百家争鸣
明暗經緯錄
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[明暗經緯錄]->[韓國特色的臆想症受到了打擊]
明暗經緯錄
·一坵之貉 公職人員黨職人員
·藍與黑 是中華民國地下工作人員的故事
·與中華民國總統兒子一起跳舞
·外省國民黨 打走日本人
·現代化的羅賓漢劫貧濟富
·陳水扁的共犯蔡英文
·忘不了新愁与舊愁 忘不了民族衰微之時
·國民黨梅花朵朵 開放在最寒冷的寒冬臘月
·鷹帥 美國兩黨之爭 讓人忍俊不禁
·政治動亂与藝術
·云云諾貝爾獎得主們唯一寫出的一首動人曲子
·美國國情 基於感恩
·放生共產黨
·台灣可與比較民主的共產黨共青團汪洋先建立關係
·訪金門的感
·內海的內戰 中華民國的意志力
·噙淚觀賞辛亥革命文藝歌唱劇
·無薪假嫁禍于人 民進黨玩弄民意
·舊金山的融洽慶賀首屆華人市長李孟賢
·民主國民党正名化
·含冤百年憶建國
·小溪流芳過人們的心澤
·沒有民族魂不能當中華民國總統
·蔡英文的日本威權主義帝王心態凌霸外省
·慶祝美國文學之父馬克吐溫誕辰
·馬英九教授PK辯論蔡英文教授
·美國柿子一個美金1元台幣30元
·中國的第二春 在台灣
·台灣香蕉在
·中國國民黨難言的秘密
·廢墟 崛起的中華民國
·孫中山先生在甲午戰爭狀態中創建救國之黨
·國民黨最高官員撤離武漢後 中山艦沉沒
·國民黨中統地下組織扶持韓國獨立
·誰扶持韓國獨立
·被時光囚禁的共產黨
·參議院的代表來自何方
·中華民國第一位女總統
·1949出中國記
·訴求民進黨先進 台灣這塊土地是我們的
·中華民國外省子女的台灣記憶
·美國加州草民的醫療心臟法
·碎心
·幫助馬英九就是幫助台灣與大陸
·誰是華爾街股票挑逗脫衣舞和裸股息的編舞家?
·我愛南京 直到月亮遺棄天空
·國民黨掏腰包治國 肯尼迪總統零薪酬 共和黨羅姆尼你能嗎﹖
·屯田者有其田 屯與囤
·大盜總統 宇宙文昌星被冒犯 宇昌案
·威權女流氓蔡英文 台灣不需唯利是圖的貪瀆女總統
·台灣共識 無法凝聚
·台灣需要外省周美青當女總統
·驀然回首 燈火聊寂處
·調節中美鼎鼐
·一場總統大選即將檢視台灣人的智慧天良
·宋楚瑜不是好的外省幫 退選就能歷史功能無量
·宇情 台灣斬不義之人 莫手軟
·宇情 台灣斬不義之人 莫手軟
·冬至湯圓 元寶滾滾 聖誕快樂 白雪愷愷 元旦新春 吉祥如意
·兩岸和平架構 國民黨的歷史責任
·聖誕禮拜的核心政治啟發 藍綠的訴求一個共主
·馬英九應辯論台灣第一個女同志總統的民望可歸性
·中國人不懂道理
·台灣本省人迫害者 會受到神的咒詛
· 太子黨PK聯邦 美國不發一兵一卒能打倒中共
·美國不發一兵一卒能打倒中共 太子黨PK聯邦
·選舉需要公平的競爭環境
·台灣沒有正義的選舉委員會
·天長地久的中華民國
·中華民國代代相傳的制度 亂世靠撫育青年振興中華
·外祖父被歸化成為國民黨 為中華民族做出一番事業
·春晚女神童
·隔代猶唱梨園春
·神圣不可侵犯的民進党潛規則
·共和黨在愛俄華州的總統候選人提名大會
·林憲同律師寫給宋楚瑜先生的信
·飄泊者的希望 國民政府
·缺席選票被否決
·偷中華民國國器的論文 模糊的外交已轉成暗渡陳倉非法吞併
·給美國所有總統候選人 政治正確的命題
·民進黨株連財團侵犯中華民國罪
·中華民國的共識與革命
·大屠殺前 日本發傳單保證南京平安
·美國政治正確的命題 加強弱勢政府
·終于共和党說出我們內心的話
·不要殺會唱歌的國民黨鳥
·投票時 請思量 你我還有幾個20年
·中華民國總統大選前 灌輸愛給台灣與大陸
·總統選舉 是非功過 自在民心
·中華民國是共主共識 眾望所歸
·中華民國馬總統平衡美國與中共
·馬總統應該廢除民進黨陳水扁的不公正國家法律
·潮漲潮落 邏輯路徑 市場估值
·蔣經國只發給南部鄉農 和平紅利
·我有一個夢想
·親愛的小舅舅 屬雷根高科技部隊
·最後 美國總統就職典禮舞曲歌唱家依妲過世
·中國黨民 即為國民
·新春佳節第一炮 未來的中華民國總統 可以保護大陸子民
·美國總統國事諮情文
·台灣門神 是古代中國的英雄
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
韓國特色的臆想症受到了打擊

   
   韓國特色的臆想症受到了打擊
   
   紐約時報﹐ 8月25日
   


   韓國三星敗訴, Apple 蘋果公司勝訴﹐陪審團判決﹐獲得$1 billion 10億美金的賠
   償。
   
   殺雞儆猴﹐誰敢亂說亂抄襲﹖
   
   版權所有﹐翻印必究。
   
   再說屈原是韓國人﹖
   
   老子告訴你﹐三星﹐是河南中原的星星。
   
   偷走咱的文化福祿壽三星﹐變成你的商標?
   
   哈哈哈! 大快人心!
   
   假三星﹐抄襲中原﹐受到美國的制裁。
   
   看來﹐唯有國民黨老派﹐才能讓台灣登上亞洲4小龍之首。
   
   牛郎織女星下凡 7夕時
   
   
   
   
   附錄
   
   http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/25/technology/jury-reaches-decision-in-apple-samsung-
   patent-trial.html?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&adxnnl=1&emc=edit_th_20120825&adxnnlx=1345888827-
   BbeRa/6dHXT7m5CxSCHJWw
   
   Jury Awards $1 Billion to Apple in Samsung Patent Case
   
   Apple won a decisive victory on Friday in a lawsuit against Samsung, a verdict
   that will give Apple ammunition in a far-flung patent war with its global
   competitors in the smartphone business.
   What the Verdict Said
   
   * Samsung violated a series of Apple's patents related to the software and
   design of mobile devices.
   * Apple's patents were valid.
   * Apple did not violate any of Samsung's patents.
   * Apple was awarded $1 billion in damages.
   
   The nine jurors in the case, who faced the daunting task of answering more than 700 questions on sometimes highly technical matters, returned a verdict after just three days of deliberations at a federal courthouse in San Jose, Calif. They found that Samsung infringed on a series of Apple’s patents on mobile devices, awarding Apple more than $1 billion in damages.
   
   That is not a big financial blow to Samsung, one of the world’s largest electronics companies. But the decision could essentially force it and other smartphone makers to redesign their products to be less Apple-like, or risk further legal defeats.
   
   Consumers could end up with some welcome diversity in phone and tablet design — or they may be stuck with devices that manufacturers have clumsily revamped to avoid crossing Apple.
   
   Samsung said it would ask the court to overturn the verdict and, if that is unsuccessful, appeal to a higher court.
   The jury found that various Samsung products violated Apple patents covering things like the “bounce back” effect when a user scrolls to the end of a list on the iPhone and iPad, and the pinch-to-zoom gesture that users make when they want to magnify an image. Samsung was also found to have infringed Apple patents covering the physical design of the iPhone.
   
   In its decision on a countersuit by Samsung, the jury added some sting by finding in favor of Apple across the board. Samsung had asked for more than $422 million from Apple, contending it had violated Samsung’s patents, but got nothing.
   Because Samsung was found to have willfully infringed Apple patents, the judge in the case could grant an Apple request to triple the damages Samsung is required to pay, though lawyers said the size of the initial award made this less likely.
   Despite the eye-popping award, one of the largest ever in a patent case, the more important effect of the jury’s decision could be the impact it has on Android, the Google operating system used by Samsung and a broad array of other companies in their devices. For every iPhone sold worldwide, more than three smartphones running Android are sold, reflecting the meteoric rise of Google’s software.
   
   Apple’s suit against Samsung, the world’s largest maker of smartphones, has partly been viewed as a proxy war against Google, which Apple executives have derided as a copycat, swiping Apple’s innovations. Steven P. Jobs, the late chief executive of Apple, told his biographer that Android was a “stolen product.”
   Apple is expected to ask the judge in the Samsung case for an injunction preventing Samsung from shipping products that infringe on Apple’s patents. The verdict could also bolster Apple’s legal attacks on Android devices from other companies.
   “It’s going to make it very difficult for not only Samsung, but for other companies to mimic the Apple products,” said Robert Barr, executive director of the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology at the University of California, Berkeley.
   
   Charles Golvin, an analyst at Forrester Research, said consumers could experience some discomfort in their use of smartphones if Samsung and other manufacturers are forced to design around certain basic functions to avoid violating Apple’s patents, though he believes the decision will prod them to innovate. “Consumers will adapt, but there will be some bumps in the road as they make that adaptation,” Mr. Golvin said.
   
   The trial provided a rare window into the inner workings of the two companies, especially the highly secretive Apple, forcing them to divulge sales figures, business negotiations and internal memos. Apple executives offered colorful detail, like the way its designers cook up new products around a kitchen table at the company’s headquarters.
   
   The evidence Apple presented, including internal Samsung memos and strategy documents, left little doubt that the iPhone inspired a major effort by the Korean manufacturer to overhaul its mobile phones. But a key question throughout the trial was whether the jury would decide that Samsung had stepped over the line by improperly copying Apple’s technologies. The members of the jury did not explain their decision before stealthily heading out a side exit.
   
   The verdict in the trial hardly concludes the legal battles over patents among companies in the mobile business. There are dozens of such cases winding their way through the courts; Samsung and Apple have also been battling in Germany, Australia and elsewhere. Even so, Samsung remains a major supplier of components for Apple products.
   
   While the decision is likely to weigh on Samsung shares, it sent Apple’s stock up 1.8 percent in after-hours trading. In a statement, Katie Cotton, an Apple spokeswoman, applauded the court for sending a “clear message that stealing isn’t right.”
   
   “We make these products to delight our customers, not for our competitors to flagrantly copy,” she said.
   
   Samsung said in a statement that the decision was a “loss for the American consumer.”
   
   “It will lead to fewer choices, less innovation, and potentially higher prices,” the company said. “This is not the final word in this case or in battles being waged in courts and tribunals around the world, some of which have already rejected many of Apple’s claims.”
   
   Lisa Alcalay Klug contributed reporting.
(2012/08/25 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场