政党社团之声
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    BURMA-缅甸风云
[主页]->[政党社团之声]->[BURMA-缅甸风云]->[Forum of Burmese in Europe 28-Jan-2007]
BURMA-缅甸风云
·莫言的锵锵真言
·益寿抑癌健康蔬菜排行榜
·天朝神仙辟谷术与增寿功
·讴歌太平盛世中国夢
·从人民巡警爱人民讲起
·吃价廉物美的保健蔬菜!
·大资本家李嘉诚有话说
· 缅甸仰望中国巨贪巨腐
·龙的传人欧来欧去记
·缅甸华族看香港占中
·缅甸莱比塘铜矿惨案
·赤子心童年梦
·缅甸第67周年独立节
·知否您身价💲千万¥万万缅元超百亿?
·彭家声誓要打回老家果敢去
·赛万赛采访缅甸众民族武装组织
·缅甸和谈双方须互让共赢
·歌曲:习近平寄语中华儿女
·食人族与美韓中三俘虏
·缅甸UNFC对68周年联邦节的声明
·猜谜:诸子百家?三教九流?习大大寄语?
·缅甸是战是和,登盛政府是问
·能耳闻眼见心知又如何呢?
·为后代活得有尊严而天长地久奋斗!
·缅甸和平,时进时退
·彭家声真的打回老家果敢去了
·缅甸果敢特区战火冲天
·68周年缅甸联邦节的感概
·果敢彭家声泣告天下同胞书
·临时协议是让缅甸多走一段路
·中国人不是瑞苗胞波吗?
·克伦民族联盟KNU声明
·有关缅甸果敢内战的舆论
·果敢战乱是侵犯国家主权吗?
·走向更完整的联邦制
·大缅族主义情绪被煽动起来了
·由缅甸王朝末日说起
·缅甸果敢战争是内战或侵犯国家主权?
·缅甸果敢战争是内战或侵犯国家主权?
·由普京的锵锵之言讲起
·缅甸军队展开冷血进攻
·缅甸革命元老德钦丁米雅逝世
·缅甸军政府长寿百年?
·缅甸为民请命的名律师 U Aung Htoo
·中国为首迅速崛起
·缅甸UNFC对目前和谈与陆空攻击发表声明
·赛万赛谈最近缅甸和谈进展
·缅甸全国停火在拐弯爬行
·成龍——100%龙的传人
·缅甸果敢:温2009年知2015年
·停战!建设缅甸Federal邦联!
·缅甸全国停火会议五月初续开
·缅甸边签全国停火协议边打内战
·缅甸佤邦五月初续开全国停火会议
·缅甸UNFC主席给登盛总统的公开信
·缅甸众少数民族维护果敢兄弟
·缅甸佤邦五月初和平会议困难重重
·缅甸果敢军四月战果
·缅甸五月初佤邦和谈任重道远
·望缅甸联邦和平复兴
·缅甸佤邦棒桑全国停火会议开锣了
·缅甸佤邦棒桑全国停火会议首日
·缅甸佤邦棒桑和平会议第四天
·缅甸佤邦棒桑和谈会第五天
·缅甸佤邦棒桑峰会胜利闭幕
·缅甸民族武装组织邦康峰会公报
·缅甸三分鼎立,看谁出奇制胜
·缅军誓要以果敢之血洗其臭脚
·缅甸温教授谈“联邦”
·看中国如何应对缅军逼民地武缴枪
·从果敢战事痛忆白华红华互屠
·Great! 世界宗教议会!
·缅甸内战源于大缅族极端主义背叛彬龙协议
·缅甸独裁将军们四两拨千斤
·谈昂山素姬首次访华
·昂山素姬与女强人妈推姬
·昂山素姬与女强人妈推姬
·缅甸将军们放下屠刀就立地成佛?
·缅甸学生七七惨案永不忘!
·煎炸烘烤动植物食品极不健康
·笑+思考+运动 = 健脑强身
·KNDO 六十七周年建军节讲话
·缅甸阿尔茨海默症
·缅甸CNF正义的呼声!
·缅甸EAO不忘小兄弟民族
·缅甸和平夜长梦多险恶
·怀念王毅诚老师
·湖南窃贼偷佛国玉坠
·缅甸众民族武装怒吼了 !
·克伦民族抵抗组织怒吼了
·韩国逍遥游
·登盛政府会平稳移交政权吗?
·寄厚望于昂山素姬新政府
·且看登盛军民政府如何逊位
·Q类败类在神州复活
·克伦民族节68周年讲话
·缅甸UNFC扩大会议文告
·赛万赛谈缅甸联邦
· 赛万赛谈缅军最近动向
·温教授继续炮轰缅甸将军们!
·赛万赛谈掸邦掸族团结自救
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Forum of Burmese in Europe 28-Jan-2007

BE, CZ, DE, DK, FIN, FR, IRL, NL, NO, PL, S, UK

Position Statement on the Role of EU and ASEAN after failed Resolution on Burma/Myanmar at the UN Security Council

    The Burmese community in Europe (Note:Belgium,Czech,Germany,Denemark,Finland, France, Ireland,Holland, Norway,Poland,Sweden,England) would like to express our heartfelt appreciation and profound gratitude to the member-states of the UN Security Council, namely, United States of America, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Belgium, France, Italy, Slovakia, Panama, Peru and Ghana that voted for the draft resolution on Burma/Myanmar.

    The non-punitive draft resolution, sponsored by the United States and co-sponsored by the United Kingdom, essentially called on the Government of Myanmar:

    - to begin without delay a substantive political dialogue, which would lead to a genuine democratic transition to include all political stakeholders, including representatives of ethnic nationality groups and political leaders,

    - to take concrete steps to allow full freedom of expression, association, and movement by unconditionally releasing Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and all political prisoners, lifting all constraints on all political leaders and citizens, and allowing the National League for Democracy (NLD) and other political parties to operate freely,

    - to permit international humanitarian organizations to operate without restrictions to address the humanitarian needs of the people of Burma,

    - to cooperate fully with the International Labour Organization and its representatives in the eradication of forced labour,

    - to cease military attacks against civilians in ethnic minority regions and in particular to put an end to the associated human rights and humanitarian law violations against persons belonging to ethnic nationalities, including widespread rape and other forms of sexual violence carried out by members of the armed forces of Burma.

    The draft resolution would have been successful by the vote 9:3:3, where China, Russia and South Africa firmly opposed the resolution, arguing that current situation in Myanmar does not pose a threat to regional peace and security, whereas Indonesia, Congo and Qatar abstained their votes.

    But the resolution has unfortunately been ambushed by the shameless veto snipers of the so-called world nations China and Russia, which are on one hand the biggest suppliers of military hardware, including nuclear reactors to the dictatorial regime in Burma and on the other hand the largest exploiters of Burma’s natural resources, including teak, gas and oil.

    Nobel Peace laureate Desmond Tu Tu expressed his deep disappointment at South Africa’s vote to block the resolution, saying “it is a betrayal of our own noble past…”. COSATU, the Congress of South Africa Trade Unions, which is an ANC’s alliance partner, joined Desmond Tu Tu in condemning the veto vote and called for sanctions against the Myanmar regime. Indonesia, an ASEAN member, that abstained its vote, is surprisingly inexplicable, presumably because of its past dictatorial environmental reality.

    Although we have suffered a setback at this stage, there have been many positive benefits in the process, for examples,

    1) even China, Russia and its alliance are of the concrete opinion that Myanmar, under the rule of despotic military regime, is confronting many serious political, socio-economic, and humanitarian challenges, particularly relating to refugees, child labour, HIV/ AIDS, human rights and drugs, and urged Myanmar government to consider the international recommendations, listen to the call of its own people and speed up the process of dialogue and reform that would contribute to peace, stability and development of the region.

    2) Myanmar/Burma remains on the formal agenda of the UN Security Council, so options for further discussions still remain.

    We applaud, among others, US President George W. Bush for using his State of the Union address to speak out for the cause of freedom in Burma, whereas Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice named Burma as an ‘ outpost of tyranny ’.

    The ASEAN Lawmaker Coalition AIPMC recently encouraged EU and ASEAN nations to act more effectively on Burma’s military regime to start the national reconciliation.

    Ambassador MacDonald, the head of the European Commission delegation in the Philippines welcomed a decision at a recent ASEAN Summit in the Philippines to start the process of drafting the ASEAN’s Charter that would adhere to the principles of democracy and human rights, and those members that breach the Charter should have their rights and privileges suspended or even be expelled in extreme cases. Ambassador Weishaupt of Germany, which currently holds the EU Presidency, urged that ASEAN nations should be firmer with the Myanmar junta and criticized for slow pace of integrating into ASEAN bloc. The ASEAN leaders, in their recent Summit statement, said that they should take primary responsibility for handling member Myanmar, encouraged Myanmar to make greater progress towards national reconciliation and called for release of all political prisoners and dialogue with all parties concerned.

    While the ASEAN leaders are hopefully engaging in drafting the ASEAN’s Charter and taking primary responsibility to encourage Myanmar for greater progress towards national reconciliation, including the release of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and all political prisoners, the European Union with all its 25 members are potentially working to help bring democratic reform in Burma, although some achievements have yet to be made.

   (Note: the most important is: ASEAN, especially Burma’s neighboring countries MUST support USA’s argument that current situation in Myanmar poses a threat to regional peace and security and thus needs UNSE’s intervention).

    We profoundly welcome that Germany, as a currently appointed EU President and as well an elected European Parliament President, has issued a CFSP statement, encouraging the government of Myanmar to enter into a genuine dialogue with all political and civil society forces about the democratization process, particularly the release of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi

    (Note : not missing something? were it not “particularly the release of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and all political prisoners”?)

    One of the most effective measures of the EU is theoretically its Common Position on Burma, which is a common foreign policy to which EU members are committed. But the EU, one of the most powerful political and economic coalitions in the world, has not yet succeeded to use its influence in an effective and productive way to help promote democracy and human rights in Burma. The EU renews the Common Position on Burma every April and the renewal is definitely an opportunity to send significant messages to the military regime.

    We would like to make the following recommendations that should Germany and EU do to help promote national reconciliation, peace, democracy and human rights in Burma:

    1) The EU should send a clear message to the military regime that they should not interpret the veto of a resolution at the UN Security Council as a sign they can act with impunity, and that EU is still able to increase pressure on the regime.

    2) The EU would send a message to the regime and the world that the veto does not mean the end of the UN Security Council attention on the issue, and the EU and its representatives could play a more pro-active role in any future discussions at the Security Council.

    3) The EU should endorse efforts to continue persuading UN Security Council members to pass a binding resolution on Burma, and the European Commission and EU members should actively lobby for such a resolution.

    4) The EU should step up high level engagement with Asian governments and lawmakers, including China, India and ASEAN, to persuade them to increase pressure on Burma to reform.

    5) Germany, in its capacity as an EU President, should encourage Russian Federation, South Africa and Congo to back the UN Security Council process on Burma in near future.

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场