大家
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    郭国汀律师专栏
[主页]->[大家]->[郭国汀律师专栏]->[答张鹤慈先生质疑]
郭国汀律师专栏
·中国人持继追问为何众多学校震成碎片废墟? 被全球英文网站转载最多的地震专文
***美国2008年总统大选南郭点评系列
·朗保罗--美国2008年大选最雄劲的黑马
·美国大选最新民意进展分析——美国2008年总统大选南郭点评系列之二
·美国2008年大选程序正义与演讲精华
·欧巴马的通往白宫之旅
·前国务卿鮑威尔支持欧巴马
·麦肯总统候选人的基本政策主张
***(42)中国民主运动研究
· 自由宪政民主运动与中共暴政的决战主战场何在?
·国人应当认清中共政权的极权专制流氓犯罪本质
·真正觉醒后英勇的你我他才是决定中国前途和命运的基本力量
·是谁制造了大陆中国的“暴戾之气的泛滥”?
·我为何对中共极权暴政及胡锦涛没有仇恨维有鄙视?
·是共特黑而非民运黑
·我所了解的政治新星曾节明
· 南郭点评陈子明社会运动与政治演练
· 序《我的两个中国 --一个六四天安门学生反革命的实录》
·时代的最强音:“六四”屠城二十一周年口号
· 警惕共匪假冒民运人士故意毁损民运声誉—答人民思想家
·论颠覆国家政权罪的律师辩护
·郭律师点评杨建立博士论三个中国
·退出自由中国论坛的公开声明
·陈尔晋与张国堂之争的性质
·我的几个基本观点答张国堂先生公开信
·中国民运战略研究
·中国民运当前面临问题与对策研究
·郭国汀加入民主中国阵线的公开声明
·论公推中国民运政治领袖的必要性
·论公推自荐公选民运政治精神领袖的紧迫性
·中国民主运动领袖论?答方文武先生
·关于筹建过渡政府与公选民运领袖问题的讨论
·关于民运领袖过渡政府与程序正义的争论
·历史功臣还是历史罪人?
·中国民主运动到底需要什么样的政治精神领袖?
·谁是中国民主运动政治精神领袖的最佳人选?
·谁是中共极权专制暴政最害怕的劲敌?
·郭国汀:汪兆钧信是中共内部爆炸的一颗原子弹
·严正责令胡锦涛及中共当局——立即无条件释放民运志士李国涛!
·反抗中共专制暴政的先驱者与英雄(修正)
·相会伟大的刘文辉烈士英魂
·敬请胡锦涛先生立即制止下属恶意疯狂攻击南郭之电脑
·"六四领袖去死吧!"及 " 逢共必反、逢华必反"?!
·草根吾友欲往何处去?
·真实的陈泱潮故事
·陈泱潮自传之二
·强烈推荐国人必读之最佳政论文
·答小溪先生质疑
·驳斥草虾兼与草根商榷!
·伟大的中国文化复兴宣言 郭国汀
·关于宣讲人权公约基金申请推荐函
·必须立即终止反动透顶的行政官员任命制
·自由中国论坛的不锈钢老鼠到底是什么角色?
·关注李宇宙的命运
***(43)中国民主运动的思想、理论与实践
·中国争人权言论表达自由权的先驱者与英雄名录
·民主革命论 陈泱潮
·《特权论的》精髓——对共产专制特权制度的深刻致命批判
·特权论的精髓——对共产专制特权制度的深刻致命批判 郭国汀
·枭雄黑道乱世的一百年!郭国汀
·论无产阶级民主制度下的两党制
·陈泱潮评胡锦涛
·陈泱潮论江泽民
·我为什么特别推崇陈泱潮先生的思想理论?
·天才论/郭国汀
·彻底揭露批判中共极权专制流氓暴政本质的奇书
·极权专制暴政的根源/郭国汀
·共产极权专制暴政的典型特征——简评陈泱潮的《特权论》
·论共产极权专制政权的本质——三评陈泱潮天才著作《特权论》
·何谓“无产阶级专政”
·陈泱潮论马克思主义的无产阶级专政 郭国汀
·论初级无产阶级专政 /新南郭点评
·论高级无产阶级专政 郭国汀
·中国何往?——政治思想论战书 /新南郭
·陈泱潮论改良主义/郭国汀
·文化大革命是中国民主革命的序幕 郭国汀
·陈泱潮妙评邓小平的“瞎猫屠夫理论” 郭国汀
·陈泱潮精评毛泽东 郭国汀
·论共产党官僚垄断特权阶级 郭国汀
·共产党官员为什么普遍腐化堕落?郭国汀
·“三个代表”是个什么玩意? 郭国汀
·对抗性的社会基本矛盾 郭国汀
·为何中共官员多具有奴隶主和奴仆的双重人格? 郭国汀
·共产专制特权等级制 郭国汀
·人民“公仆”是如何变成骑在人民头上作威作福的老爷的? 郭国汀
·神化首要分子神化党与邪教 郭国汀
·宗教政治与人权灵本主义 郭国汀
·陈尔晋论今日中国社会主要矛盾及前途与命运
·陈泱潮先生在当代中国思想史上的地位 作者:曾节明
***(44)反中共极权专制暴政争自由宪政人权民主绝食抗暴民权运动
·南郭致涵习近平先生
·郭律师致高智晟女儿格格的公开信
·福布斯报导高智晟失踪事件
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
答张鹤慈先生质疑

尊敬的张鹤慈先生:
   今天偶然看到阁下的质疑:"现在不但国际媒体,就是法轮功自己的媒体,也不再提苏家屯了。【大卫乔高和麦塔斯游说全球十五个国家或地区,】也没有下文了。希望郭先生冷静的想一想。中共就是再有钱,有实力,也不可能封住世界的媒体。
   布什和美国政府都封不住对他们自己的尖锐的批评,中共反而能够封住?如果苏家屯的事件有百分之几的真实性,不要说反共的媒体,就是中立的媒体,从经济效率看,也绝对不会放过这个体裁。怎么可能就这么静悄悄的消失了?"

   其实,阁下所说的并非事实,恰恰相当,两天前德国第二大报法兰克福福汇报即再次报导了中共活割盗卖法轮功学员人体器官的专论.具体而言,比我发表"力被中共当局无罪重判的真实原因"当时,我又找到了至少20家海外各国媒体的相关报导.至于有关该至关重大罪孽的报导,详见附件1.附件2是我用英文撰写并发表于2006年8月间的一篇评论.此外,值得一提的是,充他的证据表明,google.com正在极力配合中共当局克意封杀有关中共当局要求封杀的人和事.故现在网上有关havesting organ of Falun Gong 的信息条目少得极反常.正可谓欲盖弥彰!
   若有任何疑问,欢迎讨论争辩.
   郭国汀
   附件一: 除了大纪元、新唐人、希望之声之外,最早报导苏家屯惨案的西方媒体是美国华盛顿时报,有意思的是,那只[雌鼠]迫不及待地在自由中国论坛上贴云:“华盛顿时报是一份小报!”据不完全统计,如今世界各国主流媒体报导苏家屯事件引起世人注目的中共活割盗卖法轮功学员人体器官人权惨案者有:
   A:美国之音、BBC、路透社、英国CHANNEL4、法新社、加通社、日本共同社、加拿大广播公司、加拿大电视台、比利时国家电视台、澳洲ABC电视台、瑞典国家电视台、瑞士电讯社、美国CBS电视台;
   B:加拿大国家邮报、基督教科学缄言报、圣路易斯邮报、悉尼晨锋报、澳洲NINEMSN报、澳大利亚人报、瑞典哥德堡晚报、加拿大渥汰华公民报、意大利那不勒斯日报、比利时晚报、比利时早报、比利时GVA报、福克斯、法国西部报、丹麦日德兰邮报、丹麦林时报、德国法兰克福福汇报、德国韦斯区登快报、德国西南新闻、麦卡法广告报、《美国大众媒体》、美国费城周报、美国德洲SPERO报、丹佛大学校报、日本世界日报、日本产经新闻、马来西亚太阳报、马来西亚中国报、马亚西亚东方日报、英国星期天先驱报、爱尔兰时报、爱尔兰医疗时报、爱尔兰检察官报、世界网络日报;
   C:大赦国际、加拿大记者俱乐部、联合国人权理事会主办的《健康伦理人权讨论会》、欧盟副主席、法国《为了人权而行动》组织、爱尔兰外交委员会、台湾陆委会、联合国将组织调查团、芬兰外交部长代表欧洲向中国外交部长正式提出关注该人权;
   D: 梵蒂冈电台、台湾中央广播电台、法国新闻电台、自由欧洲电台;
   F:日本《正论》杂志、日本SAPLO杂志、日本VOICE杂志、爱尔兰医学周刊、美国《国家观察》杂志、皇家医药期刊;
   G:美国、加拿大、德国、澳洲、新西兰、法国、韩国、丹麦、比利时、爱尔兰、英国、芬兰、瑞士、瑞典等国皆有不少议员正式向各国政府提出议案。法国司法部长、台湾副总统、欧洲委员会2006年二次决策会议11名委员联名提案、由此可见,中共专制暴政活割盗卖法轮功学员人体器官的惊天罪孽真相正在全球被彻底揭露。大卫乔高及大卫麦塔斯所作的调查及他们对中国人权的伟大贡献令人敬佩!
   附件二.
   Why the CCP Harvests the Living Falun Gong Practitioner's Organ?
   By Thomas G.Guo [1]
   August 7,2006
   I. Background:
   
   Several students asked me why the CCP harvests the living FLG practitioner's organ? Is it really true? Is it just for money? It is unbelievable! A journalist and a doctor's wife, on March 8 of this year, revealed a shocking news report, which exposed the harvesting of the organs from live Falun Gong practitioners in a Sujiatun concentration camp. All main media in the world kept silence for months; however, on July 6, 2006, the Report of the investigation carried by two prominent Canadians, former M.P. David Kilgour and Human Right Lawyer David Matas, in which they confirmed the Living Organ Harvesting is true. The world main media all reported the news right away. Nevertheless, still there are many people who hardly believe such a horrible, evil crime against a human being and don't understand why? Before we answer these enquires, we have to learn some basic fact, what has happened to FLG practitioners?
   
   
   II. What has happened?
   
   1. On March 8, 2006 a journalist, Mr. Peter, revealed the shocking news that there are 6,000 FLG (Falun Gong) practitioners whose organs have been harvested for sale for transplant with high price, and then their bodies were incinerated. The World Organization to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong (WOIPFG) confirmed that hospitals and transplant centers in China use organs from living Falun Gong practitioners for transplants.[2] On March 28, 2006, the Chinese government openly denied the accusation. The speaker declared that" Most organs in the organ transplant operations in China have been from voluntary donation of Chinese citizens when they were passing away and very few from death penalty criminals" [3] However, the vice-minister of Health Minister of China, Mr.Huang Jiefu, admitted that the majority of the donors are from executed prisoners and there are only 5 % come from voluntary donors.[4]
   2. March 17,2006, the surgeon's wife, Ms. Anny, proved that her former-husband removed about 2,000 FLG practitioner's corneas during the early part of 2001 to the end of 2003. In April 2006, The Weekly Standard interviewed Ms. Anny who proved that the doctors removed FLG's kidneys, livers, hearts, skin tissues, and corneas. [5]
   
   3. April 2006, a military doctor confirmed that there is 36 similar concentration camps in China all involving the harvesting live organ business.[6].
   
   4. July 6, 2006, two prominent Canada human right activists investigation report confirmed that the harvesting is true, and about 41,000 organ transplant could not be explained at all. They said,"This is a form of evil we have yet to see on this planet," [7] (at the same day the Chinese embassy in Canada denied the charge again.[8])
   
   III. Lots of evidence shows that the harvesting of organs from living FLG practitioners is true!
   
    The reports of David Kilgour and David Matas collected 18 kinds of evidence to prove the facts of harvesting human organs:
   
   1. FLG's corpses with missing organs (pictures): The picture could explain better more than thousand words. Mr.Wand Bin, a FLG's practitioner from Hei Longjiang province was tortured to death then his heart and brain all disappear.[9] Mr.Ren Pengwu, a FLG's Practitioner from Ha Erbing, was tortured to death and his body organs all harvested then his body was forcibly burned up. Ms.Hao Runjun, a FLG practitioner from Guangzhou, was tortured by police to death then her body was opened without consent of the relative. Mr.Sun Duanjiang, a FLG practitioner from Ningde Fujian Province, also tortured to death by police and his body was opened without the consent of his wife.[10]
   
   2. The surgeon's wife's confessed that her former husband had removed 2,000 FLG practitioners' corneas in two years.
   
   3. China hospitals admissions: In a telephone investigation the doctors admitted their donors are FLG practitioners. For example, on April 28, 2006, the doctor of the Airforce Hospital in Chengdu confirmed that they could offer young healthy FLG practitioner donors.[11]
   
   
   3. The time waiting for transplant is only one or two weeks with a maximum of one month. This shows there are huge banks of living organs are waiting recipients. There must be a computer data bank of donors. In North American the transplant wait for a donor is three years. On April 28, 2006, the People's Hospital of Hu Nang offered to transplant 20 livers or a kidney for free![12]Just because of there are too many livers and kidneys waiting for harvesting.
   
   4. Victims interviewed proved that all FLG practitioners have their blood tested while in camps. Practitioners in detention are systematically blood tested. It is a pre-requisite for organ transplant. Donors need to be matched with recipients so that the antibodies of the recipients don't reject the organs of the donors.
   
   5. Human rights violations generally in China: In the end of 2005, the Chinese government first admitted to using the organs of executed prisoners. However, this happened for more than 20 years. In 1984, the Chinese government enacted a temporary regulation of the use of the body and organs of detained prisoners. In June 2001, Mr.Wang Guoqi, a military doctor of China in a hearing held by the House of Commons of the United States, confirmed that he had taken more than 100 executed prisoner's organs, all without the consent of the donors.

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场