政党社团之声
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    BURMA-缅甸风云
[主页]->[政党社团之声]->[BURMA-缅甸风云]->[UNPO: "Democracy Promotion: The European Way"]
BURMA-缅甸风云
·貌强:都灵市缅甸策略研讨会
·貌强:Strategic Consultation on Burma in Turin
·貌强:Curent SPDC Offensive and our KNU Counter-attack
·缅甸军政府的攻势与我族我军的反击
·克伦族联盟主席在56届克伦族烈士节的讲话
·貌强:KNU President's Address on 56th Anniversary of Martyrs' Day
·貌强:第八届缅甸联邦民族委员会已选出
·钦民族战线代表团访问旅欧钦族社区
·缅甸各族青年联合行动团之声明
·有关国际法内的自决权
·貌强:UNPO’s Symposium on the Right to Self-determination in International Law
·对“国际法内的自决权”的我见
·Busdachin’s Speech on “Self-Determination Right in International Law”
·UNPO: UN Human Rights Council Briefed on Human Rights in Myanmar
·联合国文告:缅甸悲惨现状
·貌强:Busdachin’s Speech to VIII UNPO GA in Taiwan
·Why Waste Time and Procrastinate?
·UNPO秘书长在台北讲话
·2006年底缅甸联邦实况
·BURMA.UNPO: The Situation in Burma
·缅甸众土著在台北UNPO大会的声明
·漫谈钦族的过去与现在
·Burmese Junta Achieves 2 Things at One Stroke
·缅中边界军演一箭双雕
·UNPO: "Democracy Promotion: The European Way"
·促进民主的欧洲道路
·波米亚将军的革命一生
·貌强:Bo Mya’s Revolutional Life
·不干涉他国内政的中国
·貌强:Our Congratulations to Dr. Lian Hmung Sakhong
·廉萨空博士荣获“2007年马丁路德金奖”
·缅甸联邦民族联合政府成立16周年纪念文告
·廉萨空博士在马丁路德金奖授奖会上的讲话
·Lian Sakhong's Martin Luther King Prize Acceptance Lecture
·追忆1967年缅甸排华暴行
· Forum of Burmese in Europe 28-Jan-2007
·欧盟缅甸人论坛07年元月28日召开
·舌战独立掸国领袖 Hso Khan Pha
·缅甸钦区钦族钦新闻-1
·缅甸革命力量的第六次策略协商会议通报
·缅甸议会民主党致函中国外长
·缅甸民族委员会NCUB开设伦敦办公室
·2007年三八妇女节感言
·貌强:CNF Peace-Talks with the Burma’s Junta
·缅甸钦民族战线CNF与军政府和谈
·2007年春季缅甸局势
·欧盟东盟2007年会议对缅甸既援助也不满
·貌强:KACHINS PROTEST BURMA'S JUNTA BARBARISM
·克钦人民抗议缅甸政府军的兽行
·从缅甸建军节想起
·缅军以强奸土族妻女为战争手段
·貌强:Burma Rape Report Exposes Brutal Army
·KNU苏沙吉准将谈克伦族革命
·Saw Hsar Gay Talks about Karen History & KNU Revolution
·貌强苏沙吉准将续谈克伦革命(1)
·印度关闭缅甸Mizzima新闻社
·Mizzima News Office sealed off by Democratic India
·AEIOU 2008学年招生通告
·糖尿病民间验方
·心腦血管病的預防
·漫谈印欧语系
·2007年缅甸国内外微妙变化
·貌强:Harn Yawnghwe, EU, USA and Burma’s Junta
·从“Honsawatoi”亡国250年谈起
·缅甸孟族纪念“Hongsawatoi ”亡国250周年
·温教授问美国为何不出手
·缅甸封杀“缅甸华商商会”
·缅甸当局封杀百年华商社团
·貌强:Act Now or Regret Later with the Unholy Alliance
·缅甸已找台阶解除对华商社团的封杀
·论缅甸吴努政府与台湾阿扁政府
·缅甸众土族再三赴美寻求支持
·由印尼华人要人权民族权想起
·缅甸世道乱——坏人有好报
·社会主义“居者有其屋”
·丹瑞大将打坐差点走火入魔
·缅甸掸邦第一特区政府(果敢)网站与彭主席访谈
·缅甸丹瑞大将参禅新法:一念代万念
·中風救命法——针刺十指尖与两耳垂放血
·EWOB/AEIOU 的声明
·缅甸僧侣和平示威,丹瑞大将心乱如麻
·缅甸和平示威扩大,丹瑞家人领先逃亡
·反对无理威胁和平集会与游行
·缅甸民族委员会NCUB 对广大士兵的呼吁
·缅甸联邦民族委员会告人民书-3
·SDU’S STATEMENT ON RECENT SPDC’S CRACKDOWN/貌强
·SDU对军政府最近开枪镇压的声明
·缅甸军政府凶杀案将告国际刑事法庭
·恢复掸邦委员会支持缅甸僧侣与民众
·缅侨向联合国与国际机构火急呼救!
·制止缅甸军政府杀害僧侣学生民众
·请求教皇给缅甸人民雪中送炭
·缅甸医生专业医务人员呼吁总罢工
·教皇雪中送炭:为缅甸苦难人民祈祷
·正义要伸张!公道要讨回!
·众土族委员会ENC对缅甸当前局势的声明
·缅甸的华人悲歌
·缅侨恳求中国在安理会勿再投否决票
·全缅学生民主先锋谈缅甸危机
·缅甸律师委员会对甘巴里《缅甸报告》的看法
·缅甸民族委员会NCUB欢迎安理会声明
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
UNPO: "Democracy Promotion: The European Way"


   (published by Burma.UNPO)
   Members of the European Parliament Marco Pannella MEP, Marco Cappato MEP, and Annemie Neyts-Uytterbroeck MEP, from the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE), and in partnership with UNPO, the Transnational Radical Party and No Peace Without Justice, have organised a conference on “Democracy Promotion: The European Way” held at the European Parliament in Brussels, Belgium from 6 – 7,December 2006.
   The Conference aims to contribute to the process of Europe articulating and funding a new and distinctive strategy for the promotion of democracy, centred explicitly on the principle of non-violence, and sensitive always to the importance of promoting democracy locally, through the support and promotion of grass-roots organisations, instead of attempting to impose it from afar.
   The Conference was Chaired and addressed by a number of leading Members of the European Parliament, as well as representatives from the European Commission, including: Edward Mc-Millan Scott MEP, Vice-President of the European Parliament, Graham Watson MEP, Leader of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe, Marco Pannella MEP, Leader of the Transnational Radical Party, Alessandro Battilocchio MEP, Annemie Neyts MEP, Leader of the ELDR Party, Hélène Flautre MEP, Chairperson of the Sub-Committee on Human Rights, Marco Cappato MEP, Benita Ferrero-Waldner, EU Commissioner for External Relations, and Emma Bonino, Minister of Italy for International Trade and European Affairs.
   As leading policy makers in the field of democratisation, all noted the numerous benefits of promoting democracy world-wide, not least with respect to security and the promotion of Human Rights, but also acknowledged the complexity and uncertainty that always accompanies this process. This underlined the necessity of reflecting upon the most effective strategies available to policy makers, as well as the importance of learning from the valuable experiences and knowledge of grass-roots practitioners in the field of democratisation.
   As a first step of this learning process, and under the banner of “urgent messages to Europe from the World’s dissidents”, a number UNPO Members, as well as other prominent activists and practitioners in the field of democratisation, shared their views and experiences on the process of democratisation.
   From the Ogoni, the President of the UNPO General Assembly Mr. Ledum Mitee stressed the importance of focusing not only on elections when promoting democracy, but also of supporting and strengthening the institutions and values that uphold and constitute a genuine democracy during the time in between elections.
   From Taiwan, Dr. Parris Chang, Honorary President of UNPO, and Dr. Wen-Cheng Lin, both emphasised the need to support emerging and practicing democracies whilst they remain fragile, both from internal and external threats, and drew attention to the work UNPO is conducting in this respect.
   From the Ahwazi, Dr. Karim Abdian spoke with great passion about the situation faced by minorities in Iran, as well as elsewhere in the world, and urged members of the parliament to inform themselves of the ethnic and political situation within countries such as Iran, so as enable better identification and support of emerging non-violent democratic forces.
   From East Turkestan, Mr. Dolkun Isa and Enver Can also echoed views about the valuable role NGOs and grass-roots organisations play in the promotion of democracy, and highlighted the successes they have had in particular with respect to putting pressure on Chinese authorities to reform.
   Their calls and proposals were also echoed by other UNPO Member:representatives from the Khmer-Krom, Mr. Thach Thach, Mr. Giap Tran, and Mr. Thach Vien, the Iraqi Turkmen, Dr. Sheth Jerjism, the Montegnards, Mr. Kok Ksor, Somaliland, Mr. Mohammoud Daar, and Chechnya, Dr. Umar Khanbiev.
   UNPO Members were joined also by representatives from other groups working to promote democracy: Marco Perduca, Executive Director of the International Antiprohibitionist League, Osvaldo Alfonso, Former President of the Liberal Democratic Party of Cuba, Evgheny Zhovtis, Director of the International Bureau for Human Rights and the Rule of Law, Walid Salem, Palestinian Centre for the Dissemination of Democracy and Community Development, Vanida Tephsouvanh, Lao Movement for Human Rights, Vo Van Ai, President of Quê Me: Action for Democracy in Vietnam, Carl Gershman, Director of the National Endowment for Democracy, Roel Van Meijenfeld, Director of the Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy, Scott Carpenter, U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights and Labour, and Wei Jingsheng, Overseas Chinese Democracy Coalition and 1996 Sakharov Prize Laureate.
   In his address to the Conference, UNPO General Secretary Marino Busdachin joined UNPO Members and the MEPs present in expressing UNPO’s strong support for this initiative, emphasising that it marks a positive first step in the crucial process of reflecting upon and developing a new policy for democracy promotion, in particular with respect to recognising and incorporating the contributions of NGOs and grass-roots organisations, such as those represented at UNPO.
   Following two days of debate and discussion, the conclusions of the Conference were summarised in a document circulated to all participants. These recommendations, based substantially on the views and experiences of the grass-roots practitioners who attended, will undoubtedly play a valuable role in the ongoing process of articulating a viable European strategy for the promotion of democracy.

Conclusions of the ALDE Conference on Democracy Promotion

Democracy Promotion: the European Way


   1.The conference on Democracy promotion convened by the ALDE Group in the European Parliament on 6-7 December 2006, in partnership with the Transnational Radical Party (TRP), No Peace Without Justice (NPWJ) and the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization (UNPO), has gathered democracy advocates from both democratic and non-democratic countries.
   2.As the European Union is evaluating the effectiveness of its instruments to promote democracy and human rights outside its borders, participants discussed on the methods and mechanisms that can prove most effective, taking into account the obstacles that face the action of agents for democratic change.
   3.The conference reaffirmed that democracy and rule of law are established universal individual rights, and as such need to be defended and promoted by transnational institutions and transnational application of the rule of law. The European Union is based on the principles of democracy, and the role of the European Union in respect of democracy should go beyond its immediate geographic proximity and prospective members.
   4.The conference recognizes that the European Union has been an engine for the promotion of democracy and the rule of law, through different means – and in particular in its bilateral pre-accession strategies and Neighbourhood Policy with their specific programs for democracy and human rights. These methods have proven to be particularly effective in accession or pre-accession countries.
   5.The conference reaffirms that the “democratic clause” of co-operation agreements between the European Union and third countries, should be enforced, strictly linking respect for democratic principles and human rights with co-operation. The European Union policy on democracy should affirm unequivocally the principle of universality of democracy as a right in itself; that good governance is not a substitute for democracy; that democracy is not simply a by-product of cooperation, trade and development policies, but requires specific political support and funding.
   6.Notwithstanding the improvement to the EIDHR, in its current form it is not currently able to assist those whom the European Union specifically needs to reach most.
   7.An effective democracy promotion mechanism should act independently of the European Commission and European Council, and should be able to focus its action on the promotion of political rights of individuals against internal obstacles to democratic development and the empowerment of non-government actors, even when European Governments and Governments in third countries have other priorities without the need to balance the principles of democracy against other bilateral priorities of the European Union or Member States;

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场