政党社团之声
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    BURMA-缅甸风云
[主页]->[政党社团之声]->[BURMA-缅甸风云]->[UNPO: "Democracy Promotion: The European Way"]
BURMA-缅甸风云
·缅甸民主基金会:建议与将军们妥协
·缅甸军政府的财源与边境贸易
·缅甸克钦族反军政府力量
·怀念掸王子Chao Tzang 老师
·是考验东盟的时候了!
·第四届旅欧缅甸人会议声明
·旅欧缅甸人第三次座谈会声明
·欧盟对缅甸的援助与制裁
·回顾缅甸的2003年
·缅甸联邦的形成与众民族纷争
·世界佛教大会在仰光闭幕
·缅甸的大“平反”与昂山素姬
·克伦族难民新年前大逃亡
·用新华社报喜消息来调剂悲痛
·荷兰电台评:缅甸又彭然关上门
·谜样的貌埃Maung Aye副上将
·传缅甸军头相杀,消息混乱
·缅甸军政府真的认错大平反?
·断臂将军“白求恩
·赛万赛在欧洲政策中心讲话
·欧缅工作站 EBN 对缅甸问题的声明
·缅军与叛军的“停战协议书”
·见利忘义的外国大公司
·缅甸会像南斯拉夫崩裂吗?
·缅甸国内外大骂泰国总理
·欧盟人道主义组织ECHO对缅甸的援助
·缅甸军政府与老挝东盟峰会
·笑谈叙旧于加州
·缅甸军政府释放政治犯?
·缅甸联邦民族委员会NCUB的的声明
·谈2004/05年国际对缅甸的经济制裁
·缅甸军政府向掸族反对党派开刀
·缅甸将军们内讧实录
·钦族说: 骗子叫”缅军”,谎言叫”缅语"
·水深火热中的缅甸各族人民
·缅甸政坛2004年11月“大变动”
·缅甸军政府2004年11月“续清洗”
·缅甸2004年11月大换血后的新闻
·缅甸军政府的大赦是“有错必改?”
·安息吧,好朋友!好团长!
·将军们在老挝东盟会议大开支票
·要 Federal 缅甸联邦制,不要分裂!
·掸族民主联盟SDU的声明
·缅军迫停战军缴械
·Burma’s 'Exchange arms for peace'
·“仰光爆炸案”KNU声明
·KNU Statement on Bomb Attacks in Rangoon City
·仰光爆炸案面面观
·中缅边镇鸦片产区走透透
·缅甸停战组织被分而治之
·对掸邦民族军与南掸邦军合并之声明
·STATEMENT ON SHAN STATE NATIONAL ARMY AND SHAN STATE ARMY MERGER
·组建无缅族在内的联邦
·Forming the Union without the Myanmar /Burman
·缅甸内战剑拔弩张
·缅甸军政府滥用种族主义
·Junta Uses Racism as Weapon against All Oppositions
·Declaration of the Shan State National Army
·掸邦民族军 的2005年18号声明
·缅甸全国民主联盟NLD的声明
·NLD’s demands on 15th anniversary of election victory
·缅甸迪巴荫惨案二周年声明
·Statement on Second Anniversary of De-pe’-yin Massacre
·缅甸掸邦掸族的心声
·对“建设性接触政策”盖棺论定
·The Last Nail in the Coffin of Constructive Engagement
·赛万赛谈缅甸现状
·Interview with Sai Wansai, General Secretary of SDU
·被世界遗弃的缅甸克伦尼族
·Karennis, the Forgotten People of the World
·缅甸流亡政府总理Dr.SEIN WIN的卫视讲话
·缅甸军政府成惊弓之鸟
·The Burmese Generals Are Wild Beasts!
·与掸邦独立领袖一席谈
·Talks With Hso Khan Pha Who Declared Shan Independence
·缅甸的第二次反法西斯斗争
·Burma Needs 2nd Anti-Fascist Movement
·Dr.Sein Win's Discourse on TV Conference
·缅甸群英会:盛温博士、萨尼博士、温教授
·RIPPLES Made by Premier Sein Win, Dr. Zarni & Prof. Win
·非正式国家人民代表组织”UNPO
·Unrepresentative Nations and Peoples Organization UNPO
·缅甸众邦众族六月份动态
·Activities of Ethnic Parties and People of BURMA in June
·UNPO 第七届代表大会
·UNPO VII Condemns Burma's Fascist Junta
·缅甸军政府的累累法西斯罪行
·The Fascist Crimes of Burma's Junta
·UNPO Resolution on EU’s Arms Embargo against China
·UNPO要求欧盟对华禁售武器
·缅甸流亡政府NCGUB 7月26日声明
·NCGUB Press Release on July 26,2005
·第七次非缅族社区发展会议的声明
·Statement of the 7th Ethnic Community Development Seminar
·克伦族联盟KNU的各族平等斗争
·KNU's Struggle for Democracy & Equality of ALL Nationalities
·可敬的柏林日本妇女小组
·Respectable Japanese Women Initiative Berlin
·About KNU’s Aims, Policy and Programme
·克伦族联盟KNU的目标、政策与纲领
·Appeal to UN Security Council
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
UNPO: "Democracy Promotion: The European Way"


   (published by Burma.UNPO)
   Members of the European Parliament Marco Pannella MEP, Marco Cappato MEP, and Annemie Neyts-Uytterbroeck MEP, from the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE), and in partnership with UNPO, the Transnational Radical Party and No Peace Without Justice, have organised a conference on “Democracy Promotion: The European Way” held at the European Parliament in Brussels, Belgium from 6 – 7,December 2006.
   The Conference aims to contribute to the process of Europe articulating and funding a new and distinctive strategy for the promotion of democracy, centred explicitly on the principle of non-violence, and sensitive always to the importance of promoting democracy locally, through the support and promotion of grass-roots organisations, instead of attempting to impose it from afar.
   The Conference was Chaired and addressed by a number of leading Members of the European Parliament, as well as representatives from the European Commission, including: Edward Mc-Millan Scott MEP, Vice-President of the European Parliament, Graham Watson MEP, Leader of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe, Marco Pannella MEP, Leader of the Transnational Radical Party, Alessandro Battilocchio MEP, Annemie Neyts MEP, Leader of the ELDR Party, Hélène Flautre MEP, Chairperson of the Sub-Committee on Human Rights, Marco Cappato MEP, Benita Ferrero-Waldner, EU Commissioner for External Relations, and Emma Bonino, Minister of Italy for International Trade and European Affairs.
   As leading policy makers in the field of democratisation, all noted the numerous benefits of promoting democracy world-wide, not least with respect to security and the promotion of Human Rights, but also acknowledged the complexity and uncertainty that always accompanies this process. This underlined the necessity of reflecting upon the most effective strategies available to policy makers, as well as the importance of learning from the valuable experiences and knowledge of grass-roots practitioners in the field of democratisation.
   As a first step of this learning process, and under the banner of “urgent messages to Europe from the World’s dissidents”, a number UNPO Members, as well as other prominent activists and practitioners in the field of democratisation, shared their views and experiences on the process of democratisation.
   From the Ogoni, the President of the UNPO General Assembly Mr. Ledum Mitee stressed the importance of focusing not only on elections when promoting democracy, but also of supporting and strengthening the institutions and values that uphold and constitute a genuine democracy during the time in between elections.
   From Taiwan, Dr. Parris Chang, Honorary President of UNPO, and Dr. Wen-Cheng Lin, both emphasised the need to support emerging and practicing democracies whilst they remain fragile, both from internal and external threats, and drew attention to the work UNPO is conducting in this respect.
   From the Ahwazi, Dr. Karim Abdian spoke with great passion about the situation faced by minorities in Iran, as well as elsewhere in the world, and urged members of the parliament to inform themselves of the ethnic and political situation within countries such as Iran, so as enable better identification and support of emerging non-violent democratic forces.
   From East Turkestan, Mr. Dolkun Isa and Enver Can also echoed views about the valuable role NGOs and grass-roots organisations play in the promotion of democracy, and highlighted the successes they have had in particular with respect to putting pressure on Chinese authorities to reform.
   Their calls and proposals were also echoed by other UNPO Member:representatives from the Khmer-Krom, Mr. Thach Thach, Mr. Giap Tran, and Mr. Thach Vien, the Iraqi Turkmen, Dr. Sheth Jerjism, the Montegnards, Mr. Kok Ksor, Somaliland, Mr. Mohammoud Daar, and Chechnya, Dr. Umar Khanbiev.
   UNPO Members were joined also by representatives from other groups working to promote democracy: Marco Perduca, Executive Director of the International Antiprohibitionist League, Osvaldo Alfonso, Former President of the Liberal Democratic Party of Cuba, Evgheny Zhovtis, Director of the International Bureau for Human Rights and the Rule of Law, Walid Salem, Palestinian Centre for the Dissemination of Democracy and Community Development, Vanida Tephsouvanh, Lao Movement for Human Rights, Vo Van Ai, President of Quê Me: Action for Democracy in Vietnam, Carl Gershman, Director of the National Endowment for Democracy, Roel Van Meijenfeld, Director of the Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy, Scott Carpenter, U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights and Labour, and Wei Jingsheng, Overseas Chinese Democracy Coalition and 1996 Sakharov Prize Laureate.
   In his address to the Conference, UNPO General Secretary Marino Busdachin joined UNPO Members and the MEPs present in expressing UNPO’s strong support for this initiative, emphasising that it marks a positive first step in the crucial process of reflecting upon and developing a new policy for democracy promotion, in particular with respect to recognising and incorporating the contributions of NGOs and grass-roots organisations, such as those represented at UNPO.
   Following two days of debate and discussion, the conclusions of the Conference were summarised in a document circulated to all participants. These recommendations, based substantially on the views and experiences of the grass-roots practitioners who attended, will undoubtedly play a valuable role in the ongoing process of articulating a viable European strategy for the promotion of democracy.

Conclusions of the ALDE Conference on Democracy Promotion

Democracy Promotion: the European Way


   1.The conference on Democracy promotion convened by the ALDE Group in the European Parliament on 6-7 December 2006, in partnership with the Transnational Radical Party (TRP), No Peace Without Justice (NPWJ) and the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization (UNPO), has gathered democracy advocates from both democratic and non-democratic countries.
   2.As the European Union is evaluating the effectiveness of its instruments to promote democracy and human rights outside its borders, participants discussed on the methods and mechanisms that can prove most effective, taking into account the obstacles that face the action of agents for democratic change.
   3.The conference reaffirmed that democracy and rule of law are established universal individual rights, and as such need to be defended and promoted by transnational institutions and transnational application of the rule of law. The European Union is based on the principles of democracy, and the role of the European Union in respect of democracy should go beyond its immediate geographic proximity and prospective members.
   4.The conference recognizes that the European Union has been an engine for the promotion of democracy and the rule of law, through different means – and in particular in its bilateral pre-accession strategies and Neighbourhood Policy with their specific programs for democracy and human rights. These methods have proven to be particularly effective in accession or pre-accession countries.
   5.The conference reaffirms that the “democratic clause” of co-operation agreements between the European Union and third countries, should be enforced, strictly linking respect for democratic principles and human rights with co-operation. The European Union policy on democracy should affirm unequivocally the principle of universality of democracy as a right in itself; that good governance is not a substitute for democracy; that democracy is not simply a by-product of cooperation, trade and development policies, but requires specific political support and funding.
   6.Notwithstanding the improvement to the EIDHR, in its current form it is not currently able to assist those whom the European Union specifically needs to reach most.
   7.An effective democracy promotion mechanism should act independently of the European Commission and European Council, and should be able to focus its action on the promotion of political rights of individuals against internal obstacles to democratic development and the empowerment of non-government actors, even when European Governments and Governments in third countries have other priorities without the need to balance the principles of democracy against other bilateral priorities of the European Union or Member States;

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场