新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[To Foreign Policy: “the public impartiality is the first values” is ]
石三生
·致瑞典国王的第三封信
·莫言与顾晓军的差距
·瑞典国王的特使回访石三生
·致瑞典国王的第四封信
·论《打倒诺贝尔奖》
·诺贝尔文学奖的堕落与和平奖的无奈
·陈瞎子明修栈道 莫言偷袭诺贝尔
·诺奖丑闻缠身 莫言臭名远扬
·致瑞典国王的第五封信
·感谢顾晓军先生及热爱公正的人们
·公正始来 漫天雪飞
·马悦然为何爆料山东文化干部行贿
·致《外交政策》:顾晓军才是当之无愧的思想家
·马悦然与瑞典文学院很可能涉嫌诈骗
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”领先全球
·致外交政策:思想家需要前瞻更须影响力
·莫言获奖橙子虚 顾晓军拒不领情
·To “Foreign Policy”: Gu Xiaojun is worthy and Fully deserve thinkers
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”是普世价值
·To Foreign Policy: “the public impartiality is the first values” is
·马悦然唯利是图 文学奖难免龌龊
·致外交政策:请全球思想家激辩"普世价值"
·为何马悦然与诺评委主席嘴中尽是谎言
·To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer
·石三生与潍坊市政府争讼案之终结篇--国家赔偿
·致外交政策:草泥马是国骂是垃圾不是思想
·权外交政策莫学纽约时报继续出洋相
·马悦然何不劝莫言扮山东文化干部?
·问外交政策:思想是什么?
·马悦然曲线求饶 张一一甘做伪使
·Asked "foreign policy": What is the Thought?
·问外交政策:你们真关心中国人的命运吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy: Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们懂得忏悔吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy:谁敢指导十八大?
·Who dares to guide 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of Ch
·Asked Foreign Policy: You know Gu dough?
·Foreign Policy's Choice - pretended blind or pretended the fool
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们知道顾粉团吗?
·Foreign Policy的抉择—装瞎或装傻
·to TIME :数中国风云人物,勿忘顾晓军
·Foreign Policy 是否正当?
·to TIME A number of influential man in China, do not forget Gu Xiaojun
·问时代周刊:为何没有中国的思想家?
·Asked TIME: Why no Chinese thinker?
·时代周刊与阴部整容
·TIME magazine and the genital organs to face-lift
·罗姆尼是落水狗 时代周刊很像猪
·瑞典国也学会了反炒
·时代周刊与罗姆尼气疯了
·The TIME magazine and Romney angry Go berserk
·问时代周刊骗子的肉香吗?
·AskedTIME liar meaty fragrant?
·TIME 的三大骗
·特务与时局
·TIME's three big cheat
·装瞎的奥巴马与TIME
·问TIME你混得怎么样?
·Spies and the current political situation
·Disguised as blind Obama and TIME
·Asked TIME: How well do you unspoken rules?
·TIME为Obama挖了一个坑
·TIME dug a pit for Obama
·TIME正全力狙击顾晓军
·TIME is full to snipe Gu Xiaojun
·TIME是在贩卖艺术还是在贩毒?
·TIME的良知与下场
·TIME conscience and the final outcome
·Asked TIME:尔等意欲何为?
·Asked TIME: What are those of you who want to
·外交政策已知羞时代周刊仍痴迷
·温家宝总理引用屈原诗赏析
·Foreign Policy already know shame TIME still obsessed
·外交政策为何要抛弃陈光诚?
·感谢美国外交政策向公正靠拢
·To thank U.S. Foreign Policy closer to impartiality
·与好争辩的美国外交政策专家谈谈
·With the like argue's U.S.Foreign Policy experts to talk
·热烈祝贺外交政策继续装傻
·顾晓军大败美国外交政策
·Warmly congratulate the foreign policy continues to play the fool
·Time 龌龊之极obama 牙白心黑
·Gu Xiaojun defeated American foreign policy
·时代风云人物—全球顶级思想家顾晓军
·Time the dirty extremely obama the teeth white heart black
·Times influential man - the world's top thinkers Gu Xiaojun
·风云人物顾晓军反智先锋数时代
·外交政策真白痴 时代风云已式微
·Influential man Gu Xiaojun Anti intellectualism pioneer is TIME
·"Foreign Policy" true idiot, "TIME" already fading
·奥巴马豪赌时代周刊 顾晓军智胜外交政策
·Obama gamble times weekly Gu Xiaojun outwit foreign policy
·时代周刊诡计多端 顾晓军思想真精彩
·时代周刊不堪凌辱 借韩媒反驳石三生
·回味顾晓军思想 看时代周刊作弊
·The U.S. TIME crafty Gu Xiaojun ism brilliant
·打倒奥巴马 解放中国人
·Time magazine unbearable humiliation borrow Korean media refute Shi Sa
·To aftertaste Gu Xiaojun Thought Time magazine cheating
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
To Foreign Policy: “the public impartiality is the first values” is

   
   
   To Foreign Policy: “the public impartiality is the first values” is a universal value
   
   “China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group” Shi Sansheng of Kyushu Comments · of 126

   
   Translator:God has eyes
   
   Baidu, or in China, in the eyes of President
   Obama’s universal “values ​​of democracy,
   freedom, the rule of law and human rights.” The
   concept of this fish to mislead the people, or
   even misleading the world. This error, mistake
   now.
   I can be found in what is a “universal value”,
   “Southern Weekend” in 2007, “What is the
   universal values”, is probably the instigator.
   Southern weeks given the universal values is​​
   “only as the value of all values, universal values,
   and that is freedom.”
   Southern weeks understanding of universal
   values is​​ clearly at the same level with a few
   hundred years ago, Rousseau. But it is by virtue
   of this fallacy, backward thinking. Southern weeks
   enthusiastically arrange things pointed out the
   direction of China’s road to democracy, that is,
   “What we need is the universal values of​​ the
   Enlightenment. Matter of course, that one day,
   society would be safely transition.”
   Perhaps because Southern Weekly geek theory
   led to a visit to China after a lapse of two years
   after the universal values of​​ the President of the
   United States in the Southern Weekly Edition, an
   open sunroof farce starring Southern weeks. This
   is a farce, because the White House published
   the Obama accept the contents of the interview
   does not have any different with the Southern
   weeks. A conformist, Obama claimed that China’s
   stability and prosperity in line with the national
   interests of the United States an exclusive
   interview, where As traumatic Southern weeks to
   open a window in protest? This is not crap!
   Besides, imposing a U.S. presidential visit to
   China, will be child’s play to advance good
   itinerary? Really the case, Obama is too non-
   compliance with the rules of the game are not.
   Then, developed countries as a democratic elite
   representatives, President Obama Why are
   pushing Southern weeks behind the “universal
   values”? Mr. Gu Xiaojun “just values” not to have
   been made before, almost no one understand
   the authorities, no one would think of this is
   Rousseau worried about the “People tend to be
   deceived” dirty. Obama and Southern weeks, but
   the name of the establishment in the guise of
   freedom on the illusory Chaki, to achieve the so-
   called democratic process in Iraq who is —
   “enlightenment, in the experience of human
   history, the modern essential step-by-step, and
   we never really started. we need universal
   values of​​ the Enlightenment. matter of course,
   that one day, society would be safely transition.
   ”
   With the result of the backward thinking of the
   Enlightenment, as summarized in the sand-
   based, high-rise buildings never built the day.
   The likewise Yugongyishan, children and
   grandchildren, even if we do not, dig up a
   mountain, will pile up another mountain. Wait
   until / dog / day / Southern weeks have put
   people enlightenment over and over, until
   suddenly found freedom actually may not. You
   say: how to do? This not only a revolution? If
   the revolution, it is also called Ping
   transformation it?
   Of course, from President Obama’s speech 90
   birthday when the Chinese Communists “Hope:
   The Chinese Communist Party is leading the
   movement of the harmony and stability
   maintenance, long-term good luck!” Can also be
   seen in even Obama are confused & P The Sai
   value stuff? Or, possibly by the theory Southern
   Zhou Pushi value freak, Obama has become a
   paradoxical freak.
   All of these are caused by Rousseau as well as
   the “Declaration of Independence” serious
   deficiencies “fair”. As Mr. Gu Xiaojun said:
   “the public impartiality is really universal values” and “the public impartiality, is
   the real universal values, is the real fundamental
   universal values.”
   Southern weeks they shoot itself in the foot freak
   theoretical efficacy horizon beginning to the
   money minch who retaliatory killing “(Global
   Times language): die with the enemy” killing, is
   it not the universal values of​​ the Southern
   Weekly Edition core — free one? When the
   universal democracy incompetent universal
   imbalance of the rule of law, universal human
   rights seems to be no. The money minch
   addition to universal freedom, what else? Since
   it is free, you tube he taken what way? Guan
   Dele this?
   Southern weeks Obama who perhaps have
   forgotten: the so-called freedom of the core, not
   that revolutionary do? French Revolution, the
   United States Declaration of Independence, the
   acquisition of freedom, that is not all revolution?
   Revolution, is the killing? If the universal value
   of the core is free. Killing, how likely is not a
   universal value?
   Great Rousseau, also believes that the retaliatory
   killing free? He said: “People’s exactly the same
   rights according to the kind of people deprived
   of their freedom, to restore their freedom, so
   people have reason to regain freedom.”
   Why to Southern weeks from Rousseau to Obama,
   the elite from the country’s elite of democracy to
   an authoritarian country can not be solved —
   “freedom requires revolution, revolution for
   freedom” a dog bites the tail-cycle of it?
   Everyone is because of the lack of a the public impartiality of
   the cause!
   Yes, the only the public impartiality first, to get rid of “freedom
   — Revolution” cycle. Mr. Gu Xiaojun said: “a
   ruling party, only interests of the public impartiality, in order to
   maintain social stability, but also in order to
   stay in power down; Otherwise, anyone can use
   what they consider a reasonable way, the
   complaint.”
   Only, and only “fair values” is the real universal
   values. This is the essence of Gu Xiaojun
   thinking, will also be a core value of the future
   of human society, the more will be the only
   principle to maintain the era of the global
   village.
   To be fair, the foreign policy should be to Mr.
   Gu Xiaojun through the ranks of one hundred
   global thinkers “!
   
   [Shi Sansheng Thursday, October 25, 2012 02:27 China]
(2012/10/24 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场