[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    滕彪文集
[主页]->[独立中文笔会]->[滕彪文集]->[有些人在法律面前更平等(英文)]
滕彪文集
·司法独立,和谐中国——2007年“两会”之际的公民呼吁/许志永 滕彪
·彻底改革司法才能避免滥用死刑
·崔英杰案,在多重反思中寻找契机
·从“两会”看赎回选票运动
·关于尽快将青岛市四方区政府违法拆迁行为纳入法制轨道的法律意见书
·青岛野蛮拆迁:袁薪玉被控放火和妨害公务案一审的当庭辩护意见
·维权书简·戴脚镣的舞者
·被遗忘的谎言——就《成都晚报》事件致中宣部长和教育部长的一封信
·滕彪:可怕的“冤案递增律”
·不是我不明白
·张敏:滕彪律师访美谈中国司法现状与维权
·萧洵:纸包子案记者被判刑引发强烈质疑
·自由亚洲电台:拾荒者遇上联防离奇死亡 孙志刚式悲剧首都重现?
·何亚福 王鑫海 杨支柱等:放开二胎倡议书
·临沂野蛮计生事件及陈光诚案维权大事记(八--九)
·一个案件的真相与两个案件的正义(附:“聂树斌案”到了最危急时刻!)
·滕彪、胡佳:奥运前的中国真相
·郑筱萸案扇了死刑复核程序一记耳光/滕彪 李方平
·“杀害自己孩子的民族没有未来!”
·关于李和平律师被绑架殴打致国务院、最高人民检察院、公安部、国家安全部的公开信(签名中)
·NO FIGHTS,NO RIGHTS——接受博闻社采访谈中国人权现状
·挽包遵信先生
·香港电台铿锵集:扣着脚镣跳舞的中国律师
·那些陌生的人们在我们心底哭泣——推荐一个短片
·关于邮箱被盗用的声明
·《律师法》37条:为律师准备的新陷阱
·保护维权律师,实现法治——采访法学博士滕彪律师/张程
·Six Attorneys Openly Defend Falun Gong in Chinese Court
·李和平 滕彪等:为法轮功学员辩护-宪法至上 信仰自由
·面对暴力的思考与记忆——致李和平
·专访滕彪律师:《律师法》2007修订与维权/RFA张敏
·The Real China before the Olympics/Teng Biao,Hu jia
·我们不能坐等美好的社会到来
·律师:维权人士胡佳将受到起诉
·胡佳被捕 顯示中國要在奧運之前大清場
·人权的价值与正义的利益
·抓捕胡佳意味着什么?
·关于《奥运前的中国真相》一文的说明——声援胡佳之一
·邮箱作废声明
·关于审查和改变《互联网视听节目服务管理规定》部分不适当条款的建议
·胡佳的大爱与大勇
·后极权时代的公民美德与公民责任
·狱中致爱人
·奥运和乞丐不能并存?
·滕彪李苏滨关于青岛于建利涉嫌诽谤罪案的辩护意见
·纽约时报社评:中国的爱国小将们
·回网友四书
·我们都来关注滕彪博士/王天成
·暴力带不来和平,恐怖建不成和谐——就滕彪、李和平事件感言/王德邦
·让滕彪回家、追究国保撞车肇事的法律责任、还被监控公民自由/维权网
·刘晓波:黑暗权力的颠狂——有感于滕彪被绑架
·Article 37 of the PRC Law on Lawyers: A New Trap Set for Lawyers
·Chinese lawyer missing after criticising human rights record
·Chinese Lawyer Says He Was Detained and Warned on Activism
·For Chinese activists, stakes are raised ahead of the Olympics
·To my wife, from jail/Teng Biao
·Beijing Suspends Licenses of 2 Lawyers Who Offered to Defend Tibetans in Court
·National Endowment for Democracy 2008 Democracy Awards
·获奖感言
·司法与民意——镜城突围
·Rewards and risks of a career in the legal system
·太离谱的现实感
·35个网评员对“这鸡蛋真难吃”的不同回答(转载加编辑加原创)
·Dissonance Strikes A Chord
·顺应历史潮流 实现律协直选——致全体北京律师、市司法局、市律协的呼吁
·但愿程序正义从杨佳案开始/滕彪 许志永
·维权的计算及其他
·我们对北京律协“严正声明”的回应
·网络言论自由讨论会会议纪要(上)
·网络言论自由讨论会会议纪要(下)
·Well-Known Human Rights Advocate Teng Biao Is Not Afraid
·法眼冷对三鹿门
·北京律师为自己维权风暴/亚洲周刊
·胡佳若获诺贝尔奖将推动中国人权/voa
·奥运后的中国人权
·Chinese Activist Wins Rights Prize
·我无法放弃——记一次“绑架”
·认真对待出国权
·毒奶粉:谁的危机?
·不要制造聂树斌——甘锦华抢劫案的当庭辩护词
·“独立知识分子”滕彪/刘溜
·经济观察报专访/滕彪:让我们不再恐惧
·人权:从理念到制度——纪念《世界人权宣言》60周年
·公民月刊:每一个人都可能是历史的转折点
·抵制央视、拒绝洗脑
·公民在行动
·Charter of Democracy
·阳光茅老
·中国“黑监狱”情况让人担忧/路透社
·《关于取缔黑监狱的建议》
·用法律武器保护家园——青岛市河西村民拆迁诉讼代理词
·关于改革看守所体制及审前羁押制度的公民建议书
·仅仅因为他们说了真话
·再审甘锦华 生死仍成谜
·邓玉娇是不是“女杨佳”?
·星星——为六四而作
·I Cannot Give Up: Record of a "Kidnapping"
·Political Legitimacy and Charter 08
·六四短信
·倡议“5•10”作为“公民正当防卫日”
·谁是敌人——回"新浪网友"
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
有些人在法律面前更平等(英文)

   
   奥斯陆大学法律系2011年2月举行为时一星期的人权会议,以“迫害”为重点. 侯安为会议的杂志采访滕彪的文章。http://bit.ly/g6GKMk (英文)
   
   
   One law for the state, another for the people

   
   Mao Zedong supposedly once said that «revolution is no dinner party». Living in today's China is surely no picnic either. Reports in Hong Kong media estimate that China's off-the-books spending on suppressing its own people is now approaching its total military budget.
   
   Few know better how those money are spent than Teng Biao, a 38 year old human rights lawyer and professor of law at China University of Politics and Law in Beijing. On December 23rd last year he was kidnapped and interrogated by secret police officers who later threatened him by screaming «we are going to beat you to death and dig a hole to bury you».
   
   However, this is not the first time Teng Biao has suffered from forceful crackdown by the authorities; they have confiscated his passport, revoked his license to practice law, kidnapped him several times and he is frequently put under house arrest. His experience the past couple of years is maybe the reason why he was able to stay calm throughout the entire detention in December. He just sat there reciting out loud the laws that the police officers were violating, as if they were his students.
   
   In an email exchange last month he explained how the guobao, China's secret police, is at the core of the Chinese governments brutal system of suppression.
   
   «Guobao, China's secret police force, is the world's darkest secret. They have powers transgressing every law, they can monitor and follow citizens, put people under house arrest or in prison and even perform cruel torture.»
   
   Mr. Teng goes on to explicate how the government uses an intricate system to lock up most everyone, from prostitutes and drug traffickers to dissidents and writers. The laogai system, re-education through labour, was officially established during the anti-rightist campaigns in 1957 and 1958. Today it ranges from labour camps in the countryside to illegal detention centers in the country's capital of Beijing. According to Laogai Research Foundation, a Washington based NGO, as many as 2 million people were held in such centers as of 2009.
   
   «China is still maintaining a system of so-called re-education through labour and arbitrary detention. This means that there are no legal procedures whatsoever and that the police has mandate to deprive a citizen of his or her freedom for as long as four years. The authorities put dissidents and civil rights activists in these so-called re-education and detention centers, and sometimes even mental hospitals to simplify procedures and to confuse public opinion.» Teng Biao says.
   
   As citizens are increasingly aware of their rights and lawyers receive better legal training, the Chinese authorities are finding it harder to prosecute people. However, authorities have started to misuse laws in an attempt to silence lawyers who take on sensitive cases. «Article 306, along with Article 38 of the Criminal Procedure Law, and Article 45 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Lawyers allows prosecutors to arrest lawyers on grounds of "perjury" or "false testimony.» the organization Human Rights in China writes in a bulletin from 2006. As Teng Biao explains, the legal situation has yet to change for the better:
   
   «Lawyers are still facing great professional risk because of Article 306. China has 180 000 lawyers, but only a hundred of these can really be called human rights lawyers. Many human rights lawyers have been sentenced to prison or so-called re-education through labour, others are under house arrest, some suffer beatings or are forced to quit because their licenses to practice are revoked. There is no independent attorney association and lawyers on all levels are completely controlled by the government.» he says.
   
   The Chinese government can beat the drum all they want for its GDP growth, but the fact remains that there have been no fundamental changes made to its legal system since the economic development started more than 30 years ago. Mr. Teng points out that the system needs to change:
   
   «The system in mainland China lacks regulated institutions and is fraught with great uncertainties. To fully change this system might not take that long, or it might indeed take a very long time. There is a certain possibility for a complete transformation as more and more people see little hope of improvement in the Communist Party, and they realize that the real hope lies with the people.»
   
   He takes a glance into the crystal ball and continues:
   
   «My judgement is that no force is capable of stopping the growing power of the people. However, it would be better if the people could play an important role in the transformation, before it turns into a violent revolution, so that China's political democratization does not end up being destabilizing and destructive.»
   
   In a philosophical essay published earlier this year, where two inner selves discuss the current state of affairs in China, Teng Biao writes: «Our society is flooded with deceit and lies. Fake milk powder, fake vaccines, fake police, fake trials, fake history, fake news and fake reports. This is obviously not a healthy society, and the people who live in this lie cannot be healthy. We should seek truth, we are so in need of truth.»
   
   When you give cruelty, violence and suppression a name, a front-desk and a budget, a mental distance is created between our perceptions of reality and the actual truth. Linguistic engineering has always been an important instrument for the Communist Party, and up to this day Party-speak remains a powerful tool to shape public opinion in China. Some people, though, of which Teng Biao is a representive, refuse to accept this distorted Newspeak reality and continue to strive for a more just China. Before the law everyone is equal, but in China some are still more equal than others.
(2011/01/25 发表)

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场