百家争鸣
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    謝田文集
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[謝田文集]->[Ancient Wisdom for Modern Predicaments]
謝田文集
·中国的央企算不算垄断企业(下)
·新纪元前夜欧洲行:英伦印象
·新纪元前夜欧洲行:将相帝王
·新纪元前夜欧洲行:伦敦的富
·中共会发行大面额的钞票吗?
·《致命中国》vs.“索命中共”
·从总裁被囚看中国社会失控
·钱荒能否逼出中国政经改革
·比特币的崛起和黄金的未来走向
·中国各级政府其实破产最好
·中国总理如何才能透过气来
·鬼城和錢荒之間有什麼關係
·新纪元前夜欧洲行:食在巴黎
·盘点世界银行给中国的建议
·影子银行地方债哪个更致命
·中国能不能再来个劫富济贫
·人民币上海试水能够成功吗?
·以房养老在中国根本行不通
·美聯儲主席之爭應波瀾不驚
·中共可能容忍地方债违约吗?
·美国前财长鲍尔森挂一漏万
·TPP何以让中南海心惊胆颤?
·中国房地产市场的九个问答
·中国为什么照猫却画不成虎
·中国为何全民捞钱却捞不着
·謝田新書《赤龍的錢囊》序與跋
·重访台湾:士林的夜市与早市
·重访台湾:福兮祸所伏的服贸
·中国高级白领的优越和忧伤
·如何拆解中国地方债的烂帐
·新纪元前夜亚洲行:韩国印象
·新纪元前夜亚洲行:狮城印象
·新纪元前夜亚洲行:印尼印象
·新纪元前夜亚洲行:万隆泗水
·中国大妈:身绑炸弹怀揣金条
·红朝一甲子前后的三次土改
·买枪、玩枪、拥枪和AK-47
·中国银行困境是全球危机吗?
·J‧埃德加‧胡佛的管理特色
·向谋士挥刀的朝廷焉得不亡
·乌克兰的黑洞和中国的黑洞
·中国货轮能不能经停夏威夷
·中国和美国宝宝军团的对比
·美国制裁赤龙时好戏会更多
·中国银行坏帐为何自产自销
·中共请吃大餐和北京的反腐
·地方诸侯经济挑战中共极权
·中国经济怎么沦落到了今天(一)
·中国经济怎么沦落到了今天(二)
·中国经济怎么沦落到了今天(三)
· 中国经济怎么沦落到了今天(四)
·中国经济怎么沦落到了今天(五)
·中国经济怎么沦落到了今天(六)
·中国经济怎么沦落到了今天(七)
·中国房地产政府不说的秘密(上)
·中国房地产 政府不说的秘密(中)
· 中国房地产政府不说的秘密(下)
·哈佛教授估量中国社会火山(上)
·哈佛教授估量中国社会火山(下)
·中国富人的机会可能不多了
·金砖银行该申请成世行分行
·荷兰人的尊严和荷兰的商船
·中国和纳粹德国经济的对比(上)
·中共为何突然要对外企翻脸?
·中国和纳粹德国经济的对比(下)
·亚马逊进中国:丛林陷入丛林
·马克思的诅咒正在中国实现
·阿里巴巴的中美双重紧箍咒
·中共的国师们在预示着什么?
·《西方对中国的误读》的误读
·新冷战的辩论居然剑指中共
·离心离德的中共中央和地方
·90高龄的卡特总统太糊涂
·占中财阀对民主?克鲁曼差矣
·美日QE之进退对中国的影响
·北京推动亚太自贸为啥没戏?
·世贸组织即将寿终正寝了吗?
·战略管理案例趣闻:陆地鲨鱼
·評點國務院參事的錦囊妙計
·世界石油戰中的陰謀和陽謀
·世界石油戰中的陰謀和陽謀
·世界石油戰中的陰謀和陽謀
·中国经济新常态恐怕是旧的
·俄罗斯的式微和中共的服软
·百年商业智慧的创新和陷阱
·中共窃取军事科技为何难成
·奥巴马的国情咨文剑指中共
·西方的教科书有多么的可怕
·世界在丢失中国传统的美德
·中共会主动进攻美国卫星吗?
·中国整合大型国企危害百姓
·奧古斯塔的直言和忍的體悟
·五百
·中共的亞投行注定竹籃打水
·六藝之射與中國經濟的不歸
·法國電影《露西》的玄學啟示
·中国信托业刚性兑付的怪圈
·谢田:美国象牙塔内的三个小故事
·商界的卡迪拉克和罗罗难题
·世界中国学论坛的矛盾讯号
·IMF的特别提款权不很值钱
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Ancient Wisdom for Modern Predicaments

Vol. 3, No. 1, 2004

   Ancient Wisdom for Modern Predicaments: The Truth, Deceit, and Issues Surrounding Falun Gong

   Frank Tian Xie, Ph.D.Department of MarketingDrexel University

   Tracey Zhu, M.D.New Haven, CT

   Editor's Note: This paper is a revised version of a presentation given at AFF's conference in Enfield, Connecticut, October 17-18, 2003. It includes an appendix, a statement by Mr. Gang Chen, also presented at the conference. It is part of an ongoing print dialogue concerning Falun Gong and the Chinese government. Other articles on this subject include: Rosedale (2002), Langone (2003), Luo (2003), Rahn (2003), Robbins (2003), and Rosedale (2003). On April 23, 2004 AFF's directors approved a statement clarifying the organization's position on Falun Gong and the Chinese government.

   AbstractThis paper presents the point of views of two practitioners in Falun Gong. The authors intend to give their personal accounts of the issues, explain what Falun Gong really is and is not, discuss the deceit of the Chinese government, explain the motivations behind the persecution of Falun Gong in China, and respond to the issues and questions raised at previous American Family Foundation (AFF) conferences and publications. In addition, the authors offer a caveat to scholars in the field about the limitation of conducting research on qigong and cultivation under the auspices of empiricism and positivism.

   I. What Exactly Is Falun Dafa (Falun Gong)?

   1. Falun Gong is a Cultivation Practice

   Falun Dafa, also known as Falun Gong, was introduced to the public by Mr. Li Hongzhi in 1992 as a form of qigong.

   The term “qigong” appeared during the Great Cultural Revolution and became popular in China since the 1960’s. Modern in its name only, it actually representsmany forms of cultivation practices, including those in the Taoist and Buddhist schools, throughout ancient history. Cultivation is the oriental method of attaining the Buddhahood and/or the Dao (or Tao), and is highly regarded and well respected in Eastern cultures. In Chinese history, many high-ranking court officials and even emperors were Taoist cultivation practitioners or Buddhist monks in their early life. Two examples were Prime Minister Zhang Liang of the Han Dynasty (206 B.C.-A.D. 220) and Minister Liu Bowen of the Ming Dynasty (A.D. 1368-1644). Cultivation to achieve the "Dao" ("Tao") was considered the ultimate achievement of personal self-realization. The Dao is an indigenous Chinese name for deity. The concept of Buddha was introduced into China from India. Derived from the ancient Indian language of Sanskrit, a Buddha is an enlightened being or someone who has achieved the highest level of human fulfillment in his/her system of cultivation.

   Buddhism should not be considered the only method of cultivation in the Buddha School since Buddha Sakyamuni indicated that there were eighty-four thousand cultivation ways in cultivating Buddhahood or reaching enlightenment. Other than Buddhism and Daoism, many more methods of cultivation were secretly taught from master to disciple in seclusion in history.

   In Mr. Li Hongzhi’s 9-day lectures, which were later compiled into the book Zhuan Falun, he began his introduction by pointing out that Falun Gong is a way of cultivation practice in the Buddha School. Falun Gong’s core principles are Truthfulness, Benevolence (compassion), and Forbearance (tolerance), and it aims atbringing practitioners to a higher level of morality through cultivation of these principles and doing the exercises. Although healing and curing diseases are not the goal of Falun Gong practice, the healing and health efficacy of Falun Gong made it extremely appealing to many who suffered various chronic, serious, and even life-threatening diseases.

   Because of its healing power and the fact that it is free to everyone, Falun Gong spread quickly by word of mouth from its introduction to the public in 1992 until today. Many started to practice Falun Gong because of its healing capability but then became dedicated practitioners after realizing its unique ability in upgrading people’s moral standards. Others first came to learn Falun Gong’s principles and then started to cultivate even before they realized Falun Gong’s health benefits.

   2. Is Falun Gong a Religion?

   Falun Gong is not a religion. The founder of Falun Gong, Mr. Li Hongzhi, never intended to make it a religion but foresaw that “future generations will regard it as one” (Li 1996). Precisely, Falun Gong is a cultivation practice that is deeply rooted in Chinese history and tradition, and such a practice does not have a word “directly corresponding to the Western term ‘religion’” (Madsen 2000). Like many religions and cultivation methods, Falun Gong does have spiritual content and beliefs.

   Practitioners’ personal experiences have proved that by cultivation in line with the guidelines of Falun Gong’s principles, one is able to become a better person who is able to contribute positively to the society. So in this regard, Falun Gong’s goals are similar to that of other cultivation practices and orthodox religions. However, Falun Gong does not have all of the other aspects of religion, including worship of a god or a deity; religious ceremonies and rituals; places of worship such as churches, temples, and synagogues; and organizational forms of membership or hierarchy. Falun Gong is most appropriately called an ancient form of self-cultivation practice, or a form of qigong.

   3. What Falun Gong is not

   Falun Gong is within the spectrum of indigenous Chinese spiritual practices, and cannot be considered to be a cult (Madsen 2000). Neither is Falun Gong a “xie jiao” (“devious religion," or more loosely, an “evil cult”), as the Chinese government under Jiang Zemin’s regime denigrated it. If “cult” is defined according to Margaret Singer and other scholars, Falun Gong is not a cult (Wong and Liu 1999). It is further argued that “the style of governance (in Falun Gong) is neither totalitarian nor suggestive of exclusivity and isolation” and “there is no clear evidence of any public idol worship of Li Hongzhi” (Wong and Liu 1999). As we will discuss in later sections, in Falun Gong there is no amassing of wealth for the founder, no worship ofidols, and no harm towards practitioners for the benefit of its “leader”. So Falun Gong, or Falun Dafa, as a cultivation practice, is not a cult or a religion, let alone an “evil cult” or “devious religion.”

   4. The Growth of Falun Gong between 1992 and 1999

   Mr. Li Hongzhi started teaching about Falun Gong on May 13, 1992 in the city of Changchun, Jilin Province, with about 180 people attending. Between 1992 and 1995, 54 classes were held, with nearly 100,000 people attending those classes. In 1995, Mr. Li discontinued his teaching inside of China. From 1995 until the start of the persecution in 1999, Falun Gong had been promulgated in China mostly via word-of-mouth among friends and families. An investigation by the Public Security Ministry of China in 1997, using undercover agents, found no culpability of practitioners nationwide, and estimated the total number of practitioners at around 70 million, or about 5% of China's population. (citation?)

   Beginning in Paris on March 13, 1995, Mr. Li started giving lectures overseas, traveling to countries in Europe, Asia-Pacific, and North America. Now Falun Dafa is practiced by millions of people in over 60 countries with the book, Zhuan Falun, now translated into over 30 languages, with nine more translations currently in progress.II. What Has Happened Since the Persecution?

   Persecution of Falun Gong started in 1999. Hundreds of thousands of practitioners were expelled from the parks where they used to do their morning exercises, and thousands were detained, nationwide, in the morning of July 22, 1999. An intense, all-encompassing campaign of propaganda immediately ensued. In the first 30 days of the persecution, between July and August of 1999, as many as 347 articles appeared in The People’s Daily alone, criticizing and ridiculing Falun Gong, with more than 10 articles per day. It was a Cultural Revolution style of a concerted state scheme almost akin to organized crime and state-sponsored terrorism against a group of unarmed civilians. The persecution is cruel and vicious, and the slogan used by the regime is that they will crush and devastate Falun Gong and its practitioners “financially, spiritually, and physically.”

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场