[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    曾铮文集
[主页]->[独立中文笔会]->[曾铮文集]->[Analyzing the CCP's Feeble Response to Reports About the Sujiatun Concentration Camp]
曾铮文集
·【澳媒观察】由维省省长贝克斯辞职想到的
·北京奧運繞不過去的兩道坎
·From A Prisoner To A Writer
·次级房贷风暴与澳洲大选
·致澳洲總理何華德的公開信
·【澳媒观察】APEC与“《悉尼宣言》”
·胡锦涛面临的内外交困
·APEC与澳洲的“外交洗牌”
·做猪要做奥运猪 打工要打澳洲工
·西澳百年老屋被拆引发的争议
·代师涛答谢辞
·【澳媒观察】中国人到澳洲旅游遭遇的陷阱
·聯合國的腐敗和墮落
·【澳媒觀察】聯邦大選 鹿死誰手
·【澳媒观察】网上“恶搞”与联邦大选
·大把撒钱的竞选策略会奏效吗?
·維州警官洩密醜聞引起的震動
·澳洲工黨大選獲勝分析及展望
·氣候變遷與環境 澳洲Vs中國
·班頓——一位澳洲的「維權」英雄
·Tortured for her beliefs
·小醫生打敗大政府的啟示
·二战后第一名美国战犯的尴尬处境
·澳洲和日本的“鲸鱼”之战
·迟来一百多年的道歉
·从中国雪灾看澳洲政府的灾害应对
·从中国雪灾看澳洲政府的灾害应对
·在以色列人权圣火传递集会上的演讲
·澳洲新总理陆克文的中国政策
·澳洲女官员性贿赂丑闻引发的政坛地震
·澳洲人关于北京奥运的20个和1个
·澳洲媒体热议“克文诤友”
·印度司机“闹事”对澳洲的贡献
·四川地震带来的挑战
·澳洲施“休克疗法”应对气候变迁
·地震救了中共?
·发展不是硬道理
·色情还是艺术?
·色情还是艺术?
·儿童色情泛滥带来的隐忧
·澳洲的部长不如中国的城管
·澳洲的马与中国的人
·西方的“办公室恋情”与中国的“包二奶”
·从悉尼世界青年节看宗教信仰
·澳洲版“三峡工程”的命运
·从澳洲的色魔想到中国的杨佳
·澳媒报导奥运 看穿开幕式“玄机”
·澳洲“排污交易计划”的三个看点
·迈塔斯报告震撼国际器官移植大会
·“中国造月亮即将着陆”
·“中国造月亮即将着陆”——Not Beijing, but faking?(不叫北京,叫造假?)
·中国股市的实质 (上)
·凤凰台节目提供活摘法轮功学员器官新证据
·秋江水冷鸭先知
·中国股市的实质 (下)
·从欧卫事件看中共最怕
·比比中澳两国的义务教育
·想结婚吗?先拿个学位
·张丹红事件解析 (上)
·张丹红事件解析 (下)
·选民用脚投票 澳政坛"变天"时代到来
·澳洲政坛新贵、"史上最富"总理侯选人坦博
·新闻简评:墨尔本市长苏震西退出澳洲政治舞台
·三千万与四百二十亿的不同遭遇
·评新华网《卫生部等5部门制定三聚氰胺限量》
·教育经费-压在中国百姓身上的一座大山
·中国能救澳洲吗?
·澳洲是否会陷入美国式经济危机
·我看澳媒对悉尼留学生坠楼案之报道
·澳洲昆士兰大学生采访曾铮并制作揭露迫害法轮功短片
·瞧瞧人家的"问责"!——兼议三聚氰胺限量
·视频:评澳洲新反恐法生效后被捕的第一名嫌疑人哈尼夫案
·此报告非彼报告
·视频:北京奥运绕不过去的两道坎
·视频:胡锦涛面临的内外交困
·澳总理陆克文执政周年“小结”
·我对澳洲人民进行了爱国主义教育
·视频:【澳媒观察】APEC与澳洲的“外交洗牌”
·图片游记:澳洲最老内陆城Goulburn(一)
·图片游记: “往日的美丽”————游世界上最大个人古董级茶壶收藏馆
·游Goulburn:啤酒中的“阴谋”和秘密——澳洲最老内陆城Goulburn(二)
·视频:【澳媒观察】西澳百年老屋被拆引起的争议
·永不会“饿死”的Goulburn地主以及…… ——游澳洲最老内陆城Goulburn(三)
·视频:【澳媒观察】中国人到澳洲旅游遭遇的陷阱——准备到澳洲旅游的朋友看过来!
·视频:【澳媒观察】联邦大选 鹿死谁手
·澳洲的离婚及孩子"共同抚养"问题
·视频:【澳媒观察】联合国的腐败和堕落
·大雪美景·极品泰山(一)
·曾铮今天申请成为中国过渡政府新公民
·组图:大雪美景·极品泰山(二)
·杨师群被告密,原来是为法轮功和九评!
·申请成为过渡政府新公民之补充说明
·视频:【澳媒观察】大把撒钱的競選
·视频:【澳媒观察】维州警官泄密丑闻引起的震动
·视频:【澳媒观察】工党获胜分析及展望
·视频:【澳媒观察】气候变迁:澳洲Vs中国
·视频:【澳媒观察】从一次州葬看澳中维权者的不同命运
·视频:【澳媒观察】山西黑窑奴工最新内幕
·视频:【澳媒观察】小医生打败大政府的故事
·澳媒聚集中国“农民土地革命”  
·悉尼歌剧院及其设计者之“世纪恩仇”
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Analyzing the CCP's Feeble Response to Reports About the Sujiatun Concentration Camp

China kept unusually silent over the allegations that organs were being harvested from living Falun Gong practitioner in the Sujiatun Concentration Camp. Three days after the hideous crime was exposed, Professor Yuan Hongbing addressed the issue at a "Nine Commentaries of Communist Party" seminar. He stated, "If the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) does not deny such gruesome accusation and does not investigate it, it admits guilt."

   March 22, eleven days later, Australia's The New Express published a short article in section five of the issue, "Shenyang Denies Setting up Falun Gong Concentration Camp." The following is a translation of the most relevant sections:

   "According to China's Xinhua Agency, allegations by Falun Gong media and websites outside China that 6,000 Falun Gong practitioners are being held at Sujiatun Concentration Camp surprised the Shenyang City government and residents in Sujiatun district. A reporter from the Xinhua Agency made a special trip to Shenyang and Sujiatun District to investigate, ...Party Secretary Luo of Sujiatun Communist Party Committee of Sujiatun District responsible for the justice department said, "A large place would be required to hold 6,000 people, support staff and facilities. How could we have kept such a killing factory secret?... Sujiatun District has two prisons,... for only criminals and suspects, but none holds Falun Gong practitioners. An official from the Provincial government had taken a team to investigate. The official said none of the officials from throughout the area had heard or known about this."

   I don't know how this report of about 300 Chinese words comes across to other readers, but the following are my thoughts:

   1. This article is a toned down version of the propaganda that existed during the early stage of the persecution of Falun Gong. At that time Falun Gong was labeled an "evil cult" and vicious attacks such as Tiananmen Square Self-Immolation incident were common. It is quite clear to me that the Chinese regime is running out of steam and does not know how to deny the existence of Sujiatun Concentration Camp. As we know, China is typically very strong in its denials and habitually denies killings, no matter how many they have killed. Such a softened response can only mean that Sujiatun exists and the truth has come out.

   2. The term "organ harvesting" was not mentioned and the focus was on "holding of 6,000 people." Someone "made a special trip" to Sujiatun to investigate and yet no word about organ harvesting was mentioned. It is widely known that China has become a major country for organ transplants and a source of organs for ten thousand transplants annually. This response also suggests that allegations that organs are being harvested while people are still alive are true.

   3. Professor Sun Wenguang from Shandong province demanded that Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao (heads of the regime) investigate the allegations. However, the report indicated that a Xinhua Agency journalist went to investigate before an official from Liaoning province. Who is this reporter? And who is this official? Why are their names not mentioned? Those who know the system in China know that a reporter from Xinhua Agency will not be told the sensitive facts. Even if he discovers the truth, he would not dare to report it. This is just how China operates. Major or minor incidents alike, everybody has to wait for "directions from higher authorities" before reporting it. They have to ensure consistency across all lines, decide on how to deal with the people involved, and even enacting laws to legitimize their actions.

   I witnessed in Beijing how the persecution of Falun Gong escalated. On December 26, 1999, I sat in the Beijing No.1 Middle-level Court during the trial of several volunteer practitioners of the former Falun Dafa Research Association. When I was being taken back to the Congwen District Police Station to be sent to a detention center. I overheard someone asking a police officer, "Do you know how long we will be held here?" The police officer said, "No idea. We have to wait for word from higher authorities."

   This is how the Communist regime operates. Concerning the Sujiatun Concentration Camp, a Xinhua Agency reporter would not dare to investigate this without explicit instructions.

   4. Leaders of a responsible government would address such a serious allegation. And yet, the Chinese regime had a lowly local government secretary say a few words in an attempt to pacify the public.

   It is important to mention here that "keeping secrets" is something the Communist regime is good at. Without such secrets, their power base would have collapsed long ago.

   One does not need a big place to hold 6,000 people. On July 20, 1999, I was held with another 3-4 thousand Falun Gong practitioners in Beijing Shijingshan Stadium. A few thousand people filled just half the stadium. With only a few ways in and out, very few additional security personnel were needed.

   At the Beijing Dispatch Center for Forced Labor Camp Inmates, twenty people are held in a room of seven to eight square meters.

   In my hometown in Mianyang, Sichuan province, there were many military factories and military research bases in the mountainous areas. The residents had only a vague awareness of the existence of such operations.

   A few decades ago, during the time of "Deep Digging and Storing Grains in Disbursed Areas" when the Chinese were suffering from a great famine, many underground projects were carried out in every city and province. They prepared for possible war and famine, and a special agency was in charge of it. There is such an underground project in the center of Mianyang City. It had been converted into a large shopping mall, with a total area of several thousand square meters.

   Since they can put twenty people in a seven to eight square meter room, they certainly are able to put 6,000 people in an area of 2,000 square meters. There is no problem in accomplishing such a feat.

   5. Sujiatun's party secretary Luo also mentioned the supplies needed for these people. This is an important detail. The witness mentioned that the large purchase of supplies attracted the attention of hospital staff. Some asked the leadership of the hospital about it. This reminded me of my own experience and I feel sure that the witness told the truth.

   While being held for several months at the Beijing Women's Detention Center, I decided to expose their secrets. I paid attention to everything inside the forced labor camp. For example, I knew that between the period of April 2001, 984 people were detained there.

   How did I find out about this? It was impossible to discuss such matters with anyone in the forced labor camp. I could not find out from different brigades, or different people within a group. There were seven brigades at Beijing Women's Forced Labor Camp. How did I know how many people were held there?

   I was detained with the cooking staff who were inmates at the forced labor camp. They used to have separate cells. But, as more and more Falun Gong practitioners were detained, each room held more than 50% inmates. As a result, the cooking staff was locked up with other inmates. I found out from them how many were in the labor camp. They cook based on the number of people.

   6. I also took note that Luo stated in the article, "Both prisons in Sujiatun held criminals and suspects, but not Falun Gong practitioners." This means that neither the Party Secretary Luo nor the reporter considered Falun Gong practitioners' criminals and suspects. This is really a slap in the face of the regime's justice system that used Provision 300 of the Criminal Law to treat tens of thousands of practitioners as criminals and wrongfully sentenced them.

   We hope that all people inside and outside of China will intensify their efforts to investigate and rescue Falun Gong practitioners to prevent the regime from killing the witnesses to cover up its crimes.

   March 24, 2006

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场