[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    曾铮文集
[主页]->[独立中文笔会]->[曾铮文集]->[The Origin of Mysterious Australian Donations ]
曾铮文集
第二部 镇压
·第一章 嫉妒之火
·第二章 大规模逮捕
·第三章 小我到大法
第三部 三进拘留所
·第一章 我不入地狱谁入
·第二章 让生命在正法中辉煌
·第三章 众生皆有佛性
·第四章 箭射出再画靶心
第四部 劳教血泪
·第一章 人间地狱
·第二章 移监天堂河
·第三章 危险时刻
·第四章 转化
·第五章 惊涛骇浪
·第六章 强制改变不了人心
第五部 流亡
·第一章 揭发真相
·第二章 神圣使命
·后记 ——我还想说什么
·跋-至誠大勇 證道真善忍──《靜水流深》出版的意義與期望
·附 法轮功大事记
曾铮文集(二)
·桉树果的歌(澳大利亚 Philippa Rayment著,曾铮翻译)
·救我北大!(2002年9月25日以笔名心痛发表)
·拎不清的总领事与“三个代表”的最新进展
·如果我能够
·苏震西的三大错误
·李祥春,我向你脱帽致敬
·关于SARS病的最新研究成果
·海外北大学子告同胞书
·今夜我不能安睡
·谁是当今最大的强奸犯与毒贩子?
·师尊的慈泪——为2003全澳法轮大法心得交流会在墨尔本召开而作
·华人世界的悲哀 华人世界的幸运
·论镇压法轮功的完全彻底非法性
·“天安门自焚”大惨案
·【红朝谎言征文】非凡的女儿
·北京人有什么话不敢说?──向勇敢的杜导斌致敬
·童话:美梦成真
·一封家书——致女儿
·致MOON——贺女儿十一岁生日
·李登輝顛覆印象記
·在天地动容的那天,我为你深深祝福----答杨银波公开信
·我的经历及思考
·神童女兒 平常心(之一)
·神童女兒 平常心(二)
·神童女兒 平常心(之三)
·我们能为这些非法轮功做点甚么?
·声明退党 做个明明白白的中国人
·《九评》与道解共产党-在墨尔本《九评共产党》研讨会上的发言
·致张林之妻方草
·再致张林之妻方草-兼论免于恐惧的生活
·方劲武麻烦大了
·與黃若先生商榷—兼談法輪功為何「動不動就報怨被『歧視』」
·中共灭亡是天意
·我为什么以“静水流深”为书名
·关注郭国汀 支持大纪元
·唾棄中共 迎接新紀元
·在悉尼紀念「六四」及中國未來研討會發言稿
·澳洲,请远离今日之“泰坦尼克”
·澳大利亚,请睁开你的双眼!
·勿為私下的行為而公開地哀痛
·為陳用林歡呼
·读张林“判决书”三致方草
·对胡锦涛的又一“棒喝”--在悉尼国际法庭逮捕江泽民令发布会上的发言
·李敖可别“一语成谶”
·The Law and Me: Chinese ‘Law’ v Jennifer Zeng
·论言论自由、新闻管制及中国人民的对策——在亚太地区作家网成立大会上的发言
·亚太作家会决议 控告雅虎
·亚太地区作家网成立大会决议案
·中共发布《重大动物疫情应急条例》意味着什么?
·Speech on the Chinese Democratic Movement Conference in Canberra
·New Era approaches amidst the echo of History
·Raising a “Child Prodigy” with an Ordinary Mindset
·在堪培拉中國民主運動新聞發佈會上的發言
·《南華早報》評論:流亡中國作家曾錚
·诉江泽民、罗干、周永康、刘京及610办公室迫害法轮功控诉辞(一)
·诉江泽民、罗干、周永康、刘京及610办公室迫害法轮功控诉辞(二)(慎入)
·诉江泽民、罗干、周永康、刘京及610办公室迫害法轮功控诉辞(三)
·《同一首歌》將與納粹標誌一樣永釘歷史恥辱柱
·我们做的事情即将载入史册
·认清中共,就是拯救人类
·胜诉控江泽民案最后陈述辞
·又见红卫兵
·近看郝凤军
·Observing a Hero Up Close
·【人物特写】“这听起来有点像传奇”
·维权绝食与六四学生绝食有何不同?
·我的絕食聲明
·致北京司法局-为什么迫害高智晟?
·我们确有“安全的”维权途径!
·绝食那天,精彩叠起!
·中共為甚麼怕我們餓肚子?
·看中共如何有氣無力抵賴蘇家屯
·China, my dear China
·Analyzing the CCP's Feeble Response to Reports About the Sujiatun Concentration Camp
·中國黑暗面的最新「發現」——答美國讀者Valerie來信
·“New Discovery" of China’s Darker Sides
·Spirit Under Siege-A Review in Utne magazine
·Outta This Place-A Review in East Bay Express
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
The Origin of Mysterious Australian Donations

   In July, Australian media reported that a mysterious Chinese billionaire—Chau Chak Wing, ranked 24th on a 2003 list of China’s wealthiest magnates—has become the biggest political donator worldwide.
   
   Since 2002, Chinese media have been reporting on Chau, and the “glorious history” of how he turned the Chao Xin Association into an enterprise earning assets over tens of billions of Yuan.
   
   The Sydney Morning Herald reports that Chau has successfully kept a low profile in the past few years. He has refused numerous interviews until recently, when he offered to provide plane tickets and housing for reporters to visit him at his estate in GuangChou.

   
   When journalists arrived at the airport, they received VIP treatment and a ride in luxurious Bentleys along the empty highway to Chau Chak Wing’s private estate, where a 27-hole golf course, 6-star hotel, and luxurious villas were being constructed.
   
   But despite the lavish treatment, what really struck reporters was Chau’s choice of Australian political figures to donate to. Not only is he the guest of honor of former New South Wales Premier Bob Carr and former New South Wales Premier Morris Iemma, he also provided financial aid for current Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Treasurer Wayne Swan, Foreign Minister Stephen Smith, and Head of Agricultural Department Tony Burke for their trip to China in 2004-2005, before they became important figures.
   
   Between 2006-2008, Chou donated A$980,000 and A$402,000 to the Australian Labor Party and union Party, respectively. When this was revealed, the media expressed concern that Australian political figures would not be able to maintain an independent position after having received such large sums.
   
   So where do Chou’s interests lie? People in China know that without support from top level officials within the Chinese Communist Party, it is impossible for anyone to become as powerful and wealthy as Chou. Therefore, benefiting from such hefty donations, Australian officials might be more beholden to Chinese interests than the people of the country that they are meant to serve.
   
   As a matter of fact, Chau’s own Australian New Express Daily has even not so subtly hinted at this scheme. Last April, on the eve of the Beijing Olympics torch arrival in Canberra, the newspaper carried an article titled “Our Paper Delivered One Thousand National Flags to Chinese Students,” highlighting the upcoming event of “the Olympics torch coloring the entire nation of Australia red with Chinese national flags” made possible by Australian New Express Daily.
   
   In addition, Chou is the Honorary Chairman of the Australian Council for the Promotion of Peaceful Reunification of China, known to be a front for the Chinese Communist agenda.
   
   Chen Yonglin, former Consul of Political Affairs at the Consulate General of the PRC in Sydney, recently exposed the CCP’s “peripheral strategy” in targeting Australia. With this understanding, one can envision that, to solidify its dominance in the region, the CCP is systematically infiltrating foreign government and media, while tightening its control within its own borders.
   
   This is why the strange phenomenon of “the have-nots relieving the haves” appeared: Australia’s largest overseas political contribution comes from China, where the national income per capita is 20 times lower than that of Australia. Also, a minority newspaper such as Australian New Express Daily has the ability to motivate thousands of people to battle “in defense of the Olympics torch.”
   
   During the Olympics torch relay last April, Canberra, the peaceful “city of gardens,” was suddenly turned into a sea of red flags. Patriotic Chinese students possessed by a complex nationalism believed the “defense of the Olympics torch” was a “victory.” But in Australians'' eyes, the scene of the city submerged in the sea of red flags was horrifying, as they wondered if a separate country had formed in the Chinese community in their neighborhoods.
   
   Therefore, at this time Australians should be asking, “Where did the ‘mysterious’ political contribution come from? And is it really unconditional?”
   
   And the Chinese should ask, “Why did the CCP squander our hard-made money and for what purpose?”
   
   Of course, under the current circumstances, Chinese people have no right-to-know, not to mention the right-to-question. But I believe, as time goes by, the day for Chinese people to truly become “masters of their own country” is well on its way.
   
   First published by Look the semi-monthly Journal in Taiwan.
   
   
   
   Chinese version at:
   
   http://epochtimes.com/gb/9/8/1/n2608573.htm

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场