百家争鸣
明暗經緯錄
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[明暗經緯錄]->[韓國特色的臆想症受到了打擊]
明暗經緯錄
·黃埔小子PK張藝謀來台統戰
·韓戰臨津江之役
·國民黨治下的教育 電影的功效
·民脂民膏
·芝加哥工業巨頭Avery Brundage擁有我商的文化瑰寶
·中共國事分析
·艾未未的鳥巢意象對比傅抱石的石頭城
·王立軍可供出核廠誘引川震
·中華民國憲法未規定總統得死在台灣
·中共社會主義全民瘋癲症候診斷
·食人族國家利益 江山如此多慘
·小舅的乾爹張國燾
·中共用雷鋒精神搶奪地方文物
·載灃改革者精神PK慈禧同志們
·國家的血脈 參政院立法院
·台灣曾有的淨土 台中
·陳水扁記憶出問題 忘記臺獨
·有一些失敗比勝利更勝利
·薄熙來一個人無法概括性承擔中共責任
·如何改造張老謀子﹖
·共產黨的辯護士 此地無銀三百
·中央無人 春光乍現 溫保姆上哪兒遊魂去了
·江澤民的太子黨對胡錦濤的共青團
·河南饅頭為中共贏得打
·中華民國國民政府的道德產權及知識產權不可受侵犯
·扛槍的黃埔父親正傳
·和談什麼﹖ 1949美國並沒有搶救太平豪華客輪
·解碼8341 中央警衛隊
·誰維護了中華大陸領土主權
·台中的雲端PK漢城
·中共債遺胡溫
·因為方勵之 大陸人還有希望
·老態龍鐘的不政改 中共恐怕老命不保
·當中國出發時
·馬英九總統 請採取孔子的中庸之道
·經國先生之子來美國留學 依然深深愛台灣
·一切有情 都無掛礙
·民進黨缺乏對台灣責任感
·共黨達官貴人其實不如普通老百姓自由
·賽先生已經創造出兩岸和平架構 等候德先生出現來成為一統國家
·1949年大陸失去的不止是黃金及故宮文物
·蘇州國家園林意識 解語亭
·共產黨下臺前的三大交待
·列舉中共中央政治局在河南省的歷史劣跡罪狀
·班禪13世 認同華夏
·為什麼﹖藏人未曾控訴英國人? 台灣人不曾追究日本人?
·為什麼﹖藏人未曾控訴英國人? 台灣人不曾追究日本人?
·幫助中共從良的第一步
·馬英九的憲兵是否被矯枉過正
·有巢士與銀行鬥智
·紀念偉大台灣的母親們
·中共延遲18大召開
·捐車記
·多彩的中國
·中華民國的主權
·台灣外省人無法割捨文化母國
·中外史上最大烏龍案
·無政府的政府 將要絕跡的黨
·如何拱馬英九上兩岸和談的制高點平臺
·中書令PK總書記
·美國讓利台灣
·中華民國領土主權涵蓋台灣与大陸
·令狐計劃的前生今世
·各自為政62年的中國
·三位河南人袁世凱張作霖徐世昌曾保護
·唱紅打黑 請君入瓮
·CC黨PK 與國民黨中央民主派的對立
·國軍之父 永別椿萱
·西藏
·請馬英九總統不要讓考試院蒸發
·中共主席張國燾在甘孜
·中共60年建國以來的北京大水 就是上天給南水北調的報應
·國父孫中山的五族共和與西藏
·替中華民國國父闡明 驅逐韃虜的時代意義
·馬英九總統打響社會公義的第一槍
·南水北調騙很大
·九權維穩九州 一個都少不了
·中華人民共和國政府靠搶地維持GDP
·南通人的智慧
·兩岸會談新里程表
·黃帝沒有名字 正如西藏人
·中國尋找德先生 寧無一個是男兒
·南水北調的戕賊
·南水北調的自相戕賊
·賊党
·河蟹的南水北調
·噢巴馬財務懸崖逼近 必須懸崖勒馬
·鄧小平打橋牌失職釀成河南潰壩死人二十四萬 中共集體必需給個說法
·奧林匹克出讓道德給強權
·國民黨義診在甘肅PK共產黨在韶山演戲作秀
·民族敗類 草泥馬粟裕
·食人族的後代 你的名字叫中共
·國菊與牡丹
·邦椿立于海島 金萱依然燦爛
·本尊未認罪 替身頂下罪
·土匪起家特色 極權麻醉社會
·只因暴秦把書燒了
·中國你來自于何方﹖
·感謝京畿台北市長的智仁勇魄力
·釋放中國
·何必虛名盜世﹖
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
韓國特色的臆想症受到了打擊

   
   韓國特色的臆想症受到了打擊
   
   紐約時報﹐ 8月25日
   


   韓國三星敗訴, Apple 蘋果公司勝訴﹐陪審團判決﹐獲得$1 billion 10億美金的賠
   償。
   
   殺雞儆猴﹐誰敢亂說亂抄襲﹖
   
   版權所有﹐翻印必究。
   
   再說屈原是韓國人﹖
   
   老子告訴你﹐三星﹐是河南中原的星星。
   
   偷走咱的文化福祿壽三星﹐變成你的商標?
   
   哈哈哈! 大快人心!
   
   假三星﹐抄襲中原﹐受到美國的制裁。
   
   看來﹐唯有國民黨老派﹐才能讓台灣登上亞洲4小龍之首。
   
   牛郎織女星下凡 7夕時
   
   
   
   
   附錄
   
   http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/25/technology/jury-reaches-decision-in-apple-samsung-
   patent-trial.html?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&adxnnl=1&emc=edit_th_20120825&adxnnlx=1345888827-
   BbeRa/6dHXT7m5CxSCHJWw
   
   Jury Awards $1 Billion to Apple in Samsung Patent Case
   
   Apple won a decisive victory on Friday in a lawsuit against Samsung, a verdict
   that will give Apple ammunition in a far-flung patent war with its global
   competitors in the smartphone business.
   What the Verdict Said
   
   * Samsung violated a series of Apple's patents related to the software and
   design of mobile devices.
   * Apple's patents were valid.
   * Apple did not violate any of Samsung's patents.
   * Apple was awarded $1 billion in damages.
   
   The nine jurors in the case, who faced the daunting task of answering more than 700 questions on sometimes highly technical matters, returned a verdict after just three days of deliberations at a federal courthouse in San Jose, Calif. They found that Samsung infringed on a series of Apple’s patents on mobile devices, awarding Apple more than $1 billion in damages.
   
   That is not a big financial blow to Samsung, one of the world’s largest electronics companies. But the decision could essentially force it and other smartphone makers to redesign their products to be less Apple-like, or risk further legal defeats.
   
   Consumers could end up with some welcome diversity in phone and tablet design — or they may be stuck with devices that manufacturers have clumsily revamped to avoid crossing Apple.
   
   Samsung said it would ask the court to overturn the verdict and, if that is unsuccessful, appeal to a higher court.
   The jury found that various Samsung products violated Apple patents covering things like the “bounce back” effect when a user scrolls to the end of a list on the iPhone and iPad, and the pinch-to-zoom gesture that users make when they want to magnify an image. Samsung was also found to have infringed Apple patents covering the physical design of the iPhone.
   
   In its decision on a countersuit by Samsung, the jury added some sting by finding in favor of Apple across the board. Samsung had asked for more than $422 million from Apple, contending it had violated Samsung’s patents, but got nothing.
   Because Samsung was found to have willfully infringed Apple patents, the judge in the case could grant an Apple request to triple the damages Samsung is required to pay, though lawyers said the size of the initial award made this less likely.
   Despite the eye-popping award, one of the largest ever in a patent case, the more important effect of the jury’s decision could be the impact it has on Android, the Google operating system used by Samsung and a broad array of other companies in their devices. For every iPhone sold worldwide, more than three smartphones running Android are sold, reflecting the meteoric rise of Google’s software.
   
   Apple’s suit against Samsung, the world’s largest maker of smartphones, has partly been viewed as a proxy war against Google, which Apple executives have derided as a copycat, swiping Apple’s innovations. Steven P. Jobs, the late chief executive of Apple, told his biographer that Android was a “stolen product.”
   Apple is expected to ask the judge in the Samsung case for an injunction preventing Samsung from shipping products that infringe on Apple’s patents. The verdict could also bolster Apple’s legal attacks on Android devices from other companies.
   “It’s going to make it very difficult for not only Samsung, but for other companies to mimic the Apple products,” said Robert Barr, executive director of the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology at the University of California, Berkeley.
   
   Charles Golvin, an analyst at Forrester Research, said consumers could experience some discomfort in their use of smartphones if Samsung and other manufacturers are forced to design around certain basic functions to avoid violating Apple’s patents, though he believes the decision will prod them to innovate. “Consumers will adapt, but there will be some bumps in the road as they make that adaptation,” Mr. Golvin said.
   
   The trial provided a rare window into the inner workings of the two companies, especially the highly secretive Apple, forcing them to divulge sales figures, business negotiations and internal memos. Apple executives offered colorful detail, like the way its designers cook up new products around a kitchen table at the company’s headquarters.
   
   The evidence Apple presented, including internal Samsung memos and strategy documents, left little doubt that the iPhone inspired a major effort by the Korean manufacturer to overhaul its mobile phones. But a key question throughout the trial was whether the jury would decide that Samsung had stepped over the line by improperly copying Apple’s technologies. The members of the jury did not explain their decision before stealthily heading out a side exit.
   
   The verdict in the trial hardly concludes the legal battles over patents among companies in the mobile business. There are dozens of such cases winding their way through the courts; Samsung and Apple have also been battling in Germany, Australia and elsewhere. Even so, Samsung remains a major supplier of components for Apple products.
   
   While the decision is likely to weigh on Samsung shares, it sent Apple’s stock up 1.8 percent in after-hours trading. In a statement, Katie Cotton, an Apple spokeswoman, applauded the court for sending a “clear message that stealing isn’t right.”
   
   “We make these products to delight our customers, not for our competitors to flagrantly copy,” she said.
   
   Samsung said in a statement that the decision was a “loss for the American consumer.”
   
   “It will lead to fewer choices, less innovation, and potentially higher prices,” the company said. “This is not the final word in this case or in battles being waged in courts and tribunals around the world, some of which have already rejected many of Apple’s claims.”
   
   Lisa Alcalay Klug contributed reporting.
(2012/08/25 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场