百家争鸣
明暗經緯錄
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[明暗經緯錄]->[韓國特色的臆想症受到了打擊]
明暗經緯錄
·心理分析台灣民情 以台制台
·龍應台這個人請下臺
·送給中華民國文化部長一首歌
·連戰是否用丐幫的錢 援助百萬給雲南
·要如何形成一個中國共識
·嬗變PK政改 天下三嬗都是亡國奴的不屈不撓行動政變者
·天下三嬗 方興未艾
·中共軍委歷史定案是叛國的組織
·民進金光黨蔡英文侵佔外省金條
·請習近平聽一首歌 抗戰七十四軍軍歌
·黨龍
·細雨夢煙難回首
·1979美國解放中共治理下的人民 才有如今帶有西方特色的中國共產制度
·Coup 好個沒志氣的紅衛兵
·美國赤字懸崖pk中國政治懸崖
·時代的金執吾 治理大中華備忘錄
·明慎政體
·使中華民國再度恢復國際的聲名
·馮小剛流氓導演 會遭到集體追討美金10
·澄清李陵與湯恩伯的千古奇冤
·國民黨舊金山支部探花
·出席白先勇新書‘父親與民國’發表會的感想
·文氣蕩漾的第29屆北加州中國大專校友會聯合會晚宴
·中華民國台灣的流行歌曲音樂教父 劉家昌
·哈佛醫學研究所的莊醫師 H7N9禽流感說明文
·論一國氣勢的形成
·徐志摩的歌 流傳在台灣與美國
·化作千
·敦促習近平總統 落實和平發展外交
·
·李敖走了 在春天裏 何以新聞媒體均未報導?
·杜斌吶喊我是人 在繁榮富強的祖國領土上
·父親節冥思
·祝福習近平先生60歲生日快樂
·中華民國的道統精神 就是商朝的伯夷與叔齊
·比較周文王的周易與商易
·故國的康定情歌
·外國月亮不比中國圓 外國空氣比中國新鮮 外國水
·中華民國積極備戰日本之備忘錄 德國支援中華軍事防禦史實
·追夢京華
·國民黨始終是與中國大陸和解中的主角
·7.7.國殤日
·7.7.國殤日 國難日
·沒有中 那來央﹖
·是誰在唱未央歌
·奉告共黨新生代 歷史會有還原的狀態
·比較四位中華民國總統的醫療福利與日本前首相村山富士
·中華共和國的國粹是 假借烏托邦名義 行使吃人肉之實
·追尋早期中華人的心靈價值
·我開始喜歡上臉書,因為昨天它給了我出其不意的小橫財
·唱紅打黑 天下大亂
·中共建軍節與國共和談的真諦
·
·習近平被蒙蔽了 統戰不是團圓
·大陸可惜了
·改革步步為艱 同志仍需努力
·中華民國國家利益不等於連家勢力消長與嫡長子的繼承威權
·老共智囊又被黑臉民進黨加上白臉國民黨的聯軍給將軍了
·鄭人買履是中共大陸人教條主義下的人性模式
·行政院被立法院凌駕於上了!
·王毅打王金平 台灣人不要錯怪馬英九
·為什麼共產黨對薄熙來在秋分處分﹖
·薄熙來認共黨為父 太沉重
·秋分的氣象預報
·永懷濟南民族英雄 國民政府外交官蔡公時
·何謂中華民國寬容精神
·孔子告訴弟子子路﹕道不行,乘桴浮於海
·比較台灣與大陸的政府績效
·禮失求助野 孔子名言
·欺負老外就是砸自己招牌 斯文掃地是中國的現在進行式
·論矛盾的滿族意識
·2014國民黨2甲子的輝煌 120年的奮鬥
·連勝文並非是中華民國的中流砥柱
·中華民國早已超越三軍總司令發號施令年代
·大連戰家族與美國民主不相配合 不能代表中華民國與中共談判
·漫談台中老市長胡志強連選的優勢
·習近平是否該換上有歷史高度的大秘
·台灣是苦情花之地?
·中華民國中央銀行的金塊流失何處
·服貿法沒有基於一個國家的倫理道德
·台灣關係法 及六項保證已經是美國的法律
·被遺忘的海棠葉 我的美麗中華祖國
·歷史罪犯毛澤
· 美國與中共下棋比高下
·國民黨民主派傳承人 清明節悼念 中國人文氣
·貿炸彈 兩岸政策灰飛煙滅
·滄浪之水清兮 可以濯吾纓
·接受小鄧統一大陸 不接受老鄧統一台灣
·值得敬佩的中華民國總統夫人周美青
·是誰驅逐在
·黑天鵝的到訪中國
·甲午戰爭的二甲子的國殤祭與禱祝
·國台辦留給中華民族一點面子吧!
·為中華民國政府說句公道良心話
·中華民國在台灣九合一選舉預言 中共的代理商鐵輸定了!
·連戰式反攻大陸敗北 習禁平進取台灣敗南
·《推背圖》預測中共黨2020年 亡於美國之鵰鷹
·駕蹇騾而無策兮? 號稱帶有中國社會主義特色的中共黨在上海踐踏無辜
·守護台北國父紀念館
·國民黨塞翁失馬 焉知非福﹖ 上天放生國民黨
·士可殺不可辱 台灣外省幫的古義士情懷
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
韓國特色的臆想症受到了打擊

   
   韓國特色的臆想症受到了打擊
   
   紐約時報﹐ 8月25日
   


   韓國三星敗訴, Apple 蘋果公司勝訴﹐陪審團判決﹐獲得$1 billion 10億美金的賠
   償。
   
   殺雞儆猴﹐誰敢亂說亂抄襲﹖
   
   版權所有﹐翻印必究。
   
   再說屈原是韓國人﹖
   
   老子告訴你﹐三星﹐是河南中原的星星。
   
   偷走咱的文化福祿壽三星﹐變成你的商標?
   
   哈哈哈! 大快人心!
   
   假三星﹐抄襲中原﹐受到美國的制裁。
   
   看來﹐唯有國民黨老派﹐才能讓台灣登上亞洲4小龍之首。
   
   牛郎織女星下凡 7夕時
   
   
   
   
   附錄
   
   http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/25/technology/jury-reaches-decision-in-apple-samsung-
   patent-trial.html?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&adxnnl=1&emc=edit_th_20120825&adxnnlx=1345888827-
   BbeRa/6dHXT7m5CxSCHJWw
   
   Jury Awards $1 Billion to Apple in Samsung Patent Case
   
   Apple won a decisive victory on Friday in a lawsuit against Samsung, a verdict
   that will give Apple ammunition in a far-flung patent war with its global
   competitors in the smartphone business.
   What the Verdict Said
   
   * Samsung violated a series of Apple's patents related to the software and
   design of mobile devices.
   * Apple's patents were valid.
   * Apple did not violate any of Samsung's patents.
   * Apple was awarded $1 billion in damages.
   
   The nine jurors in the case, who faced the daunting task of answering more than 700 questions on sometimes highly technical matters, returned a verdict after just three days of deliberations at a federal courthouse in San Jose, Calif. They found that Samsung infringed on a series of Apple’s patents on mobile devices, awarding Apple more than $1 billion in damages.
   
   That is not a big financial blow to Samsung, one of the world’s largest electronics companies. But the decision could essentially force it and other smartphone makers to redesign their products to be less Apple-like, or risk further legal defeats.
   
   Consumers could end up with some welcome diversity in phone and tablet design — or they may be stuck with devices that manufacturers have clumsily revamped to avoid crossing Apple.
   
   Samsung said it would ask the court to overturn the verdict and, if that is unsuccessful, appeal to a higher court.
   The jury found that various Samsung products violated Apple patents covering things like the “bounce back” effect when a user scrolls to the end of a list on the iPhone and iPad, and the pinch-to-zoom gesture that users make when they want to magnify an image. Samsung was also found to have infringed Apple patents covering the physical design of the iPhone.
   
   In its decision on a countersuit by Samsung, the jury added some sting by finding in favor of Apple across the board. Samsung had asked for more than $422 million from Apple, contending it had violated Samsung’s patents, but got nothing.
   Because Samsung was found to have willfully infringed Apple patents, the judge in the case could grant an Apple request to triple the damages Samsung is required to pay, though lawyers said the size of the initial award made this less likely.
   Despite the eye-popping award, one of the largest ever in a patent case, the more important effect of the jury’s decision could be the impact it has on Android, the Google operating system used by Samsung and a broad array of other companies in their devices. For every iPhone sold worldwide, more than three smartphones running Android are sold, reflecting the meteoric rise of Google’s software.
   
   Apple’s suit against Samsung, the world’s largest maker of smartphones, has partly been viewed as a proxy war against Google, which Apple executives have derided as a copycat, swiping Apple’s innovations. Steven P. Jobs, the late chief executive of Apple, told his biographer that Android was a “stolen product.”
   Apple is expected to ask the judge in the Samsung case for an injunction preventing Samsung from shipping products that infringe on Apple’s patents. The verdict could also bolster Apple’s legal attacks on Android devices from other companies.
   “It’s going to make it very difficult for not only Samsung, but for other companies to mimic the Apple products,” said Robert Barr, executive director of the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology at the University of California, Berkeley.
   
   Charles Golvin, an analyst at Forrester Research, said consumers could experience some discomfort in their use of smartphones if Samsung and other manufacturers are forced to design around certain basic functions to avoid violating Apple’s patents, though he believes the decision will prod them to innovate. “Consumers will adapt, but there will be some bumps in the road as they make that adaptation,” Mr. Golvin said.
   
   The trial provided a rare window into the inner workings of the two companies, especially the highly secretive Apple, forcing them to divulge sales figures, business negotiations and internal memos. Apple executives offered colorful detail, like the way its designers cook up new products around a kitchen table at the company’s headquarters.
   
   The evidence Apple presented, including internal Samsung memos and strategy documents, left little doubt that the iPhone inspired a major effort by the Korean manufacturer to overhaul its mobile phones. But a key question throughout the trial was whether the jury would decide that Samsung had stepped over the line by improperly copying Apple’s technologies. The members of the jury did not explain their decision before stealthily heading out a side exit.
   
   The verdict in the trial hardly concludes the legal battles over patents among companies in the mobile business. There are dozens of such cases winding their way through the courts; Samsung and Apple have also been battling in Germany, Australia and elsewhere. Even so, Samsung remains a major supplier of components for Apple products.
   
   While the decision is likely to weigh on Samsung shares, it sent Apple’s stock up 1.8 percent in after-hours trading. In a statement, Katie Cotton, an Apple spokeswoman, applauded the court for sending a “clear message that stealing isn’t right.”
   
   “We make these products to delight our customers, not for our competitors to flagrantly copy,” she said.
   
   Samsung said in a statement that the decision was a “loss for the American consumer.”
   
   “It will lead to fewer choices, less innovation, and potentially higher prices,” the company said. “This is not the final word in this case or in battles being waged in courts and tribunals around the world, some of which have already rejected many of Apple’s claims.”
   
   Lisa Alcalay Klug contributed reporting.
(2012/08/25 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场