百家争鸣
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    郭国汀律师专栏
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[郭国汀律师专栏]->[中国是国际网络表达自由的头号敌人]
郭国汀律师专栏
·《论中共极权专制暴政的滔天罪孽》中共盗国窃政后的滥杀罪孽
·《论中共极权专制暴政的滔天罪孽》中共谋杀性大饥荒
·《论中共极权专制暴政的滔天罪孽》毛共文革罪孽深重
·《论中共极权专制暴政的滔天罪孽》六四天安门屠城
·《中共极权专制暴政的滔天罪孽》中共统治西藏罪孽深重
·《郭律师论中共极权流氓暴政》郭国汀著
·共产党极权暴政为争权夺利党内自相残杀的罪恶
·论推翻中共极权专制暴政的合法性
·中共政权始终是一个非法政权 郭国汀
·驳中共政权合法论 郭国汀
·中共极权暴政是严重污染毁灭中国生态环境的罪魁祸首
·论中共政权新闻控制-----2008年《巴黎中国新闻媒体控制国际研讨会》专稿
·论中共专制暴政与酷刑(全文)
·论中共专制暴政下的宗教信仰自由(英文)
·中国共产党极权专制流氓暴政的滔天罪孽
·中共政权是一个极权专制流氓暴政
·《郭国汀评论》第十九集:论中共暴政
·《郭国汀评论》第二十集:论中共暴政(下)
·郭国汀评论:论中共政权是个超级暴政
·郭国汀评论:论中共政权是个极权暴政
·郭国汀评论:论中共政权是个流氓暴政
·郭国汀评论:论中共是个犯罪组织
·论中共的骗子本能
·《郭国汀评论》第六集中共暴政与精神病
·郭国汀评论:论中共暴政体制性司法腐败
·郭国汀评论:论中共暴政体制性司法腐败(下)
·论逼良为娼的中共律师体制
·论逼良为娼的中共律师体制(下)
· 郭律师评价中共律师诉讼及司法体制现状
·郭国汀评论第八十三集:暴政恶法不除,国民无宁日
· 郭国汀评论第八十四集:暴政恶法不除,国民无宁日(下)
·郭国汀评论第六十六集中国共产党极权暴政的滔天罪行
·郭国汀评论第六十七集:中共极权专制暴政的滔天罪孽
·郭国汀评论第六十八集:中共极权专制暴政的滔天罪行
·郭国汀评论第六十九集:中共极权流氓暴政的滔天罪孽
·郭国汀评论第七十集:中共极权专制暴政的深重罪孽
·郭国汀评论第七十一集:中共极权流氓暴政的深重罪孽
·郭国汀评论第七十二集:中共极权流氓暴政的滔天罪孽
·郭国汀评论第七十三集:中共极权流氓暴政的深重罪孽
·郭国汀评论第七十四集:中共极权流氓暴政的深重罪孽
·郭国汀评论第七十五集:中共极权流氓暴政的滔天大罪
·郭国汀评论第七十六集:中共极权流氓暴政的深重罪孽
·郭国汀评论第七十七集:共产党极权暴政的缩命
·郭国汀评论第七十八集:论共产党极权暴政的宿命(中)
·郭国汀评论第七十九集:论共产党极权暴政的宿命(下)
·郭国汀评论第八十集:中共极权暴政摧残教育的深重罪孽
·共产党极权专制暴政的滥杀罪孽
·中共极权暴政的野蛮残暴杀人罪孽
·中共人为制造谋杀性大饥荒虐杀农民5000万
·中国反对派不能合作的根源何在?
·共产主义是好的,只是被共产党搞糟了?
·中共极权暴政下根本不可能存在法治
·今日中共还是共产党吗?
·推翻中共专制暴政是替天行道 郭国汀
·中共政权是吸血鬼暴政
·江泽民和胡锦涛均极可能是货真价实的特大汉奸卖国贼!
·中共专制暴政与生态环境
·中共专制暴政正在毁灭中国生态环境
·郭国汀论中共专制暴政与酷刑(上)
·论中共专制暴政与酷刑(中)
·郭国汀论中共专制暴政与酷刑(下)
·郭国汀评论:胡锦涛不是在执政而是在犯罪
·彻底推翻极权专制流氓暴政!永志不忘六四屠城滔天罪孽!
·朱镕基犯有贪污盗窃罪吗?
·朱镕基有关劳动保险金的罪责是非之我见
·中共党员是罪犯!——评贺卫方教授的中共分成两派说
·中共党员是罪犯 无耻无行文人是重罪犯!
·不是中国政府而是中共暴政丧尽天良!不但温家宝而且胡锦涛皆乃政治精神重症患者!
·中国共产党早已病入膏肓无可救药!
·杜绝三鹿毒奶粉事件的三项原则
·郭国汀律师系统批判中共极权专制暴政论文目录
·郭国汀中共政权已经彻底流氓化
·中共是极端残暴下流无耻的流氓暴政 郭国汀
·怀念当代中国最高贵的人——杨天水/张林
·关于中共政权合法性及专制暴政与人种信仰关系的论战 郭国汀
·南郭/推翻颠覆中共流氓暴政有功无罪!
·面对中共流氓暴政全体中国人应当做什么?
·面对十八层地狱,我的真情告白
·我的退党(社)、团、队声明
·从中共控制媒体看中共政权的脆弱
·关于加国公民起诉江泽民罗干李清王茂林案的宣誓证词(英文)
·中共极力扶持缅甸军事专制政府及苏丹专制暴政
·请胡锦涛立即停止疯狂攻击郭国汀律师的电脑
·中共专制暴政恶贯满盈
·申曦(曾节明):剥胡锦涛的画皮
·申曦(曾节明):胡锦涛其人其事
·申曦(曾节明):胡锦涛虚伪狡诈邪恶凶残阴险的真面目
·申曦(曾节明):胡锦涛的伪善与病态人格
·申曦(曾节明):盖棺认定胡氏中共暴政
·申曦(曾节明):江泽民的心病
·申曦(曾节明):邓小平罪孽深重
***(35)中国政治体制批判
·中共政权始终是一个非法政权 郭国汀
·郭国汀律师批判极权专制政治司法教育体制主张自由人权宪政民主文章目录
·郭国汀律师政论时评目录
·中国反抗专制暴政的先驱者与英雄
·郭国汀与横河谈中共暴政阉割国人灵魂使警察成为恶魔
·孙文广、程晓农、郭国汀谈共产党的公务员非法歧视政策
·划时代的审判,创造历史的壮举
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
中国是国际网络表达自由的头号敌人

中国是国际网络表达自由的头号敌人
   欧洲议会于七月六日通过一项决议将中国列为国际互联网表达自由的头号敌人;同时谴责Yahoo, Google and Microsoft助肘为虐。 “a number of countries can be seen as enemies of freedom of expression on-line as stated in the last Reporters Without Borders report, including China, Belarus, Burma, Cuba, Iran, Libya, Maldives, Nepal, North Korea, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan and Vietnam. ” “whereas Chinese government has successfully persuaded companies such as Yahoo, Google and Microsoft to facilitate the censorship of their services in the Chinese internet market;”
   Texts adopted by Parliament
   
   Thursday 6 July 2006 - Strasbourg Provisional edition
   Freedom of expression on the Internet P6_TA-PROV(2006)0324 B6-0401, 0402,
   0404, 0408, 0411 and 0414/2006
   
   European Parliament resolution on freedom of expression on the Internet
   The European Parliament ,
   - having regard to its previous annual resolutions on the situation of
   human rights in the world,
   - having regard to its previous resolutions on human rights and freedom of
   the press and on the evaluation of the World Summit on the Information
   Society held in Tunisia in December 2005,
   - having regard to Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human
   Rights,
   - having regard to Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights,
   - having regard to the EU Guidelines on Human Rights Dialogue (2001) and
   on Human Rights Defenders (2004) and their first evaluation under Austrian
   Presidency,
   - having regard to the Declaration of Principles adopted by the World
   Summit on the Information Society on 12 December 2003
   - having regard to the Joint Declaration of 21 December 2005 by the UN
   Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, the OSCE
   Representative on Freedom of the Media and the OAS Special Rapporteur on
   Freedom of Expression,
   - having regards to the EU policy on human rights and democratisation in
   third countries adopted by the Council in December 2005,
   - having regard to the European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights
   (EIDHR),
   - having regard to Rule 115 of its Rules of Procedure,
   A. whereas Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states
   that everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right
   includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive
   and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of
   frontiers;
   B. welcoming the statement of the World Summit in Tunis of 16-18 November
   2005 on the primary importance of the information society for democracy and
   respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; in particular the freedom
   of expression and opinion, as well as the freedom to receive and access
   information;
   C. whereas the fight for freedom of expression has today largely shifted
   on-line as the Internet has become a mean of expression of choice for
   political dissidents, democracy activists, human rights defenders and
   independent journalists worldwide;
   D. whereas access to the Internet can strengthen democracy and contribute
   to a country's economic and social development and restricting such access
   is incompatible with the right to freedom of expression;
   E. whereas restrictions should only exist in cases of using the Internet
   for illegal activities, such as incitement to hatred, violence and racism,
   totalitarian propaganda and children's access to pornography or their sexual
   exploitation;
   F. whereas, according to Reporters Without Borders, authoritarian regimes
   and governments have been working on ever more far-reaching methods of
   controlling the Internet, chiefly using more and more sophisticated
   filtering technology and surveillance of electronic communications and
   setting-up cyber-police;
   G. whereas, according to human rights organisations, a large number of
   cyber-dissidents are detained in prison - most of them in China - including
   Hao Wu, Chinese blogger and documentary filmmaker, Yang Zili, Chinese
   cyber-dissident, Shi Tao, Chinese journalist at the daily Dangdai Shangbao,
   Motjaba Saminejad, Iranian blogger, Mohammed Abbou, Tunisian lawyer, Pham
   Hong Son, Vietnamese doctor and Habib Saleh, Syrian online journalist;
   whereas the most recent cases concern the Egyptian bloggers Mohamed Sharkawy
   and Karim Lel-shaer;
   H. whereas a number of countries can be seen as enemies of freedom of
   expression on-line as stated in the last Reporters Without Borders report,
   including China, Belarus, Burma, Cuba, Iran, Libya, Maldives, Nepal, North
   Korea, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan and Vietnam.
   I. whereas companies based in democratic States partly provide these
   countries the means to censor the web and to monitor electronic
   communication;
   J. whereas Chinese government has successfully persuaded companies such as
   Yahoo, Google and Microsoft to facilitate the censorship of their services
   in the Chinese internet market; also notes that other governments have
   required the means for censorship from other companies;
   K. whereas equipment and technologies supplied by Western companies such
   as CISCO Systems, Telecom Italia, Wanadoo, a subsidiary of France Telecom
   have been used by governments for the purpose of censoring the Internet
   preventing freedom of expression;
   L. whereas US legislators introduced a bill in February 2006, the Global
   On-line Freedom Act, aimed at regulating the activities of Internet
   businesses when they operate in repressive countries;
   M. whereas the EU should demonstrate that the rights of Internet users are
   at the heart of its concerns and that it is ready to act to promote free
   speech on-line;
   1. Reaffirms the fact that freedom of expression is a key value shared by
   all EU countries and that they have to take concrete steps to defend it;
   2. Calls, in this respect, on the Council and the EU Member States to agree
   on a joint statement confirming their commitment in favour of the protection
   of the rights of internet users and of the promotion of free expression on
   the internet world-wide;
   3. Reiterates its commitment to the principles which were confirmed at the
   Tunis Summit, viz.:
    - building the information society on the basis of human rights and
   fundamental freedoms,
    - combating the digital divide and seeking resources for action plans to
   foster development,
    - developing Internet governance arrangements which are more balanced,
   pluralist and representative of the States involved, to meet the new
   technological challenges (spamming, data protection, etc.);
   4. Strongly condemns restrictions on Internet content, whether they apply
   to the dissemination or to the receipt of information, that are imposed by
   Governments and are not in strict conformity with the guarantee of freedom
   of expression; strongly condemns the harassment and imprisonment of
   journalists and others who are expressing their opinions on the Internet;
   calls, in this respect, on the Council and the Commission to take all
   necessary measures vis-à-vis the authorities of the concerned countries for
   the immediate release of all detained Internet users;
   5. Calls on the Commission and the Council to draw up a voluntary code of
   conduct that would put limits on the activities of companies in repressive
   countries;
   6. Calls on the Commission and the Council to maintain the presence and
   active participation of the EU and the presentation of common positions
   especially with ECOSOC, ITU, UNESCO and UNDP;
   7. Calls on the Council and the Commission when considering its assistance
   programmes to third countries to take into account the need for unrestricted
   Internet access by their citizens;
   8. Welcomes the Joint Investor Statement on Freedom of Expression and the
   Internet at the initiative of Reporters Without Borders; stresses that
   corporations which provide Internet searching, chat, publishing or other
   services should have a responsibility to ensure that the rights of users are
   respected;
   9. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the
   Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场