盛雪文集
[主页]->[独立中文笔会]->[盛雪文集]->[RED SEA, BLACK GRIEF ]
盛雪文集
·加总理未出席伦奥,没有激怒英国人
·千古啟芳 傲立蒼茫
·在加拿大国会人权委员会听证会上作证
·高山進去王國強出來(图)
·加移民部长在盛雪家与流亡者共度中秋,并向盛雪颁发勋章(图)
·加拿大是流亡者的家園
·辛亥与中国国运
·热比亚:维吾尔人的母亲
·寬容多元──加拿大在全球推動宗教自由(多图)
·市长犯法与庶民同罪
·专访郭国汀从海事律师转变成人权律师的心路历程
·关注殷德义和他关注的世界
·日内瓦国际研讨会聚焦中国民族问题
·必须用民主制来杜绝腐败
·冷酷的暴政 不孤独的英雄
·THE POST-JUNE FOURTH GENERATION SUFFERING HARDSHIPS BUT WALKING TOWARD
·“六四”后一代:承载苦难走向阳光
·社区吁特鲁多访华为人权发声
************
报道及访谈
************
·亚衣:“这里也有激情与诗意”——访民联、民阵“六四”事件调查委员会主任盛雪
·盛雪获加拿大少数族裔新闻记者奖
·专访在多伦多风雪中绝食抗争的盛雪
·民运女将转眼成了明星
·RFA:有人冒名盛雪挑拨海外民运
·表里俱澄澈 肝胆皆冰雪
·海外华人(女记者盛雪女士) 梦回故乡
·《TAXI》首演(图) 六.四悲惨往事呈现舞台
·陈奎德:剑气箫心
·记被CCTV构陷为“民族败类”的盛雪
·入港被拒民运人士盛雪 指北京违背奥运精神
·64二十一周年——這是一代人的悲劇
·CBC电视新闻节目评论加拿大总理哈珀中国贸易之旅
·盛雪在UCLA发表「国家恐怖主义」专题演讲
·盛雪应邀参加温哥华国际作家节并做主题演讲
·专家讨论中国国家恐怖主义问题
·引渡賴昌星的前後
·賴昌星對中國政壇微妙衝擊
·中国的巨变已经到来(图)
·哈伯将带11名中国政治犯名单访问中国
·撰新闻 评时事 屡获奖 盛雪获封流亡作家(图)]
·反对中共渗透加拿大能源领域
·自由跨越宗教 人权高于主权
·六四悲情的现代主义演绎——漫评英文舞台剧《的士》
·加中关系研讨会 中国人权再成焦点
·李竹阳获救彰显加拿大人权大国形象
·“六四”后一代:承载苦难走向阳光
·《远华案黑幕》作者盛雪女士谈赖昌星被遣返回中国
·你可以 “借阅” 著名作家盛雪
·成龍遭遇艾未未
·各方帮助 李竹阳申请加拿大庇护获准
·張樸:盛雪印象
·盛雪的香港六天 六四情结萦绕
·盛雪 北风谈网络纪念“六四”的活动
·盛雪、六哥“六四”结义
·女侠香港行 情深深 雨蒙蒙--记民阵主席盛雪访港
·盛雪:法总统会见达赖是民主国家应採做法
·追逃追赃誓打“出逃虎”咋不使杀手锏
·封你没商量!纪念六四全球网络会议遭袭
·蘇庚哲——沒有最奇,只有更奇
·中国乱象 全民倒共应运生
·27年揭露六四 盛雪入選麦克林「加拿大故事」
*************
评诗集《觅雪魂》
*************
·陈奎德:雪韵
·诗集《觅雪魂》如何成为禁书
·盛雪诗集《觅雪魂》纽约发布会
·劉劭夫:我多想迎著太陽走
·北明:丢失后的残字 --读盛雪《觅雪魂〉
·陈破空:在文学与信念之间 (图)
·刘真:《觅雪魂》的另一种荣幸
·黄河清:四美俱,二难并
·阿海: 盛雪詩集《覓雪魂》出版散記
·黄河清:盛雪《觅雪魂》诗集成为大陆禁书的事实证据
·黄河清:且觅丁亥雪魂,聊述戊子衷肠
·盛慧:盛雪诗歌的兵器谱
·费良勇:《覓雪魂》就是自由魂
·胡平:推薦盛雪詩集《覓雪魂》
·野火:捕捉詩性的灵光1
·东海老人: 聯賀盛雪詩集《覓雪魂》出版
·刘路:败仗
·文婧: 尋覓圣雪的灵魂1
·三妹:读盛雪诗文随想
*************
友人赠诗赠文
*************
·黄河清:俚词贺盛雪获英女王颁发钻石勋章
**************
百年不风流 千古人传颂
·
**************
·超越时空的对话
·迟了半个世纪的臧家祭奠
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
RED SEA, BLACK GRIEF

- Reflections on the Rally in Dundas Square
   
   
   by SHENG Xue
   

   RED SEA, BLACK GRIEF

   Oct.23, 2010; Toronton
   
   
   On the afternoon of March 29 at Dundas Square in Toronto, Canada, a sea of red, five-starred PRC flags and posters with patriotic slogans overwhelmed my eyes. It was a scene I had not witnessed for many years, (see attached photos), since the height of the Cultural Revolution in China when tens of thousands of young Red Guards were greeted by Chairman Mao in Tiananmen Square. People brandished the Red Flag excitedly, shouted "Long live China!", and loudly sang the Chinese national anthem "March of the Volunteers: when the Chinese nation was at its most dangerous time." Old overseas Chinese, new immigrants and visa students all shed tears.
   
   
   Meanwhile, the Chinese organizations' leaders calmly struggled to walk through the crowd. The rally's name was "Maintain the truth about Tibet. Safeguard the integrity of the motherland". They believed that the western media, in reports about the Tibet disturbances, discredited the Chinese government. They claimed that western societies are hostile to the Chinese and some of the populace in the West are stupid and ignorant. They argued that, in order to maintain national integrity, it was necessary for the Chinese government to deploy military force.
   
   This demonstration, called the 3.29 assembly, was widely reported by many Chinese media and websites. By general estimation, one- to 2,000 people attended. One organizers of the demonstration only provided a web name to the public: Black White. Because he left his email address for the demonstration, some people on the Internet accused this hot-blooded youth of operating a wife-swapping club in Toronto. This man, "black white" spoke loudly during the demonstration about Tibetan history. He fervently insisted that Tibet since ancient times is part of Chinese territory, and angrily protested the West's support of Tibet independence in order to split up China. He urged those at the demonstration to tell the truth about Tibet to the Canadian public and wake up the people of the West.
    Another speaker said during an interview that China's population includes 56 different ethnic groups, and everyone lives together in harmony, in a quite comfortable situation. There is no repression of any ethnic group or extermination of any culture. Before and after the demonstration, a local immigrant service website forum exploded with several thousand related posts. Many displayed anger towards western media and western society on the Tibet question.
   
   However, they - the demonstrators and spokespeople - have intentionally avoided some basic facts. Why did the Chinese government expel all reporters and media when the events of March 10 and 14 took place? Why didn't they let the media directly obtain the truth, and report the complete picture of the events? And why don't these young students and patriotic overseas Chinese use their energy to organize demonstrations to tell the world the truth about Tibet. They live thousands of miles away, and the overwhelming majority of them have never been to Tibet and possibly don't know a single Tibetan.
   
   For over 50 years, within China, have people been able to freely and openly discuss Tibet? Do the Chinese have normal channels of communication to understand Tibet, its history and the present situation?
   
   In Mainland China, do the Han-Chinese and the Tibetans have the right to assemble in public to express demands like they do in Canada? They have lived their lives in a society where news media are controlled, and correspondence is blocked. So how is it possible that, under these circumstances, they can better grasp the truth about Tibet than we can in a society where the flow of information is unimpeded, where there is freedom of speech, freedom to do research?
   
   Why, indeed, do the Tibetan lamas need large-scale demonstrations to deliver their petitions? Why did their peaceful petitions and assemblies require armed suppression which deteriorated into violent disturbance?
   
   Moreover, who is this "western media"? Who are they? In the West, each outlet of media has its own, individual political stand. The US has the Wall Street Journal with a relatively right-wing standpoint. They also have "the New York Times" with a more liberal stance and a comparatively left-wing perspective. Even extreme-left Maoist magazines that kiss Jiang Qing (Madame Mao) are permitted. In Canada we also read the People's Daily's overseas edition and see China's Central Committee Television (CCTV) programs without censorship.
   
   Western media are multi-faceted with many bosses, and are basically all privately owned. In western nations, unlike China, a government-dominated media monopoly, such as that of the CPC, is impossible. In China, most newspapers, magazines, radio and television are controlled by the Party and the government.
   
   Every media outlet can make mistakes, and, in western nations, their biases can result in big mistakes. The mistakes are often caused by competition among the media outlets, but competition also acts as a restraint resulting in public vigilance to correct them. Those who aren't truthful and objective can be defeated through competition. People don't buy their products, and they go out of business. Western media are not dominated by a unified political influence or a special-interest group. Western media, while skeptical and vigilant about those in power in government and in society, are at the same time being scrutinized by the people.
   
   Unlike China's media, western media cannot be forced to be the mouthpiece of a political party or the megaphone for a government. At times when politics demands it the Chinese collectively create lies. This monopoly of false news, without any long-term surveillance, brings disaster on the nation and people. The anti-right campaign, the great famine, and the Cultural Revolution are some of the most obvious examples.
   
   The dauntless spirit of these hot-blooded, indignant Chinese youths who want to use the "truth" to "awaken the western populace", reminds one of the 60s when the young Red Guards wanted to plant the red five-starred flag all over the world to liberate the world's population. They act as if, over the last 50 years, China was a democracy, Chinese citizens could speak freely, and China was a society where they lived incomparably happy lives. On the other hand, the entire western world is portrayed as evil and despotic. In coming to Canada, they shoulder the huge responsibility to liberate the local people from an information blockade, opinion control and illiteracy. What a joke!
   
   If 80 million people who died under Chinese Communist Party rule had the right to speak, they would send out a roar that would certainly instill fear in this group of brave warriors and scatter them from the Square. However, these protesters whose blood boiled in response to their own accomplishment are obviously not interested in taking advantage of the opportunity of a society where information flows freely. They don't know, and don't want to know, the true history of Tibet.
   
   The Tibetan uprising started as a result of Tibetans inside and outside of Tibet commemorating the 50th anniversary of the uprising on March 10.
   
   On 10 March, 1959, Tibetans rose up in revolt against Chinese Communist Party rule. The CPC army suppressed the revolt, killing 80,000 Tibetans, and the 14th Dalai Lama and 100,000 Tibetans took refuge in India. More than 6,000 Tibetan temples were nearly all destroyed during the Cultural Revolution. According to the deceased Punchen Lama's memoirs, of the original more than 600,000 Buddhist lamas, 110,000 were persecuted and killed, and 250,000 people were compelled to return to secular life.
   
   In 1989, three months before the Chinese Communist Party carried out the June 4th suppression in Beijing, the CCP used the PLA to suppress Tibetan demonstrations in Lhasa. During this event the Tibetan death and injury toll was serious, and more than 3,000 Tibetans were arrested.

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场