百家争鸣
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    郭国汀律师专栏
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[郭国汀律师专栏]->[互联网自由度的测定方法]
郭国汀律师专栏
***(38)思想自由与宗教信仰自由
·郭国汀论宗教信仰
·神学与哲学的异同
·宗教的思索
·爱因斯坦信犹太教和贵格教也信上帝
·信神是愚昧吗?!基督教义反人性吗?!谁在大规模屠杀婴儿?!
·爱因斯坦宗教信仰上帝相关言论选译
·爱因斯坦宗教上帝相关言论第二集
· 爱因斯坦原信的准确译法
·大哲大师大思想家大政治家论宗教上帝
·哲学家的前提与基础
·宗教是统治阶级麻醉人民的鸦片吗?
·为什么说爱才是宇宙的本质?
·宗教起源的根源何在?
·圣父圣子圣灵三位一体论的由来
·人民圣殿教真相
·质疑东海一枭良知大法兼驳良知宇宙本体论
·自然科学与宗教哲学灵魂
·读东海兄批判美国神话有感
·郭国汀为上帝信仰辩护
·驳东海之糊涂上帝观
·四海之内皆兄弟人类本是一家人
·推荐陈尔晋先生之《圣灵福音》
·质疑东海君之《良知大法》
·祝愿祖国早日实现真正的自由!
·关于司法公正的讨论郭国汀律师在北大法律信息网上发表了非常危险的错误观点应该予以驳斥!
·中共当局封杀言论为那般?
·六四的记忆
·谈中华文化与道德重建(四)
·中国百年最伟大的文字!
·郭国汀:为刘荻女英雄辩护吾当仁不让!
·只有思想言论出版新闻舆论的真正自由能够救中国!
·只有说真话的民族才有前途
·一个能思想的人才是力量无边的人/南郭
·思想之可贵在于其独立性
·独立思想是最美的
·思想的高度统一是人类社会之大敌
·统一思想之谬误由来已久矣/南郭
·我的心里话--有感于杜导斌先生被捕
***中共专制暴政政治迫害郭国汀律师实录
·郭国汀律师遭遇黑色元宵节
·中共对我的八次政治迫害--在温哥华告别恐惧讨共诉苦座谈会上的发言(上)
·中共暴政对我的八次政治迫害(中)
·中共暴政对我的八次政治迫害(下)
·If You Really Want Control Lock up Their Lawyers
·Anti-communist sentiments landed Chinese lawyer in an asylum
·我的思想认识与保证/郭国汀
·郭国汀律师的[悔罪][悔过]与[乞求]
·郭国汀因言论“违宪”行政处罚听证案代理词
·我推崇的浦志强大律师/郭国汀
·我被中共当局非法剥夺执业资格的真实原因
***(24)《共产主义黑皮书》郭国汀编译
·共产党皆变成杀人犯罪团伙的历史与理论分析
·朝鲜的罪恶与恐怖和秘密:共产党暴政罪恶批判系列之一
·古巴共产极权政权的罪恶:共产党暴政罪恶批判之二
·越南共产党暴政罪恶昭彰:共产党极权暴政罪恶实录之三
·中欧和东南欧共产党暴政的深重罪孽: 共产党极权暴政罪恶批判之四
·埃塞俄比亚共产党政权的罪孽: 共产党政权罪恶实录之五
·安哥拉和莫桑比克共产党政权的血腥暴力:共产党政权罪恶实录之六
·阿富汉共产党暴政罪大恶极:共产党极权暴政罪恶实录之七
·尼加拉瓜共产党政权的罪孽:共产党暴政罪恶实录之八
·秘鲁共产党的血腥残暴:共产党暴政罪恶实录之九
·虐杀成性的柬普寨共产党暴政:共产党暴政罪恶实录评论系列之十
·波兰共产党政权的罪孽:共产党暴政罪恶实录系列评论之十一
·苏联共产党暴政的滔天罪行:共产党暴政罪恶实录系列评论之十二
·中国共产党极权流氓暴政的滔天罪孽:共产党暴政罪恶实录系列评论之十三
·论共产党极权暴政的归宿-- 2010年全球支持中國和亞洲民主化斯特拉斯堡大會专稿
·金正日真面目
·韩战真相
***(25)《苏联东欧天鹅绒革命》郭国汀编译
·东欧天鹅绒革命导论
·苏联政治民主革命:共产党国极权暴政崩溃原因分析系列评论之一
·罗马尼亚暴力革命:共产党国极权暴政崩溃原因分析系列评论之二
·匈牙利静悄的革命:共产党国极权暴政崩溃原因分析之三
·捷克戏剧性革命:共产党国极权暴政崩溃原因分析之四
·东德和平革命:共产党国极权暴政崩溃原因分析之五
·波兰自我限制的革命:共产党极权暴政崩溃原因分析之六
·罗马尼亚35天革命成功真相
·社会转媒(国际互联网)对阿拉伯之春革命的巨大作用
·郭国汀:苏共政权垮台的根本原因
·阿拉伯之春埃及部分成功的革命
·阿拉伯之春:突尼斯成功的革命
·觉醒的人民粉碎专制体制:阿拉伯革命
·民主革命决非恐怖主义
·东欧各国追究共产党罪犯的罪责概况
·共产党专制暴政皆依赖秘密政治警察实行极权恐怖统治
·共产党极权暴政利用强制劳改劳教集中营野蛮残暴迫害人民
·共产党极权专制暴政实质上皆与人民为敌
·共产党极权专政暴政的大清洗
·共产党极权专制暴政皆利用强制劳改集中营野蛮迫害人民
·共产党极权专制暴政皆践踏法律司法暗无天日
·共产党极权专制暴政皆疯狂迫害宗教信仰者
***(26)《共产主义的历史》郭国汀编译
·序《共产主义的历史》
·共产主义的理论与实践批判
·列宁主义批判
·斯大林主义批判
·西方国家的共产主义
·第三世界的共产主义
·共产主义谬误的根源及其注定失败的原因
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
互联网自由度的测定方法

互联网自由度的测定方法

   版权所有人:自由之家

   译者:郭国汀

   
互联网自由度的测定方法

   自由的春色

   Freedom on the Net Methodology(draft)

   This 2009 pilot Freedom on the Net provides analytical reports and numerical ratings for 15 strategic countries. The countries were chosen in order to provide a representative sample with regards to geographical and regional diversity and economic development, as well as varying levels of internet and digital media freedom. The ratings and reports included in this pilot primarily cover events that took place between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2008.

   2009年互联网自由指南提供了15个国家的指数分析报告。被选择的样板国家,主要考虑其地理位置、地区多样性和经济发展、以及各不同程度的互联网自由度。本指南所含的互联网自由度等级和报告,主要根据自2007年1月1日至2008年12月31日发生的事件而做出。

   What we measure

   测定依据

   The Freedom on the Net index aims to measure each country’s level of internet and digital media freedom on the basis of two key components – access to the relevant technology and the free flow of information through it without fear of repercussions. Given increasing technological convergence, the index measures not only internet freedom, but also access and openness of other digital means of news media transmission, particularly mobile phones and text messaging services.

   互联网自由度指南,是根据两个关键要素做出:其一,相关网络通讯技术和通过互联网自由传播信息而无需担忧受到起诉;其二,衡量每个国家互联网和数码媒体自由度的水准。本指南不仅以互联网自由度来衡量,而且以存取和开放其他数据手段的新闻媒体传送,特别是移动电话和文本资讯服务为依据。

   Freedom House does not maintain a culture-bound view of freedom. The index methodology is grounded in basic standards of free expression, derived in large measure from Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights:

   “自由之家”不以文化背景来界定自由的概念。本指南的测定方法所采用的自由表达的基本标准,很大程度上源于“世界人权公约”第19条的规定:

   Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media regardless of frontiers.

   “每个人均有言论和表达自由权;这种权利包括不受干扰地持有、寻求、接受和通过任何媒体不分国界地传送信息和观念的自由”。

   

   This standard applies to all countries and territories, irrespective of geographical location, ethnic or religious composition, or level of economic development.

   这项标准适用于所有国家和地区,无论其地理位置,种族或宗教成分及经济发展水平如何。

   In measuring digital media freedom, the index is particularly concerned with the transmission and exchange of news and other politically relevant communications, as well as the protection of users’ rights to privacy and freedom from both legal and extra-legal repercussions arising from their online activities. At the same time, the index acknowledges that in the some instances freedom of expression and access to information may be legitimately restricted. The standard for such restrictions applied in this index is that they be implemented only in narrowly defined circumstances and in line with international human rights standards, the rule of law, and the principles of necessity, and proportionality. As much as possible, censorship and surveillance policies and procedures should be transparent and include avenues for appeal available to those affected.

   在衡量数码媒体自由方面,本指南着重考虑新闻的传送、交换和其他与政治有关的通讯及用户权利和隐私的保护,以及免受由于他们的网络活动而引起的法律和法外追究。与此同时,本指南承认在某些情况下,自由表达和存取或传送网络信息可能会受到合法的限制。适用于本指南的此种限制标准乃是他们仅在严格限定的情况下,按照国际人权标准、法治和必要的原则和比例实行。审查、监视互联网的政策与程序,应当尽可能公开透明,并包括对那些受到影响的用户可用的上诉渠道。

   The index does not rate governments or government performance per se, but rather the real-world rights and freedoms enjoyed by individuals within each country. While digital media freedom may be primarily affected by state actions, pressures and attacks by nonstate actors, including insurgents and other armed groups, are also considered. Thus, the index ratings generally reflect the interplay of a variety of actors, both governmental and nongovernmental, including private corporations.

   本指南与其说是评价政府或者政府表现本身,不如说是对每个国家内个人享受的现实世界的权利和自由度作出评价。自由会受到国家行为以及非国家的主体,包括叛乱者和其他武装团体的影响。因此,本指南综合评价政府和非政府(包括私营公司)各种角色的相互反应。

   The scoring process

   评分程序

   The index aims to capture the entire “enabling environment” for internet freedom within each country through a set of 19 methodology questions, divided into three subcategories, which are intended to highlight the vast range of issues that can impact digital media freedom. Each individual question is scored on a varying range of points. Assigning numerical points allows for comparative analysis among the countries surveyed and facilitates an examination of trends over time. Countries are given a total score from 0 (best) to 100 (worst) as well as a score for each sub-category. The degree to which conditions in each country enable the free flow of news and information via the internet and other information and communication technologies (ICTs) determines their overall classification as “Free,” “Partly Free,” or “Not Free.” Countries scoring between 0 to 30 points overall are regarded as having a “Free” internet and digital media environment; 31 to 60, “Partly Free”; and 61 to 100, “Not Free”. An accompanying country report provides narrative detail on the points covered by the methodology questions.

   

   本指南旨在通过提出分成三大类19个分类92个子类的方法学问题,纪录每个国家互联网自由的整个“许可环境”,意在突显能影响数码媒体自由的大范围的问题。每个个体问题在不同系列点得分。确定数码点允许在被调查的国家中进行比较分析,有助于测验日后的发展趋势。各个国家给定一个总分,从0分(最好)到100分(最坏),并按每一个子类给定分数。每一国家通过互联网和其他信息通讯技术,能够自由流通传送新闻和信息的条件程度,决定他们总体归类为“自由”,“部分自由”,或“不自由”。总分在0分至30分之间的国家属于“自由”互联网和数码媒体环境;31分至60分的国家,属“部分自由”;61分至100分的国家,则属“不自由”。随附各国指数报告提供详细说明该方法学问题提及的各个问题。

   The methodology examines the level of internet and ICT freedom through a set of 19 questions, organized into three baskets:

   通过19个问题对互联网和信息通讯技术自由度的方法学检验,按下述分成三大类:

   • Obstacles to Access—including governmental efforts to block specific applications or technologies; infrastructural and economic barriers to access; as well as legal and ownership control over internet and mobile phone access providers.

   • 互联网使用权的障碍—包括政府极力封锁特定产品的申请或技术;登陆互联网的基础设施与经济障碍;以及对互联网和移动电话使用权供应商的法律与所有权控制。

   • Limits on Content and Communication—including legal regulations on content, filtering and blocking of websites; other forms of censorship and self-censorship; manipulation of content; the diversity of online news media; and usage of digital media for social and political activism.

   • 内容和通讯的限制—包括对互联网内容的法律法规,过滤和封锁网站;其他形式的审查和自我审查;操纵内容;网上新闻媒体的多元化;数码媒体用于社会和政治活动。

   • Violations of Users’ Rights—including legal protections and restrictions on online activity; surveillance, privacy; and repercussions for online activity, such as legal prosecution, imprisonment, physical attacks, or other forms of harassment.

   • 用户权利的侵犯—包括对网络活动的法律保护和限制;监视,隐私,和对网上活动的反应,诸如法律起诉,监禁,人身伤害,或其他形式的骚扰。

   Index Checklist Questions

   指南问题清单

    Each country is ranked on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 being the best and 100 being the worst.

    每个国家均从0分到100分定级,最佳为0分,最差为100分。

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场