[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    曾铮文集
[主页]->[独立中文笔会]->[曾铮文集]->[Insight into China’s boom]
曾铮文集
·《伟大的隐藏者》:被“隐藏”的伟大主题
·《来自星星的你》为何爆红?
·《自由中国》再获印度国际电影节大奖
·加州选举观察:提案被否 说明什么?
·《自由中国》将在台湾四城市电影院公映
·《自由中国》台北放映 观众谴责中共迫害
·台湾人的小动作与大陆人的防盗内裤
·《一步之遥》露骨的暗示:姜文到底想说什么?
·抢先公告:新唐人1月23日对大陆播出《自由中国》
·NTD’s Exclusive Broadcast into China of Award-winning Film: Free Chin
·《自由中国》2月3日起全球网络发行
·白宫正式回应调查中共活摘器官请愿
·《自由中国》全球线上上映(图)
·《自由中国》感动人心 开放网络点播
·《自由中国》感动人心 开放网络点播
·《自由中國》舊金山灣區首映會
·The Wallet of a Taiwanese vs. "Theft- Proof” Underwear of Mainland Ch
·永远的四二五
·重温《九评》 迎接没有中共的美好明天
·【三退征文】我的父亲(上)
·【三退征文】曾铮:我的父亲(中)
·【三退征文】我的父亲(下)
·【独家图片】彭丽媛在北大演唱
·【圖片遊記】臺灣(1)-臺北篇(上)
·法轮大法好莱坞圣诞遊行隊伍
·【圖片遊記】臺灣(2)-臺中篇
·【圖片遊記】臺灣(1)-臺北篇(中)
·【圖片遊記】臺灣(1)-臺北篇(下)
·【圖片遊記】臺灣(3)-臺南高雄篇
·华人携200万美元现金赴美险遭没收内情
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(1)-瑞典篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(2)-瑞典篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(3)-瑞典-丹麦篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(4)-瑞典
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(5)-瑞士
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(6)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(7)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(8)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(9)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(10)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(11)-美丽的瑞士小村庄
·【图片游记】伦敦塔(Tower of London)-《自由中国》欧洲行(13)
·【图片游记】伦敦塔(Tower of London)-《自由中国》欧洲行(13)
·【图片游记】伦敦塔及其珍宝
·【图片游记】伦敦塔
·从我做陪审员的经历谈对梁彼得案的看法
·【图片游记】伦敦大学放映会
·【图片游记】芬兰:北极圈中的国度及女儿对母亲的国际营救
·"Injustice Anywhere Is a Threat to Justice Everywhere"
·《自由中国》伦敦高校放映 观众赞其将改变世界
·【图片游记】伦敦唐人街与大英博物馆
·【图片游记】艾克斯主教座堂-兼谈艺术的起源、目的和出路
·迷人的马赛老港
·《自由中国》在欧洲议会放映-新华社记者全程捧场
·一群法国人对一个中国人的“仰慕”-兼谈中国人的文化自信
·我的臺灣鄉愁
·洛杉矶“电召车”司机和他的四类华人客户
·在「末日」來臨的紐約 講述神韻的希望故事
·感悟神韻(之一)
·「財大氣粗」的孔子學院與「全球最恐怖上學路」
·感悟神韻(之二):感悟神韻的藝術風格
·感悟神韻舞蹈-感悟神韻(之三):
·感悟神韻音樂-感悟神韻(之四)
·感悟神韻聲樂-感悟神韻(之五)
·評《我不是潘金蓮》
·《致命中国》作者掌白宫贸委会 中美会爆发贸易战吗?
·快评川普总统就职典礼
·觀川普白宮發言人首次新聞發布會有感
·也談「文化自信」
·總統與媒體「幹仗」 誰贏面更大?
·評川普推特被美國國家檔案局收入歷史
·李克強買肉 Chinese Premier Li Keqiang Buying Meat
·倒行逆施的「兩高」釋法與歷史大勢
·再談「文化自信」
·童言童語
·女儿语录(2)Quote of My Daughter(2)
·女儿语录(3)Quote of My Daughter(3)
·女儿语录(4)Quote of My Daughter(4)
·女儿语录(5)Quote of My Daughter(5)
·從川普國家祈禱早餐會演講想到的
·感悟神韻(之六):感悟神韻的藝術家們
·这鸡蛋真难吃-The Egg Tastes Terrible
·女兒語錄6)Quote of My Daughter(6)
·我用書換來的最美麗聞浪漫的回報The Most Beautiful and Romantic Reward I
·有信仰與無信仰生命之區別——那個撕心裂肺的下午
·女兒語錄(7)Quote of My Daughter(7)
·女兒語錄(7)Quote of My Daughter(7)
·女兒語錄(7)Quote of My Daughter(7)
·女兒語錄(8)Quote of My Daughter(8)
·女兒語錄(8)Quote of My Daughter(8)
·女兒(毛衣)語錄(9)Quote of My Daughter(’s Sweater) (9)
·女兒(毛衣)語錄(9)Quote of My Daughter(’s Sweater) (9)
·當唐僧遭遇媒體……What Happens When You Fight Fake News?
·感悟神韻(之七):感悟神韻的觀衆反饋
·女兒語錄(10)Quote of My Daughter(10)
·女兒語錄(11)Quote of My Daughter(11)
·女兒語錄(12)Quote of My Daughter(12)
·女兒語錄(13)Quote of My Daughter(13)
·女兒語錄(14)Quote of My Daughter(14)
·女兒語錄(15)Quote of My Daughter(15)
·女兒語錄(16)Quote of My Daughter(16)
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Insight into China’s boom

   
   
   Insight into China’s boom
   Sandra Hattingh
   The Epoch Times – Sydney, Australia

   Recent SBS TV Insight programme “China’s Boom – will it last?” caused controversy for reasons more profound than its topic.
   The sudden withdrawal from the debate by owner and CEO of Soho property development company came as the result of a simple question: “Zhang Xin in Beijing, you’re one of the richest property developers in China, one of the country’s new billionaires. Can you give us an idea of just how big your business interests are in China?”
   General enough question, but according to author Jennifer Zeng, a former policy research consultant and former financial consultant from China, this hurried and rather panicked withdrawal speaks volumes about the shadowy secrets behind the Chinese economy.
   “The actions of this Beijing CEO tell the whole secret of the Chinese economy; that is, no billionaires or millionaires dare to make public how they have become so rich, even if their money is clean. Most money is “dark” money,” said Ms Zeng who enjoyed a successful career within China’s booming economic sector, both public and private.
   While some Insight debaters were seemingly gleeful about China’s booming economy, not so was Mobo Gao, Associate Professor of Chinese Studies at the University of Tasmania: “I think that indicates the lawlessness of the Chinese capitalism currently. Because this really means that she (Soho CEO) can’t tell the scale of business. Why she’s afraid? Because that’s how business is done in China. It’s not lawful.”
   The SBS Insight debate questioned the stability of the boom economy on which Australia heavily depends. On the SBS website promoting the debate it stated: “Australia is riding high on the resources boom, with BHP Billiton recording the biggest profit by an Australian company ever. Recent tax cuts for all Australians were funded by China’s boom. But despite China’s rise its future remains uncertain.” The reality check continues: “Behind the economic boom is a looming environmental crisis….. The growing wealth gap continues to divide the country and rampant corruption infects every part of society.”
   Ms Zeng agrees: “The bigger picture is that nobody dares to make long-term business or investment plans in China; nobody feels that his wealth and social status are stable. Today you can be a billionaire, tomorrow you could end up in jail for whatever reason. Two things are sure: no big money is decent in China, and nobody is comfortable with being exposed to the public as being too rich.”
   “Wealthy people are fearful; poor people are miserable, who see no chance at all of getting anywhere in society, and who even have problems surviving. Middle class? There is no such thing in China. With everything subject to Communist Party whims, liable to change at any time, there is no political, social or economic environment for a middle class to be formed in society”, she says.
   “The bad debt of the banks may have well risen to somewhere between 40 per cent to 60 per cent, far above the 25 per cent”bankrupt” level by the international standard. Can we perceive such a society as stable? That’s the real mind of China under this regime: not daring to face the world and tell people anything about their “business”.”
   SBS was unable to bring the debate, originally between 40 people, from Beijing as they had planned. Media visas were denied to the Insight team by the Chinese Embassy in Canberra. “Of course it could have been a bureaucratic snuffle, but I also suspect that they did not like the idea of a debate. They did not want to lose the control of the content”, explained Insight guest Dr Minxin Pei of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, USA.

此文于2006年09月17日做了修改

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场