我救赎秀
·副省长被打应该是杜撰
·哈佛教授与“五毛党”(二)
·雷洋案的“程序正义”只能是意淫
·是“偷鸡腿”还是偷民心?
·从“偷鸡腿”到中国的人权
·安康副市长到底是咋死的?
·安康副市长真是个清官?
·再谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·广西律师被扯破裤子的破绽
·安康副市长的“移民”算腐败吗?
·郑永年的谬论(一)
·又是一个“穷”死的县委书记?
·新常态,无常理
·胡长官一个暑假如何赚100多?
·呼格母亲梦太多 聂树斌案难公正
·同是自杀,两副市长命运两重天
·“你懂的”与“抢孩子”
·现身说法话聂树斌的签名
·聂树斌案只能糊涂了事
·聂树斌案只能糊涂了事(二)
·聂树斌案涉及的官到底有多大?
·聂树斌案只能糊涂了事(三)
·怎一个乱字了得
·众筹十万,再批周小平
·618,不只是京东们的救命稻草
·聂树斌案与乌坎事件
·“网友告政府”就是一笑话
·高考与诺贝尔奖
·且慢吹嘘聂树案再审
·《求是》副总编为何求死?
·人民日报对“反腐败”自信的离谱
·《中国共产党问责条例》可信吗?
·造谣,是一种教科书式的美德
·三谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·四谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·五谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer

   
   To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers
   heated debate "universal values"
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials 

   hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments · 127 
   
   Translator:God has eyes
   
   The Centuries ago, the great thinker Rousseau and
   Voltaire, Diderot of heated debate and generated
   ill feelings. And help us to understand the
   truth: there is no perfect idea, great thinkers
   can not get rid of the limitations of the times.
   Based on this, Mr. Gu Xiaojun "just values" has
   deeply affected the care Disciples, Gu Powder
   group members, as well as subtle many people
   dare not anger nor outspoken. But they still lack
   the voice of opposition. Shi Sansheng I feel
   sorry, not against people, but seen in the
   network "dissidents" and more general terms,
   dare to refute Mr. Gu Xiaojun thinking of
   glorious, just blindly attack Xia Sanlu. Such
   "dissent", a slight understanding of the little
   people of the mainland strict management
   ideology can tell, which was fifty cents were the
   usual "thinking of you speak to him, he speaks to
   you and sophistry" approach.
   So, in addition to fifty cents trouble. Have not
   really thought people dare to stand up and
   loudly refuted Mr. Gu Xiaojun "fair view"? Of
   course not, there are at least the selection of
   "foreign policy" previous "one hundred global
   thinkers" who was never shot. Even foreign
   thinkers read understand Mr. Gu Xiaojun "fair
   view", as well as the local Chinese thinkers. Even
   the local Chinese thinkers refused to hand, not
   there "Foreign Policy" can "emancipate the mind
   the great debate" in the name, a survival of the
   fittest to do!
   Way back Shi Sansheng year has also been
   located the Recruitment Challenge Cup world
   Confucius Hole Sun and hole Confucian
   descenShit on Confucius's "destiny" concept is
   the grotesque not by the divination doctrine
   "debate. Unfortunately, until it is blocked, not
   even one person can refute Shi Sansheng
   global. Detract from one of the world's leading
   media --- "foreign policy, are not as good as Shi
   Sansheng my tolerance? Moreover, the Chinese
   culture is about "was not exposed deed goes
   unpunished". If foreign policy seriously affect
   China willing to liberal ideas of the Western
   world, why not schooling is a Shi Sansheng, to a
   real confrontation of ideas?
   Seriously China, the courage to stand up and
   self-proclaimed "big thinkers", the only one of
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun ear. The world to see: Mr. Gu
   was blocked under every possible way, his mind
   is still "wild fire, Springtime Renaissance. The
   estimated global thinkers, especially local
   Chinese thinkers early on Mr. Gu Xiaojun unique
   heart Health unforgiveness. "Foreign Policy" Why
   not nationality Mr. Gu Xiaojun introduce
   ourselves to another disciple recommend, Gu
   dough recommended when the title "public impartiality is
   the first values, Chinese thinkers shot together
   to field the Rush it? Sure enough, the natural
   rights of freedom "beat" public impartiality is the first
   values. That does not prove that the westerly
   overwhelm the Dongfeng? Foreign policy from the
   sidelines, fame and fortune, why not?
   To be honest, not even good at Habitat the Gu
   disciples first "Big Brother", "public impartiality is the first
   values," Mr. Gu Xiaojun still feel a puzzle. How
   eager global foreign policy thinkers wing,
   pointing my maze!
   How? Foreign policy decision-makers, you have
   no courage and magnanimity, dare to come to
   the farm, the Western ideological polemics?
   People cooking, CCTV, huh "Sino-French Culinary
   Competition. Is the so-called thinkers, not
   people cooking brave?
   The mule is a horse, he will have to pull out yo
   not.
   [Shi Sansheng Friday, October 26, 2012 5:43 China]
(2012/10/26 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场