百家争鸣
明暗經緯錄
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[明暗經緯錄]->[韓國特色的臆想症受到了打擊]
明暗經緯錄
·三位河南人袁世凱張作霖徐世昌曾保護
·唱紅打黑 請君入瓮
·CC黨PK 與國民黨中央民主派的對立
·國軍之父 永別椿萱
·西藏
·請馬英九總統不要讓考試院蒸發
·中共主席張國燾在甘孜
·中共60年建國以來的北京大水 就是上天給南水北調的報應
·國父孫中山的五族共和與西藏
·替中華民國國父闡明 驅逐韃虜的時代意義
·馬英九總統打響社會公義的第一槍
·南水北調騙很大
·九權維穩九州 一個都少不了
·中華人民共和國政府靠搶地維持GDP
·南通人的智慧
·兩岸會談新里程表
·黃帝沒有名字 正如西藏人
·中國尋找德先生 寧無一個是男兒
·南水北調的戕賊
·南水北調的自相戕賊
·賊党
·河蟹的南水北調
·噢巴馬財務懸崖逼近 必須懸崖勒馬
·鄧小平打橋牌失職釀成河南潰壩死人二十四萬 中共集體必需給個說法
·奧林匹克出讓道德給強權
·國民黨義診在甘肅PK共產黨在韶山演戲作秀
·民族敗類 草泥馬粟裕
·食人族的後代 你的名字叫中共
·國菊與牡丹
·邦椿立于海島 金萱依然燦爛
·本尊未認罪 替身頂下罪
·土匪起家特色 極權麻醉社會
·只因暴秦把書燒了
·中國你來自于何方﹖
·感謝京畿台北市長的智仁勇魄力
·釋放中國
·何必虛名盜世﹖
·胡耀邦PK四人幫
·被除戶 台北市長不懂社會正義嗎﹖
·外交修兵與國共停戰
·毛澤
·中共有礙國際視聽瞻觀 違反國際公義的大連人體工廠
·台灣關係法訂立的濫殤
·韓國特色的臆想症受到了打擊
·項莊舞劍 意在谷歌Google
·古時中國不包括嶺南 遑論釣魚台
·Senkaku釣魚台可以釣到大魚台灣﹖
·天朝亡於過度膨漲擴張
·討回Vladivostok俄羅斯海參崴 義和團未收復的失地
·受陳水扁青睞的人 不要助紂為虐
·開台聖王的啟發
·美共和黨還得仰賴台灣 繼續維持亞洲平穩
·慈禧扶清滅洋 中共重溫惡夢
·反共復民
·怎麼恢復我們中華民國的主權
·開羅會議把台灣交給中華民國
·甦醒吧! 中國!
·如果人民大會堂可以演奏中華民國優美國歌
·美國對國民黨敬畏 而衍生出共產黨把持中國
·以漢制漢一國兩制
·永遠的中華民國的孩子
·沒有綠葉的牡丹
·蘇莊評論共和黨總統侯選人Romney 你只能活兩次
·1943開羅宣言把台灣及釣魚台還給中華民國的中國
·恭喜滿清遺族金溥聰任駐美代表
·歷史告示錄 中共大陸主權不被中華民國承認
·美國的軟實力優勢
·掂量一個政府的實力與真心實意
·自由的海風
·台灣深山裡本土大黑熊的話
·共產黨莫言國民黨未抗戰
·陸生的帳單應由中華人民共和國來支付
·國民政府的仁政 荒地有情天
·台灣貔貅 只吃不拉
·台灣弱勢人口規劃之責
·中共曾經利用劉延
·人性的自由
·令計劃真正的致命傷 侵犯河南的南水北調計劃執行
·誰在消費中華民國的治權 行政院
·秒殺18大去毛化 增中山 穩中華 民心向
·傳奇人物 國寶金嗓子 反映了時代的辛酸過程
·抗美援朝的中共遺毒思想
·台灣亂民盲從被民進黨挖空國家資源 卻要軍人抵罪
·請邱毅揭發是誰在蝕國家數萬
·推背圖 中華民國生我美猴死我俄鵰
·赤伏符 中興名主政治讖言
·如何點共黨死穴
·連勝文臭乳未乾 不夠格當丐幫幫主
·中華民國是渡過台灣海峽的中樞執政政府
·父親的故鄉與習仲勳情系祖居地南陽
·來自于美國總統的致謝函
·如何幫助馬英九總統振興台灣中華
·如何幫助馬英九總統振興台灣
·心理分析台灣民情 以台制台
·龍應台這個人請下臺
·送給中華民國文化部長一首歌
·連戰是否用丐幫的錢 援助百萬給雲南
·要如何形成一個中國共識
·嬗變PK政改 天下三嬗都是亡國奴的不屈不撓行動政變者
·天下三嬗 方興未艾
·中共軍委歷史定案是叛國的組織
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
韓國特色的臆想症受到了打擊

   
   韓國特色的臆想症受到了打擊
   
   紐約時報﹐ 8月25日
   


   韓國三星敗訴, Apple 蘋果公司勝訴﹐陪審團判決﹐獲得$1 billion 10億美金的賠
   償。
   
   殺雞儆猴﹐誰敢亂說亂抄襲﹖
   
   版權所有﹐翻印必究。
   
   再說屈原是韓國人﹖
   
   老子告訴你﹐三星﹐是河南中原的星星。
   
   偷走咱的文化福祿壽三星﹐變成你的商標?
   
   哈哈哈! 大快人心!
   
   假三星﹐抄襲中原﹐受到美國的制裁。
   
   看來﹐唯有國民黨老派﹐才能讓台灣登上亞洲4小龍之首。
   
   牛郎織女星下凡 7夕時
   
   
   
   
   附錄
   
   http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/25/technology/jury-reaches-decision-in-apple-samsung-
   patent-trial.html?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&adxnnl=1&emc=edit_th_20120825&adxnnlx=1345888827-
   BbeRa/6dHXT7m5CxSCHJWw
   
   Jury Awards $1 Billion to Apple in Samsung Patent Case
   
   Apple won a decisive victory on Friday in a lawsuit against Samsung, a verdict
   that will give Apple ammunition in a far-flung patent war with its global
   competitors in the smartphone business.
   What the Verdict Said
   
   * Samsung violated a series of Apple's patents related to the software and
   design of mobile devices.
   * Apple's patents were valid.
   * Apple did not violate any of Samsung's patents.
   * Apple was awarded $1 billion in damages.
   
   The nine jurors in the case, who faced the daunting task of answering more than 700 questions on sometimes highly technical matters, returned a verdict after just three days of deliberations at a federal courthouse in San Jose, Calif. They found that Samsung infringed on a series of Apple’s patents on mobile devices, awarding Apple more than $1 billion in damages.
   
   That is not a big financial blow to Samsung, one of the world’s largest electronics companies. But the decision could essentially force it and other smartphone makers to redesign their products to be less Apple-like, or risk further legal defeats.
   
   Consumers could end up with some welcome diversity in phone and tablet design — or they may be stuck with devices that manufacturers have clumsily revamped to avoid crossing Apple.
   
   Samsung said it would ask the court to overturn the verdict and, if that is unsuccessful, appeal to a higher court.
   The jury found that various Samsung products violated Apple patents covering things like the “bounce back” effect when a user scrolls to the end of a list on the iPhone and iPad, and the pinch-to-zoom gesture that users make when they want to magnify an image. Samsung was also found to have infringed Apple patents covering the physical design of the iPhone.
   
   In its decision on a countersuit by Samsung, the jury added some sting by finding in favor of Apple across the board. Samsung had asked for more than $422 million from Apple, contending it had violated Samsung’s patents, but got nothing.
   Because Samsung was found to have willfully infringed Apple patents, the judge in the case could grant an Apple request to triple the damages Samsung is required to pay, though lawyers said the size of the initial award made this less likely.
   Despite the eye-popping award, one of the largest ever in a patent case, the more important effect of the jury’s decision could be the impact it has on Android, the Google operating system used by Samsung and a broad array of other companies in their devices. For every iPhone sold worldwide, more than three smartphones running Android are sold, reflecting the meteoric rise of Google’s software.
   
   Apple’s suit against Samsung, the world’s largest maker of smartphones, has partly been viewed as a proxy war against Google, which Apple executives have derided as a copycat, swiping Apple’s innovations. Steven P. Jobs, the late chief executive of Apple, told his biographer that Android was a “stolen product.”
   Apple is expected to ask the judge in the Samsung case for an injunction preventing Samsung from shipping products that infringe on Apple’s patents. The verdict could also bolster Apple’s legal attacks on Android devices from other companies.
   “It’s going to make it very difficult for not only Samsung, but for other companies to mimic the Apple products,” said Robert Barr, executive director of the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology at the University of California, Berkeley.
   
   Charles Golvin, an analyst at Forrester Research, said consumers could experience some discomfort in their use of smartphones if Samsung and other manufacturers are forced to design around certain basic functions to avoid violating Apple’s patents, though he believes the decision will prod them to innovate. “Consumers will adapt, but there will be some bumps in the road as they make that adaptation,” Mr. Golvin said.
   
   The trial provided a rare window into the inner workings of the two companies, especially the highly secretive Apple, forcing them to divulge sales figures, business negotiations and internal memos. Apple executives offered colorful detail, like the way its designers cook up new products around a kitchen table at the company’s headquarters.
   
   The evidence Apple presented, including internal Samsung memos and strategy documents, left little doubt that the iPhone inspired a major effort by the Korean manufacturer to overhaul its mobile phones. But a key question throughout the trial was whether the jury would decide that Samsung had stepped over the line by improperly copying Apple’s technologies. The members of the jury did not explain their decision before stealthily heading out a side exit.
   
   The verdict in the trial hardly concludes the legal battles over patents among companies in the mobile business. There are dozens of such cases winding their way through the courts; Samsung and Apple have also been battling in Germany, Australia and elsewhere. Even so, Samsung remains a major supplier of components for Apple products.
   
   While the decision is likely to weigh on Samsung shares, it sent Apple’s stock up 1.8 percent in after-hours trading. In a statement, Katie Cotton, an Apple spokeswoman, applauded the court for sending a “clear message that stealing isn’t right.”
   
   “We make these products to delight our customers, not for our competitors to flagrantly copy,” she said.
   
   Samsung said in a statement that the decision was a “loss for the American consumer.”
   
   “It will lead to fewer choices, less innovation, and potentially higher prices,” the company said. “This is not the final word in this case or in battles being waged in courts and tribunals around the world, some of which have already rejected many of Apple’s claims.”
   
   Lisa Alcalay Klug contributed reporting.
(2012/08/25 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场