[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    滕彪文集
[主页]->[独立中文笔会]->[滕彪文集]->[有些人在法律面前更平等(英文)]
滕彪文集
·Article 37 of the PRC Law on Lawyers: A New Trap Set for Lawyers
·Chinese lawyer missing after criticising human rights record
·Chinese Lawyer Says He Was Detained and Warned on Activism
·For Chinese activists, stakes are raised ahead of the Olympics
·To my wife, from jail/Teng Biao
·Beijing Suspends Licenses of 2 Lawyers Who Offered to Defend Tibetans in Court
·National Endowment for Democracy 2008 Democracy Awards
·获奖感言
·司法与民意——镜城突围
·Rewards and risks of a career in the legal system
·太离谱的现实感
·35个网评员对“这鸡蛋真难吃”的不同回答(转载加编辑加原创)
·Dissonance Strikes A Chord
·顺应历史潮流 实现律协直选——致全体北京律师、市司法局、市律协的呼吁
·但愿程序正义从杨佳案开始/滕彪 许志永
·维权的计算及其他
·我们对北京律协“严正声明”的回应
·网络言论自由讨论会会议纪要(上)
·网络言论自由讨论会会议纪要(下)
·Well-Known Human Rights Advocate Teng Biao Is Not Afraid
·法眼冷对三鹿门
·北京律师为自己维权风暴/亚洲周刊
·胡佳若获诺贝尔奖将推动中国人权/voa
·奥运后的中国人权
·Chinese Activist Wins Rights Prize
·我无法放弃——记一次“绑架”
·认真对待出国权
·毒奶粉:谁的危机?
·不要制造聂树斌——甘锦华抢劫案的当庭辩护词
·“独立知识分子”滕彪/刘溜
·经济观察报专访/滕彪:让我们不再恐惧
·人权:从理念到制度——纪念《世界人权宣言》60周年
·公民月刊:每一个人都可能是历史的转折点
·抵制央视、拒绝洗脑
·公民在行动
·Charter of Democracy
·阳光茅老
·中国“黑监狱”情况让人担忧/路透社
·《关于取缔黑监狱的建议》
·用法律武器保护家园——青岛市河西村民拆迁诉讼代理词
·关于改革看守所体制及审前羁押制度的公民建议书
·仅仅因为他们说了真话
·再审甘锦华 生死仍成谜
·邓玉娇是不是“女杨佳”?
·星星——为六四而作
·I Cannot Give Up: Record of a "Kidnapping"
·Political Legitimacy and Charter 08
·六四短信
·倡议“5•10”作为“公民正当防卫日”
·谁是敌人——回"新浪网友"
·为逯军喝彩
·赠晓波
·正义的运动场——邓玉娇案二人谈
·这六年,公盟做了什么?
·公盟不死
·我们不怕/Elena Milashina
·The Law On Trial In China
·自由有多重要,翻墙就有多重要
·你也会被警察带走吗
·Lawyer’s Detention Shakes China’s Rights Movement
·我来推推推
·许志永年表
·庄璐小妹妹快回家吧
·开江县法院随意剥夺公民的辩护权
·Summary Biography of Xu Zhiyong
·三著名行政法学家关于“公盟取缔事件”法律意见书
·公益诉讼“抑郁症”/《中国新闻周刊》
·在中石化上访
·《零八宪章》与政治正当性问题
·我来推推推(之二)
·我来推推推(之三)
·國慶有感
·我来推推推(之四)
·国庆的故事(系列之一)
·国庆的故事(系列之二)
·
·我来推推推(之五)
·我来推推推(之六)
·净空(小说)
·作为反抗的记忆——《不虚此行——北京劳教调遣处纪实》序
·twitter直播-承德冤案申诉行动
·我来推推推(之七)
·关于我的证言的证言
·我来推推推(之八)
·不只是问问而已
·甘锦华再判死刑 紧急公开信呼吁慎重
·就甘锦华案致最高人民法院死刑复核法官的紧急公开信
·我来推推推(之九)
·DON’T BE EVIL
·我来推推推(之十)
·景德镇监狱三名死刑犯绝食吁国际关注
·江西乐平死刑冤案-向最高人民检察院的申诉材料
·我来推推推(之十一)
·法律人的尊严在于独立
·我来推推推(之十二)
·听从正义和良知的呼唤——在北京市司法局关于吊销唐吉田、刘巍律师证的听证会上的代理意见
·一个思想实验:关于中国政治
·公民维权与社会转型(上)——在北京传知行社会经济研究所的演讲
·公民维权与社会转型——在北京传知行社会经济研究所的演讲(下)
·福州“7•4”奇遇记
·夏俊峰案二审辩护词(新版)
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
有些人在法律面前更平等(英文)

   
   奥斯陆大学法律系2011年2月举行为时一星期的人权会议,以“迫害”为重点. 侯安为会议的杂志采访滕彪的文章。http://bit.ly/g6GKMk (英文)
   
   
   One law for the state, another for the people

   
   Mao Zedong supposedly once said that «revolution is no dinner party». Living in today's China is surely no picnic either. Reports in Hong Kong media estimate that China's off-the-books spending on suppressing its own people is now approaching its total military budget.
   
   Few know better how those money are spent than Teng Biao, a 38 year old human rights lawyer and professor of law at China University of Politics and Law in Beijing. On December 23rd last year he was kidnapped and interrogated by secret police officers who later threatened him by screaming «we are going to beat you to death and dig a hole to bury you».
   
   However, this is not the first time Teng Biao has suffered from forceful crackdown by the authorities; they have confiscated his passport, revoked his license to practice law, kidnapped him several times and he is frequently put under house arrest. His experience the past couple of years is maybe the reason why he was able to stay calm throughout the entire detention in December. He just sat there reciting out loud the laws that the police officers were violating, as if they were his students.
   
   In an email exchange last month he explained how the guobao, China's secret police, is at the core of the Chinese governments brutal system of suppression.
   
   «Guobao, China's secret police force, is the world's darkest secret. They have powers transgressing every law, they can monitor and follow citizens, put people under house arrest or in prison and even perform cruel torture.»
   
   Mr. Teng goes on to explicate how the government uses an intricate system to lock up most everyone, from prostitutes and drug traffickers to dissidents and writers. The laogai system, re-education through labour, was officially established during the anti-rightist campaigns in 1957 and 1958. Today it ranges from labour camps in the countryside to illegal detention centers in the country's capital of Beijing. According to Laogai Research Foundation, a Washington based NGO, as many as 2 million people were held in such centers as of 2009.
   
   «China is still maintaining a system of so-called re-education through labour and arbitrary detention. This means that there are no legal procedures whatsoever and that the police has mandate to deprive a citizen of his or her freedom for as long as four years. The authorities put dissidents and civil rights activists in these so-called re-education and detention centers, and sometimes even mental hospitals to simplify procedures and to confuse public opinion.» Teng Biao says.
   
   As citizens are increasingly aware of their rights and lawyers receive better legal training, the Chinese authorities are finding it harder to prosecute people. However, authorities have started to misuse laws in an attempt to silence lawyers who take on sensitive cases. «Article 306, along with Article 38 of the Criminal Procedure Law, and Article 45 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Lawyers allows prosecutors to arrest lawyers on grounds of "perjury" or "false testimony.» the organization Human Rights in China writes in a bulletin from 2006. As Teng Biao explains, the legal situation has yet to change for the better:
   
   «Lawyers are still facing great professional risk because of Article 306. China has 180 000 lawyers, but only a hundred of these can really be called human rights lawyers. Many human rights lawyers have been sentenced to prison or so-called re-education through labour, others are under house arrest, some suffer beatings or are forced to quit because their licenses to practice are revoked. There is no independent attorney association and lawyers on all levels are completely controlled by the government.» he says.
   
   The Chinese government can beat the drum all they want for its GDP growth, but the fact remains that there have been no fundamental changes made to its legal system since the economic development started more than 30 years ago. Mr. Teng points out that the system needs to change:
   
   «The system in mainland China lacks regulated institutions and is fraught with great uncertainties. To fully change this system might not take that long, or it might indeed take a very long time. There is a certain possibility for a complete transformation as more and more people see little hope of improvement in the Communist Party, and they realize that the real hope lies with the people.»
   
   He takes a glance into the crystal ball and continues:
   
   «My judgement is that no force is capable of stopping the growing power of the people. However, it would be better if the people could play an important role in the transformation, before it turns into a violent revolution, so that China's political democratization does not end up being destabilizing and destructive.»
   
   In a philosophical essay published earlier this year, where two inner selves discuss the current state of affairs in China, Teng Biao writes: «Our society is flooded with deceit and lies. Fake milk powder, fake vaccines, fake police, fake trials, fake history, fake news and fake reports. This is obviously not a healthy society, and the people who live in this lie cannot be healthy. We should seek truth, we are so in need of truth.»
   
   When you give cruelty, violence and suppression a name, a front-desk and a budget, a mental distance is created between our perceptions of reality and the actual truth. Linguistic engineering has always been an important instrument for the Communist Party, and up to this day Party-speak remains a powerful tool to shape public opinion in China. Some people, though, of which Teng Biao is a representive, refuse to accept this distorted Newspeak reality and continue to strive for a more just China. Before the law everyone is equal, but in China some are still more equal than others.
(2011/01/25 发表)

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场