盛雪文集
[主页]->[独立中文笔会]->[盛雪文集]->[在加拿大国会人权委员会听证会上作证]
盛雪文集
·十:流亡生涯
·十一:赖昌星加国入狱,朱熔基誓言引渡
·不是结语/本书人物简介
*******
散文
*******
·雁阵惊寒──祭父亲
·达兰萨拉:辛酸与悲凉的故事
·逃离苦难的死亡之旅--四名大陆偷渡女子访谈录
·福建偷渡者在加拿大
·血色黎明
·请点燃一支蜡烛
·抒情诗人与敌对份子
·雪魂飘隐处 满目尽葱茏
·爷爷的恩缘
·我为刘贤斌绝食
·埃德蒙顿并不寒冷(多图)
********
用心听西藏
********
·敬请联署——
·超越禁忌 缔造和平
·达兰萨拉不是故乡
·专访达赖喇嘛——1999
·西方首脑会见达赖喇嘛高峰期----加拿大总理哈珀又迈一大步
·达赖访加 华人争议
·红色的海洋 黑色的悲哀
·RED SEA, BLACK GRIEF
·藏人地震捐款为何被拒----且看中国驻多伦多总领事馆如何讲政治
·西藏真相
·寻找共同点——日内瓦汉藏会议:背景及缘起
·慈悲与尊重是汉藏关系的前途——温哥华汉藏论坛评述
·用了解、理解来化解误解——北美华文媒体访问达兰萨拉
·搭起漢藏民族相互瞭解的橋樑——谈多伦多汉藏论坛
·一路走来的脚印
·百位华人学者及民主人士与达赖喇嘛尊者对谈
·關注西藏命運,華人自我救贖
·透过藏人自焚的火焰(图)
·3. 10 請華人發出正義的呼聲
·暴政有期 大爱无疆
·暴政有期 大愛無疆
·西藏之痛 中國之恥 文明之殤
·在加拿大藏人于国会山举行的集会上演讲
·要求加拿大国会就西藏紧急局势举行听证会(请签名参与)
*********
中共国家恐怖主义
*********
·中共与国家恐怖主义(一)
·中共与国家恐怖主义(二)
·中共与国家恐怖主义(三)
·中共与国家恐怖主义(四)
**********
朱小华案独家报道
**********
·THE ZHU XIAOHUA CASE: A WINDOW INTO CHINESE HARDBALL POLITICS
·朱小华案系列报道(一)朱小华案开审,权力斗争升温
·朱小华案系列报道(二)朱小华庭上抗辩,推翻所有指控
·朱小华案系列报道(三)卷入权力斗争 朱小华家破人亡
·朱小华案系列报道(四)朱小华要求中央允境外记者采访
·朱小华案系列报道(五)朱镕基出访 朱小华遭殃
·朱小华案系列报道(六)朱案厮杀 港商垫底
·朱小华案系列报道(七)朱小华案将宣判,刑期十五年
·朱小华案系列报道(八)朱小华咆哮法庭
·江、朱各人手上一张牌――透视朱小华案、远华案
·原交通部副部长郑光迪案判决内幕
·朱熔基羽翼被翦──浅析朱小华案件
***********
政评和时评
***********
·知识界依附人格及选择困境
·江泽民访加与丢中国人的脸
·大厦将倾 硕鼠搬家-----谈中国贪官外逃
·共产劫富后的两个中国----透视中国的贫富悬殊
·致曹常青兼談民運
·新年感言
·我们是来自同一个国家么?
·张林被拘,亟需声援
·生命不能承受之重
·何处是乐园——福建偷渡者在加拿大
·世纪之交的中共对台湾政策及台湾的选择
·贾庆林与赖昌星案
·天人永隔之际--王炳章父亲病危唯一心愿见儿子一面
·一步之遥——平安或苦难
·王炳章父故世心愿未了天人永隔
·胡锦涛访加纪实
·万事似具备 遣返又成空--分析赖昌星遣返案的一波三折
·回应历史呼声终结共产暴政
·华妇溺杀患病女儿引争议
·熱比婭:維族的母親
·加拿大前後任總理為中國人權爭功勞
·正视中共在海外的间谍活动
·加拿大人对中国产品不放心
·加总理忙峰会:从北美到亚太
·为什么加中旅游协议总签不成
·奥运精神何在?──八十八岁母亲遥盼王炳章
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
在加拿大国会人权委员会听证会上作证

(注: 今天偶然看到网上登载了加拿大国会“外交和国家发展委员会”下属的“国际人权委员会”,于2006年11月21日,在国会举办的中国人权听证会的正式文件。
   
   本人应邀出席,是四位证人之一。我在证词中特别介绍了师涛、张林、杨天水和王炳章的案子。现任加拿大移公民暨民部长兼多元文化部长杰森.肯尼(Jason Kenney)主持了听证会。数十位加拿大国会议员出席了听证会。)
   
   

   http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=2521988&Mode=1&Language=E
   
   
   特摘录其中本人发言部分内容如下:
   
   
   
   CANADA
   39th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION
   Subcommittee on International Human Rights of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development
   
   
   EVIDENCE
   CONTENTS
   Tuesday, November 21, 2006
   
   The Chair (Mr. Jason Kenney (Calgary Southeast, CPC))
   
   
   
   Ms. Xue Sheng (Vice-President, Federation for a Democratic China):
   
    Ladies and gentlemen, honourable members of Parliament, first of all, I would like to thank the subcommittee for inviting me here.
   
    My name is Sheng Xue, and I am vice-president of the Federation for a Democratic China, which was established by those who fled China after the Tiananmen Square massacre and other pro-democracy dissidents outside China. It is headquartered in Germany now, with more than 20 branches across the world, including Canada. Some of our members, including those from the Toronto area, are at the moment joining the rally on Parliament Hill to give our support to Prime Minister Harper for his courageous efforts regarding human rights in China.
   
    The official bilateral Sino-Canada human rights dialogue has been going on for nearly ten years. Throughout this period the Chinese government has learned to be more cunning in its response to the international community's concerns and the criticism about its human rights record. They are at the moment hosting a large-scale Human Rights in China exhibition. This so-called “let the whole world witness the new development of China's human rights cause” is in fact a sham.
   
    What is really going on? I am going to describe a few cases that are related to me directly. In the spring of 2004, in preparation for the memorial service for the 15th anniversary of the June 4 massacre, I e-mailed some pro-democracy friends around the world asking whether we should use the opportunity to try to visit China, since we had been barred from visiting China for 15 years. Soon after my e-mail, the newspaper office in Shanxi province, where the writer Shi Tao was working, issued a notice from China's central government that stated that pro-democracy elements of foreign countries should be strictly prevented from entering China during the 15th anniversary of the June 4 movement. After learning this, Shi Tao e-mailed the information to a friend in New York through Yahoo.
   
   Shi Tao was then arrested and sentenced to ten years in prison on charges of leaking state secrets. One e-mail message landed him ten years in prison. This case makes me very sad, because I was the one who initiated the discussion of entering China. This is a picture of Shi Tao. He married just one year before he was arrested. His wife was forced to divorce him.
   
    Another case is about Zhang Lin. He graduated from Tsinghua University, China's most prestigious university in the field of science and technology. Because of his pro-democracy activities, Zhang Lin was given a prison sentence for three years followed by two years in a forced labour camp. He came to the United States in 1997, but in 1998 he decided to return to China to continue implementing his vision. Because of his dream for a better China, he was sentenced to three years again of re-education through labour right after he entered China.
   
    Last February, I sent him an e-mail invitation to join the memorial service committee for Zhao Ziyang, the former general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party who was ousted and put in house arrest for fifteen years for sympathizing with the June 4 student movement. Zhang Lin readily accepted. He was then stopped by police on the way to the home of Zhao Ziyang in Beijing to offer condolences. He was arrested at the train station on his way home. He has totally lost his freedom. On July 28, 2005, last year, he was sentenced to five years' imprisonment, a jail term even longer than before, on charges of inciting subversion of state power.
   
    (1120)展示照片
   
    This was Zhang Lin with his wife and two-year-old daughter.
    Mr. Jason Kenney had an experience when he was in Beijing where he was stopped by plainclothes police.
   
    Finally I'd like to mention Yang Tianshui. He was a freelance writer who had already served a ten-year prison sentence between 1990 and 2000 for counter-revolutionary crimes. As a dissident in cyber space, he was sentenced in May 2006 to twelve years in prison for subversion of state power. The trial was rushed through in three hours. So he got an even longer sentence for the same reason.
   
    Among the thirteen items of the so-called proof of guilt, two of them are related to me. First, a 500-euro donation for his lawyer's fee that I collected for him was labelled by the court as a fund to subvert the government. Second, my invitation to him to join the memorial service for Zhao Ziyang was defined as an anti-government crime.
   
    Reports by Reporters Without Borders have shown that each and every year the Chinese regime has arrested and jailed more journalists and writers than any other country in the world. Hardly anyone who dares to advocate democracy or establish an organization based on this work can escape the fate of persecution.
   
    In conclusion, I believe that in the past ten years there has been no progress in the improvement of human rights in China. The official bilateral human rights dialogue between China and Canada has not been helpful. Therefore, we call upon the Canadian government to suspend the closed-door human rights dialogue with the Chinese government and replace it with a more effective approach.
   
    Second, if talks must continue, the Canadian government should invite non-governmental organizations, such as the Federation for a Democratic China, Canada, to participate.
   
    Third, we call upon the Canadian government to develop a structure that will help organize and finance the human rights dialogue between non-governmental organizations in Canada and China.
   
    Thank you very much.
   
   。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。
   
   Ms. Xue Sheng:
   
    Of course, dialogue is very important, but dialogue is not just talking to each other; there are lots of other ways to have dialogue.
   
    As I mentioned in my presentation, the Chinese government is holding a big human rights exhibition that the Chinese media are calling the biggest human rights exhibition in the world. It is the first one held by the state. Of course, the Chinese government has learned to be smarter on human rights issues. The Chinese government knows how to educate its own people to be proud of the human rights situation in China. But Chinese citizens don't have much information about the real human rights situation in the world. I think we need to do this, and in three parts: Canadian society, the Chinese Canadian society here, and the Chinese society in China.
   
    We have a million Chinese people here in Canada. When Prime Minister Harper raised the human rights situation in China, I don't think every Chinese person here was happy about that. To me that's very funny, because why are we here? Why did we come to Canada?
   
    We had a rally in Toronto yesterday, and I spoke to the crowd in the street. A lot of people were yelling at us, “Hey, you are here. Why are you saying something good about Harper? Aren't you Chinese?” I said, “Ask yourself why you are here, why you are in Canada.” It was pretty strange.
   
    The Chinese community here is frightened by the Chinese government, even though they are in Canada. I think the Canadian government should invest in the Chinese community here in Canada, to educate them and let them know, to protect them and make them safe. A lot of Chinese organizations or social groups are very close to the consulate and to the embassy. Why is that? It's not because they don't understand the values, or they don't trust or agree with the values; it's just because they are so frightened. They know that the Chinese government is so brutal they could do anything.

[下一页]
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场