[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    曾铮文集
[主页]->[独立中文笔会]->[曾铮文集]->[Insight into China’s boom]
曾铮文集
·如果这样的调查发生在中国……
·视频:陷赤字危机 澳减移民保就业
·视频:为77元锒铛入狱的首名澳联邦大法官
·视频:澳洲总理陆克文的“中共泥潭”
·视频:难民船外海爆炸 引发澳政坛风暴
·视频:应对中共军事威胁 澳国防战略重大转变
·视频:澳媒揭央视地震周年节目虚伪内幕
·视频:澳洲新预算案之“看点”
·澳洲国防部长下台之“中共因素”
·力拓“间谍门”震惊全澳
·“卡车门”到底伤了谁?
·好文转载:孙延军:顶着镇压的拯救
·神秘献金来自何方?
·一样腐败 两种光景
·The Origin of Mysterious Australian Donations
·十一期间行人交通管理紧急通知!!!
·澳洲人对中国的好感为何下降?
·世界人权日,曾铮应邀发表演讲
·澳洲与中国:一样腐败 两种后果
·中共活摘法轮功学员器官新证据(上)
·从优昙婆罗花谈起
·A Triumph of Spirit: A Woman’s Plight to Expose Injustice in China
·从追查国际最新公告谈起
· 中共活摘法轮功学员器官新证据(下)
·澳洲紐省大選專訪隨筆——澳洲紐省大選專訪隨筆
·三十年爱国梦断
·重贴旧文-CHINA IN 2008
·正被“党的喉舌”吞噬著的海外中文媒体
·谈《围剿》
·谈追查国际发布的录像片
·我在澳洲审命案
·“好人多的地方”
·獨家:911紀念館設計者談設計思想
·世貿中心的瞬間感動——新唐人採訪手記(1)
·卡恩究竟干了没有?—— 新唐人采访手记(2)
·亲历纽约艾琳飓风——新唐人采访手记(3)
·视频:中國沒有喬布斯 是否有華爾街
·曾铮作客新唐人〈热点互动〉直播:誰是貪官?誰是奸商?
·王立军到底有无将活摘证据交予美国?
·强摘器官惊现美国非移民签证表说明什么?
·World Premiere of “Free China: The Courage to Believe”
·Experts Discuss Freedom at Free Speech Film Festival
·Speech at the Free Speech Awards Ceremony
·震撼人心的故事 撞击心灵的音乐——评记录片《自由中国:有勇气相信》的强
·Free China Wins American Insight’s Inaugural Free Speech Film Festiva
·在《自由中国》颁奖典礼上的发言
·美律師:應以仇恨罪起訴舊金山暴徒
·谨以此诗献给钟鼎邦——旧诗重发:李祥春,我向你脱帽致敬
·《自由中国》获丹佛国际电影节最杰出电影奖
·《自由中国》加首映 电影节总裁感动落泪
·致奥巴马罗姆尼公开信
·《自由中国》入围渥太华”自由思想“电影节-11月3日放映
·“Free China or Death by China” Forum & Screening
·The One Thing I Would Like Western Governments to Do
·《伟大的隐藏者》:被“隐藏”的伟大主题
·《来自星星的你》为何爆红?
·《自由中国》再获印度国际电影节大奖
·加州选举观察:提案被否 说明什么?
·《自由中国》将在台湾四城市电影院公映
·《自由中国》台北放映 观众谴责中共迫害
·台湾人的小动作与大陆人的防盗内裤
·《一步之遥》露骨的暗示:姜文到底想说什么?
·抢先公告:新唐人1月23日对大陆播出《自由中国》
·NTD’s Exclusive Broadcast into China of Award-winning Film: Free Chin
·《自由中国》2月3日起全球网络发行
·白宫正式回应调查中共活摘器官请愿
·《自由中国》全球线上上映(图)
·《自由中国》感动人心 开放网络点播
·《自由中国》感动人心 开放网络点播
·《自由中國》舊金山灣區首映會
·The Wallet of a Taiwanese vs. "Theft- Proof” Underwear of Mainland Ch
·永远的四二五
·重温《九评》 迎接没有中共的美好明天
·【三退征文】我的父亲(上)
·【三退征文】曾铮:我的父亲(中)
·【三退征文】我的父亲(下)
·【独家图片】彭丽媛在北大演唱
·【圖片遊記】臺灣(1)-臺北篇(上)
·法轮大法好莱坞圣诞遊行隊伍
·【圖片遊記】臺灣(2)-臺中篇
·【圖片遊記】臺灣(1)-臺北篇(中)
·【圖片遊記】臺灣(1)-臺北篇(下)
·【圖片遊記】臺灣(3)-臺南高雄篇
·华人携200万美元现金赴美险遭没收内情
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(1)-瑞典篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(2)-瑞典篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(3)-瑞典-丹麦篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(4)-瑞典
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(5)-瑞士
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(6)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(7)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(8)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(9)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(10)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(11)-美丽的瑞士小村庄
·【图片游记】伦敦塔(Tower of London)-《自由中国》欧洲行(13)
·【图片游记】伦敦塔(Tower of London)-《自由中国》欧洲行(13)
·【图片游记】伦敦塔及其珍宝
·【图片游记】伦敦塔
·从我做陪审员的经历谈对梁彼得案的看法
·【图片游记】伦敦大学放映会
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Insight into China’s boom

   
   
   Insight into China’s boom
   Sandra Hattingh
   The Epoch Times – Sydney, Australia

   Recent SBS TV Insight programme “China’s Boom – will it last?” caused controversy for reasons more profound than its topic.
   The sudden withdrawal from the debate by owner and CEO of Soho property development company came as the result of a simple question: “Zhang Xin in Beijing, you’re one of the richest property developers in China, one of the country’s new billionaires. Can you give us an idea of just how big your business interests are in China?”
   General enough question, but according to author Jennifer Zeng, a former policy research consultant and former financial consultant from China, this hurried and rather panicked withdrawal speaks volumes about the shadowy secrets behind the Chinese economy.
   “The actions of this Beijing CEO tell the whole secret of the Chinese economy; that is, no billionaires or millionaires dare to make public how they have become so rich, even if their money is clean. Most money is “dark” money,” said Ms Zeng who enjoyed a successful career within China’s booming economic sector, both public and private.
   While some Insight debaters were seemingly gleeful about China’s booming economy, not so was Mobo Gao, Associate Professor of Chinese Studies at the University of Tasmania: “I think that indicates the lawlessness of the Chinese capitalism currently. Because this really means that she (Soho CEO) can’t tell the scale of business. Why she’s afraid? Because that’s how business is done in China. It’s not lawful.”
   The SBS Insight debate questioned the stability of the boom economy on which Australia heavily depends. On the SBS website promoting the debate it stated: “Australia is riding high on the resources boom, with BHP Billiton recording the biggest profit by an Australian company ever. Recent tax cuts for all Australians were funded by China’s boom. But despite China’s rise its future remains uncertain.” The reality check continues: “Behind the economic boom is a looming environmental crisis….. The growing wealth gap continues to divide the country and rampant corruption infects every part of society.”
   Ms Zeng agrees: “The bigger picture is that nobody dares to make long-term business or investment plans in China; nobody feels that his wealth and social status are stable. Today you can be a billionaire, tomorrow you could end up in jail for whatever reason. Two things are sure: no big money is decent in China, and nobody is comfortable with being exposed to the public as being too rich.”
   “Wealthy people are fearful; poor people are miserable, who see no chance at all of getting anywhere in society, and who even have problems surviving. Middle class? There is no such thing in China. With everything subject to Communist Party whims, liable to change at any time, there is no political, social or economic environment for a middle class to be formed in society”, she says.
   “The bad debt of the banks may have well risen to somewhere between 40 per cent to 60 per cent, far above the 25 per cent”bankrupt” level by the international standard. Can we perceive such a society as stable? That’s the real mind of China under this regime: not daring to face the world and tell people anything about their “business”.”
   SBS was unable to bring the debate, originally between 40 people, from Beijing as they had planned. Media visas were denied to the Insight team by the Chinese Embassy in Canberra. “Of course it could have been a bureaucratic snuffle, but I also suspect that they did not like the idea of a debate. They did not want to lose the control of the content”, explained Insight guest Dr Minxin Pei of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, USA.

此文于2006年09月17日做了修改

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场