大家
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    郭国汀律师专栏
[主页]->[大家]->[郭国汀律师专栏]->[论中共专制暴政下的宗教信仰自由(英文)]
郭国汀律师专栏
·自由之我见
·不自由勿宁死!
·自由万岁!----我为“新青年学会四君子”及“不锈钢老鼠”辩护
·真正的民主自由政体是中国唯一的选择
·自由万岁!新年好!
·三论思想自由
·为自由而战,为正义事业献身,死得其所无尚光荣
·言论自由受到了严重威胁
·思想自由的哲学基础/郭国汀
·冲破精神思想的牢狱--自由要义/郭国汀
·我们为什么要争言论自由权?/南郭
***(38)思想自由与宗教信仰自由
·郭国汀论宗教信仰
·神学与哲学的异同
·宗教的思索
·爱因斯坦信犹太教和贵格教也信上帝
·信神是愚昧吗?!基督教义反人性吗?!谁在大规模屠杀婴儿?!
·爱因斯坦宗教信仰上帝相关言论选译
·爱因斯坦宗教上帝相关言论第二集
· 爱因斯坦原信的准确译法
·大哲大师大思想家大政治家论宗教上帝
·哲学家的前提与基础
·宗教是统治阶级麻醉人民的鸦片吗?
·为什么说爱才是宇宙的本质?
·宗教起源的根源何在?
·圣父圣子圣灵三位一体论的由来
·人民圣殿教真相
·质疑东海一枭良知大法兼驳良知宇宙本体论
·自然科学与宗教哲学灵魂
·读东海兄批判美国神话有感
·郭国汀为上帝信仰辩护
·驳东海之糊涂上帝观
·四海之内皆兄弟人类本是一家人
·推荐陈尔晋先生之《圣灵福音》
·质疑东海君之《良知大法》
·祝愿祖国早日实现真正的自由!
·关于司法公正的讨论郭国汀律师在北大法律信息网上发表了非常危险的错误观点应该予以驳斥!
·中共当局封杀言论为那般?
·六四的记忆
·谈中华文化与道德重建(四)
·中国百年最伟大的文字!
·郭国汀:为刘荻女英雄辩护吾当仁不让!
·只有思想言论出版新闻舆论的真正自由能够救中国!
·只有说真话的民族才有前途
·一个能思想的人才是力量无边的人/南郭
·思想之可贵在于其独立性
·独立思想是最美的
·思想的高度统一是人类社会之大敌
·统一思想之谬误由来已久矣/南郭
·我的心里话--有感于杜导斌先生被捕
***中共专制暴政政治迫害郭国汀律师实录
·郭国汀律师遭遇黑色元宵节
·中共对我的八次政治迫害--在温哥华告别恐惧讨共诉苦座谈会上的发言(上)
·中共暴政对我的八次政治迫害(中)
·中共暴政对我的八次政治迫害(下)
·If You Really Want Control Lock up Their Lawyers
·Anti-communist sentiments landed Chinese lawyer in an asylum
·我的思想认识与保证/郭国汀
·郭国汀律师的[悔罪][悔过]与[乞求]
·郭国汀因言论“违宪”行政处罚听证案代理词
·我推崇的浦志强大律师/郭国汀
·我被中共当局非法剥夺执业资格的真实原因
***(24)《共产主义黑皮书》郭国汀编译
·共产党皆变成杀人犯罪团伙的历史与理论分析
·朝鲜的罪恶与恐怖和秘密:共产党暴政罪恶批判系列之一
·古巴共产极权政权的罪恶:共产党暴政罪恶批判之二
·越南共产党暴政罪恶昭彰:共产党极权暴政罪恶实录之三
·中欧和东南欧共产党暴政的深重罪孽: 共产党极权暴政罪恶批判之四
·埃塞俄比亚共产党政权的罪孽: 共产党政权罪恶实录之五
·安哥拉和莫桑比克共产党政权的血腥暴力:共产党政权罪恶实录之六
·阿富汉共产党暴政罪大恶极:共产党极权暴政罪恶实录之七
·尼加拉瓜共产党政权的罪孽:共产党暴政罪恶实录之八
·秘鲁共产党的血腥残暴:共产党暴政罪恶实录之九
·虐杀成性的柬普寨共产党暴政:共产党暴政罪恶实录评论系列之十
·波兰共产党政权的罪孽:共产党暴政罪恶实录系列评论之十一
·苏联共产党暴政的滔天罪行:共产党暴政罪恶实录系列评论之十二
·中国共产党极权流氓暴政的滔天罪孽:共产党暴政罪恶实录系列评论之十三
·论共产党极权暴政的归宿-- 2010年全球支持中國和亞洲民主化斯特拉斯堡大會专稿
·金正日真面目
·韩战真相
***(25)《苏联东欧天鹅绒革命》郭国汀编译
·东欧天鹅绒革命导论
·苏联政治民主革命:共产党国极权暴政崩溃原因分析系列评论之一
·罗马尼亚暴力革命:共产党国极权暴政崩溃原因分析系列评论之二
·匈牙利静悄的革命:共产党国极权暴政崩溃原因分析之三
·捷克戏剧性革命:共产党国极权暴政崩溃原因分析之四
·东德和平革命:共产党国极权暴政崩溃原因分析之五
·波兰自我限制的革命:共产党极权暴政崩溃原因分析之六
·罗马尼亚35天革命成功真相
·社会转媒(国际互联网)对阿拉伯之春革命的巨大作用
·郭国汀:苏共政权垮台的根本原因
·阿拉伯之春埃及部分成功的革命
·阿拉伯之春:突尼斯成功的革命
·觉醒的人民粉碎专制体制:阿拉伯革命
·民主革命决非恐怖主义
·东欧各国追究共产党罪犯的罪责概况
·共产党专制暴政皆依赖秘密政治警察实行极权恐怖统治
·共产党极权暴政利用强制劳改劳教集中营野蛮残暴迫害人民
·共产党极权专制暴政实质上皆与人民为敌
·共产党极权专政暴政的大清洗
·共产党极权专制暴政皆利用强制劳改集中营野蛮迫害人民
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
论中共专制暴政下的宗教信仰自由(英文)

Freedom of Religion justified from natural law
   
   By Guoting Guo
   
   Throughout history, governments have attempted to control religious organizations and limited religious freedom. However, over the past two hundred years the world has extended religious liberty. What explains this rise in religious freedom? For all human being has the free will and personal spiritual experience, through study we learn that the first nation come true the religious liberty is United States and their fundamental documents drafter was Thomas Jefferson who was mainly influenced by John Locke's theory of natural law. Therefore, I think the main reason for the freedom of religion has developed in the world is the natural law ideology.

   
    I the right of religious liberty is well build in International law
   
   The right to freedom of religion is one of the oldest human rights recognized internationally. The Peace of Westphalia (1648), which accorded international protection to religious groups. The right of religious liberty added dynamism to the Virginia's Bill of Rights of 1776, the Austrian Act of Religious Tolerance of 1781 and the Virginia Statute of Religious Liberty of 1786.[1]The Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations (UDHR1948) was a fruit of development, which was followed by a series of human rights conventions supported in varying degrees by all countries.[2] all articles are based and developed from the article 18 of the UDHR of 1948, which states:
   
   "Everyone has the right to freedom of… religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance".
   
   1. Everyone have the right to freedom of religion. This right includes freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, observance, practice, and teaching.
   2. no one shall be subject to coercion, which would impair his freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice.
   3. freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, or moral or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.
   
   Therefore, the principle of Freedom of Religion is welled build in the field of international law; almost in all State's law declare that citizens have the right of religious liberty now. However, in practice, in all totalitarian and dictatorship regimes, no such thing as religious liberty, for these regimes all deny the principle of natural law, deny the natural rights and wherever and whenever deny the principle of natural law and natural rights, where and when the religious liberty could not survive.
   
   
   II. Freedom of Religion and natural law
   
   A. national law theory
   
   What is religion? It is impossible to have a universal accepted definition, for different people have various opinions. A apologist for Christianity, Schleiermacher, defined religion in terms of 'the feeling of absolute dependence upon God'; a philosopher, Whitehead, defined religion as ' what the individual does with his solitariness'; a famous religion scholar, Edward Tyler, defined religion as 'belief in spiritual being'; a another religion scholar, James Frazer ,defined religion as 'a propitiation or conciliation of powers superior to man'; a author, Rudolf Otto defined religion as 'a unique, original feeling response…which claims consideration in its own right'; and the well-known psychologist, Freud even described religion as 'a universal obsessional neurosis'; even Marxism and Fascism have been described as 'quasi-religion'.[3] In my opinion, religion is a faith for where we are from and where we are going.
   
   1. nature and religion
   
   Generally speaking, the religious origin of man's consciousness of right and the legal order was or is affirmed through the intermediary of the natural law. In the rationalistic conception, man's consciousness of right and the legal order is not brought into relationship with God[4]. For primitive man nature had a numinous and sacral meaning, they lived in a society whose norms were dictated by nature and for them nature was never merely 'natural'; it is for them always filled with religious meaning. Nature's life of the primitive man had the numinous and the sacred, he tried to integrate his own life into that of nature, the nature and culture have spontaneously a religious meaning, not only birth and death, sexual relations and sickness, but also work, politics, morality, traffic, science, economy-everything has a religious foundation.[5] Thus, religion was born at very beginning with the human being.
   
   2. God and Natural Law
   
   Hammurabi called himself " King of Justice" because he received the legal order of his kingdom from the hands of Shamash. All Chinese ancient emperors declared themselves as the Son of God. Therefore, entire legal order or at least the authority and the power of the rulers receive an absolute and sacred character if they are seen as directly related to God's will.
   
   Spinoza asserted that the power and force through which everything in nature exists and operates is nothing but the power and force of God. God's power is unlimited and therefore God has a right to everything. Since whatever is in nature exists and operates by virtue of God's power and since God's absolute power is God's absolute right, it follows that the right of whatever is in nature is in direct ratio to the power it has to exist and operate. This right of everything that exists in nature is the natural law, and the natural law extends as far as the power of nature and of everything that exists in nature[6].
   
   3. Reason and the natural law.
   
   The natural law derives from a few very general and self-evident principles. Sometimes they even estimated it as superior and better then positive law because it did not come forth from the will of a lawgiver and therefore was valid for all times and places for all human beings. However someone challenged: How would the discursive reason on its own be able to formulate a system of legal norms which in its completeness and its detailed character can be compared with positive law when the creation of a single role of positive law sometimes demands months and even years of strenuous work? How can reason alones be able to excogitate a system of norms valid for all people at all times and all places when it is certain that no two times, no two places and no two people are alike? How can a system of norms be unchangeable if times, places and people change? In the light of the strenuous work jurists must perform in order to precisely take account of the concrete and change times, places and people, the rationalistic view of the natural law presents itself as an intolerable pretension. The rationalistic view of the natural law has disappeared from the scene.[7] Mans natural rights would be determined by the power of his reason. But man does not live according to his reason; he is driven by passions and desires. Because people let themselves be swayed by their passions and desires, they are naturally one another's enemies.[8]
   
   4. Essence and natural law.
   
   The legal order as a whole must have a foundation that cannot have a purely positive-juridical character. Many philosophers have tried to base the positive legal order on the nature of man. In so far as the legal order is based on man's essence, there will be as many different views about the natural law as there are different anthropologies. Even the rationalistic conception of the natural law is based on a view of man. [9]
   
   B. Natural law
   
   Natural law theory is one of the most important theories in the philosophy of Classical Realism. In order to understand the natural law we need discuss more detail some content of the natural law.
   
   1. the definition of the natural law
   
   Natural law is that "unwritten law" that is more or less the same for everyone everywhere (Aristotle). In an another word, natural law is the concept of a body of moral principles that is common to all humankind and recognizable by human reason. It may be defined as "rules of action prescribed by non-human authority which is superior to the state. These rules variously are derived from divine commandment; from the nature of humankind; from abstract Reason; or from long experience of mankind in community". [10]

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场